TN govt appoints V-C search panels for Dr Ambedkar Law University
A three-member search panel — comprising Aruna Jagadeesan, retired judge of the Madras High Court, as the government's nominee, S Sachidhanandham, former V-C of the law university and former professor of National Law University (New Delhi), as the syndicate's nominee, and V Vijayakumar, former V-C of the law university, as the senate's nominee — has been constituted for selecting a new V-C for TN Dr Ambedkar Law University.
The search panel for Tamil University consists of five members. Justice KBK Vasuki, former Judge of the Madras High Court, and K Deenabandu, former Chief Secretary of TN, will be the government's nominees. M Selvam, retired professor of Bharathidasan University, and M Thangaraju, former V-C of Periyar University, will be the syndicate's nominees, and S Rajendran, professor and head of economics department of the Gandhigram Rural Institute, will be the senate's nominee.
Notably, the respective Acts governing these universities did not have a governor-chancellor's nominee in the search panel, unlike many other state universities. While the chancellor's nominees have been removed in some of these through 10 amendment bills cleared by the apex court, a few other universities still have the nominees.
It is to be noted that the 10 bills transferred the powers of appointing V-Cs in 18 state universities. Higher education department officials said search panels for all other state universities will be notified soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Ramadoss vs. Anbumani — the father-son feud in Tamil Nadu's Pattali Makkal Katchi
The story so far: After futile efforts of the Madras High Court to mediate a truce between Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) founder Dr. S. Ramadoss and his son Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss on Friday (August 8, 2025), the general body meeting of the party, convened by Mr. Anbumani, was held at Mamallapuram the next day (August 9), for the first time without its founder Mr. Ramadoss. It was resolved that Mr. Anbumani would continue as party president for a year until the next party election in August 2026. Pattali Makkal Katchi's ongoing leadership feud between Mr. Ramadoss and Mr. Anbumani has shocked the cadre and created a split within the party, causing conflict – right from senior leadership down to the grassroots. In districts where they are strong, there are two groups of office-bearers, claiming that they are the PMK office-bearers. When did Ramadoss-Anbumani spat begin? During the party's special general council meeting at Pattanur in Villupuram district on December 28, 2024, the father and son sparred publicly for the first time when Mr. Ramadoss announced P. Mukundan, his grandson (Ramadoss' elder daughter Gandhimathi's son), as the party's youth wing president. Mr. Anbumani objected saying that Mr. Mukundan (who is also his son-in-law) had joined the party only four months back and it was 'too soon'. Mr. Ramadoss rejected it and even asked Mr. Anbumani to leave the party if he cannot function as per his wishes. The next day, Mr. Anbumani called on his father at his Thailapuram residence and later told reporters that heated arguments or debates during general council meetings were normal. But, the conflict did not end there. A difference of opinion emerged between #PattaliMakkalKatchi founder #Ramadoss and his son and party president #AnbumaniRamadoss during the party's general council meeting at Pattanur in #Villupuram district on Saturday. Video: Special Arrangement — The Hindu - Chennai (@THChennai) December 28, 2024 Months later, Dr. Ramadoss announced his decision to remove Mr. Anbumani from the post of party president and took on the role himself, redesignating his son as the 'working president' during a press conference at his Thailapuram residence on April 10, 2025. After two days, Mr. Anbumani asserted that he would continue to be the party president as his appointment was approved by PMK's general council. Ramadoss-Anbumani rift widens Sharing the dais with Mr. Anbumani during the Vanniyar youth conference held after a gap of 12 years at Mamallapuram on May 11, Mr. Ramadoss hinted at cliques being formed within the party, which was seen as a veiled attack on his son and insisted that he would take the final call on PMK's alliance for the upcoming Tamil Nadu Assembly elections in 2026. His speech raised the eyebrows of senior PMK leaders. While the senior leadership expected that the issue would be resolved, but Dr. Ramadoss' weekly press conferences accusing Dr. Anbumani of violent attack against his own mother and non-performance as party president, escalated the feud as each faction attempted to consolidate the party under their leadership, forcing office-bearers, who had previously expressed their wished to see a quick resolution, siding with either Mr. Ramadoss or Mr. Anbumani. On May 16, more than 200 of the 216 district presidents and secretaries of the PMK did not turn up for a meeting called by Mr. Ramadoss at his Thailapuram residence. He attributed it to exhaustion, following their participation in Vanniyar Youth Conference. While addressing at a party meeting in Tiruvallur on June 15, reiterating that he would continue as party president, Mr. Anbumani sought 'forgiveness' saying, 'If Ayya [Mr. Ramadoss] is angry with me, I sincerely ask for his forgiveness. There is nothing big in apologising to father.' Reluctant to reconcile, the PMK founder even restrained his son from using his surname, allowing him to use only in the latter's initial. Making a serious allegation, Mr. Ramadoss, on July 11, stated that a bugging device was planted beneath his chair at his Thailapuram residence. A police investigation is underway. Days later, Mr. Ramadoss lodged a complaint with the Director-General of Police seeking to prevent Mr. Anbumani's 100-day padayatra across Tamil Nadu in order to 'reclaim the rights of the Tamil people,' citing that the campaign would cause law and order issues due to a possible clash between the two factions. However, minutes before the denial of police permission came, Mr. Anbumani had already kickstarted his padayatra at Thiruporur on July 25. PMK loses its sheen The root of the issue, many political observers say, lies with steady erosion of PMK's political capital, in the last 15 years. At one point, PMK was seen as a progressive force – which reserved the general secretary's post for Scheduled Caste, erected hundreds of Dr. Ambedkar's statues and gave plum ministries to Scheduled Castes. Today, the PMK is seen as its opposite, largely down to Dr. Ramadoss' problematic campaign of 'Nadaga Kadhal' against Dalit youths in the early years of