Scientists Reconstruct Bust Of Woman From 10,500 Years Ago
With her clear blue eyes and slightly nervous gaze, the reconstructed bust of Mos'anne -- a woman who lived around 10,500 years ago -- is uncannily lifelike.
Reborn via a close partnership between science and art, Mos'anne's bust was created at Belgium's Ghent University as part of a project to explore how the region's last hunter-gatherers lived during the Mesolithic era.
"Part of the project is also understanding the genetics of these people, figuring out their kinship and so on, and to be able to really translate the science that we do to a wider audience," the project's lead researcher, Isabelle de Groote, told AFP.
Scientists chose the skull of Mos'anne -- named by public vote in reference to Belgium's Meuse Valley -- for reconstruction, as it was exceptionally well preserved.
The bones held a large amount of preserved DNA, making it possible to reconstruct the woman -- aged between 35 and 60 at her death -- with remarkable realism.
"We also know that in the Mesolithic times, she is genetically part of the Western hunter-gatherer group," said de Groote.
Using genetic testing, researchers were able to determine the Mesolithic woman's skin and eye colour.
"This group is known for having very dark skin and blue eyes, a bit like Cheddar Man in Britain," she said, referring to the man who lived in Britain around 10,000 years ago, whose skeleton was discovered in 1903.
'Mixed emotions'
Mos'anne's DNA revealed valuable clues about her appearance but it was the unique skills of Dutch "paleo-artists" Alfons and Adrie Kennis that brought her back to life.
After receiving guidance from the researchers -- including instructions to use ochre pigment on Mos'anne's headband -- the twins began their work, from moulding the skull to the final decorative feather, meticulously sculpting each facial muscle in clay.
"The biggest part of the reconstruction is forming a character," Alfons Kennis said from their Darwin-esque studio in Arnhem.
"You can make a forensic reconstruction... use the data, apply the muscles, apply the skin, but you get no character," Kennis said of their artistic process.
The Kennis brothers -- whose surname means "knowledge" in Dutch -- take about six months to complete a reconstruction.
They gained global recognition in the 2000s, their work exhibited in museums worldwide and featured in specialist publications.
The twins, fascinated by evolution and visual art since childhood, draw inspiration from archived anthropological images of early encounters between isolated populations and researchers.
"At the first meeting, there's nervousness, shyness. People are laughing, maybe out of nerves," said Kennis.
"When a prehistoric ancestor meets you for the first time, you see these mixed emotions... It's these emotions that we want to show."
Much about Mos'anne remains unknown. In Ghent, researchers are still analysing her to find out what she would eat.
With her headband dotted with duck feathers, golden skin, and pierced animal teeth adorning her ears and necklace, the prehistoric woman seems closer to us than ever.
"It was always my wish to be able to make it more tangible in a way," De Groote said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
14 hours ago
- India Today
80 years of Hiroshima: When Japan burned, but the Soviets got the message
Eighty years ago, on August 6, 1945, a city woke up to a regular morning -- and was turned into dust within seconds. Hiroshima, Japan, became the first place in the world to be attacked with an atomic what many still don't know is that behind this strike wasn't just revenge or war strategy. It was rumour that fuelled it -- a fearful political strike in a rapidly shifting world WORLD AT WAR, BUT JAPAN WAS ALREADY FALLINGBy mid-1945, the world was exhausted. World War II had been dragging on for six bloody years. Nazi Germany had already surrendered in May. Field Marshall Keitel signs German surrender terms in Berlin, May 8, 1945 (Photo: WIkimedia Commons) In the East, Japan was cornered, isolated, and nearly defeated. Most of its fleet had been destroyed, and American firebombing had reduced Tokyo and several other cities to surrender seemed like a matter of time. Yet, on that fateful August morning, the US chose to drop a new kind of weapon -- something the world had never seen before -- on a largely civilian Hiroshima in 1948 (Photo: AFP) THE SCIENTIST WHO UNLEASHED A MONSTERA few years earlier, a group of scientists -- many of them refugees who had fled from Hitler's Europe -- had begun secretly working in the US on something terrifying: a bomb that could unleash the destructive power of the atom. It was called the Manhattan of the key scientists was a brilliant physicist named J Robert Oppenheimer. He had studied ancient Indian texts, and after the first successful test of the bomb in July 1945, he quoted the Bhagavad Gita: 'Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.'The line, uttered by Lord Krishna in the epic, captured exactly what he felt -- power, fear, and a sense that something irreversible had just bomb worked, only too well. THE GERMAN SHADOW THAT LOOMED LARGEBut here's the twist. The US didn't just race to make the bomb to defeat Japan. Japan was near surrender, fact, they feared Germany might be building one first. German scientists had discovered nuclear fission back in 1938. The fear was that if Hitler got to the bomb first, the consequences would be fear, which was never quite confirmed, pushed Americans to invest billions, round up the best scientists in the world, and rush the project to by the time the bomb was ready, Hitler was already dead. Germany had surrendered. Japan was still fighting, yes, but not