Brazil judge eases Jair Bolsonaro house arrest to allow family visits
The former paratrooper turned populist has been under house arrest since Monday, when Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the measure on the grounds that Bolsonaro had allegedly violated court orders.
In his initial ruling, Moraes permitted Bolsonaro to receive only his lawyers and the family members he lives with at a mansion in Brasília: his wife, Michelle, his daughter and his stepdaughter.
All other relatives were required to seek judicial authorisation, a restriction that has now been lifted.
'I authorise visits from the detainee's sons, daughters-in-law, granddaughters and grandsons without prior notice,' Moraes wrote, stressing that all visitors must still comply with the ban on using mobile phones or taking photos and videos of the former president.
Bolsonaro also remains barred from contacting his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a congressman who has been in the United States since March and claims to have played a key role in persuading Donald Trump to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports – a move the US president justified as a response to what he called a 'witch-hunt' against Bolsonaro.
Two weeks ago, Moraes ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle tag to prevent a potential escape attempt.
In justifying last Monday's house arrest, the justice argued that Bolsonaro had flouted a court order prohibiting the use of social media – including by third parties – by appearing via video call at Sunday rallies, a recording of which was later posted by one of his politician sons, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro.
Although legal experts broadly agree that the case accusing Bolsonaro of leading a coup attempt in 2022 is strong, the house arrest order has sparked a more contentious debate.
Some have defended the judge's decision, arguing he had been 'patient' with Bolsonaro's repeated breaches of court rulings. But other legal scholars argue that it is unclear what precise violation Bolsonaro committed, noting that he was not explicitly banned from speaking at public events.
In response to Moraes's latest ruling, politicians aligned with Bolsonaro have blocked congressional proceedings, demanding that lawmakers vote to impeach the supreme court justice and grant amnesty to the hundreds accused of involvement in the alleged coup attempt – including the ransacking of Brasília on 8 January 2023.
The case against the 70-year-old politician is at an advanced stage and a verdict is expected as early as next month, with Bolsonaro facing a potential sentence of more than 40 years in prison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Model, 29, ‘held captive, raped, tied to staircase & beaten by footballer boyfriend' as she reveals horror injury pics
A MODEL who was allegedly raped, tied to a staircase and beaten by her footballer boyfriend has revealed horror images of injuries. Jannah Nebbeling, 29, accused Paraguayan footballer Jorge Báez of physical, psychological and emotional abuse during their three-year relationship. 8 8 8 8 Báez has not publicly responded to the claims. The Brazilian influencer claimed her ex-partner kept her locked up for months before she escaped and fled back to her home country. The model said she first met Baez when she was 18 and described the relationship as a traumatic experience in which she was manipulated, assaulted and kept in isolation. She claims Baez tied her up with ropes and assaulted her while using boxing gloves, allegedly to avoid visible damage to her face. She filed a formal complaint with Brazilian cops after she claimed previous attempts to report him in Paraguay failed. The Brazilian said: "He tied me to a ladder with ropes, assaulted me with boxing gloves, and bit my hand." Nebbeling alleged the athlete stomped on her feet and inflicted severe bruising and injuries including to her lips eyes and limbs. She also claims she suffered sexual abuse while she was unconscious, and said that the footballer controlled her social media. Shocking images posted online showed Nebbeling scantily clad with visible bruises on her face and body and tied to a staircase which she says was taken during one of the assaults. She has also published medical reports screenshots and audio files as evidence. Rapper posts 'Conor McGregor's NUDES' online & claims disgraced UFC star 'sexually harassed her' In one post she wrote: "This is me Jannah Nebbeling tied to a staircase, tortured and completely isolated from the world. "This is what the law calls unlawful deprivation of liberty or rather false imprisonment within a brutal cycle of domestic violence." She added: "I want justice. For myself for every silenced woman and for those who are no longer alive to speak." The alleged victim also claimed that Baez, who played for teams such as Olimpia Arsenal de Sarandi and Resende, only allowed her to speak to people he approved of. She said she lived in what she called a "private prison" for a year in Paraguay while being closely monitored. Nebbeling said she initially tried to report the alleged abuse to a doctor in Paraguay but was advised against doing so. 8 8 She was allegedly warned that the footballer could use his money and influence to avoid charges and even turn the situation against her. The allaged victim said she filed the complaint at the women's police station in Jacarepagua in Rio de Janeiro. But she claims her case was first mocked and dismissed before being taken seriously. Baez, 34, has not made any public comment - but he reportedly told local media he would only respond if formally requested by courts. Paraguayan authorities have reportedly requested international assistance to clarify the case. The police probe into the alleged attacks and forced captivity is still ongoing Brazil. If you or someone you know is affected by any of the issues raised in this story, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or chat at 8 8
