
Ofsted chief inspector apologises for short notice on school inspection reforms
School leaders' unions have threatened to tell their members to quit as Ofsted inspectors unless changes are made to the timescale for inspection reform.
Speaking at the Festival of Education, Sir Martyn Oliver, chief inspector of Ofsted, said he was 'sorry' about the delayed timescale as he acknowledged it was 'difficult' for schools.
At the event at Wellington College, Berkshire, Sir Martyn called on school leaders to 'judge' him on the Ofsted's revised inspection model once it is published at the start of the academic year.
Last year, the Government announced that headline Ofsted grades for overall effectiveness for schools in England would be scrapped.
Previously, Ofsted awarded one of four single-phrase inspection judgments: outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate
Under proposed report cards, set out in February, schools could be graded across at least eight areas of a provision using a colour-coded five-point scale.
They would receive ratings, from the red 'causing concern' to orange 'attention needed', through the green shades of 'secure', 'strong' and 'exemplary' for each area of practice.
During the Q&A session at the event on Thursday, Sir Martyn suggested that Ofsted ratings can alter local house prices by thousands of pounds because parents 'value' them.
When asked whether Ofsted's new report cards could affect house prices, Sir Martyn said: 'Well, I don't know.'
But Sir Martyn, who used to be an academy trust leader, spoke of how he had supported two 'special measures' schools where he lived and the house prices 'shot up' after they received better Ofsted ratings.
He told the audience: 'They were both in special measures, both went outstanding, and the house prices went up £15,000 within a week.
'It does make a difference.'
Sir Martyn added that 'parents obviously put a value on it'.
Ofsted had planned to publish its formal response to its consultation on proposed inspection reforms in the summer term ahead of the changes coming into effect in November.
But Ofsted will now publish its full response in September due to the scale of the feedback it received.
When asked whether this delay was fair on school leaders, Sir Martyn said: 'I think that is difficult and again I'm sorry about that.'
On single-word judgments, he added: 'We've been doing something for 30-plus years in a single way.
'If I look at my phone, there will be pictures of people standing in front of their schools with balloons, with an O, an U, with a T – 'outstanding', and local newspapers up and down the country celebrate.
'It happens all of the time, and we're about to take that away and change it to something else that for more than three decades people are used to.'
Sir Martyn said: 'Here's a burning question, what's Rightmove going to do?'
Currently, Rightmove includes the Ofsted ratings for local schools in its listings for houses for sale.
In a speech at the event, Sir Martyn said children are increasingly receiving life lessons from influencers or 'AI-generated summaries'.
The Ofsted boss argued that classroom learning with human interaction 'has never been more important' as many children spend much of their lives online.
He said: 'Young people are growing up in an increasingly curated world in which their favoured influencers or corporate algorithms can have a disproportionate impression on their views and opinions.
'It's more important than ever that young people are able to lift their eyes from the screen and connect with their teachers, in person.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
After Two Tier Keir, we now have Two Tear Rachel… Reeves is finished but how long before her boss exits too?
IF there is one cast-iron rule in politics, it's this: If the Prime Minister is having to say he has full confidence you will stay in your job, your days are definitely numbered. So no wonder then that Rachel Reeves was moved to tears as she sat behind Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs on Wednesday when, after months of saying she would be his Chancellor until the next election and beyond, he chose to studiously dodge the question. 2 2 After Two-Tier Keir, we now have Two-Tear Rachel. As those tears rolled down her cheeks, the Chancellor prompted feverish speculation about the cause of her sobs — wiping £3billion off the markets, pushing up government borrowing costs and devaluing the Pound into the bargain. Wheeled out to face the cameras yesterday, Reeves plastered on the make-up and a beaming smile to insist she had been upset about a ' personal issue ' and had been 'having a tough day' which, unlike most people's bad days, was broadcast 'on the telly' for all to see. We may never know the true reason behind her blubbing, but what we do know is that her wobbly bottom lip didn't just wobble the markets, it also sent trembles through the entire Government. Facing a swift exit There is no doubt now that Rachel Reeves is facing a swift exit from the Treasury, even if she does survive until the autumn Budget. Yet the real question mark now is not over HER future but that of her boss, the Prime Minister. This, after all, was supposed to be a week of celebration for Labour's first year in office after winning a landslide victory in the General Election last July. Instead the PM has suffered a humiliating