logo
Several bills filed to weaken vaccine mandates as more Texas families opt out of immunizations

Several bills filed to weaken vaccine mandates as more Texas families opt out of immunizations

When speech pathologist Rebecca Hardy recalls her up-close seat to lawmaking during the 2015 state legislative session, she remembers how tough it was to find anyone interested in what she wanted: more choice for Texans when it came to getting vaccinated.
After forming Texans For Vaccine Choice the year before, she came to Austin to see if she could find lawmakers interested in policies to help parents who believe it's their responsibility, not the government's, to decide if and when a vaccination is administered to their child.
'We were on the scene far before COVID was even a word that anybody knew and 10 years ago, we did kind of have to sneak around the Capitol, have these conversations about vaccine mandates in the shadows,' the Keller resident now recalls. 'And it was really hard to find people willing to put their names on protective pieces of legislation.'
What a difference a global pandemic makes.
vaccinations in the workplace in 2023.
While most of the vaccine bills 10 years ago were filed by Democrats to strengthen vaccine use, the opposite is now true — Republicans are filing most of the bills which aim to claw back vaccine requirements. There is even a House joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Texas Constitution that would preserve Texans' right to refuse a vaccination.
The proposal is among more than 20 bills endorsed by Hardy's group that have been filed, most of them before the legislative session began this month. Among them include legislation that would:
1. Make it easier for parents to opt out of vaccinations.
2. Ensure no one is denied medical care based on vaccination status.
3. Keep across-the-board vaccine mandates at bay.
4. Give the Texas Legislature final approval on any new vaccinations required by schools.
5. Apply more rules for dispensing the COVID-19 vaccination.
6. Demand more transparency when it comes to a national clearinghouse on adverse effects of vaccines.
'TVC is not anti-vaccine,' Hardy said. 'We're not here to restrict anybody's access to vaccines or to dismantle the vaccine program. So we do not take a stance on if children should get all, some or no vaccines.'
Instead, she insists, she wants laws that better support families' right to choose what medical care they receive, including vaccines.
It's a sentiment that is gaining more traction, particularly after President Donald Trump's re-election and his selection of Robert F. Kennedy as his choice for U.S. Health and Human Services secretary. And it's a somewhat counter trendline at a time studies have consistently shown that vaccines save lives and money.
A study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, released last summer, found the immunization of children born between 1994 and 2023 have saved the United States $540 billion by preventing illness and costly hospitalizations as well as preventing more than 1.1 million deaths.
But this move away from vaccines worries health care workers. A Texas Hospital Association's position paper stresses concerns that vaccines have become politicized and the importance of vaccines is now overlooked because they work so well. Carrie Williams, an association spokesperson, said any decision about opting out of a vaccine should be a careful one that considers the ripple effect on others.
'Vaccine decisions impact the availability of care, hospital workforce and wait times, and the people around you,' she said. 'We're always going to be on the side of policies that help prevent epidemics.'
Focus on the vaccine exemption process
Texas requires children and students to obtain vaccines to attend schools, child care centers and college. An individual can claim they are exempt if they are in the military, they have a religious or personal belief that goes against getting immunized or if a health provider determines it is not safe to do so.
Currently, those who want to claim an exemption for their children from vaccination must request from the state Department of State Health Services that an affidavit be mailed to their home, a process that can take up to three weeks. Once it's received, the requestor must get the affidavit notarized.
'It's very inefficient,' Hardy said.
Her group wants the form to be downloadable. Any one of three measures filed so far could do that: House Bill 1082, House Bill 1586 or House Bill 730. She also wants providers to stop denying medical care to individuals who choose to delay or opt out of vaccinations altogether.
'If you don't have the right in what you inject or not inject in your body, then what rights do we have?' Hardy said.
Travis McCormick, a government affairs professional, has formed the group Make Texans Healthy Again that is advocating for better affordability, access and transparency in health care. As a new dad, he said he was taken aback by medical providers' rigid adherence to the vaccine schedule for newborns.
