logo
Poll shows Missourians unsure of state income tax elimination, national TikTok ban

Poll shows Missourians unsure of state income tax elimination, national TikTok ban

Yahoo18-03-2025

A new statewide poll provides a glimpse into how Missourians feel about current political leaders, the state of the economy, public education policies and policing at both the state and national levels. Particularly, voters were asked about the proposed elimination of Missouri's state income tax and policies of cellphones in schools.
Saint Louis University and YouGov surveyed 900 likely Missouri voters from Feb. 18 to March 2. The margin of error for the survey results is 3.64%.
With Republicans in power in both federal and state governments, a majority of those surveyed approve of elected leadership and believe both the country and Missouri are on the right track and headed in a good direction. However, people are still pessimistic about the economy, with 84% of responders rating the national economy as fair or poor. This is the worst rating the survey has recorded since February 2023, Steve Rogers, the poll director and a political scientist at St. Louis University, said.
"In this, there's a little bit of a conundrum in which it's like ... people think it's still not very strong, but then they're very approving of the political actors, which is probably reflecting polarization, kind of within the state and country," he said.
Republican state lawmakers have been pushing for Missouri to eliminate the income tax and instead depend on sales tax for revenue. While voters generally seem in support of the proposal, many still remain unsure, according to the poll results.
The poll showed total 52% people supported the elimination with 25% opposing and 23% not sure. Answers largely fell along political lines, with 73% of Republicans surveyed in support. A large portion of Democrats, 30%, were unsure and 47% were opposed. Regionally, most of those in Southwest Missouri, 58%, supported the elimination of the tax though 21% were still unsure and 21% were opposed.
The poll also asked which transactions responders would be most willing to tax to make up for the lost revenue if the income tax was eliminated. Even more people were unsure at 46% total. From the options provided, 15% selected professional services like accounting and legal services to make up the revenue. Those in Southwest Missouri also largely chose professional services and personal care services like salons as the alternative. Other options included auto and home repair services, real estate transfers and inheritances. For this question, the sample size was 450, with a 5.3% margin of error.
Rogers said the uncertainty about how to make up revenue is likely due to the complexities of government. He noted the survey also asked in which areas voters would be most willing to cut spending, but that dataset is still being processed.
"In other research I've done more nationwide, individuals, for example, don't have a very good comprehension of, like, state budgets themselves, like even the size of state budgets, or what is kind of going into it," Rogers said. "So, then here it may be something where, if we're kind of having this debate about taxes and things like that, we need to kind of inform voters a little bit more about what are the alternatives and the options."
State Rep. Jamie Gragg, a Republican from Ozark, filed a bill this session to outlaw student use of cellphones in schools during any instructional time. The bill would require districts to adopt a written policy for the 2025-26 school year prohibiting cellphone or other internet-connected device in any elementary, middle or high school during "regularly scheduled instructional activities."
The poll asked voters whether they were in favor or opposed to such a measure at each educational level. Across all three school levels, most people were supportive of the restrictions, with 76% in support for elementary schools, 75% for middle schools, and 70% for high schools.
The poll also included several questions about requiring Missouri public schools to teach several different subjects. A strong majority of responders were in support of requiring schools to teach about the importance of the right to freedom of speech, how to identify online misinformation, the purpose and acceptable use of social media platforms, social media's negative effects on mental health, and how to appropriately use artificial intelligence in educational and workplace settings.
The poll also asked whether people were in favor of providing each student a personal laptop or tablet to use in the classroom for educational purposes at each educational level. While for elementary schools opinions were mixed with both those in favor and opposed at around 43%, more favored providing students with personal tech devices in middle and high school.
