logo
Energy bills in Great Britain could fall this summer but ‘crisis not over'

Energy bills in Great Britain could fall this summer but ‘crisis not over'

Business Mayor19-05-2025

Household energy bills could drop this summer but experts have warned that 'the crisis is not over' for households and manufacturers struggling to afford gas and electricity costs.
The industry regulator's quarterly price cap is expected to fall in July by an average of £129, or 7%, according to forecasts from Cornwall Insight, a leading energy consultancy. It has predicted that the cap will fall to £1,720 a year for a typical dual-fuel household this summer, from £1,849 under the current limits.
The modest drop would return the energy price cap to its levels at the beginning of the year – but this is still about 60% higher than where the cap was set in the summer before Russia's invasion of Ukraine caused a global energy market surge.
Britain's gas and electricity prices have remained some of the highest in the world, in large part due to reliance on gas for generating electricity and in home heating, which has led to record high levels of household energy debt and a sharp slump in industrial activity.
The output from Britain's energy intensive industries has fallen by a third since 2021, according to official government figures published on Monday, and is now at its lowest level since 1990.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) have revealed that the average electricity price for companies and manufacturers rose by 90% at the peak of the global energy crisis in 2023, and were still 75% higher at end of 2024 compared with costs in 2021.
Gas prices have taken an even greater toll on non-domestic energy users. Costs surged by 187% at the peak of the crisis, according to the ONS, but remained 120% higher than pre-crisis levels at the end of last year.
'These figures are a wake-up call,' according to Sam Richards, the chief executive of Britain Remade, a pro-growth lobby group. 'Sky-high energy costs have gutted Britain's industrial base, with output in sectors like steel and chemicals collapsing to record lows. If we're serious about protecting jobs and rebuilding our manufacturing strength, we need to cut industrial electricity costs, and fast.'
Figures published last week by the ONS warned that households are struggling with energy costs too. A record proportion of households were unable to pay their energy bills by direct debit last month because there was not enough money in their bank accounts.
The watchdog for Great Britain, Ofgem, is expected to set out the next cap, which reflects the average annual dual-fuel bill for about 29 million households, on Friday before it takes effect from July until the end of September.
The latest estimate from Cornwall marks a small rise from its previous forecast of £1,683 a year, which the analyst said was partly due to increases in energy wholesale markets.
skip past newsletter promotion
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
Dr Craig Lowery, a consultant at Cornwall, said energy bills were still too high for many. 'Prices are falling, but not by enough for the numerous households struggling under the weight of a cost of living crisis, and bills remain well above the levels seen at the start of the decade,' he added.
'The fall is also a clear reminder of just how volatile the energy market remains – if prices can go down, they can bounce back up, especially with the unsettled global economic and political landscape we are experiencing. This is not the moment for complacency.'
Jess Ralston, an analyst at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said: 'Predicted falls in energy bills simply cancel out recent rises, meaning the crisis is not over for bill payers who are still struggling with gas prices significantly above pre-crisis levels.
'Costs of oil and gas will always be volatile and can be manipulated by foreign actors like Putin, but every home that is insulated and has a heat pump installed reduces our gas demand and so exposure to these geopolitically vulnerable markets.'
Cornwall expects that the price cap will fall again in October, followed by another drop in January, although this is subject to several varying factors, including weather patterns, the impact of the war in Ukraine and EU gas storage rules.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mental health sick days are an oxymoron
Mental health sick days are an oxymoron

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mental health sick days are an oxymoron

Donald Trump has changed his mind so often on tariffs that my head is spinning. Writing about the crushing weight of the budget deficit has been getting me down. And to be honest, if I have to listen to Rachel Reeves do her impression of a Dalek with a bad head cold one more time I might ask to be left alone in a dark room with a revolver and a glass of whisky. There are plenty of reasons why I could tell the Telegraph editor that I was too stressed, anxious or depressed to deliver a column today. But hold on. In fact, knuckling down to some work will be good for me, and will almost certainly make me feel better. In reality, as the latest shocking numbers on the days lost to mental health made clear this week, British employers need to start insisting that putting in a proper shift at the office, factory or warehouse is better for everyone – and bring the epidemic of psychological sickness under control before it crushes the economy. Output has stagnated, the stock market is disappearing, and job vacancies are starting to fall. Still, it is good to see the UK is still leading the world at something. According to the Office for National Statistics – where fortunately the staff managed to pull themselves together long enough to crunch the numbers on our behalf – the time taken off work for mental health has just hit a record high. Over the course of 2024, British employees took a record 20.5m days off for mental health conditions such as stress, anxiety and depression, up from 14.8m as recently as 2023. With grim inevitably, the public sector has been leading the way on that, with mental health accounting for an absence rate of 2.9pc, or 16.4pc of all absences, compared to a rate of 1.8pc at private businesses, or 6.7pc of total absences. Overall, that is a rise of 38pc over just two years. If anything else in the economy was increasing at that kind of a rate, we wouldn't be worrying about growth. We would be richer than Dubai, Switzerland and Singapore put together. We may have only seen the start of the really big increases. The figures are 'only the tip of the iceberg', according to Jamie O'Halloran, of the Institute for Public Policy Research, who argues that many employees carry on working even when they are unwell. Heck, surely we can push that 20m figure even higher. Thirty million, perhaps? Or 50m? Or 100m? The sky is the limit. The trouble is, the numbers are rising so fast that it is hard to accept that we should take them at face value. Sure, we all agree that better diagnosis and a more tolerant culture has meant that staff who might have suffered in silence in the past are now more honest about their problems, and more likely to seek help, and take time off where necessary for treatment. No one thinks that people should avoid treating any form of illness, and it is right to recognise that a mental health condition is just as serious as any more obvious physical affliction. And yet, to put this politely, it is surely also obvious that something fishy is going on. Why is mental health, for example, so much worse in the public sector than the private? Are government jobs really more stressful, or demanding, than private sector ones? With working from home, gold-plated pensions, strong unions, and little chance of redundancy, you might think there was less to make you feel anxious. And how can the total go up by 38pc over just two years, a rate which would imply that days off for mental health will rise by 423pc over the next decade, taking the total number of absences up to 107m days lost, or the equivalent of taking 475,000 people out of the UK's total workforce? The blunt truth is this. If the mental health epidemic keeps on growing at its current rate it is going to crush the economy. And yet the science tells us that, actually, work is good for our mental health. It gives us purpose, and a sense of belonging. For example, according to a study by the University of Cambridge, looking at over 70,000 UK residents between 2009 and 2018, 'paid employment brings other benefits – often psychological – such as self-esteem and social inclusion', while according to a study published in the National Library of Medicine in the United States 'unemployment worsens mental health and gaining employment can improve mental health, even for people with the most serious mental illnesses'. I could easily quote dozens of similar findings. But I am sure everyone gets the point by now. While there are limits to how much people should work, in general it is better for their mental health, improving their sense of well-being, giving them a purpose, enabling them to mix with more people, and sometimes just filling up days that would otherwise feel very empty. Led by human resources departments that have grown too powerful, many employers, and especially in the public sector, are being far too indulgent. Sure, they need to be sympathetic, and they need to allow people who have a genuine issue to take time off for a well-planned course of treatment. But the British economy already has woeful productivity, and is trapped in a doom loop of stagnant growth, rising taxes, and falling living standards. We simply can't afford this level of mental health absences – because on current trends the economy is going to be completely destroyed. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

