logo
Diageo calls tequila purity allegation 'baseless' as US lawsuit proceeds

Diageo calls tequila purity allegation 'baseless' as US lawsuit proceeds

Time of India15-07-2025
Diageo
on Monday filed an initial response to a lawsuit accusing the spirits giant of misleading U.S. consumers about the purity of some of its popular
tequila
brands, calling the claim "baseless".
The company, which also owns whisky brands such as Johnnie Walker, said in the filing the complaint provides no evidence to support the claim that its
Casamigos
and
Don Julio
tequilas are not "100% agave".
All bottled tequilas of these brands labeled as "100% agave" are made from 100% Blue Weber agave and undergo a rigorous production and independent, multi-step certification process, the company said.
One of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, Steve Berman of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, said he does not have a response yet, while Robert Tolchin of The Berkman Law Office did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
In May, a class action filed in federal court in Brooklyn accused the company of falsely advertising Casamigos and Don Julio tequilas as "100% agave," claiming they contained other alcohols and failed to meet U.S. or Mexican standards for pure tequila.
Live Events
Two similar lawsuits were filed against Diageo in California and Florida in the same month, with one alleging that some versions of Casamigos and Don Julio contained between 33% and 42% agave-derived ethanol, citing carbon isotope testing commissioned by the plaintiff. Diageo has called the claims "outrageous and categorically false", adding it will "vigorously defend" the quality of its tequilas in court.
The lawsuits highlight a broader industry dispute over
tequila purity
, with "additive-free" claims prompting pushback from Mexico's Tequila Regulatory Council (CRT).
The CRT has warned some producers using the "additive-free" label that their export licenses could be revoked unless the claim is removed from packaging and marketing, according to a copy of one letter sent to a brand and seen by Reuters.
The CRT called the "additive-free" label misleading, noting that tequila can legally contain additives such as colorants and sweeteners up to 75 grams per liter of sugars or similar ingredients, according to official Mexican regulations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Modi, Putin to meet in Delhi by end of year
Modi, Putin to meet in Delhi by end of year

Indian Express

time9 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Modi, Putin to meet in Delhi by end of year

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Narendra Modi will meet in New Delhi by the end of the year; however, the dates are yet to be finalised, news agency Reuters reported, quoting the Russian embassy in India Wednesday. The announcement comes at a time when geopolitical tensions continue to rise, with the United States imposing tariffs on Indian goods in a bid to increase pressure on Russia over its actions in Ukraine. Accusing the US of double standards, Russian deputy chief of mission Babushkin said, 'Sanctions are hitting those who are imposing them, disrespecting national interests. Pressure on India not to buy Russian oil is unjustified. We are confident India-Russia energy cooperation will continue notwithstanding external pressure.' 'If Indian goods cannot go to the US market, they can head to Russia, and India matters very much to Russia,' Babushkin said, calling the sanctions unjustified. He also asserted that Russia understands the challenging circumstances for India and is committed to removing them. He emphasised that Russia values its strategic partnership with India, and is committed to supporting New Delhi during challenging circumstances. 'If Indian goods cannot go to the US market, they can head to Russia, and India matters very much to Russia,' Babushkin said, adding that the current sanctions were 'unjustified'. Babushkin further stated that India understands the current global energy supply situation, saying, 'India understands there is no chance to change supplies right now, and the profit is very high for India.' Despite the ongoing pressures and shifting dynamics, Babushkin noted that India and Russia have 'always managed to find ways to work in our interests despite issues'. 'Mechanisms are in place to continue oil supplies to India,' he assured, adding that both countries are working to remove further barriers to trade in order to strengthen economic cooperation. The Russian Embassy also underlined the strategic significance of India-Russia-China relations. 'Engagements between Russia, China, and India, are important for regional security,' he said hoping for a trilateral will happen with India and China sooner rather than later.'

Canva begins share sale at $42 billion valuation: Report
Canva begins share sale at $42 billion valuation: Report

The Hindu

time39 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Canva begins share sale at $42 billion valuation: Report

Australian graphic design platform Canva launched an employee stock sale valuing the company at $42 billion, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Canva did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Company employees are able to sell shares to both new and existing investors, including Fidelity Management & Research Company and JPMorgan's asset management division, Bloomberg said, citing a statement from Canva. Sydney-headquartered Canva allows users to create posters, social media graphics, presentations, and more using presets, templates, and generative AI tools. It reached a peak valuation of $40 billion in late 2021. Launched in 2013, Canva has more than 200 million monthly active users across 190 countries and reported an annualised revenue of $2.5 billion last year.

Why Trump levied penalty tariff on India, not on China: Even US is confused
Why Trump levied penalty tariff on India, not on China: Even US is confused

First Post

time39 minutes ago

  • First Post

Why Trump levied penalty tariff on India, not on China: Even US is confused

With contradictory statements from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the rationale of slapping 50% tariffs on India but not on China —also a buyer of Russian oil— is under question. US property mogul Donald Trump leads a media event on the sand dunes of the Menie estate, the site for Trump's proposed golf resort, near Aberdeen, north east Scotland, May 27, 2010. File Image/Reuters With contradictory statements from top US officials, the rationale of tariffs on India is under question. President Donald Trump has slapped India with 50 per cent tariffs on India as a punishment for buying Russian oil. But he has not imposed any tariffs on China, which has consistently bought more Russian oil than India. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have justified with contradictory statements that leads to the question: Does the Trump administration even have a policy-based objective for tariffs on India or is Trump taking out frustration on India or acting out of a grudge? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'They [India] are just profiteering. They are reselling. This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage — buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product,' Bessent told CNBC, adding that India has made $16 billion in 'excess profits'. Contradictory statements on Russian oil purchases Bessent on Tuesday said that tariffs were slapped on India because India was refining Russian crude oil and selling it elsewhere and profiting from it. But Rubio on Sunday said China was doing the same thing and that was why there were no tariffs on the country. 'China just refines that oil [Russian oil]. That oil is then sold into the global marketplace and anyone who's buying that oil would be paying more for it or if it doesn't exist, would have to find an alternative source for it,' Rubio told Fox News. The fact remains that China and India keep the international prices of oil in check with the purchase of Russian oil by, firstly, absorbing the Russian supply, and, secondly, refining Russian crude and selling gasoline and diesel elsewhere at lower prices. While Bessent said that this refining and subsequent selling was the basis of tariffs on India, Rubio said that this was the basis for not imposing tariffs on China. However, going by Rubio's logic, there should not be any punitive tariff on India. And, as per Bessent's logic, there should be tariffs on China just like India. Notably, Russia has consistently bought more Russian oil than India — nearly half of all Russian exports. Top buyers of Russian oil in percentage terms. As Indian purchases of Russian oil stabilised the international oil prices, the previous Joe Biden administration of the United States had encouraged India to buy Russian oil and even refine and sell it elsewhere — the same rationale that Rubio has used for China now. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Biden administration had asked India to accept Russian crude as other countries imposed bans in order to prevent a major oil price spike after the invasion of Ukraine that would result in high gasoline prices in the United States, Bob McNally, the President of Rapidan Energy, told CNBC. 'India played a key role in the price cap sanction mechanism designed by the US and its European allies to ensure Russian oil still flowed while trying to crimp the revenue Moscow earned,' McNally said. However, as Trump has aligned himself with China and has pursued an overt campaign against India, which has ranged from economic warfare to an alliance with India's adversaries in the region, he has flipped the understanding reached between the two countries in the previous administration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store