‘That's significant': Battle River-Crowfoot independent candidate comes away with 10 per cent of vote
Bonnie Critchley, who ran as an independent candidate in Monday night's Battle River-Crowfoot byelection, didn't top Tory Leader Pierre Poilievre's 40,548 votes but came in second with more than 5,000.
She pulled in just shy of 10 per cent of ballots to Poilievre's just over 80 per cent.
'To get over 5,000 votes for an independent candidate running against a professional politician who's going to go in as a leader of the opposition, that's significant,' said political analyst Lori Turnbull.
'She certainly managed to harness a feeling in the riding that is, I think, directed at someone who was running in that riding, who doesn't live there.'
The riding was considered 'safe' for Poilievre to restore his seat in Parliament after losing his Ottawa-area seat during the spring general election.
Former MP Damien Kurek, who won with 83 per cent of the vote in the general election, stepped down so Poilievre could run.
During the byelection campaign, many wondered whether Poilievre could match the level of support his predecessor received, as some voters were critical of an outsider parachuting into the riding.
A campaign brochure for Bonnie Critchley is seen on July 7, 2025. (CTV News Edmonton)
After the Conservative Party announced Poilievre won the riding, Critchley spoke with reporters.
'I'm still absolutely ecstatic because my entire purpose from when I started to right now has been to tell Mr. Poilievre that he is not allowed to just walk in and use us as a tool and then disappear back to Ottawa,' Critchley said.
'I've left a very large boot print on the Canadian (political) landscape, on our elections, to say that a nobody from nowhere can stand up and say enough is enough.
'The big parties need to pay attention and actually listen to people because they work for us, not the other way around.'
A campaign sign for independent candidate Bonnie Critchley next to signs for Pierre Poilievre and Darcy Spady in Camrose, Alta., on July 22, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Amber Bracken
Critchley remained critical of Kurek.
'Mr. Kurek, if he thinks we're going to welcome him back with open arms, he is in for a rude awakening,' Critchley said.
Asked if she would consider running again, Critchley confirmed she would.
'This is our riding; this is our home,' Critchley said.
'We are going to keep fighting for it.'
Voter turnout was lower compared to the spring general election but higher compared to other byelections.
With files from Kathy Le
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
10 minutes ago
- CBC
Chow calls on feds to restore funding for refugee shelter program as city faces $107M shortfall
Social Sharing Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow is calling on the federal government to reverse a funding decision she says will hinder the city's ability to shelter refugees and asylum seekers. In a letter sent to council members Wednesday, Chow said the city will have to come up with an additional $107 million this year to continue to provide emergency shelter to refugee claimants at its current level, after the federal government offered just 26 per cent of the funding the city requested through the Interim Housing Assistance Program (IHAP) for 2025. The federal program has been the main source of funding for Toronto's refugee response in recent years, reimbursing 95 per cent of the city's expenses. "As you know, providing safe shelter for refugee claimants is a federal responsibility and the city and province cannot shoulder the cost," Chow wrote. Chow urged councillors to "get the message out that the federal government must not walk away from their responsibility to provide the funds to do so." In a statement, Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) said there was "significant interest" in the Interim Housing Assistance Program in recent years and that funding requests exceeded the amount allocated to it. "Grant amounts were largely based on the information applicants provided about their demonstrated need, cost-effectiveness, and the expected results of their projects," the statement reads. Going forward, the new IHAP model focuses on "cost-effective, sustainable solutions and long-term capacity building across Canada," IRCC said. "These include building reception centres and providing sustainable temporary housing solutions. This shift will reduce costs to Canadians and improve outcomes for claimants." Funding cut could lead to longer shelter stays: briefing note A briefing note to councillors sent last week says the grant the IRCC is offering for the next two years represents only 39 per cent of what the city is projected to spend to shelter refugee claimants over that same time period. That would leave the city with a shortfall of $107 million for 2025 alone, which represents about 1,800 beds across the shelter system, the briefing note says. It also says that as of Aug. 8, 3,528 refugee claimants were living in the city's shelter system, which makes up about 40 per cent of the total number of shelter clients. "It is not possible for the city to immediately stop providing shelter to refugee claimants already in the system and to those claimants who are homeless," the note says. To address the funding gap, the city will have to stop or delay its plans to establish 250 more spaces in refugee houses and shelters, as well as plans for an enhanced case management program tailored to refugees. "Additionally, lack of funding will mean refugee claimants placed in the base shelter system will stay there longer," the briefing note says. This week, Ontario's Big City Mayors also called on the federal government to reverse recent changes to the Interim Housing Assistance Program, asking Ottawa to maintain its commitment to reimburse 95 per cent of municipalities expenses to provide shelter and housing supports for refugee claimants.
23 minutes ago
Was Battle River-Crowfoot the last hurrah for the long ballot protest?