ONS admits inflation blunder
ONS admits inflation blunder

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

ONS admits inflation blunder

Britain's beleaguered statistics agency has admitted that it overstated April's inflation figures after uncovering errors in its data. On Thursday, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) confirmed annual inflation hit 3.4pc last month, compared to its previous calculation of 3.5pc. Official blamed the blunder on faulty car tax data provided by the Government, as Whitehall provided the relevant numbers on Vehicle Excise Duty (VED). However, the mishap will no doubt pile pressure on the ONS, which has been repeatedly criticised over the past year for publishing flawed data about the UK jobs market. As well as lowing the headline rate of inflation, Thursday's correction will also take 0.1 percentage points off the retail price index, reducing that measure to 4.4pc. This embedded content is not available in your region. This will be of significance for Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, as a significant chunk of the Government's debt is linked to the measure. Some economists will also breathe a sigh of relief after last month's price rises were higher than they expected. It comes at a critical time for the economy as the Bank seeks to work out how far and how fast to cut interest rates. Threadneedle Street's policymakers, led by Governor Andrew Bailey, try to set borrowing costs to keep inflation at or around 2pc, with their decisions are guided by data from the ONS on price rises and unemployment. However, Mr Bailey told MPs this week that the Bank of England is now now using a much broader range of data after recent shortcomings at the ONS, which has struggled with a poor response rate post-Covid. 'It is a work in progress,' said Mr Bailey. 'I don't want to take away from the fact that the ONS is working very hard at this. 'There is a very severe health warning on every release they make. Until they introduce what they call the new transformed labour force survey (LFS), which will not be until next year, we should still regard the LFS with a great deal of caution and a big health warning.' The latest admission from the ONS startled analysts and moved financial markets, with potential repercussions for household and business finances. Bruna Skarica, at Wall Street bank Morgan Stanley, noted the jump was far larger than anything she had thought possible. It also fed straight into forecasts for the Bank of England's interest rate cuts. 'Today's data raises doubts on expectations for two further cuts this year,' said Gabriella Dickens, economist at AXA Investment Managers. Critically for borrowers, those forecasts have already led to trades trimming their bets for a summer rate cut, meaning borrowing costs are likely to remain higher for longer. The ONS was approached for comment. Sign in to access your portfolio

ONS admits April inflation figure was too high after vehicle tax data error
ONS admits April inflation figure was too high after vehicle tax data error

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

ONS admits April inflation figure was too high after vehicle tax data error

The UK's headline inflation figure was 0.1 percentage points too high for April because of an error in the vehicle tax data collected, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has said. Official data published last month showed Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rose to 3.5% in April, up from 2.6% in March. But the ONS said on Thursday that it has since spotted an error in the vehicle excise duty data provided to the ONS by the Department for Transport, which is part of the information used to calculate inflation. The number of vehicles subject to the tax in the first year of registration was too high in the data given, according to the statisticians. This meant CPI was overstated by 0.1 percentage points in April – meaning it should have been 3.4%. Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation was also 0.1 percentage points too high for the month. The ONS said it would not be revising the official published figures, in line with its policy which only carries out revisions in exceptional circumstances. It also confirmed that no other periods were affected by the error. The correct vehicle excise duty data is set to be brought in for May's inflation announcement. The tax is levied on every vehicle using public roads in the UK, including electric cars, which from April were no longer exempt. Rates for petrol cars also increased from April, with owners of the largest and most polluting vehicles seeing a doubling of the amount they have to pay in the first year. The ONS had said the tax hike was one of the biggest factors contributing to the jump in CPI inflation during the month. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store