HRF and HRW demands criminal prosecution of police for killing Maoists
: The Human Rights Forum (HRF) and the Human Rights Watch (HRW) demand criminal prosecution of police personnel responsible for the killing of three Maoist armed squad members on the morning of June 18, 2025 in the forest area of Rampachodavaram mandal in Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh.
Those involved must be booked under relevant provisions of the law, including murder and the SC, ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is imperative that an independent, impartial investigation – either by the CBI or under Supreme Court monitoring – be done. It cannot be entrusted to the local police, regular or special, since they are implicated in the crime.
A three-member HRF and HRW team (Y Rajesh – HRF AP State general secretary, VS Krishna – HRF AP&TG Coordination Committee member and Balu Akkisa – HRW AP State president) on July 18, 2025 visited the Rampachodavaram Agency area on a fact-finding into the 'encounter'.
We spoke with Adivasis of several villages in the Vemulakonda and Akuru panchayats as well as residents of Kintukuru, a remote habitation. The version of the police that a combing party of Greyhounds personnel were fired upon by the Maoists and the retaliatory fire in self-defence resulted in the death of three Maoists is a patent falsehood.
The three Maoists were ambushed and executed in a burst of one-sided firing by the Greyhounds in the early morning of June 18.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Dubai villas | search ads
Get Deals
Undo
The Maoists had been encamped deep in the forest area at a location about 3.5 km to the West of Kintukuru village. The camp is at a place referred locally as 'Oota mamidi' a perennial spring abutting a mango tree. Just behind it is a rivulet that flows East to merge with the Pamuleru vaagu. The three Maoists were camped at that spot for over two weeks.
A large contingent of Greyhounds went via Kintukuru (Akuru panchayat) past midnight of June 17.
They evidently had precise detail of the camp location which they surrounded from two sides to the South. The Greyhounds opened fire at daybreak, killing all three Maoists. There was no exchange of fire – no crossfire - only a targeted execution. The Greyhounds could have easily apprehended the three alive but they chose to kill them instead.
The three Maoists killed were Gajarla Ravi (of Velishala village in Chityala mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district, Telangana), Venkata Ravivarma Chaitanya (of Karakavanipalem in Pendurthi mandal, Visakhapatnam district, AP) and Kovvasi Anju, an Adivasi from Bodagubal village, Konta block, Sukma district of Chattisgarh.
The bodies were taken to the Rampachodavaram Area Hospital the same evening, but the post-mortem was deliberately delayed until the next day. Relatives were forced to wait, plead, and it was only after sustained media pressure that they ultimately received decomposed bodies late on the night of June 19. By the time they were brought home, the bodies were infested with worms.
These killings by special forces are part of a chilling, systematic ongoing campaign.
Since January 2024, over 440 Maoists and unarmed civilians – preponderantly Adivasis in Chattisgarh - have been killed in encounters, many of them allegedly staged. We call on the Central and State governments in Maoist-affected regions to immediately halt this vicious slaughter. No democracy that claims to uphold Constitutional values can legitimise such a brutal policy of State-sanctioned extra-judicial bloodletting.
HRF and HRW are of the opinion that the Maoists' repeated offers to cease hostilities and pursue peace talks warrants the government's utmost seriousness and constructive engagement. There is now a rare political opening to mitigate suffering, particularly among Adivasis, and address long-standing and deep-rooted grievances. This protracted conflict has already exacted a significant human cost, the three-member team added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Vikas Barala dropped as law officer in Haryana advocate general's office, say sources
The name of BJP MP Subhash Barala's son Vikas Barala, appointed as a law officer in the office of the Haryana advocate general, has been dropped from the list as he did not join the post, official sources said on Monday (July 28, 2025). Vikas, an accused in a case of stalking, had been appointed as an assistant advocate general to represent the Haryana government before judicial platforms in the national capital. His appointment was part of a broader recruitment of 100 law officers by the government and which was officially notified on July 18, according to an appointment order issued in this regard recently. The official sources said since Vikas did not join, his name was dropped from the list of those appointed. When contacted, Haryana's Advocate General Pravindra Singh Chauhan said over the phone on Monday (July 28, 2025), "Vikas didn't join (assume charge)". "Generally, there is a timeframe of a week to ten days given, but if anyone does not join by then, we inform the government accordingly, the AG said over the phone. Told that some of those appointed as law officers are relatives of politicians and bureaucrats, Chauhan, without going into the specifics of those recruitments, said, "All those appointed are there only because of themselves. Don't go by the surnames. "It won't be correct to see all from one lens. They are competent lawyers and their selection has been made on merit." The advertisement for the appointments of the law officers was put out in January by the state government. In June, the state government constituted a "selection committee" under the Haryana Law Officers (Engagement) Act, 2016 for the finalisation of the selection process to engage 100 law officers, which included 20 additional advocate generals, 20 senior deputy advocate generals, 30 deputy advocate generals and 30 assistant advocate generals, following the January 31 advertisement. After Vikas Barala's appointment, the complainant in the stalking case slammed the move, saying that appointing someone to a public position of power is not only a political decision but it is also a reflection of values and standards. Accusation against Vikas Barala The incident leading to the charges against Vikas occurred in 2017 when his father was the Haryana BJP chief. Subhash Barala is currently a Rajya Sabha MP. The complainant had expressed her disappointment at the development. The woman had in her complaint accused Vikas and his friend of stalking and attempting to abduct her. Taking to social media last week but without naming Vikas directly, she issued a statement calling out the authorities involved in his appointment as a law officer. "Appointing someone to a public position of power is not only a political decision but it is also a reflection of values and standards. So, perhaps, the questions should be directed at the authorities whose ethics and standards allowed this decision to be made. Our policymakers run the country; the rest of us are just hoping they remember that they work for the Indian citizen," she said in her post. Vikas and his friend Ashish Kumar were charged with stalking and attempting to kidnap her by a court here in October 2017. The trial in the case is ongoing before a Chandigarh court. On August 5, 2017, Vikas, who was 23 at the time and a law student, along with Kumar, had allegedly followed her car in their SUV and tried to block the way. The charges against them were framed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including 354d (stalking), 341 (wrongful restraint) and 365 read with 511 (attempt to kidnap). Initially, arrested on the night of August 4-5, 2017, they were released on bail as their charges were bailable under the IPC and the Motor Vehicles Act. They were later re-arrested on August 9, 2017, after cooperating with the investigation, but received bail again from the high court in January 2018.
