Ex-MP Theo Clarke says maternity care changes must be made faster
Ex-Conservative MP Theo Clarke has criticised the government for its lack of progress in improving maternity care in England and Wales.Ms Clarke has campaigned on the issue since making an emotional speech in the House of Commons in 2023 about her own maternity experience and also chaired an All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) that made recommendations.The former MP for Stafford suffered severe blood loss and needed emergency surgery following a 40-hour labour to deliver her daughter, at the Royal Stoke University Hospital in 2022. She has now written a book, detailing her own harrowing experience, in a bid to help other women.
Ms Clarke launched the memoir "Breaking The Taboo - Why We Need to Talk About Birth Trauma" in London on Tuesday evening. She said: "They (the government) appear to have been under the misapprehension that I would disappear when I lost my seat - that is not going to happen".
'Not enough has happened'
Ms Clarke was joined at the launch by senior midwife Donna Ockenden, who conducted the independent review into the baby deaths scandal at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (Sath Inquiry) and is currently chairing an inquiry into maternity care in Nottinghamshire.Ms Ockenden, who wrote the foreword for the book, said: "Three years ago the then Secretary of State Sajid Javid agreed to implement my recommendations, but in the intervening years not enough has happened".
Earlier this month, it was reported that of the £100m allocated to improve maternity care in the aftermath of the Sath Inquiry, only £2m is ring-fenced this year to be spent on maternity services, In response however, the Department of Health (DoH) said progress was being made."[This is] across a number of the recommendations from the APPG on Birth Trauma, including achieving 5.8% increase in the number of midwives," it said in a statement.It added that this week it had announced a rollout of a national NHS training programme to reduce the number of brain injuries during childbirth.
After she lost her seat in 2024 General Election, Ms Clarke launched a podcast on the topic of birth trauma and interviewed campaigners and other women who had also experienced traumatic births.A number of women from across the country also feature in her book, including Molly Hunter, a mum of three, who lives in Staffordshire.
'Miscarriage is a lonely process'
Ms Hunter has endured a number of missed miscarriages - a pregnancy that has failed, but the body hasn't started the process of miscarriage - and said she wanted to share her story to try and make a difference."My contribution to albeit small, shares a different angle because a lot of the book is focussing on birth trauma and for my second, third, fourth and fifth pregnancies, I had the miscarriages and never got to the stage where I was able to bring my baby home," she said."Theo is breaking the taboo, talking about the issues that so many women suffer from and I think she has done such an important job."I think going through a miscarriage is a very very lonely process."Ms Hunter hoped the book would "highlight the postcode lottery" that determined the care that women received. A survey by Mumsnet in April found that the vast majority of mothers had experienced physical or psychological birth trauma, of which 53% said they were less likely to have more children because of their experience of maternity care.
'The campaign continues'
The Tory government agreed to implement the recommendations of Theo's Birth Trauma APPG report last year, however nine days later the general election was called. "In the turmoil that followed, the government let down women, three years on I'm still working, the government must listen," said Ms Ockenden. "We are all born and we are all affected by this."
The DoH accepts there is more to be done. "Through our Plan for Change, we are transforming the NHS, training thousands more midwives and have set an explicit target to close the Black and Asian maternal mortality gap," it said. Ms Clarke said: "The campaign is not over and I am very unhappy that they have not adopted all of our recommendations".
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
North Yorkshire man's efforts to help others find sobriety
Three years ago Jimi Wilson was drinking well over ten times the weekly recommended alcohol limit every week - now he's not had a drink in over two years."Usually I would drink as soon as I finished work, which was usually two o'clock in the afternoon, right up until 10 or 11," says 40-year-old Mr now volunteers with North Yorkshire Horizons, which supported him when he wanted to quit group provides support for people with drug and alcohol dependency from its five hubs in Northallerton, Selby, Scarborough, Skipton and Harrogate and holds smaller drop-in sessions in rural locations like his home town of Bentham. "I finished work maybe two years ago due to my capability. I would leave work early on many occasions due to anxiety and it turns out it was my alcohol use which was driving my anxiety" says Mr Wilson, who has remained out of employment during his England recommends "men and women are not to drink more than 14 units a week on a regular basis", which Mr Wilson was exceeding on a daily basis."I was drinking around 150 units a week, around 20 units a day, about 12 pints of strong lager."My health had declined massively, I was off work, signed-off long term, I couldn't really get around so much due to the pressure I put on my body, so it was just a case of getting alcohol delivered from supermarkets."I was just drinking at home, signed off work long-term, drinking at home, all day, every day." If you are affected by the issues raised in this story, you can visit the BBC Action Line for support. Mr Wilson, who has been sober since March 2023, now runs rural support sessions with North Yorkshire sessions, which Mr Wilson leads alongside a support worker from the group, involve sharing his story and "lived experience", which he says aids his own recovery as well as helping others."When I am working closely with the treatment worker, she will say 'Jimi was sat in your chair three years ago and look at him now' and I can see little glimmers of hope in people's expression and their eyes."Just giving people an ear and allowing them to speak is massively helpful to people, helps them realise they are not alone in these rural communities.""It's giving people that bit of hope and just reassuring people there is help."Although Mr Wilson has been out of work since leaving his factory job, he hopes to be able to use his volunteering experience to get full-time employment."I'm sticking with my volunteering, getting as much experience as I can, so that when my health allows it, I definitely will be getting a job in drug and alcohol recovery services." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
