
Understanding Your RMD Options Before Turning 73
Do I have to take an RMD?
As I turn 73 later this year, I've reached a significant, if dubious, milestone. I'm now subject to Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs). It's worth taking a moment to celebrate reaching this point. Having to take RMDs suggests that I've accumulated enough assets to require such withdrawals. I'd rather be in this position than having nothing to distribute.
But now, like many other individuals turning age 73, I have to make some decisions. My RMDs will be subject to ordinary income tax, and that's a concern. I'm still working and don't need the income. Nonetheless, I have to start taking my RMDs soon, and this means more income taxes and an increase in my Medicare premiums because of the dreaded IRMAA penalty.
Fortunately, I have some options. And if you're in a similar situation, so do you.
Preplanning as an option
The basic formula for RMDs is straightforward. You take the sum of your qualifying accounts (traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, etc.) and divide that number by an IRS life expectancy factor. The resulting number is the amount you must take in the year you turn 73 - or suffer a 25% penalty. However, with preplanning you have several options for determining what that sum of accounts will equal when you turn 73. That number can be lowered.
In my case, several years ago I took two steps to significantly improve my RMD situation by initiating a Roth conversion and purchasing a Qualified Longevity Annuity Contract (QLAC). The Roth conversion lowered my balances that are subject to lifetime RMDs. And, the QLAC I purchased delays when I must start taking RMDs on those funds. My QLAC will not be subject to RMDs for years down the road.
Another planning opportunity exists if you're still working. Employment allows you delay some of your RMDs. For example, if you are still employed this year, you typically don't have to take RMDs on your workplace 401(k) account until you retire.
The point is you're not necessarily stuck with high RMDs at age 73. You can do some preplanning to lower and/or delay taxable withdrawals.
Now what?
If you are turning 73 anytime this year, first ask yourself if you need the money, or is this just more income being imposed on you that'll increase your taxes? If you need the money, RMDs are not really an issue. Take the money, pay the tax, and enjoy retirement. If, however, these distributions are unwanted current income, consider your options going forward:
Take this year's RMD when you reach age 73
Since your RMD is based on your account's value for end-of-year 2024, there's no market timing involved. You know your account balance and your age. Your RMD is set, and you can take the distribution now. For example, assume your accounts that are subject to RMDs totaled $1 million at the end of 2024. Your age 73 factor is 26.5, so you'll need to take at least $37,736 this year to satisfy your RMD. This is true irrespective of whether your account values have since slid down or increased.
Wait to take this year's RMD until the end of the year
This approach might help you better assess your overall tax situation, as you'll likely have a clearer picture of your final taxable income for the year. For example, you may unexpectedly decide to retire this year – causing your income tax bracket to be lower next year. Having this information may help you decide whether to take your RMD this year or consider using the next option.
Defer this year's RMD until next year
In your first year of RMDs there is a tempting opportunity to procrastinate. The law grants a one-time option to defer taking your first RMD payment until the following year, as long as you take it by April 1 of that year. This option is appealing because it allows more time to implement tax-efficient strategies. However, a significant downside is that this would require you to take two RMDs in the same tax year. Next year you would have to double up your RMDs. While this strategy might save taxes in 2025, it could significantly increase your taxes – and other costs – in 2026.
For example, if you have a high income this year and expect it to continue into next year, delaying your RMD may inflict costs beyond additional ordinary income taxes. The extra RMD you take next year could cause you to be in a higher capital gains bracket, put you in a higher threshold for IRMAA's Medicare premiums, or subject you to the Net Investment Income (NII) tax. Piling taxable income into one year often generates increased expenses.
Which is the best option?
what's the solution?
When turning age 73, tax modeling is crucial. First, identify all your accounts that are subject to RMDs. Then, assess their availability and liquidity. Although you'll be able to calculate your RMDs early in the year, you have some flexibility as to whether and when to take them.