defeat in the Commons over his welfare reforms at the hands of his own backbenchers and been forced to deny he plans to sack his Chancellor while facing approval ratings so low that they've surfaced in New Zealand. Some of us knew this Labour government would be bad but not many realised just how bad they would turn out to be. It would have been inconceivable a year ago to imagine, after being elected to Downing Street with a whopping 411 MPs, that Starmer would be facing questions about not only his Chancellor's future but even his own so soon. Even Britney Spears has had longer honeymoons than this. Squirming Keir Starmer refuses to say Rachel Reeves will be Chancellor at next election after horror Budget And for all the PM's claims that Reeves will be Chancellor for years to come, after months of broken promises and U-turns no one actually believes a word he says any more. After all, Rachel From Accounts hardly had a great start in the job. From the disastrous decision to cut winter fuel payments to ten million pensioners to the inflation-busting pay rises for train drivers and doctors, to the revelations that her CV was full of exaggerations and her taste for freebie tickets to Taylor Swift concerts, the Chancellor's reputation has long been in tatters. The sight of Reeves blubbing in the Commons this week wasn't just embarrassing for her — it embarrassed the whole country. And the desperate cries of 'bullying!' and 'sexism!' by Labour MPs are shameless coming from a party that happily attacked both Margaret Thatcher and Theresa May for crying as they left office. If you can't stand the heat, Rachel, get out of the Number 11 kitchen. The Chancellor's claims to have had a 'tough day' will fall flat with many voters who are having tough days EVERY day thanks to this Government's policies. What about people struggling to pay their bills as the cost of living continues to rise and taxes go up? What about pensioners worried about putting the heating on last winter after Reeves took away their winter fuel allowance? What about the farmers who face losing their family farm thanks to the inheritance tax hike? What about the small business owners who have had to shut up shop after the Chancellor's employer National Insurance rises? Everyone in Westminster knows that the only thing keeping Reeves in her job right now is that she acts as the PM's human shield — someone he can blame for every mishap, every poor judgment, every U-turn and every tax rise to come in the next Budget. From being hailed as Labour's greatest asset, as 'the first woman Chancellor' (as if anyone cared), Reeves has quickly become the Government's punching bag. No wonder the tears have started rolling. It is obvious to everyone that Rachel From Accounts is way out of her depth. But she isn't alone. Starmer is also flailing around like a drowning man, desperate to blame anyone and anything else for his own failings. Nothing of substance Ultimately, though, everyone knows he is in charge and the buck stops with him. Reeves may have exposed a fatal weakness with her tears, but the past 12 months have revealed far greater failings in her boss. As he marks his first year in office, we now know that underneath Starmer's shiny helmet of Brylcreemed hair, there is absolutely nothing of substance. Sir Keir has proved himself to be a Prime Minister with no ideas and no philosophy, no policies and no plan; a man with no backbone and no moral compass. He is a leader who cannot lead, a manager who cannot manage, a politician with no political instinct. The Prime Minister is just an empty suit — and he likely didn't even pay for the suit himself. He probably got Labour donor Lord Ali to buy it for him. Starmer can keep telling us that his Chancellor is going nowhere but we all know her exit from the Treasury will come sooner rather than later. The question remains, after his damaging and chaotic first 12 months in office, can the country survive another year of this Prime Minister? VYLAN COUNT COST OF HATE WORDS have consequences, as the Left-wing cancel culture mob have cried for years as they happily ended the careers of anyone who dared to question them. Well, indeed they do for Bob Vylan, the punk-rap duo from the mean streets of Ipswich, who led chants of 'Death, death to the IDF' and ranted about 'f***ing Zionists' during their Glastonbury performance as it was live-streamed on the BBC iPlayer. Not only do they now face a criminal investigation over their antisemitic chants, they've been dropped by their management, seen visas for a US tour revoked, and UK gigs have been cancelled. Oops. There have been consequences too for the BBC, where institutional antisemitism is now so part and parcel of the corporation's culture that, no one – not even the Director General Tim Davie – could spot the obvious anti-Jew hatred in those chants and shut down the live feed from public view. Now the BBC has said it will no longer live-broadcast 'high risk' performances and staff may face disciplinary action for any failures. As Bob Vylan face the fallout from their 'music' hate-fest, they should learn a lesson from another Glasto performer. As Rod Stewart proved, there's a lot more longevity in showbiz for entertainers who show musical talent than there is for those spewing vile torrents of hate. Oh yes, and a bevy of beautiful leggy blonde backing singers helps too.

Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Ex-Labour MP says she will set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn
Zarah Sultana – who had the Labour whip suspended last year – said she was resigning from Sir Keir Starmer's party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with the ex-Labour leader. In a statement posted on X, Ms Sultana, who represents Coventry South, said that the project would also involve 'other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country'. Today, after 14 years, I'm resigning from the Labour Party. Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other Independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country. Join us. The time is now. Sign up here to stay updated: — Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) July 3, 2025 She said that 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. She added: 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and lift 400,000 children out of poverty. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much.' She urged people to 'join us'. Ms Sultana was one of seven MPs who had the Labour whip suspended last summer when they supported an amendment to the King's Speech which related to the two-child benefit cap. Four of the seven had the whip restored earlier this year but Ms Sultana was not among them.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour have just blown Britain's last chance to fix the NHS
This was Labour's big shot. It's unlikely another government will be gifted this golden chance to gut and rebuild Britain's broken health system. But judging by the contents of Wes Streeting's 10-year plan, Labour has lost its nerve. The Government's goal of shifting away from treating very ill and frail people in hospital to preventing their illness in the first place is a sound one. Streeting's plans do include some interesting policy ideas, particularly around technology and neighbourhood health. But too many concerns go ignored for these plans to be considered a serious blueprint for change. Not least the fundamental problem that the NHS is a nationalised service funded through general taxation, with no price mechanism. We continue to refuse to learn from the experience of other countries, from France and Germany to Switzerland and Singapore, which all operate mixed economy healthcare systems. There is a real risk now that NHS reform may become Labour's Brexit, a great opportunity with massive upside that ends up being squandered through timidity and incompetence, with a political fallout which could be just as fierce. This is a moment of both unprecedented crisis and opportunity. Demand for healthcare in our ageing nation, with increasing numbers on sickness benefits, is set to explode by 40 per cent in the next 10 years. The political climate for reform has never been more favourable, and Labour, as the 'party of the NHS' is given latitude by the public when it comes to the health service. It also has 403 seats. The public no longer regards the NHS as a sacred cow: according to one poll just one in five are satisfied with the way it is run. It is in the interests of the political Right to back a genuine bid by Labour to transform it. Streeting should be commended for an energetic attempt to lay out a new vision that threatens to ruffle feathers and challenge vested interests. The PM's press launch yesterday should have been a historic moment. But it was overshadowed by the fallout from Rachel Reeves's tears in the chamber on Wednesday, which Keir Starmer yesterday appeared to try and laugh off. This is not a Government the public believes is serious about change, but rather one descending into chaos. Many of Streeting's policy proposals are welcome. Yet the plans are packed with oddities – such as a 'patient power payments' trial whereby the public will be given a say on whether their healthcare provider should be paid in full for specific treatments. As one senior Tory quipped to me: 'It's like the TV show where people pay the amount they feel the hotel stay was worth'. Doctors rightly fear that such provisions could lead to greater waste, with medics incentivised to offer unnecessary operations and drugs. Even more worrying is that the plan does not even engage with the social care timebomb. Nor does it offer any meaningful solutions to the NHS's manpower crunch, even though its labour shortfall is set to quadruple in the next decade. Arguably the biggest disappointment is that Labour's 10-year plan fails to confront the reality that, at a time when Britain is cash-strapped, shifting the healthcare model from late treatment towards prevention would require that we defund the hospitals which currently consume 70 per cent of the health budget. Put simply, the country needs to stop chucking money at bringing down waiting lists. Instead it needs to bet the farm on preventative healthcare, putting money into everything from lung trucks and genomic sequencing to diet management courses for those at risk of diabetes. The UK could learn from Finland, which legislated in the 1970s to move funds from hospitals into community health. Or from the prairies of the remote American Midwest, which have boosted the prestige and quality of neighbourhood health by setting up medical schools that only produce GPs. But the Health Secretary, perhaps wary after Liz Kendall's disastrous attempts to reform welfare, seems reluctant to genuinely shake things up. As the former North-West Regional Director for Public Health, John Ashton, told me: 'An infatuation with hospitals has dominated the British psyche since 1948, when we dismantled a public health system that had prevention elements. Since then, the lion's share of funding has been sucked into hospitals. And we have had this collusion between politicians and the medical profession, which is dominated by hospital medicine and hospital consultants.' Those who back Labour's vision are worried about its ability to see things through. If Streeting's weaker policy ideas border on the bizarre, his stronger ones, such as enhancing the NHS app, seem incomplete. Just as banking apps only became powerful when they could do more than display customers' balances and were wired into underlying financial transaction systems, a healthcare app will only be of use if it can be connected to appointments and referrals networks. It is not clear that Labour fully understands this, or is willing to put up the investment. They risk presiding over Britain's biggest computer flop since the New Labour NHS IT upgrade fiasco. Yet the most immediate problem with Labour's plans is that they are simply financially implausible. This week, amid the Prime Minister's Personal Independence Payment climbdown, a benefits cuts package that was supposed to bring in £5 billion of savings will probably end up costing the taxpayer tens of millions. Britain does not have the money to bankroll a NHS reform package which refuses to accept the need for trade-offs, or to end its most wasteful elements. We saw with the Tories how the failure to rise to the historic occasion of Brexit can condemn an almost hegemonic party to irrelevance. If the Labour Government, mired in division and bogged in ensuring its day-to-day survival, has just allowed an unparalleled opportunity to slip through the country's fingers, then that is a national tragedy for which Labour may never be forgiven.