Condo owners sue over New York skyscraper they say is riddled with ‘thousands of severe cracks'
The condo board at 432 Park Avenue, a super-skinny high-rise on Manhattan's Billionaire's Row, claims that real estate firm CIM Group failed to disclose the extent of damage that has resulted in flooding and impacted the value of their multimillion-dollar properties.
Filed at the state court in New York in late April, the lawsuit also names architecture and engineering companies involved in the project. Condo owners are collectively seeking more than $165 million in damages, according to the complaint.
Completed in 2015, the slender 1,396-foot-tall skyscraper has a 15:1 height-to-width ratio, putting it among the so-called 'pencil towers' now dotting midtown Manhattan's skyline. To protect against high winds, the building was designed with unoccupied floors that encourage airflow, anchors drilled deep into the bedrock and 'tuned mass dampers' that act like pendulums to counteract swaying.
Property developer Harry Macklowe — whose firm McGraw Hudson Construction Corp is also named in the suit — compared the tower to the Empire State Building, telling the New York Times in 2013 that it was 'the building of the 21st century.' Pop star Jennifer Lopez and Chinese businessman Ye Jianming are among those reported to have purchased units there for eight-figure sums.
But owners and residents have since complained of numerous construction issues, including more than 20 water leaks since 2017, according to the complaint. In 2021, the condo board filed a lawsuit alleging a range of defects, from malfunctioning elevators and poor energy efficiency to a trash chute that sounds 'like a bomb' when used.
The new lawsuit meanwhile claims that the tower's facade is 'plagued with thousands of severe cracks, spalling, and other forms of deterioration,' including a 10-inch-deep crack in the building's core. As well as causing flooding, the damage has corroded some of the steel in the tower's reinforced concrete columns, the complaint alleges.
While the 2021 complaint also detailed 'substantial cracking,' the condo board said it filed its most recent action after claiming it uncovered evidence that defendants had 'conspired' to conceal the extent and seriousness of the defects.
In statements provided to CNN, both CIM Group and SLCE Architects, the project's architect of record, said they 'vehemently' deny the claims and are moving to have the complaint dismissed. Engineering firm WSP declined to comment. McGraw Hudson Construction Corp did not respond to CNN's inquiries.
Related article
Construction of world's tallest abandoned skyscraper to resume after a decade
The lawsuit attributes cracking to the building's 'experimental' facade, which is made from white concrete. The material is, it says, 'typically used for aesthetic purposes' and had to be strengthened to withstand the supertall building's structural load — especially during high winds.
Among the suit's allegations are claims that CIM Group ignored concerns raised by various concrete consultants, as well as the project's late architect Rafael Viñoly about the strength of the concrete mix. The condo board claims that mockup tests showed the material's use would result in cracking. But CIM Group and its contractors 'bulled forward' with 'complete disregard for… the inevitable problems it would cause for the building and its future residents,' the suit adds.
The condo board alleges that, despite having knowledge of the facade's defects, SLCE Architects deceived condo owners by making 'materially false' claims in its offering plan, a document disclosing important information to potential buyers. (The lawsuit cites an alleged change in the document's wording, which went from claiming the concrete 'will' prevent water penetration to saying that it was only 'designed to' do so.)
Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that McGraw Hudson and WSP misled New York City Department of Buildings in a letter that 'misrepresented the nature, extent, and type of cracking.' It claims the letter failed to disclose the full findings of a survey that had discovered 1,893 defects.