strong enough to pose any real threat to the Allies. So why drop the bomb? Little Boy atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima () THE POWER GAME BEYOND THE WARThe answer lies not just in what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but in what came the time the mushroom clouds cleared, a new rivalry was quietly igniting. The United States and the Soviet Union, once uneasy allies against Hitler, were already sizing each other up for the next global showdown. The war had ended, but the game for dominance had only just what better way to tilt the board than by unveiling the deadliest weapon the world had ever seen?Historians have long debated whether Japan's surrender was the only reason the bomb was used. One of the most prominent voices, Gar Alperovitz, in his landmark book Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam, argued that the bomb served a second purpose: to show the Soviet Union exactly who was boss in the post-war to Alperovitz, 'gaining diplomatic leverage against the Soviet Union was a major consideration in the atomic bombing.' HL Stimson (l) and Eisenhower (r) (Photos: Wikimedia Commons) That line of thinking wasn't limited to historians. Inside the US government, similar views were brewing. Henry Stimson, then Secretary of War, described the bomb in his memoirs not just as a military tool, but as a 'psychological weapon,' designed to create a 'tremendous shock' that would shake Japan into surrender and show America's strength on the world Stimson worried that flaunting the bomb 'ostentatiously on our hip' would only fuel Soviet paranoia, and trigger an arms race. He was General Dwight D Eisenhower, who had commanded Allied forces in Europe, later admitted that he believed the bombings weren't necessary to end the war. Japan, he said, was already on the verge of unease grew stronger as he realised the real audience for the atomic spectacle might not have been Japan at all -- but Joseph Stalin, watching from yes, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings ended a war. But they may have also started something else: the Cold War. And in that light, the bombs were not just about victory. They were a signal. A threat. A warning shot fired into a new world order. Smoke cloud after nuclear attack on Hiroshima (Photo: AFP) THE CITY THAT NEVER SAW IT COMINGAt 8:15 am on August 6, 1945, a US bomber named Enola Gay dropped a single bomb over Hiroshima. It was called 'Little Boy'. In seconds, the city vanished in a blinding evaporated where they stood. Buildings were flattened. Rivers boiled. Around 80,000 people died instantly. Thousands more would die later from radiation and days later, the US dropped another bomb on Nagasaki. Combined deaths reached nearly 200,000. Japan surrendered soon even today, the question remains: was it even necessary? Japan's Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War 1945 (Photo: Wikimedia Commons) THE REGRET THAT CAME LATERAlbert Einstein, the genius whose theories laid the groundwork for nuclear physics, had once written to US President Franklin D Roosevelt urging him to develop the atom bomb, fearing Nazi Germany would get there first. Written with Leo Szilrd and Eugene Wigner, it warned that Hitler might weaponise he never worked on the Manhattan Project, it was Einstein's 1939 letter to Roosevelt that helped set the whole project in the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Einstein deeply regretted his role. He famously said, 'Had I known that the Germans would not succeed in developing an atomic bomb, I would have done nothing for the bomb.' Franklin D Roosevelt (l) and Oppenheimer (r) (Photos: Wikimedia Commons) He called signing the letter the 'one great mistake of my life.' He co-founded the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists and helped draft the Russell-Einstein Manifesto, warning the world: 'Remember your humanity, and forget the rest.'Even Oppenheimer, celebrated and feared as the 'father of the atomic bomb,' faced a storm of guilt. In a post-war meeting with the US President, he reportedly said, 'Mr. President, I feel I have blood on my hands.'REMEMBERING HIROSHIMA 80 YEARS LATERToday, Hiroshima stands as both a thriving city and a chilling reminder of what happens when science and power fall into the wrong hands. Peace memorials, survivor testimonies, and museums keep the memory alive -- not for revenge, but as a warning. devastated city of Hiroshima after the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US Air Force B-29 on August 6, 1945 (Photo: AFP) Eighty years on, the world is still struggling with the legacy of that day. Some 12,500 nuclear warheads still exist worldwide. Nations still test missiles. Tensions still rise and fall, much like they did in atom bomb on Hiroshima didn't win a war. Politics did, along with the fear of what Hitler might build, inspired by rumours, and paid for in remains a symbol: scientific ambition, political expedience, and moral reckoning interwoven into one lethal moment. The story still confronts us: will we keep chasing death, or learn to choose differently?- Ends
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Build readiness against rising dirty-war risks