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Michelle Gomez releases statement after Harry Potter role backlash
Gomez, known for her roles in Green Wing and Doctor Who, posted a statement after fans were furious she is taking on the role of Professor McGonagall in an Audible series of JK Rowling's books. Fans were not happy with Gomez taking on the part, as Rowling has become renowned for her opposition to transgender rights. Gomez insisted she was a supporter of LGBT+ rights, and said she 'understood' why her taking on the role was 'painful' for many fans. READ MORE: Ross Greer demands action on Scottish Israel boycott plan The Harry Potter author recently called for a boycott of Marks and Spencers over a transgender member of staff working in the lingerie section. And, Rowling contributed to For Women Scotland's crowdfunder when they took the case over the definition of a woman to the Supreme Court. Following the ruling, which said the definition under the Equality Act referred to biological sex, Rowling posted a photograph of her smoking a cigar on a yacht, celebrating the outcome. Following the judgment, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) published guidance that essentially banned transgender people from using toilets of their acquired gender. One fan wrote: 'It is incredibly disappointing to see that Michelle Gomez has chosen to work on the Harry Potter audio series. There isn't an excuse for it- JK Rowling's contribution to anti trans legislation and violence, supported by her HP earnings, has been well known for several years now.' Another said: 'Michelle Gomez can post as many apologies as she wants - you cannot call yourself an ally to trans (or LGBT*) people while actively choosing to work on a project directly linked to the most notorious, unapologetic transphobe in the world. That is not allyship, it's performance.' Posting on her Instagram story, Gomez said: 'To my LGBTQ+ fans, and especially the trans community: I want to speak directly to the concerns that have been raised about my involvement in this project. I hear you, and I understand why this is painful for many. 'I want to be clear that I stand with trans people, and I support trans rights - fully and without hesitation. (Image: Audible) 'When I accepted this role, I did so as someone who has always loved the stories and what they meant to so many, especially those who found comfort and identity in that world. 'I now understand more clearly how deeply complicated and hurtful this association can feel, and I take that seriously. 'Being an ally means listening even when it's uncomfortable and taking accountability where it's needed. I'm committed to doing both.' She then linked to a donation page for Callen-Lorde, a US-based LGBT+ healthcare provider. In response, one fan said: 'Quite frankly I'm not convinced she was truly this ignorant & is trying to save her own ass. It won't work. Not unless you drop out of the project & show you're against JKR & her trans genocide.' The audiobook adaptations are set to star Hugh Laurie as Albus Dumbledore, Matthew Matthew MacFadyen as Lord Voldemort and Riz Amed as Professor Snape.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The legal loophole that lets 13-year-olds get away with 'murder' - as a heartbroken mother demands justice after her son's teenage killer walks free
A devastated mother whose 13-year-old son was stabbed to death by another boy the same age is demanding urgent changes to Australia's youth justice laws after his killer walked free from court. Kristie Morris, 40, endured a harrowing five-week trial at the Supreme Court in NSW, only to see her son Brody's killer found not guilty under a centuries-old legal clause, 'Doli Incapax'. The legal loophole rules that children of 13 or under can be found to be too young to be held responsible for their actions, regardless of the seriousness of their offending. 'My heart is shattered,' Ms Morris told the Daily Mail. 'My 13-year-old son was a larrikin who loved fishing and was stabbed to death by another 13-year-old, someone he used to call a friend.' The boy who took her son's life admitted what he did. There were multiple witnesses and video evidence. But in court, he was found not guilty. 'Not because he was innocent, but because of his age,' Ms Morris said. 'Because of a legal loophole. The law said he was too young to understand what he did. 'But my son is gone. Forever. And the boy who took his life walks free, with no punishment, no consequences, nothing.' 