Ashley Burle, the associate poll director and director of graduate admission at SLU's School of Education, said that a significant difference was noticeable between white and Black voters on the topic of technology provided to elementary school students. Where 72% of Black voters favored providing laptops or tablets at the elementary level, only 40% of white voters did the same.
Overall, ratings for public schools in their local communities and in Missouri remain negative. Local public schools were rated as fair or poor by 55% of voters and public schools across the state were rated as fair or poor by 66% of respondents. Based on last year's results, the ratings of schools within the community have worsened by about a percentage point, whereas perceptions of schools statewide actually improved by 7 percentage points.
Burle said there are several factors, both local and otherwise, that can influence perceptions of the state of public schools, whether that be how well local schools address parent concerns or if any controversies are present on local boards.
Last week, the Missouri legislature sent a bill to the governor's desk that would put the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department in the hands of a state board, rather than a local one as is currently the case. If the legislation becomes law, St. Louis would join Kansas City in being controlled by a board appointed by the governor and Missouri Senate, becoming the only major U.S. cities with a police force under state control, according to Missouri Independent reporting.
The poll showed most people favor leaving both cities' police in the hands of local leadership, though many were unsure. While there haven't been any conversations around the Springfield Police Department being controlled by the state, the poll posed the question to voters.
A stronger majority than for either Kansas City or St. Louis favored keeping Springfield's police department under local control. Unsurprisingly, Southwest Missourians felt the strongest from all regions, with 68% of them supporting local control.
President Donald Trump has pledged to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education, with widespread reports that an executive order to do so was in the works. The department announced last week nearly 50% of the workforce will be cut.
The poll indicates Missourians are mostly opposed to the notion of eliminating the department with 42% and 10% being strongly opposed and somewhat opposed respectively. Still, more than a third indicated they either strongly or somewhat supported the elimination. While 87% of Democrats strongly opposed, 43% of Republicans strongly supported the elimination.
Regionally, Southwest Missourians were relatively varied in their opinions. In total, 48% were either strongly or somewhat in support and a total 43% were either strongly or somewhat opposed, with 9% not sure.
Rogers said the fairly collective opposition to shutting down the department stands out against the likely voters' strong approval of Trump. The president received a 56% approval rating, which is the highest the poll has seen, Rogers said, only trailing the 53% approval ratings of former Gov. Mike Parson and Sen. Josh Hawley in 2021. The responses to the poll ended March 2, ahead of several decisions related to the Department of Education.
More: Missouri colleges, districts monitoring U.S. Department of Education's potential closure
With a lot of back-and-forth surrounding the federal ban on TikTok, one of the questions asked Missourians to weigh in on whether the federal government should outlaw social media platforms owned by foreign corporations.
Voters appear to have mixed feelings on the topic. In total, 46% respondents were in favor of such a ban, but 34% and 20% were opposed and not sure, respectively. Younger people were more stringently opposed, with 64% of 18- to 29-year-olds not in support of a ban. Republicans were the most strongly in favor of a ban, with 62% agreeing.
Currently, TikTok is facing an April 5 deadline for the owner ByteDance to divest the app. According to USA Today reporting, President Donald Trump is working with "four different groups" interested in purchasing TikTok.
As technology continues to advance and artificial intelligence has become an increasingly prominent talking point, several questions covered policies surrounding restrictions on the use of AI.
Most people were supportive of prohibiting students from using AI on schoolwork and prohibiting the use of AI-generated content in political advertisements. Likewise, even a stronger majority across political party lines supported requiring political advertisements to include a disclaimer if they contain AI-generated content.
Marta Mieze covers local government at the News-Leader. Have feedback, tips or story ideas? Contact her at mmieze@news-leader.com.
This article originally appeared on Springfield News-Leader: Missouri poll checks thoughts on income tax, cellphones in schools