'I had a pediatrician who said if we didn't get all four (vaccines) in one day we couldn't be a client,' McCormick said.
In 2023, Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 7, which bars private employers from mandating COVID-19 vaccinations for employees and contractors. Those employers who violate the law face a $50,000 fine and are subject to an investigation by the Texas Workforce Commission.
That same year, House Bill 44 passed, prohibiting Medicaid and Child Children's Health Insurance Program providers from denying services to patients based on their vaccination status.
Hardy said her group lobbied hard for both bills.
'In my perspective, our movement is just beginning,' Hardy said of the 2023 victories. 'We're barely chasing the pickup.'
The appetite for vaccine exemptions growing
Data shows a consistent rise in interest in obtaining exemptions to vaccines since 2003, when then state Sen. Craig Estes offered a measure that allowed Texans to claim a conscientious exemption in addition to established exemptions based on medical and religious reasons. It's a decision that he still stands by today, he recently told The Texas Tribune.
Since 2018, the requests to the Texas Department of State Health Services for an exemption form have doubled from 45,900 to more than 93,000 in 2024.
A spokeswoman for the agency, Lara Anton, said all requests for exemption affidavits are granted.
'There is no gatekeeping,' Anton said.
In the 2023-24 school year, more than 13,000 kindergarteners had a non-medical exemption from at least one vaccination in Texas, twice the number a decade ago. While other states had higher rates, Texas led the nation in total exemptions.
Still, most Texas children are vaccinated. More than 90% of kindergarten and 7th grade students had each of the required vaccines.
As Texans emerged from lockdowns and navigated a new vaccine for COVID-19 that became more widely available in 2021, views about shutdowns and the vaccine shifted dramatically. While Abbott moved quickly with executive orders keeping businesses and schools closed when infections spread in the United States beginning in March 2020, by November, he was resisting calls for more lockdowns.
The public's weariness of mandates is now impacting vaccine rates, worrying public health officials and advocates who see the number of vaccine bills as problematic.
Terri Burke, who heads The Immunization Partnership, a pro-vaccine advocacy group, has the same Texas vaccine bills on her group's watch list that Hardy does.
'I fear the vaccine issue is something they (state lawmakers) will continue to chip away at, like abortion, the border,' Burke said. 'It's like death by 1,000 cuts.'
She anticipates a hard legislative session, which runs through June 2, that will relax the exemption process as well as put more burden on health providers who could face more outbreaks if exemptions are made easier. 'It's going to be tough. It's really going to be tough,' she said. 'All we can do is block them.
Some of the legislation filed so far focus on the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, or VAERS, a collection of self-reported post-vaccination health issues. Others mandate physicians to report to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of health-related problems that result in death or incapacitation after a vaccine was administered.
State Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, who said he declined the COVID-19 vaccine on advice of his doctor, has filed one such bill, Senate Bill 269, because he wants to see better transparency about vaccines.
He believes the process during the race to get a COVID-19 was so fast that he and other Texans did not have enough details to evaluate potential risks for themselves.
'I hope RFK can get a more transparent system,' Perry said, referring to Kennedy if he is approved as U.S. health secretary. 'We like to believe our doctors and our science' but Texans, Perry insists, want more information.
Health experts like Dr. Peter Hotez of Houston, say vaccine choice or vaccine hesitant groups exaggerate the adverse effects of vaccines and downplay the good they do in keeping deadly diseases from killing more Americans.
Hotez, one of the nation's leading vaccine experts, is worried about any reduction in the nation's vaccination rate, and that Texas specifically could be setting itself up for becoming the stage for the next pandemic.
Whooping cough is now returning to pre-pandemic levels. After the measles was officially eliminated in the United States in 2020, the disease has returned, occurring usually after someone has contracted it in another country. Polio, another disease thought to be eradicated, was detected in New York State wastewater in 2022.
Hotez is concerned that hesitancy and refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine is having a 'spillover' effect on childhood immunizations.
'I'm worried about it unraveling our whole pediatric vaccine ecosystem,' he said.
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chart: Hundreds of gigawatts of clean energy at risk with GOP bill
Chart: Hundreds of gigawatts of clean energy at risk with GOP bill