The key next step is to decide from which accounts you want to withdraw your RMDs. RMDs must be calculated separately for each account, but the total amount of your RMDs can sometimes be withdrawn from any one or a combination of your accounts. For example, you can aggregate an IRA and SEP IRA account and take your combined RMDs out of only one account. Be careful though. Aggregation of RMDs is not permitted in some cases, for example if you have a 401(k) and an IRA.
Also, be sure to have the liquidity available to take the distribution in cash. If your accounts are heavily concentrated in equities, consider transferring your liquid funds into the accounts that will be used to satisfy your RMDs.
Finally, if you truly don't need the additional income, and have a charitable bent, consider directing your RMDs (maximum of $108,000 in 2025) to a qualified charitable distribution (QCD). As early as age 70 ½ you can use a QCD to directly transfer money from your IRA to a qualified charity. As long as certain rules are met QCDs can be counted toward satisfying your RMDs for the year. Rather than having to deduct your charitable contribution from your tax return, you directly offset your RMD obligation, a far better tax result.
Planning for Future RMDs
Choosing when, where and how to take RMDs in the first two years is just one part of the strategy. You should also plan for subsequent years. Continued Roth conversions, additional QLAC purchases, and utilizing QCDs can further shield your assets from the tax sting of future RMDs.
Roth conversions remain a compelling option even when you're subject to RMDs. Roth accounts do not have lifetime RMDs, providing tax-free growth for later distributions. However, you cannot use Roth conversions as a way to avoid current RMDs on accounts you have; plus, converting will increase your taxable income, potentially compounding your current tax headaches. Still, depending on your future tax situation, Roth conversions may work well in the long run.
Another plan for the future is to create or increase QLACs. In 2025, the total limit for QLACs is $210,000. This financial instrument reduces the IRA balance subject to RMDs by allowing an annuity purchase to defer income well into the future. For example, if you purchase a QLAC at age 73 and the annuity payments in your QLAC are scheduled to begin at age 80, you have deferred RMDs – and saved taxes - for seven years. Once you begin, however, your payments are subject to income taxation. Accordingly, much like Roth conversions, this approach demands careful tax management.
A hassle or an opportunity?
Selecting the best RMD strategy involves weighing your current financial needs against long-term objectives. A holistic approach ensures that you meet immediate cash flow requirements while managing tax liabilities and maintaining flexibility in retirement. Don't just put off RMDs; figure out how to best manage your retirement income and taxes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Warner Bros. Eyes Mid 2026 For Full Separation
Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. is splitting itself in half, unshackling its fast-growing streaming business from the struggling legacy media channels and setting up two independent companies that could pursue deals on their own. Bloomberg's Felix Gillette has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)


Skift
25 minutes ago
- Skift
Marriott Chases Lower Price Points With $100-a-Night Rooms
Marriott has realized it has been been leaving money on the table by primarily catering to expense-account travelers and vacationers in the luxury and upscale segments. Marriott opened its first mid-market extended stay hotel last week, a milestone in its bid to capture budget-conscious travelers seeking apartment-style accommodations. It also pits the company against established players like Extended Stay America and Choice Hotels, as well as newer entrants like Hilton. The 124-room StudioRes property in Fort Myers, Florida was developed by Concord Hospitality for approximately $13 million with help from private equity firm Whitman Peterson. It offers studio-style rooms, full kitchens, and designated work areas. "We just feel really good about the momentum that should build off of this opening in less than a year from announcing the brand and from the others that are already under construction," Noah Silverman, Marriott's global development officer for the U.S. and Canada, told Skift. Marriott plans 40 more StudioRes properties through 2027, and said it is in talks for hundreds of potential deals across 150 U.S. markets.