In attempting to give Monday's federal byelection in Alberta the longest ballot in Canadian history, a group of electoral reform advocates may have instead created the shortest one — and with further policy changes possibly on the horizon, the future of such protests is unclear. Elections Canada issued special write-in ballots — where voters simply fill in the name of their preferred candidate — after the group known as the Longest Ballot Committee organized over 200 candidates to run against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in Battle River-Crowfoot. Combined, the candidates affiliated with the group received just over 300 votes — 0.6 per cent of the ballots cast. More than 70 long-ballot candidates received no vote at all. Despite the name of his group, organizer Tomas Szuchewycz doesn't seem bothered that no long ballot was printed, or that his candidates earned only a fraction of the votes. Overall it's been a really fantastic experience, he told CBC News. Enlarge image (new window) An example of a ballot that included the names of 91 candidates. Photo: La Presse canadienne / Justin Tang The Longest Ballot Committee has organized dozens of candidates to run in byelections over the past five years, forcing Elections Canada to adapt its rules to accommodate dozens of names on a single ballot. Prior to Battle River-Crowfoot, the largest number of candidates the group had gotten on a ballot was 91, resulting in a metre-long document that caused counting delays and irritated some voters. By using a write-in ballot, Szuchewycz said Canada's elections body found a great solution in the face of his group's efforts. Enlarge image (new window) A sign reminds people how to spell Pierre Poilievre's name on the ballot for the Battle River-Crowfoot byelection in Camrose on Monday. Photo: The Canadian Press / Jason Franson Elections Canada showed that the ballot hysteria is a non-issue. There are other ways to solve the problem of large ballots than to try to prevent people from exercising their Charter rights, he said. [For us] it's about getting the message out that our election rules need to be passed to an independent, non-partisan body. The Longest Ballot Committee wants a citizens' assembly in charge of electoral reform, and says political parties are too reluctant to make government more representative of the electorate. Politicians looking to change election rules The group's efforts have certainly caught the attention of politicians who are willing to make changes to Canada's electoral system — but only to make it harder to organize long ballot protests. Poilievre — who has twice run in a riding where the long-ballot candidates have organized, including his victory in Battle River-Crowfoot on Monday — is pushing for the government to bring in legislation that would prevent Szuchewycz and his group from running dozens of candidates in any one riding. We have to take action because this is a scam. It is unfair, it is unjust and it must stop, Poilievre said on the campaign trail earlier this summer. One of the suggestions Poilievre made is to change the rules around the number of signatures a candidate is required to gather to run — from the current 100 to 0.5 per cent of a riding's population. Enlarge image (new window) Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre looks on as his swife Anaida Poilievre casts her vote in the federal election on April 28 in Ottawa. The Carleton riding featured a long ballot of 91 candidates. Photo: (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press) The Liberals say they are open to some changes. House leader Steve MacKinnon's office has said the government shares the concerns about the longest ballot initiative and is examining the issue. Jayson Cowan, a Battle River-Crowfoot candidate affiliated with the Longest Ballot Committee, said making it harder for candidates to gather signatures could prevent people like him from getting on the ballot. Although the long ballot initiative has been framed as a protest, Cowan said that wasn't the case for him. He argues there aren't enough politicians who are Indigenous or from the disabled community. A member of the Métis Nation of Alberta, Cowan previously tried to run as an Independent, but he struggled to gather enough signatures, in part due to mobility issues. He credits the Longest Ballot Committee for helping get his name on the ballot for the first time. I don't know that I would have had that experience any other way, he said. Both Cowan and Szuchewycz cautioned that raising the bar regarding the number of signatures might also force smaller parties out of the picture. Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault, the head of Elections Canada, offered his own suggestions on how to prevent long ballots (new window) in front of a House committee last fall. The long ballot group is able to put forward so many candidates by having electors sign multiple candidates' nomination forms. Perrault argued that rather than raising the number of signatures a candidate is required to gather, certain penalties should be imposed on individuals who sign — or encourage others to sign — multiple nomination papers. He didn't say what he thinks those penalties should be. Enlarge image (new window) Chief Electoral Officer Stephane Perrault holds up a sample ballot from a byelection that featured 91 candidates during a meeting of a House of Commons committee on Nov. 21, 2024. Photo: Parliament of Canada Despite indications of rule changes on the horizon, Szuchewycz said the group is garnering more interest from people seeking to run. We've been able to put out our message that politicians shouldn't be in charge of their own election rules because it's obviously a conflict of interest, and that message is really resonating with people, he said. Even though the committee has been able to recruit more candidates, it hasn't necessarily translated into success on the