HRF and HRW demands criminal prosecution of police for killing Maoists
: The Human Rights Forum (HRF) and the Human Rights Watch (HRW) demand criminal prosecution of police personnel responsible for the killing of three Maoist armed squad members on the morning of June 18, 2025 in the forest area of Rampachodavaram mandal in Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh.
Those involved must be booked under relevant provisions of the law, including murder and the SC, ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is imperative that an independent, impartial investigation – either by the CBI or under Supreme Court monitoring – be done. It cannot be entrusted to the local police, regular or special, since they are implicated in the crime.
A three-member HRF and HRW team (Y Rajesh – HRF AP State general secretary, VS Krishna – HRF AP&TG Coordination Committee member and Balu Akkisa – HRW AP State president) on July 18, 2025 visited the Rampachodavaram Agency area on a fact-finding into the 'encounter'.
We spoke with Adivasis of several villages in the Vemulakonda and Akuru panchayats as well as residents of Kintukuru, a remote habitation. The version of the police that a combing party of Greyhounds personnel were fired upon by the Maoists and the retaliatory fire in self-defence resulted in the death of three Maoists is a patent falsehood.
The three Maoists were ambushed and executed in a burst of one-sided firing by the Greyhounds in the early morning of June 18.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Dubai villas | search ads
Get Deals
Undo
The Maoists had been encamped deep in the forest area at a location about 3.5 km to the West of Kintukuru village. The camp is at a place referred locally as 'Oota mamidi' a perennial spring abutting a mango tree. Just behind it is a rivulet that flows East to merge with the Pamuleru vaagu. The three Maoists were camped at that spot for over two weeks.
A large contingent of Greyhounds went via Kintukuru (Akuru panchayat) past midnight of June 17.
They evidently had precise detail of the camp location which they surrounded from two sides to the South. The Greyhounds opened fire at daybreak, killing all three Maoists. There was no exchange of fire – no crossfire - only a targeted execution. The Greyhounds could have easily apprehended the three alive but they chose to kill them instead.
The three Maoists killed were Gajarla Ravi (of Velishala village in Chityala mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district, Telangana), Venkata Ravivarma Chaitanya (of Karakavanipalem in Pendurthi mandal, Visakhapatnam district, AP) and Kovvasi Anju, an Adivasi from Bodagubal village, Konta block, Sukma district of Chattisgarh.
The bodies were taken to the Rampachodavaram Area Hospital the same evening, but the post-mortem was deliberately delayed until the next day. Relatives were forced to wait, plead, and it was only after sustained media pressure that they ultimately received decomposed bodies late on the night of June 19. By the time they were brought home, the bodies were infested with worms.
These killings by special forces are part of a chilling, systematic ongoing campaign.
Since January 2024, over 440 Maoists and unarmed civilians – preponderantly Adivasis in Chattisgarh - have been killed in encounters, many of them allegedly staged. We call on the Central and State governments in Maoist-affected regions to immediately halt this vicious slaughter. No democracy that claims to uphold Constitutional values can legitimise such a brutal policy of State-sanctioned extra-judicial bloodletting.
HRF and HRW are of the opinion that the Maoists' repeated offers to cease hostilities and pursue peace talks warrants the government's utmost seriousness and constructive engagement. There is now a rare political opening to mitigate suffering, particularly among Adivasis, and address long-standing and deep-rooted grievances. This protracted conflict has already exacted a significant human cost, the three-member team added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
3 held in hockey trainee rape case
Jajpur: Three persons were arrested by Jajpur Town police on Tuesday for their alleged involvement in the rape of a minor hockey trainee in Jajpur district. The arrested have been identified as Sandip Swain (26), Sarthak Mohanty (23) and Sagar Nayak (26). While Swain is a coach at Jajpur hockey stadium, Mohanty and Nayak are former hockey coaches at Jajpur and presently working at Barabati Stadium in Cuttack, police said. Police have released Siddharth Rout, another hockey coach who was detained along with three others, as he was not involved in the crime. The incident came to light on Monday after the 15-year-old girl filed a complaint at Jajpur Town police station alleging that her coach and his two associates abducted her when she was returning home on July 3 evening and raped her in a lodge at Jajpur town. Acting on the complaint, police immediately detained four persons. 'We have arrested one hockey coach and two former coaches of Jajpur hockey stadium. While one of them has raped the minor girl, the two others assisted him in the crime,' said Prasant Kumar Majhi, Sub-Divisional Police Officer of Jajpur Town police station. The girl had been undergoing training at Jajpur hockey stadium in the district headquarters town for the past two years. On July 3 evening, when the girl was going home, her present coach and two former coaches allegedly abducted her and took her to a lodge and sexually assaulted her there, the complainant said. The accused also reportedly threatened to kill the girl if she revealed the incident to anyone, stated the complaint. Based on the complaint, police registered a case under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 6 (rape) and 8 (sexual harassment) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The medical examination of the victim and the accused were conducted on Monday and the survivor's statement has been recorded before the district court. The accused were forwarded to court on Tuesday and remanded in judicial custody after their bail pleas were rejected,police said.