New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Power conference commissioners voice confidence in House settlement: ‘Our schools want rules'
The leaders of college sports' most powerful conferences voiced their confidence in the recently approved House settlement Monday, shepherding in a new era of college athletics in which schools can begin directly paying college athletes on July 1. 'The decision (to approve the settlement) on Friday is a significant step forward toward building long-term stability for college sports while protecting the system from bad actors seeking to exploit confusion and uncertainty,' SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said. Advertisement The newly formed College Sports Commission (CSC) held a news conference Monday morning featuring commissioners of the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC. Established in the wake of Friday's approval of the House settlement, the CSC will oversee the implementation and enforcement of settlement terms, shifting much of the responsibility away from the NCAA. Bryan Seeley, the former head of investigations for Major League Baseball, has been announced as CEO and will report to a board comprised of the power conference commissioners. Those commissioners addressed a settlement that intends to reshape the college sports industry and install guardrails on name, image and likeness (NIL) payments that have become unregulated and sparked repeated legal challenges in recent years. 'Ultimately, it is incumbent upon everyone involved in college sports … to make the terms of this settlement work. We must be committed and embrace both the realities and opportunities ahead,' said Sankey, who acknowledged that there will be 'challenges and growing pains.' 'While this settlement does not solve every issue, it establishes a solid foundation for stability and a sustainable future,' Sankey said. The CSC has been tasked with oversight of the settlement's new revenue-sharing pool, which will be capped at roughly $20.5 million per school in the first year, as well as third-party NIL deals via the new NIL Go clearinghouse. NIL Go, which will evaluate any third-party NIL payments worth at least $600, is expected to be up and running this week and will determine whether those deals represent a valid business purpose and fall within an approved range of compensation. Those that don't fit the criteria will be flagged and forced to be adjusted or taken to arbitration. The aim is to stamp out the unchecked 'pay-for-play' deals popularized by NIL collectives. Advertisement The power conference commissioners did not offer specifics Monday on what the enforcement and penalties might look like under the CSC, but ACC commissioner Jim Phillips stated that Seeley will have a lot of input on those areas moving forward. Even prior to Friday's approval, there has been no shortage of questions or doubts from those inside and outside college sports about the viability of the settlement terms and the CSC's ability to enforce these new rules. 'It all sounds great in theory, but how will it actually work?' one power conference athletic director recently posited to The Athletic. The commissioners made clear in no uncertain terms Monday that they expect strict adherence and buy-in from their member schools. 'It's progress over perfection,' Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark said. 'Our schools want rules and we're providing rules and we will be governed by those rules. And if you break those rules, the ramifications will be punitive.' Part of that process includes 'participation agreements' in which the schools agree to comply with the terms of the settlement and not seek legal action, regardless of any differences and discrepancies with state laws. Yormark, who said that the agreement 'codifies the rules of settlement,' described it as a 'work in progress' within the Big 12 but one that has received no pushback and that he plans to execute in short order. Sankey stated at the SEC spring meetings last month that all 16 conference members approved of the agreement. 'We want oversight, we want guardrails, we want structure. (Administrators and coaches) don't have the luxury to just say that in meeting rooms. They don't have the luxury to just be anonymous sources,' Sankey said. 'They have a responsibility to make what they've sought, what they've asked for, to make it work.' Advertisement Buy-in from schools and conferences won't necessarily prevent continued legal battles from outside parties — part of the potential challenges that were referenced. There could be future lawsuits or complaints on the basis of Title IX or antitrust violations. (The commissioners did state that decisions on how the revenue sharing pool will be distributed will be made on a school-by-school basis.) To that end, the NCAA and power conferences, as part of the College Sports Commission, will continue to lobby Congress for things like antitrust exemptions and federal legislation that preempts state laws and addresses athlete employment status. Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti said he hopes the settlement will provide a foundation that encourages Congress to take action, and Sankey acknowledged that he and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua played golf with President Donald Trump on Sunday to discuss some of these same issues. There is no timetable for if or when Congress will take action, but lobbying efforts will continue in Washington, D.C.'I don't know if there is an exact timeline, but there is a sense of urgency, for sure,' said Yormark. 'I don't think we have to sell them on the topic, we just have to land in the right place that works for both parties on the Hill, and I think we're getting closer.'