The complaint claims that developers then 'repeatedly rejected' recommendations on how to address issues that arose. A suggestion that an opaque elastomeric covering could be applied to the facade to prevent air and water infiltration, for instance, was ignored because it would 'significantly alter' the building's appearance and make it less appealing to 'the world's billionaires,' the lawsuit alleges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
‘I am your voice': Trump relaunches on TikTok with White House account
Rally highlights, White House glamour shots and his signature moves. President Donald Trump made a surprise return to the popular video app TikTok with three montages posted to a new official @whitehouse account Tuesday night. "America we are BACK," the first post was captioned. Trump pledged "I am your voice" as the video played. The account isn't Trump's first foray with the Chinese-owned app. Both he and his 2024 rivals, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, signed up for TikTok in an effort to reach the 170 million users the company claims it has in the U.S. Trump last posted to his 15 million-plus followers from his former account @realdonaldtrump on Election Day. Candidates especially hoped to court young voters on the platform. But TikTok has faced scrutiny from the U.S. government since Trump's first administration. In August 2020, he released an executive order calling for "aggressive action" against TikTok to protect national security. One Republican-introduced bill that became law in 2022 banned most federal employees from downloading the app on government devices. U.S. authorities have listed concerns about possibilities of stolen U.S. user data and a potentially manipulative and addictive algorithm. Trump threatened to ban the app in his first term, but has thrice in his second term delayed the enforcement of a 2024 bipartisan law requiring TikTok's Chinese-owned parent company, ByteDance, to sell it in the U.S. or be banned. In anticipation of the initial ban deadline, TikTok briefly left app stores in the U.S. the day before Trump's second inauguration and went dark for 14 hours. A pop-up message crediting him appeared when the app started working again, reading, "As a result of President Trump's efforts, TikTok is back in the U.S.!" TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew was among many tech leaders who Trump invited to his inauguration. The company offered various alternatives to divesting, including increased oversight and data protection. The latest pause on the ban is set to end on Sept. 17, though Trump repeatedly vowed to cut a deal for TikTok, even suggesting the sovereign wealth fund he created in February could be used to keep TikTok operating in the U.S. Despite security concerns, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to ABC News that TikTok will be a powerful tool for the president. "The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible," Leavitt said. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before." Leavitt also appeared in a clip on the White House account. The account racked up more than 140,000 followers by Wednesday afternoon, still catching up to Trump's more than 10 million Truth Social followers and more than 108 million followers on his less frequently used X account.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
India and China to explore border demarcation amid US tensions
India and China have agreed to explore demarcating their disputed border, a key move toward resolving decades-old territorial disputes as the neighbors look to recalibrate ties against the backdrop of strained India-U.S. relations. The two sides will set up an expert group to examine an interim arrangement for marking out border areas, India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement on Tuesday. The decision came as Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi wrapped up a two-day visit to India - his first in three years. A statement from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the expert group will "explore advancing boundary delimitation negotiations in areas where conditions are ripe," without specifying which ones. The world's two most-populous nations have clashed repeatedly over their disputed border in the past 70 years. Ties plunged sharply in 2020 after a deadly confrontation but have recently been on the mend, with efforts gaining urgency amid U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policy. Experts on both sides said the decision to explore an initial border arrangement marks a major step in recalibrating ties. The idea offers a "way forward," said Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at Shanghai's East China Normal University. "It will lead to difficult questions about other border areas but help foster mechanisms and trust for resolving them." The decision comes as New Delhi pursues stronger engagement with China and fellow BRICS nations, against the backdrop of strained ties with Washington after Trump's 50% tariff. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to meet President Xi Jinping when he visits China to attend a regional summit later this month, marking his first trip to the country in seven years. Wang - who was in Delhi partly to lay the groundwork for Modi's visit - also met with India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval on Tuesday and the two officials expressed satisfaction with the progress on border talks. At a briefing on Wednesday, China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said the two sides reached "new common understandings" during Wang's trip, adding that the "hard-won results should be cherished." Beyond border talks, the two sides have also moved forward in other areas. Beijing has also loosened curbs on urea exports, New Delhi has reinstated tourist visas for Chinese nationals, while a growing number of Indian businesses have been seeking partnerships with Chinese companies for deals including technology transfers, Bloomberg News has reported. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