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Cong taunts BJP's BC leaders over ‘Upper Caste' state chief
Hyderabad: The Congress party on Tuesday challenged Backward Classes (BC) leaders within the BJP to respond to comments made by their newly appointed state president, N Ramchander Rao. Rao had reportedly questioned the Telangana state government's sincerity regarding a proposed 42 per cent reservation for BCs, citing an 'unscientific approach.' Speaking to media at Gandhi Bhavan, Congress official spokesperson B Lingam Yadav asserted that if BJP MPs Bandi Sanjay Kumar, D Aravind, and Eatala Rajender failed to counter the remarks from their new state president, it would convey a misleading message that the BJP is a party opposed to Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and BCs. The Congress leader affirmed that the Revanth government's objective is to implement reservations mirroring the model in Tamil Nadu, which has successfully navigated the constraints of reservation caps. 'The BC leaders in BJP should respond,' Yadav pressed. 'Bandi Sanjay, Aravind, Etela Rajender should respond to Ramchandra's comments on BC reservations. If 42 per cent reservation is not given to BCs, BCs would be further marginalised.' He vowed, 'We will achieve 42 per cent reservation by building pressure on Centre and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.' Yadav further contended that those opposing the reservation now are the same leaders who championed 'Kamandal politics' as a counter to the 'Mandal Commission' recommendations in the past.
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
IPS officer ordered to publish apology in newspapers, social media as SC finalises divorce
Settling a deeply contested marital dispute, the Supreme Court Tuesday granted divorce to a couple and directed that the wife, who is an IPS officer, to issue an 'an unconditional apology to the husband and his family' and have it published it newspapers and on social media as part of the settlement. The couple, an IPS officer and Delhi-based businessman, had married in 2015 and separated in 2018. The woman became an IPS officer in 2022, three years after she separated from her husband and moved to her hometown in Uttar Pradesh. According to the terms of the court-mandated settlement, the woman did not seek alimony or maintenance and instead offered to transfer property owned by her parents to her estranged husband. These properties — three pieces of land in Aligarh — will be transferred by the officer's mother who owns them through a gift deed. 'As a result of the cases filed by the wife, the husband remained in jail for a period of 109 days and his father for 103 days and the entire family suffered physical and mental trauma and harassment. What they have suffered cannot be resituated or compensated in any manner,' the top court said, directing the IPS officer, and her parents to tender an unconditional apology to the husband and his family members which shall be published in the national edition of the renowned one English and one Hindi newspaper. 'Such apology shall also be published and circulated on all social media platforms,' the SC said in its order. The apex court also granted primary custody of the child to the mother and visitation rights to the father. The SC further granted police protection to the husband and his family, cautioning the IPS officer to 'never use her position and power as an IPS officer or any other position that she may hold in future,' to cause 'any bodily or mental injury to the husband and his family, in any manner whatsoever.' A bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih also added that 'the apology is made to bring about amicable closure to the protracted legal battle and associated emotional and mental stress. It is without prejudice to/for either party. It shall not ever be used against (her),' the apex court said. Under Article 142 of the Constitution, which gives the SC power to do complete justice, the court directly grants divorce for irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The top court was hearing two transfer petitions filed by the couple. While the wife had filed cases in UP, the husband had filed cases in Delhi's Rohini court. Goel had sought divorce and did not seek either alimony or maintenance. The husband, in turn, had sought custody of their eight-year-old daughter. The marital dispute soon turned into a litany of cases against each other. While the wife alleged domestic violence, rape, and made income tax complaints, the husband alleged defamation and even challenged the IPS candidature of the wife.