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chart: Hundreds of gigawatts of clean energy at risk with GOP bill

See more from Canary Media's "Chart of the week' column. Amid rising power bills and surging energy demand, Republicans in Congress are set to undermine the country's primary source of new electricity — clean energy. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' passed in May by House Republicans and now being considered by the Senate would rapidly phase out key clean-energy tax credits, casting uncertainty over more than 600 gigawatts' worth of solar, battery, and wind projects slated to come online in 2028 or later, according to new analysis from research firm Cleanview. To be fair, the 600-GW figure is based on what's currently in the interconnection queue, and a good number of those projects won't get built regardless of the fate of the tax credits. (Projects often drop out of the queue for all kinds of reasons.) But if the bill kneecaps even a fraction of what's anticipated, it will have serious consequences for the U.S. energy system. For context, the entirety of the U.S. had a generating capacity of around 1,200 gigawatts at the end of 2023. The current version of the legislation would rapidly phase out federal tax credits that encourage clean energy development. As it stands, developers would be eligible for the tax credit only if their projects begin construction within 60 days of the bill's passage and if they come online before the end of 2028. That puts the 318 GW worth of projects planned to be completed in 2029 and later at explicit risk of losing their tax-credit eligibility. It also jeopardizes 2028 projects that either can't break ground with just two months' notice or which might hit snags that push their completion into 2029. That doesn't necessarily mean those projects would be cancelled, but it would scramble their economics, which were calculated under an entirely different set of policy assumptions. It's near certain that some would fall through. Many more would be delayed as developers hash out new financial terms — read: higher power prices that will be passed onto consumers. A slowdown in clean energy construction is the exact opposite of what the moment demands. These days, when a new energy project is built in the U.S., more than nine times out of 10 it is a solar, battery, or wind installation. That's not an exaggeration. In 2024, solar, batteries, and wind made up 93% of new energy resources. The year before that, it was 94%. Meanwhile, construction of new large-scale fossil-gas power plants is constrained by turbine shortages that are unlikely to ease in the near term. At the same time, electricity demand is surging and expected to climb even higher in coming years as the development of AI sets off a race to construct power-hungry data centers. If congressional Republicans pass a bill that stifles solar, batteries, and wind, study after study predicts the same outcome: higher energy bills — and more planet-warming emissions.

Why these college students are wary of the GOP megabill
Why these college students are wary of the GOP megabill

USA Today

time44 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Why these college students are wary of the GOP megabill

Why these college students are wary of the GOP megabill Congressional Republicans are proposing big changes to college financial aid programs. One vocal group of students is pushing back. Show Caption Hide Caption Senators grill Education Secretary Linda McMahon over proposed cuts Education Secretary Linda McMahon testified to Congress over proposed budget cuts. WASHINGTON – Emi Glass had one thing on her mind when she was applying to college: cost. Footing the bill for a degree was never a foregone conclusion for her, growing up in a single-parent household in Kettering, Ohio. In between shifts at the local Dairy Queen, she poured hundreds of hours into applications for a wide range of schools and scholarships. She worried about where she would go, and more importantly, if she'd be able to pay for it. Those worries vanished when she was accepted to Yale University. The Ivy League school in Connecticut offers some of the most generous financial aid in the country to lower-income students. Between federal grants, outside scholarships and financial aid directly from Yale, going to college suddenly seemed affordable. 'I'm living out a dream that once felt unattainable for me,' said Glass, now 21, standing outside the U.S. Capitol on June 12. She came to Washington with a group of other college students, many from similar financial circumstances, to bring attention to the financial aid implications of President Donald Trump's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' for low-income students. 'For students like me, financial aid isn't just helpful,' said another student, Jackson Howe, 21, a rising senior at West Virginia University. 'It's essential.' The students were in the nation's capital to lobby congressional Republicans to oppose new taxes on university endowments and changes to federal student loan programs. As part of the GOP's efforts to get Trump's major domestic policy bill across the finish line this summer, lawmakers are considering a slew of reforms to funding for higher education. One aggressive legislative package, which already passed the U.S. House of Representatives, would significantly curb eligibility for Pell Grants (federal subsidies that help low-income people pay for college) and fine schools for leaving students with debt. Read more about the House bill: Republicans propose massive overhaul of student loans, Pell Grants The other package, which was published by a U.S. Senate committee on June 10, takes a more measured approach. Still, it would make big changes, including cutting the number of student debt repayment plans to just two (which the House bill also suggests) and imposing new caps on borrowing. Read more about the Senate bill: Major student loan changes just came one step closer to becoming law Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, chair of the Senate committee overseeing education, said his chamber's bill would save taxpayers at least $300 billion and make higher education more affordable. 'We need to fix our broken higher education system,' he said in a statement. 'While Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college, Republicans are taking on the root causes of the student debt crisis to lower the cost of tuition and improve Americans' access to opportunities that set them up for success.' The Senate package includes several provisions with bipartisan support. One measure, which would yank financial aid funding from certain college programs that provide a poor return on investment, has been pushed for years by a former high-ranking official in the Obama administration. Some Democrats also agree with a provision that would expand Pell Grants to weekslong training programs in fields like welding and cosmetology, even though consumer protection advocates warn that doing so without the right guardrails could lead to fraud. Endowment taxlooms Among the chief concerns for the students rallying outside the Capitol on June 12 were new taxes on university endowments. Those penalties, which would primarily hurt some of the richest schools in the country, could force institutions like Yale to pay upwards of $700 million a year to the government. Read more: With a war on Harvard raging, religious colleges get big tax break in Trump spending bill Republicans such as Missouri Rep. Jason Smith, who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, say the provision would hold 'woke, elite universities that operate more like major corporations and other tax-exempt entities accountable, ensuring they can no longer abuse generous benefits provided through the tax code.' Cayla Waddington, 18, a rising sophomore at Yale, worries the tax could force schools like hers to pull back on their financial aid commitments, which can be supported in part by endowment funds. 'I pay next to nothing for my Yale education, thanks to their endowment,' she said. 'There are thousands of us across the country who share the same story.' Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @

RFK Jr. blows up America's vaccine policy
RFK Jr. blows up America's vaccine policy

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

RFK Jr. blows up America's vaccine policy

America's vaccine policy has been set for decades, with patients, providers, scientists and insurers more or less in sync on the merits of immunizations. In the last several weeks, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has upended long-standing norms, introducing uncertainty into a once-reliable system. Why it matters: Access to health care may shift in unpredictable ways. At worst, infectious diseases once thought to be eradicated could return. Catch up quick: Kennedy sent shockwaves through the medical community two weeks ago with a controversial decision to stop recommending the COVID vaccine to healthy kids and healthy pregnant women. The CDC contradicted this just days later, recommending that healthy kids do get the COVID shot. Confusion escalated this week, when Kennedy abruptly dismissed all 17 members of the expert panel that wields a great deal of power in shaping vaccine policy and makes recommendations to the CDC. Some of the eight new members Kennedy quickly named have expressed anti-vaccine sentiment in the past. Together, these changes represent a sharp break from public health precedent — and raise questions about what happens next. Case in point: Leigh Haldeman, a pregnant woman in Seattle, was recently turned away when going to get a COVID booster shot, as recommended by her doctor, CNN reports. Cases like hers could become more common. While most doctors and pharmacies will likely still be able to recommend and administer the vaccine, access might start to erode. Insurers are likely to start denying coverage of the COVID vaccine to groups who aren't deemed eligible by the government, putting the vaccine out of reach for people who don't have the time to seek out a willing provider or the money to pay out of pocket for the shot. The other side: Kennedy has said replacing the members of the expert panel is a "major step towards restoring public trust in vaccines." He's also said the decision to stop recommending COVID vaccines to kids is common sense because they're less likely to get very sick from COVID than adults. But the vaccine can still protect kids who could develop serious symptoms — and do so with no appreciable side effects, Chris Forrest, a professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told the New York Times. Zoom out: The COVID vaccine could just be the beginning. The CDC advisory panel members picked by Kennedy thus far are more aligned with his skeptical views of vaccines. They could radically reshape — or even scrap — national vaccine recommendations, including those for kids. They could also require more testing of new vaccines for safety and efficacy, which could have upstream effects — discouraging academic labs and drug companies from pursuing vaccine research and development. What to watch: Big changes in America's vaccine policy come amid a major cultural shift. Vaccine skepticism is on the rise, and more kindergartners are showing up to school with exemptions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store