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Arrest of Khadse's son-in-law in drugs case suspicious: Sanjay Raut
A day after the arrest of Eknath Khadse's son-in-law in a drugs case, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Monday claimed the former Maharashtra minister was being targeted for linking BJP leader Girish Mahajan with an alleged honey trap scandal. Sanjay Raut dubbed the arrest of Khadse's son-in-law Pranjal Khewalkar as suspicious and also slammed BJP for "targeting" the family.(ANI File) Talking to reporters in New Delhi, Raut dubbed the arrest of Khadse's son-in-law Pranjal Khewalkar as suspicious and also slammed the ruling BJP, alleging it was "targeting" family members of political rivals and maligning them. The former Maharashtra minister's home was attacked to shut his mouth, he said in an apparent reference to Khadse. Pranjal Khewalkar, the husband of Eknath Khadse's daughter Rohini Khadse, was arrested along with six others after the police raided a "drug party" at an apartment in Pune in the early hours of Sunday and claimed to have seized narcotics, hookah set ups and liquor from there. Rohini Khadse is the state head of the NCP (SP) women's wing. "The entire matter is suspicious," Raut said. "Khadse has been talking about honey traps for the last three days. He is talking about the involvement of (state cabinet minister) Girish Mahajan in this but there is no probe related to it. Now that Khadse is talking, his son-in-law has been arrested," the Rajya Sabha member said. Such incidents were occurring everywhere in Maharashtra, Raut said. He also accused the police of having become a servant and targeting those who speak against the government. Mahajan recently accused Khadse of trying to malign his image by raising baseless allegations in connection with an alleged honeytrap scandal. The fight between Khadse, a BJP veteran who quit the party to join the then undivided NCP in 2020, and Mahajan is not new. Both belong to the Jalgaon district. "We followed a principle that family members (of political rivals) were never dragged. Unfortunately, people from the BJP are now targeting family members, maligning them," Raut charged. He claimed that after the arrest of Khadse's son-in-law, Mahajan was just short of breaking into a dance. NCP leader and former minister Nawab Malik's son-in-law was arrested in a similar NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act case and so was actor Shahrukh Khan's son Aryan Khan, Raut pointed out.
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Don't undermine power of court': SC says no interim stay on Bihar voter revision, asks EC to accept Aadhaar
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to put an interim stay on the publishing of draft electoral rolls in Bihar, with Assembly elections in the state slated to be held soon. The SC bench observed that the last order passed by the top court noted the petitioners not pressing for interim stay. (ANI) While passing the order, the SC said it would once for all decide the pleas against the Election Commission of India's (ECI) special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls. The bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said they would on July 29 fix the schedule for conducting a final hearing on the matter. Appearing for NGO Association for Democratic Reforms, Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan submitted before court that the electoral rolls should not be finalised in the interim, and asked for a stay on publishing them on August 1. The bench observed that the last order passed by the top court noted the petitioners not pressing for interim stay. Replying to this, Sankaranarayanan said the interim relief of stay was not pressed because of SC's assurance that the matter would be listed for hearing before August 1. However, the bench said that the stay could not be granted now and the pleas would be decided once for all. 'Don't undermine the power of the court. Trust us,' the bench said, adding that if court was in agreement with the submissions and if any illegality was found, everything would be quashed 'there and then'. SC asks EC to continue accepting Aadhaar, voter cards Meanwhile, the SC also asked the EC to continue accepting Aadhaar cards and voter IDs for the SIR in Bihar and comply with its order stating that these documents had a 'presumption of genuineness'. The top court reiterated the July 10 order by a bench headed by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, which had asked the poll body to consider Aadhaar, voter and ration cards as valid documents. 'As far as ration cards are concerned we can say they can be forged easily but Aadhaar and voter cards have some sanctity and have presumption of genuineness,' the bench said.