This August 6 marks 80 years of the US's nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, Japan, which permanently altered the trajectory of global security and warfare. The two bombs dropped in 1945, on Hiroshima and on Nagasaki three days later, killed over 350,000 people instantly and left another 400,000 dead within a few months — introducing the world to the devastating potential of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). At the time, the yield or intensity of these weapons was relatively modest compared to the nuclear arsenal that exists today. Today, the world faces far more advanced, lethal, and widespread threats under the growing umbrella of 'dirty wars'. The scale of suffering and devastation is beyond comprehension, and today's weapons are exponentially more powerful. There are estimated to be over 12,000 nuclear warheads in the world. Many of the modern strategic nuclear weapons are thermonuclear weapons, having yields equivalent to a 100 kilo tonnes (KT) of TNT and above. This has the potential to destroy the world as we know it many times over. Tactical nuclear weapons can be 50 KT and less. Each WMD category brings its own horrors: While nuclear weapons incinerate cities, biological and chemical agents work invisibly, silently, and over time. (AFP) The India-Pakistan conflict captures the world's attention given both have nuclear capabilities. A nuclear bomb's destruction extends far beyond its immediate blast radius. It generates an intense fireball, a blinding flash, a shockwave and, most dangerously, ionising radiation. The radioactive mushroom cloud not only contaminates the target, but reaches far-flung regions, depending on wind conditions — rendering vast areas uninhabitable for decades. In the Cold War era, WMDs were broadly categorised under the NBC triad — nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Over time, radiological was added to this, creating the term CBRN. Each category brings its own horrors: While nuclear weapons incinerate cities, biological and chemical agents work invisibly, silently, and over time. Chemical weapons, although banned under international law, are still accessible to States and non-State actors. They can be created using widely available industrial and pharmaceutical chemicals, turning everyday compounds into agents of mass death. Sarin, VX, chlorine, and mustard gas are examples. Equally alarming are biological weapons — viruses and bacteria designed to infect and kill populations indiscriminately. The Covid-19 pandemic gave the world a preview to the havoc a simple virus can unleash, even if accidental. But when weaponised and intentionally released, pathogens could cripple societies, economies, and militaries in a matter of days. The proliferation of biological research facilities worldwide, some poorly regulated, raises grave concerns. The Wuhan lab controversy underlined the thin line between scientific exploration and potential dual use for bio-warfare. Biological and radiological warfare has become the preferred 'silent weapon' of the future, and many nations are covertly advancing such capabilities under the guise of health research. A critical issue lies in the imbalance of offensive and defensive capacities. While many nations possess the capability to launch CBRN attacks, few are adequately prepared or capable of defending themselves. Countries like China have built subterranean tunnel networks housing military assets in case of nuclear or chemical strikes. Such preparation indicates an evolving mindset — wars will no longer be limited to borders or frontlines. They will target critical infrastructure, command-and-control (C2) nodes, urban populations, and national willpower itself. Missiles, aircraft, and now drones can deliver munitions deep into the hinterland. In a dirty war, collateral damage will be immense — not just military installations but power grids, hospitals, transport systems, and even the financial sector can be targeted through kinetic, cyber, or biological means. Even conventional missile warheads will be toxic enough to cause permanent damage to the lungs, heart and brain. A dirty war is now a creeping reality. Technology has empowered even smaller nations and insurgent groups to wield devastating power. Leaders today appear less tolerant, more reactive, and increasingly reliant on first-strike doctrines. What can nations do? Preparedness must be comprehensive. This includes building CBRN shelters in key cities and military bases and training first responders and civilians for CBRN scenarios. It should be essential to stockpile antidotes, protective suits, and detection systems. The civil defence and NDMA should conduct regular drills and heighten awareness. Securing borders and labs against bio-accidents/terrorism, investing in early warning, air defence and missile defence systems, especially empowered by space and cyber domains would be essential. Civil defence needs revival. Strategic deterrence must go hand-in-hand with societal resilience. Dirty wars may not be declared, but their impact will be undeniable. Let us prepare, not panic. PJS Pannu is a retired lieutenant general with the Indian Army. The views expressed are personal.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
KCHR's ‘Cosmos Malabaricus Summer School' from August 11
The Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) will organise the 'Cosmos Malabaricus Summer School' in collaboration with Leiden University here from August 11 to 14. The event will explore Malabar's history, heritage, and Dutch archival sources. It will be held at Gama Heritage Residency, Fort Kochi. The programme emerged from the Cosmos Malabaricus (CosMa) project, aimed at decoding, translating, and contextualising Dutch archival materials related to 17th–18th century Kerala, according to a release. Noted scholars such as Jos Gommans, Lennart Bes, Lekshmi Subramanyam, and Mahmood Kooria will lead thematic sessions. The event will also host discussions on Dutch language learning and the challenges and opportunities in translating primary sources. The programme will feature archival workshops, cartographic field work, and academic and heritage roundtable sessions, it said.