ballot. Last year in a Toronto byelection, long-ballot candidate Félix-Antoine Hamel achieved a first in Canadian electoral history (new window) by receiving zero votes in a contested riding. While Hamel's result was a novelty just a year ago, dozens more long-ballot candidates have laid a goose egg since — including 75 in Battle River-Crowfoot (although results there still need to be finalized). Brian Wishart, one of the long-ballot candidates who received no votes, said he isn't fixated on the result. For me, it's about bringing attention to some of the flaws in our election system, he told CBC News. Enlarge image (new window) A mock ranked ballot shown here was used to educate voters ahead of the 2018 municipal election in London, Ont. Photo: Radio-Canada / Hala Ghonaim A resident of London, Ont., Wishart voted using a ranked ballot in the city's 2018 mayoral election (new window) , but was dismayed when the Ontario government later scrapped the initiative (new window) . It was absolutely fantastic. It's the best I've ever felt about voting in my life, he said. Cowan, who doesn't live in Battle River-Crowfoot and was unable to vote for himself, received just one vote on Monday. I want to believe that I got through to somebody … [for] somebody who's disabled, who can't get around [to] get through to people, I think that's fantastic, Cowan said, adding that he would run again if the opportunity presents itself. I really do think that it's an experience that everybody should have…. I want regular people giving it a shot. That would be amazing. Szuchewycz said the Long Ballot Committee intends to keep going in some capacity, but how will depend on what rule changes are pushed through Parliament. We'll have to see what exactly the legislation is that they pass. Maybe it becomes impossible to do this, maybe it's just slightly harder, or maybe it's even easier. Who knows? he said. We'll just have to wait and see. Darren Major (new window) · CBC News · Senior writer Darren Major is a senior writer for CBC's parliamentary bureau in Ottawa. He previously worked as a digital reporter for CBC Ottawa and a producer for CBC's Power & Politics. He holds a master's degree in journalism and a bachelor's degree in public affairs and policy management, both from Carleton University. He also holds master's degree in arts from Queen's University. He can be reached at
National Post
39 minutes ago
- National Post
Colby Cosh: Homeless people ridiculously exempt from Nova Scotia's forest ban
CBC News' industrious Taryn Grant gives us a fresh occasion to peep at Nova Scotia, that parched corner of Hades wherein it is currently forbidden to go for an invigorating saunter in the woods. A couple of weeks ago I discussed the controversial and suffocatingly broad travel restrictions imposed by the province in response to dangerous wildfire conditions. Nova Scotia, not content with everyday tools of regulation like campfire or vehicle bans, has almost totally denied its citizens access even to privately owned woodlands. When critics outside the province yoinked a few questioning eyebrows upward, they were told they failed to understand the precious communitarian spirit of Nova Scotia or its particular vulnerability to forest fire. Article content Article content Well, let's concede that the government of Nova Scotia is answerable primarily to the people of Nova Scotia. In our usual sunny, optimistic way, I scanned for the glint of a silver lining in the exotic, ambitious ban on walking in or through the forest. Perhaps, I remarked, it betokened a new no-nonsense approach to the regulation of public amenities. Article content Article content Article content 'If 'extremism in defence of public property is no vice' is to be the new rule in Canada, we are surely going to see a lot of big changes to urban public parks and other land patches, which, for a decade, have been beset by nomadic tent-dwellers who make copious and inveterate use of propane tanks, electrical heaters, camp stoves, improvised wiring from hijacked power supplies, and open fires.' Article content Well, don't hold your breath. The CBC has now inquired into the possibility that some members of the Wandering Fire-Bringer class may be testing the Nova Scotia fire ban. Turns out it's made of vapour. The province's Department of Opportunities and Social Development estimates that an estimated 137 rough sleepers are still living in the Nova Scotia woods and 'cannot be convinced' to leave. They've been visited repeatedly by a team of 'outreach workers' who themselves enjoy an exemption from the travel rules. A few of the tent-dwellers, worn down by social-worker nattering, agreed to move on or accept spaces in urban shelters. Most have stayed put as if they'd grown roots. Article content Article content And the state turns out to be helpless, even though one fire may already have been started at an 'encampment.' It seems to be generally agreed that there is no point in fining any of the fairy folk of the forest. The provision in the provincial fire proclamation that allows for $25,000 penalties is reserved exclusively for those who might conceivably have such a sum to cough up. Article content Well, what about the ordinary police powers of arrest and detention? After a fortnight of hearing Nova Scotians insist that the current forest-fire risks are unprecedented, and that the traditional mobility privileges of citizenship must necessarily shrivel into abeyance, I am suddenly assured by a legal-aid lawyer that anyone collared for being unlawfully encamped 'would have to be quickly released, as the offence would not warrant being detained.' Article content This ultra-confident prediction leaves me confused. One struggles to understand, from outside N.S., how forest protection can be so important as to justify a ministerial fiat of extraordinary and unprecedented character — but not so important as to be at all enforced. Article content
