Plea to remove unregulated barricades with advertisements installed on roads
A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete sought response of the authorities to a petition filed by A. Azhagesan of Kanniyakumari district.
The petitioner also sought a direction to instruct Corporation, Municipality and local bodies to give effect to Rule 326 (22) and Rule 337 (1) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, frame standing orders for placement and procurement of barricades, reduce the size of the plate covers to one-fourth of the total width of the barricade for installing advertisements or police instructions making the road visible to riders, drivers and commuters, within a time frame.
He said that in the last decade the number of vehicles plying on the roads had multiplied. It is just and necessary for the authorities to maintain the public roads and streets as road worthy and motorable for all categories of vehicles and ensure the safety and well being of the commuters. The authorities have undertaken no major scientific studies and no concrete effective steps to resolve the traffic problems, he complained.
Barricades were being put up in the middle of the roads in an unplanned and unscientific manner posing a threat to the drivers and commuters. These barricades were put up at various junctions with an intention to reduce the speed of vehicles and also allow the pedestrians to cross the road. However, instead of reducing accidents, the barricades have been the reason for accidents including fatal ones. The barricades do not have any reflectors or warning sign boards, the petitioner said and sought a direction for removal of unregulated barricades. The case was posted for hearing after two weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Money laundering probe: ED raids Tamil Nadu minister I Periyasamy's residence, other properties ; Madras HC orders retrial
CHENNAI: Enforcement Directorate ( ) officials on Saturday launched fresh search operations at properties linked to state rural development minister I Periyasamy in Chennai and his hometown Dindigul. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Simultaneous searches were carried out at his official residence on Greenways Road and at his house and other properties in Dindigul. While the minister was in Dindigul, a five-member ED team reached his official residence around 7am, accompanied by two CRPF personnel for security. Though the ED has not disclosed the background of the searches, it may be noted that the Madras High Court recently overturned the order of the Dindigul trial court, which had acquitted the DMK leader and his family in the Rs 2.01 crore disproportionate assets case. The case relates to the alleged accumulation of assets worth Rs 2.01 crore between 2006 and 2010, investigated by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC). A chargesheet was filed against Periyasamy, his wife Suseela, and sons Senthilkumar and Prabhu. Although the trial court acquitted all of them, Justice P Velmurugan of the Madras High Court in April set aside the order and directed a fresh trial.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Corporation tender lapses: Madras HC raps DVAC , questions prosecution nod delay
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has questioned the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) over the delay in obtaining sanction from the competent authorities of the government to prosecute the accused persons in the alleged Rs 98.25 crore tender irregularities in Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) and Coimbatore Corporation (CC) when SP Velumani was the municipal administration minister during the previous AIADMK government. Velumani and some government officials, including two IAS officers, have been arraigned as accused. Justice N Anand Venkatesh, in a recent order, directed respondent DVAC SP to file additional affidavit explaining why there was substantial delay in obtaining sanction. He directed the special court for cases registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) in Chennai to submit a report on the delay in taking on file the charge sheets filed by the DVAC against the accused persons and companies as per orders passed in another contempt petition on April 4, 2024.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court orders inspection of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham campus run by Mata Amritanandamayi Math
The Madras High Court has directed the Forest Department officials to inspect the Mata Amritanandamayi Math-run Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, a deemed university campus at Ettimadai, located at the foothills of Bouluvampatty ranges of the Western Ghats in Coimbatore district, and find out whether it fully complies with the 17 conditions imposed before granting building permission. A special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy directed the jurisdictional District Forest Officer (DFO) to conduct the inspection along with amici curiae T. Mohan, Chevanan Mohan, Rahul Balaji, and M. Santhanaraman on a convenient date to all the parties concerned, and submit a detailed report before the court on or before September 12, 2025. The orders were passed after senior counsel R. Sankaranarayanan, representing the Math, told the court that the institution was fully in compliance of the 17 conditions imposed by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force) on January 18, 2024, for converting 12.622 hectares of agricultural dry lands for educational purposes, and that it was also open to any inspection. 'If there are any defects, we will cure it immediately,' the senior counsel said after the High Court in July this year suo motu impleaded the Math as one of the respondents to a public interest litigation (PIL) petition related to the protection of forests and elephant corridors. The Math was impleaded following a complaint that it had erected a two-kilometre-long electric fence, disturbing free movement of elephants. Filing an affidavit on behalf of the Math, its authorised signatory G. Gopakumar, 54, residing on the Ettimadai campus, said: 'We have erected green solar smart fencing in the border areas of our patta (revenue document related to private land ownership) lands by complying with the technical specifications formulated by the Tamil Nadu Power Fences (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2023.' He pointed out that one of the 17 conditions imposed by the PCCF permits fencing around the lands in conformity with the 2023 Rules. He also asserted that the institution had provided a 150-metre vacant buffer zone between the lands belonging to the institution and the border of the forest areas in order to ensure free movement of all kinds of wild animals, including elephants. 'We have provided three troughs and supply water through pipelines for drinking by forest animals. We ensure the availability of water at all times. We also allow the existing natural stream running through our patta lands without any obstruction or alteration of direction. We grow mainly forest trees which do not attract forest animals,' the affidavit filed by Mr. Gopakumar read. Stating that Mata Amritanandamayi, a spiritual leader fondly called Amma by her followers, firmly believes in showing compassion towards all living beings, the deponent of the affidavit said, she always promotes harmony in nature and insists on protecting plants and animals too. He also stated that the Math runs educational institutions because she believes that education would eradicate poverty.