After dillydallying, Thailand proceeds with Chinese-built submarine
CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand — Once tempted to ditch its acquisition of a Chinese-built S26T diesel-electric submarine, Thailand has decided the project will now proceed. The cause of the indecision was China's failure to obtain German diesel engines for the submarine, and its proposal to substitute Chinese variants instead. However, the Thai Cabinet approved a contract amendment on Aug. 5, which permits this project to recommence after it had remained dormant since 2021. Bangkok ordered this solitary S26T submarine on May 5, 2017, although it had originally wanted three submarines until fiscal constraints scuppered this plan. Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Group subsequently laid the boat's keel in Wuhan on Sept. 5, 2019. Replacement engines The Thai government had stipulated that the 2,600-ton boat must use German-manufactured MTU 396 diesel generator sets. When Germany refused to supply these engines, China Shipbuilding & Offshore International Co (CSOC) then proposed to utilize equivalent Chinese-made CHD620 engines to resurrect the project. Bangkok was reluctant to do so, however, over concerns about the quality and longevity of Chinese engines. The Royal Thai Navy — or RTN — next conducted a series of studies and stipulated that China must certify these CHD620V16H6 engines to assure their reliability. After China bench-tested the engines for more than 6,000 hours, the RTN issued its conclusion. 'It demonstrates a quality comparable to the original engine,' the RTN stated, 'in accordance with the performance limits specified in the agreement, and does not affect the submarine's performance.' Bangkok simultaneously requested compensation, with Beijing agreeing to assistance worth US$24.7 million. This includes China extending the warranty and maintenance support from two to eight years; providing future equipment and weapons; and giving support for submarine simulators. It is unclear what weapons the RTN will receive, but the package presumably includes heavy torpedoes, sea mines and perhaps anti-ship missiles like the CM-708UNB. Following August's approval, China now has until December 2028 to finish the submarine. Originally slated to enter service in 2023, the vessel is currently 64% complete. So far, Thailand has paid CSOC 7.7 billion baht, about US$237 million, across 10 instalments. Another 5.5 billion baht, or 37% of the submarine's cost, remains outstanding. Lessons learned This saga raises several issues. First, there was contractual laxity on the part of both China and Thailand, which assumed there would be no issue obtaining MTU engines. This proved not to be the case. Secondly, why did Germany block the export of these engines? Ostensibly it was because of a EU embargo imposed in late June 1989 in the wake of the Tiananmen Square massacre, with the German government confirming to Defense News that this 1989 declaration listed 'an embargo on trade in arms with China.' However, countries like France and Germany have not rigorously applied the embargo. For example, China has manufactured hundreds of Z-9 helicopters based on the Airbus Dauphin. Similarly, Chinese warships and submarines are commonly powered by German-derived engines. 'The Chinese and the Thais were in agreement, and then suddenly the Germans threw a spanner in that wheel, which is somewhat surprising,' said Siemon Wezeman, a senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Wezeman noted the engines themselves 'are not supersensitive,' and 'similar MTU engines have been actually sold by Germany to China.' However, he suggested Germany may have reevaluated its policy, and that dual-use items destined for China's military are now being more strictly policed. Wezeman even suggested the deeper problem Germany had might lie in the end user of the submarine being Thailand, rather than the builder being China. Thailand has been under military rule since a 2014 coup, and Germany previously blocked the sale of engines for Ukrainian-built BTR-3E 8x8 armored vehicles to Thailand. Thirdly, there is the important question of what engines Chinese submarines use. If China had to put the CHD620 through a qualification regime to satisfy Thailand, this indicates the People's Liberation Army Navy has not been using these engines on its own Type 039 submarines. Whose engines, then, has it been using? Defense News approached MTU numerous times for comment on the issue of selling engines to China for naval use, but the company failed to respond as of publication. Wezeman said it becomes hazy to what extent China is producing or buying foreign engines. 'As far as we know, there's still production going on in China of engines of originally French and German design,' he said. 'Very often this is under an agreement which is very old.' The Pakistan Navy has eight similar Chinese-designed Hangor-class submarines under construction as well. These will use the same CHD620V16H6 engines. Thailand's submarine purchase was emblematic of closer ties between its junta-led government and Beijing, as ties with the U.S. waned after the 2014 coup d'état. In fact, Australian scholar Dr. Greg Raymond concluded that 'the preponderance of evidence suggests that Thailand's submarine procurement was not solely about capability, but also intertwined with geopolitics and diplomacy.' Raymond found evidence that the Thai government 'exerted pressure on the navy to select the Chinese submarines,' even though European and South Korean alternatives offered better performance. Solve the daily Crossword