'Where is the justice in that? There is none. Doli incapax robbed us of accountability.' Children under the age of 14 cannot be held criminally responsible unless it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt they realised what they were doing was seriously wrong. The ancient common law principle, Doli Incapax, Latin for 'incapable of crime', is designed to protect children from harsh punishment. But for this mother, it has instead left her family shattered and without justice. Earlier this week a 13-year-old Chinese exchange student was charged with murdering a 14-year-old in the home of their host family in Edgeworth, Newcastle NSW. The family heard a commotion late on Monday night and discovered the 14-year-old allegedly stabbed to death with a kitchen knife, with wounds to her torso. The 13-year-old was arrested and remains behind bars but police so far say they do not know what led to the attack. 'When I saw that story on the news my heart went out to the parents,' said Ms Morris. 'I know the emotions they are going through will be exactly what I went through losing Brody, or maybe worse because they are not here.' Brody met his former friend in a residential street in Kariong, an hour north of Sydney, for a pre-arranged fight on January 11, 2022. Tensions between the pair had been brewing for weeks and a group of local teens had gathered to watch. One witness, who filmed the encounter, claimed she thought it was only going to be a 'muckaround fight.' But within seconds it was over, with Brody suffering three fatal stab wounds inflicted by a kitchen knife. 'My older son came and woke me and said, "Quick mum, we have to go - Brodie has been stabbed" and I ran straight to the scene,' she told the Daily Mail. 'We were there in less than ten minutes and arrived as the ambulance got there. 'I was in absolute shock. I was vomiting, screaming - it was like an out of body experience.' Brody died on the street. The accused pleaded not guilty to murder at the Supreme Court in NSW in November 2023, but the jury was told there was no dispute the teen fatally stabbed the boy. But they were instructed to instead consider whether the accused was too young and immature to understand that his actions were 'seriously or gravely wrong.' After the five-week trial, the young boy was found not guilty of murdering his former friend and Brody's family broke down in tears. 'It was horrible, it was like he didn't matter. There was no justice for him at all.' 'There is no record that this ever happened, he will never be named and now no one is responsible for Brody's death.' In July Ms Morris decided she couldn't just stand by and watch this happen to another family and with the support of her daughter Lily and son Jack she decided tht 'Brody's death shouldn't be in vain'. 'Brody's death can't be in vain, something needs to change and I won't stop because it's becoming more common. 'You can't just wipe your hands clean of these kids there must be a system that ensures accountability, even if they are found not guilty under Doli Incapax. 'If a child is old enough to take a life, they are old enough to answer for it and be held accountable.' Criminal psychologist Dr Tim Watson-Munro says there has been much discussion about raising the criminal age of responsibility in Australia. 'Thirteen is really on the cusp in many ways,' he told Daily Mail. 'It depends on whether they fully understand the magnitude of what they are doing. 'Thirteen is still a very young and immature person, but they are entering conceptual thinking. 'So it needs to be found that any 13-year-old had not fully understood what they were doing.' Ms Morris said she doesn't want harsh punishments or long jail sentences for young kids, but a system of age-appropriate consequences and real rehabilitative justice. After the five-week trial, the young boy was found not guilty of murder 'This allows for intervention when it is most needed early, before more lives are lost and more futures destroyed,' she said. 'Doli Incapax may have served its time, but that time has passed. 'In today's world, children grow up faster, with smartphones and access to endless information. 'They are exposed to violence online, engage in complex digital planning, and often understand exactly what they're doing and yet, the law presumes they cannot. 'That outdated assumption is failing both victims and the children it's meant to protect.' Current laws have the minimum age of criminal responsibility set at 14, one of the highest in the world, and the mum says it sends the wrong message. 'It means youthful indiscretion overshadows personal responsibility,' she added. 'It tells young people their actions have no real consequences. 'For families like ours, it's devastating. It undermines the pain, the trauma, the loss and it endangers other children too.' Many legal experts and psychologists argue children as young as 10 are capable of understanding right from wrong particularly in cases involving violence, she said. Ms Morris has now launched a petition on calling for accountability and justice as Brody's legacy, and pleading for more to sign up and join her. She added: 'Your signature could help stop other families from suffering the way we have.'
