Canada could produce first LNG by this weekend, sources say
HOUSTON, June 18 (Reuters) - Canada could produce its first ever liquefied natural gas this weekend, from the LNG Canada export facility in Kitimat, British Columbia, two people familiar with the startup of the plant told Reuters on Wednesday.
The facility, the first of a handful of Canadian LNG projects to begin production, will be the first LNG facility in North America with direct access to the Pacific coast, significantly reducing sail time to Asian markets.
When fully operational it will have a capacity to export 14 million metric tonnes per annum (mtpa), according to company statements.
"We began cooling down Train 1 on Monday and as long as there is no unforeseen difficulty we expect to produce LNG six days from Monday. So I would say between Saturday and Sunday we can expect first LNG," one of the people familiar with the startup told Reuters.
Cooldown of Train 1 is expected to continue until Thursday June 19 and extensive flaring is expected, LNG Canada told staff in a memo last Friday.
First LNG will be produced from Train 1, with first LNG cargoes by the middle of this year, LNG Canada told Reuters on Tuesday.
Only a portion of the processing plant will be operating this weekend, according the two sources.
Train 1 which has a capacity of 6.5 mtpa, or half of the total output of LNG Canada, has had difficulties with one of its lines and it will only produce at half its capacity until it is able to solve the problem, one of the two sources told Reuters.
LNG Canada did not comment on the production challenges.
LNG tanker Gaslog Glasgow is on its way to LNG Canada's Kitimat port, according to LSEG ship tracking data. The vessel is expected to arrive on June 29 and will be loaded with LNG, the people said.
It is now seven years since the partners, Shell Plc (SHEL.L), opens new tab, Petronas (PGAS.KL), opens new tab, (PGAS.KL), opens new tab, PetroChina (601857.SS), opens new tab, Mitsubishi Corporation (MITSBQ.UL) gave the project a financial go ahead.
Once LNG Canada enters service, Canadian gas exports to the U.S. will likely decline, traders said, as Canadian energy firms will have another outlet for their fuel and will sell more to other countries. For now, the U.S. is the only outlet for Canadian gas.
Canada exported about 8.6 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) of gas via pipelines to the U.S. in 2024, up from 8.0 bcfd in 2023 and an average of 7.5 bcfd over the prior five years (2018-2022), according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That compares with a record 10.4 bcfd in 2002.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Pernod Ricard launches restructuring plan as spirits sales slide
PARIS/LONDON, June 18 (Reuters) - Pernod Ricard ( opens new tab is streamlining its business by grouping brands into two main divisions, according to internal presentation slides seen by Reuters on Wednesday, as European spirits makers grapple with a downturn in sales. The French spirits maker told Reuters it had announced an "internal project to create a more agile and simplified organisation". "These changes imply the launch of local consultation processes with our social partners and employees where necessary," Pernod Ricard said. It did not comment on the number of jobs affected or the plan to group brands into two units.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Will the new Middle East crisis rock the world economy? The markets say no – but I fear they're wrong
Financial markets picked up the clear message when Donald Trump cut short his stay at the G7 summit in the Canadian Rockies this week. Despite calls from fellow western leaders to de-escalate the crisis, the president's early return to the White House was taken as a sign that the US is considering joining Israel in its military action against Iran. Trump says he wants Iran's unconditional surrender. This is where modern summitry came in half a century ago. In 1975, the first meeting of what eventually became the G7 was convened at Rambouillet in France in an attempt to work out a joint response to the oil shock that accompanied the Yom Kippur war between Israel and its neighbours. Back then, the impact of higher crude prices was immediate and brutal. The cost of crude rose fourfold in a matter of months and killed off the post-second world war boom, leading first to higher inflation and then to recession. A second dose of stagflation arrived a few years later when the Iran-Iraq war led to a further doubling of oil prices. Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990 again led to higher oil prices and weaker activity. History suggests the Middle East can cause all sorts of problems for the global economy. The response to the latest conflict has been much more muted. Oil prices have risen by about $10 a barrel but that will give only a modest upward jolt to inflation and certainly nothing to compare with the shocks of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. At least so far. The region has form and given the risks, the financial markets are taking a remarkably sanguine view of events, even though there are reasons for a moderate degree of optimism. The first oil shock of the mid-1970s was triggered by an embargo orchestrated by Opec, a producers' cartel that is less able to affect crude prices than it was half a century ago. Some countries – the US in particular – are much less dependent on imported oil than they once were. Wind and solar power provide alternatives to fossil fuels. The war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has been raging for almost two years, with only a small and short-lived impact on oil prices. All that said, it is less than three years since