the last decade to consolidate non-Dalit communities. The PMK's narrative was an attempt to appeal to the larger OBC communities, beyond the traditional Vanniyar strongholds, that are deeply conservative in rural Tamil Nadu and smaller towns. While it helped PMK, which was a part of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) comprising Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK), Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK) and others, in the short term as Mr. Anbumani won the three-cornered contest in 2014 Lok Sabha elections. However, PMK gradually began to lose its position as being the crucial piece in the winning alliance's jigsaw. In 2016, Mr. Anbumani launched a campaign that was called 'Maatram Munnetram Anbumani', pitching himself as a Chief Ministerial candidate, shedding the party's caste identity and in an attempt to attract young, new voters. It did not work. PMK's relationship with EPS-led AIADMK With the death of AIADMK leader J Jayalalithaa in December 2016, Mr. Ramadoss and Mr. Anbumani launched a blistering attack against the new AIADMK leadership, then led by former Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami and former Deputy Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam, on an almost daily basis for the next two years. However, in an inexplicable decision, the father and son formed an alliance with the AIADMK in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, losing their credibility and the elections. Mr. Anbumani has hinted that it was not his decision to form an alliance with AIADMK in 2019. After the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, they began a campaign to urge the AIADMK government to provide 20% reservation to Vanniyars within the most backward class category in jobs and education. The PMK was able to convince a desperate AIADMK government to pass a law in the State Assembly just before notification of the Assembly elections, on 10.5% internal reservations for the Vanniyars. Despite contesting in 23 seats as part of the alliance, the PMK won in just five. PMK in NDA Again, in 2024 Lok Sabha elections, when Salem West MLA R. Arul visited AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami's house, who had then left the NDA alliance, it was believed that PMK-AIADMK alliance was sealed. However, the PMK joined the NDA in the wee hours of the morning, which Mr. Ramadoss recently said he had agreed due to pressure exerted by his son Mr. Anbumani and his wife. The bone of contention The key disagreement between the father and the son seems to be about who would take crucial decisions within the party – office-bearer appointments, candidate selection and decision on alliance during elections. While Mr. Ramadoss always had the final say when it comes to most decisions in the PMK, with the appointment of Mr. Anbumani as party president in 2022, the dynamics began to change. Mr. Ramadoss reportedly was not comfortable with Mr. Anbumani sticking his hands into the former's pie. With the State Assembly elections just months away, it remains to be seen whether the father, Mr. Ramadoss and the son, Mr. Anbumani can patch up and see eye-to-eye to prevent further erosion of Pattali Makkal Katchi's political capital in the upcoming polls.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
DUSU poll candidates to sign Rs 1L anti-defacement bond
NEW DELHI: In a decisive move to curb defacement during student elections, the University of Delhi has mandated that every candidate contesting the Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) elections must sign a Rs 1 lakh anti-defacement bond. This new measure, inspired by the existing anti-ragging affidavit required at admission, binds candidates to strictly follow the election code of conduct and refrain from damaging or defacing university and college property. The initiative aims to promote responsible campaigning and preserve the cleanliness and integrity of DU's campuses. The notification, released on Friday, emphasises discipline, accountability, and adherence to legal standards, based on relevant Acts, court orders, and Lyngdoh Committee recommendations. Students must now submit an anti-defacement affidavit at the time of admission, similar to anti-ragging declarations. Colleges will organise orientation programmes on discipline and the protection of public property during campaigns. Two 'walls of democracy' will be designated in each institution for campaign posters. An online portal at both the university and college levels will allow students to report violations. Each candidate must sign a `1 lakh bond when filing nominations, pledging not to deface property. The use of false names must be reported to police within 24 hours. Violations can lead to fines of up to `25,000, suspension, rustication, expulsion, or disqualification. Campaigning restrictions include a ban on posters, rallies, roadshows, loudspeakers, and vehicles, while encouraging electronic outreach. Candidates may only use names from their secondary and senior secondary certificates, with changes permitted only through official government processes. Each college will form a College Committee for Prevention of Defacement of Property, while a university-level committee will monitor compliance. Candidate debates will be hosted and uploaded online. Outsider entry will be strictly controlled, with possible biometric checks.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Land acquisition delay: Madras HC summons chief secretary
MADURAI: Expressing displeasure at the state government's delay in releasing funds to the tune of Rs 25.4 crore towards acquisition of 9.5 acres of temple land in front of the court campus, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday summoned the chief secretary of Tamil Nadu for an explanation. If the amount is released by the next hearing on August 13, the authority need not appear, the court added. 'If the government is not able to spare a sum of Rs 25,42,21,775 for additional infrastructure to the high court in the state, it reflects the poor state of affairs prevailing in the state,' a bench of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan remarked. The bench, which was hearing a batch of petitions filed in connection with the said land parcel, was specifically constituted to monitor the acquisition process and issue directions as required. When the matter was heard in April this year, the bench had made serious observations over the delay and had directed the authorities to act swiftly considering the dire need of the land parcel for the court's use. Even then, there has been no major progress except exchange of communication between officers at the lower level, the judges said.