LGBT veterans will not lose other benefits after compensation
Veterans due to receive payments from the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme will not lose out on other benefits after a change to Scottish government has confirmed that 1,200 armed forces members who suffered under the ban on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) personnel have now applied to the UK government's payment ban was in place within the UK military from 1967 to 2000 and, after years of campaigning, the UK government announced the payments last December. Up to £75m has been set aside to acknowledge hurt and discrimination, with affected veterans able to receive awards of up to £70,000 each. Some veterans currently receive financial help, on a means-tested basis, through the council tax reduction scheme. But Finance Secretary Shona Robison said regulations would be now changed to ensure any compensation payments do not affect eligibility for Robison said: "As we mark 25 years since the lifting of the ban on LGBT people serving in the armed forces, it is important to recognise the hardship that so many faced, with widespread homophobic bullying and harassment."Nothing will make up for the difficulties that LGBT veterans faced, however, our action will ensure those in Scotland receive every penny that they are entitled to."Under the UK government scheme, those who were dismissed or discharged from the armed forces because of their sexual orientation or gender identity could receive £50, service personnel who suffered harassment, intrusive investigations or even imprisonment could receive further payments of up to £20,000. Peter Gibson, chief executive of Fighting with Pride, said the group had "campaigned for justice for LGBTQ+ veterans for many years, helping to secure reparations and financial recognition of their horrendous treatment prior to 2000".He added: "As we slowly see the UK government deal with those financial payments, protected from benefit and taxation impact, it is wonderful to see the Scottish government taking action to ensure other benefits such as council tax benefit is also protected too."We continue to seek out veterans who were discharged or dismissed from the military to support them, and this news is one more step towards helping those in Scotland."
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Who cares that Britain is on course to be ‘minority white'?
Language is a funny thing. This week, a new report appeared to warn that the white British population could be a minority in the UK within 40 years. And it has brought out the worst in some of us. An analysis of migration, birth and death rates by the University of Buckingham suggests the white British population is set to fall from its current 73 per cent, to 57 per cent by 2050, before becoming a minority by 2063. One newspaper's report explained, rather curiously, that white British is 'defined as people who do not have an immigrant parent'. Bad luck, then, all you non-white kids of an Irish, French or German parent. Unlucky, too, King Charles, Winston Churchill and Boris Johnson. By this metric, it seems that you no longer qualify as white British. Beyond this rank stupidity, there is of course something else going on here. This is less dog whistle than plain old whistle. Dodgy extrapolations posing as predictions. Few people are spared. We're informed, presumably with some regret, that there is going to be a rise in the number of foreign-born people and of second-generation immigrants, all of whom could well be British. Further on, Matthew Goodwin, the author of the report, shifts the goalposts one more time, asserting that by 'the end of the current century, most of the people on these islands will not be able to trace their roots in this country back more than one or two generations'. And then, of course, we have the equating of 'foreign-born and Muslim populations', implying, presumably, that if you're Muslim, you just don't cut it wherever you happen to have been born. If the problem that this country simply isn't white enough, someone may as well just come out and say it. Because it's clear the issue here isn't Britishness. There is a serious debate to be had not only about immigration, but also about integration. Happily, the country that most of us inhabit is somewhere where both ethnic and religious integration is a daily reality for millions of families, including my own. While I think we in the UK do rather better at this than many of our Western peers, there is still more that can and should be done. There is also a conversation worth having about what a manageable level of immigration might be, and whether immigration policy is fit for purpose. This, however, is not the way to have those conversations. Indeed, potentially inciting distrust and dislike between different communities is not how anyone sensible would go about, in the words of the report itself, 'informing, rather than polarising'. That is the only conclusion that I can draw from their sloppiness. If, after all, their aim really was to 'inform, rather than polarise', they might spend more time explaining that forecasts are not predictions. They might explain that there is good evidence that the total fertility rate among immigrants tends to fall over time. That the population projections Goodwin has used – calculations based on assumptions about fertility, mortality and migration – are already massively outdated, and become even less reliable the further forward one projects. But no, there is no such nuance to be found. Merely certainty that the findings are certain to spark a 'considerable degree of anxiety, concern and political opposition' from those who oppose immigration. And, let's think about this in a global context for a moment. The world is changing, its balance of power is shifting steadily eastwards. Demographically, and I'm sorry about this, it is becoming less, not more, white. Relatively small countries like the UK will have to work ever harder to compete and to attract talent in this new world order. Do we really think that bemoaning the insidious impact of non-white foreigners who cannot trace their ancestry back several generations is going to help us in this task? But what I do know is that I'm not only not white, but apparently not British, either.