Russia's invasion of Ukraine led to a surge in global oil and gas prices, contributing to a cost of living crisis that is only just abating. The latest UK inflation figures released on Wednesday showed the annual increase in prices at 3.4% – well down on the recent 10.9% peak but still above the Bank of England's 2% target. The comparison between the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022 and Israel's attacks in the past week is not exact. Russia accounts for 17% of global gas production, while Iran is responsible for just 4% of oil production and China is the biggest customer for its crude exports. That helps explain why the financial markets have been relatively relaxed, with the $10 a barrel boost to oil prices reflecting a sense that the conflict will be contained. The US's potential involvement raises the stakes. One possibility is that the deployment of US military firepower will quickly overcome Iran's resistance and lead to regime change in Tehran. Another is that Iran will retaliate by seeking to close the strait of Hormuz, a narrow passage through which 20% of the world's oil passes daily. That would send the price of oil rocketing from its current $75 a barrel to well over $100 a barrel. The shock would be more severe and longer lasting were Russia and China to get dragged into the conflict. The markets are betting that none of this happens. Oil prices are at their current level because dealers think Iran has had its military capability depleted by Israel's attacks, that Iran would damage its own economy by seeking to close the strait of Hormuz, and that Russia and China will be wary of becoming involved. Things may indeed pan out this way, but the call by the non-US members of the G7 for a de-escalation of the crisis highlights the real risk that it might not. Western economies are still feeling the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, higher energy prices and a cost of living crisis, and could well do without another setback. Petrol prices are already set to rise, the first evidence of higher inflation and a fresh squeeze on disposable incomes. It goes without saying that it would be better for the global economy to avoid yet another Middle East oil shock. But if the financial markets have called it wrong and oil prices do start to spiral upwards, it is important that policymakers don't panic. Higher energy prices are initially inflationary but are then deflationary because they add to business costs and leave consumers with less money to spend. Central banks should resist the temptation to respond by raising interest rates because that would only add to the risks of recession and higher unemployment. Likewise, finance ministers should avoid raising taxes or cutting spending if weaker activity pushes the public finances deeper into the red. In the longer term, countries like the UK need to make themselves self-sufficient in renewable energy and thus reduce their exposure to the Middle East's fossil fuels. The lesson to be drawn from the damage caused by the repeated oil shocks since the 1970s is that we have been here before and it doesn't end well. Larry Elliott is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
US-Canada deal prospect offers hope but inflation a worry if tariffs remain, says BoC
By Promit Mukherjee OTTAWA, June 18 (Reuters) - The Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said on Wednesday that the prospect of a new Canada-U.S. trade deal offers hope that tariffs will be removed, but cautioned that inflation could rise if tariffs stayed in place. U.S. President Donald Trump and Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney this week agreed to reach a trade deal between the two countries in 30 days that could possibly resolve a trade conflict triggered by U.S. tariffs and the subsequent Canadian counter duties. "Restoring open trade between our countries is critical to jobs and growth in Canada," said Macklem in a speech in the Atlantic province of Newfoundland and Labrador. "It is also important for prices and inflation," he said, calling the understanding between the two leaders as "very welcome news." Trump has hit Canada with a barrage of tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles and Canada has retaliated with its own set of duties. The dispute between the two countries has hurt Canada's exports, and taken a toll on hiring and investment. "If tariffs are not removed, we expect they will be passed through to higher consumer prices," Macklem said in his speech. He said it was important for any deal between the two countries to roll back tariffs, given Canada's dependence on the U.S. market, which consumes three-fourth of its total exports. "But until we have a deal, inflation will be affected by both U.S. tariffs and Canadian counter-tariffs," Macklem said. Canada's annual inflation rate eased to 1.7% in April due to removal of some tax measures, but closely tracked core measures of inflation rose above the central bank's target range of 1% to 3%. The Bank of Canada has also raised concerns that underlying inflation has been rising faster than expected and there was a chance that tariffs could keep prices higher for longer, its summary of deliberations from the bank's last monetary policy meeting showed. If the current tariffs and counter-tariffs remain in place, past experience suggests pass-through of about 75% of the costs of tariffs over roughly 18 months, Macklem said. He warned that while the Canadian economy has avoided mass layoffs so far, if tariffs and uncertainty continue, households and businesses will likely remain cautious and at some point more businesses will cut jobs. (Reporting by Promit Mukherjee, Editing by Ismail Shakil) Keywords: CANADA CENBANK/