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

time28 minutes ago

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.

What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically

time36 minutes ago

What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into pardons and other executive actions issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden — launching an extraordinary effort to show that the Democrat hid his cognitive decline and was otherwise too mentally impaired to do the job. Trump, who turns 79 this month, has long questioned the mental acuity and physical stamina of Biden, and is now directing his administration to use governmental investigative powers to try and back up those assertions. Biden, 82, and now undergoing treatment for prostate cancer, dismissed Trump's actions as 'ridiculous.' Here's a look at what Trump is alleging, what impact it could have, and why the country may never have seen anything like this before. Trump directed his White House counsel and attorney general to begin an investigation into his own allegations that Biden aides hid from the public declining mental acuity in their boss. Trump is also casting doubts on the legitimacy of the Biden White House's use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. It marks a significant escalation in Trump's targeting of political adversaries, and could lay the groundwork for arguments by leading Republicans in Congress and around the country that a range of Biden's actions as president were invalid. 'Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president,' Trump said Thursday. He then went further, suggesting that rogue elements within the Biden administration might have effectively faked the president's signature and governed without his knowledge — especially when it came to pushing policies that appeased the Democratic Party's far-left wing. 'He didn't have much of an idea what was going on,' Trump said, though he also acknowledged that he had no evidence to back up those assertions. A Trump fundraising email released a short time later carried the heading, 'A robot ran the country?' Legal experts are skeptical about that the investigation will do much more than fire up Trump's core supporters. 'I think it's more of a political act than one that will have any legal effect,' said Richard Pildes, a constitutional law scholar at New York University School of Law. He added: 'I think it's designed to continue to fuel a narrative that the administration wants to elevate, but courts are not going to second-guess these sorts of executive actions' undertaken by Biden. Trump has long questioned the legitimacy of pardons his predecessor issued for his family members and other administration officials just before leaving office on Jan. 20, people whom Biden was worried could be targeted by a Trump-led Justice Department. But Trump has more recently suggested Biden was unaware of immigration policies during his own administration, and said Thursday that aides to his predecessor pushed social issues like transgender rights in ways Biden might not have agreed with. It is well-established that a president's executive orders can easily be repealed by a successor issuing new executive actions — something Trump has done repeatedly since retaking the White House. That lets Trump wipe out Biden administration policies without having to prove any were undertaken without Biden's knowledge — though his predecessor's pardons and judicial appointments can't be so easily erased. 'When it comes to completed legal acts like pardons or appointing judges,' Pildes said, a later president 'has no power to overturn those actions.' Autopens are writing tools that allow a person's signature to be affixed automatically to documents. The Justice Department, under Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognized the use of an autopen by presidents to sign legislation and issue pardons for decades — and even Trump himself acknowledges using it. 'Autopens to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country and you want to get them back,' Trump said Thursday. Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt said the 'consensus view is that, as long as the president has directed the use of the autopen in that particular instance, it is valid.' 'The only issue would be if someone else directed the use of the autopen without the President's approval,' Kalt, an expert on pardons, wrote in an email. Yes. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution bestows the president with the power 'to grant Reprieves and Pardons.' 'A president's pardons cannot be revoked. If they could, no pardon would ever be final,' American University politics professor Jeffrey Crouch, author of a book on presidential pardons, said in an email. 'There is no legal obstacle I am aware of to a president using an autopen on a pardon.' Kent Greenfield, a Boston College law professor, said, 'Once you pardon somebody, you can't go back and un-pardon them.' 'If it's done with a president's authority, I don't think it matters whether it's done with an autopen or not,' Greenfield added. 'The president's authority is the president's authority.' Trump's suggestions that Biden's administration effectively functioned without his knowledge on key policy matters go beyond questions about pardons and the president using the autopen. Even there, though, the Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution. At the time, Trump celebrated the ruling as a 'BIG WIN' because it extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against him on charges he plotted to overturn his 2020 election loss. Such immunity would likely cover Biden as a former president. It might not extend to Biden administration officials allegedly acting without his knowledge — though Trump himself acknowledged he's not seen evidence of that occurring. Biden has dismissed Trump's investigation as 'nothing more than a mere distraction.' 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he said in a statement. In a word, no. There have been allegations of presidents being impaired and having their administrations controlled by intermediaries more than the public knew — including Edith Wilson, who effectively managed access to her husband, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson, after his serious stroke in 1919. Wilson's critics grumbled about a shadow presidency controlled by his wife, but the matter was never formally investigated by Congress, nor was it a major source of criticism for Wilson's Republican successor, Warren G. Harding. More recently, some questioned whether President John F. Kennedy struggled more than was publicly known at the time with Addison's Disease and debilitating back pains while in office. And there were questions about whether dementia might have affected Ronald Reagan during his second term, before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994, five years after he left office.

High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha
High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha

(NewsNation) — The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected legal precedent that people in a majority group have a higher standard for proving discrimination. Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha agrees with the high court decision. 'Discrimination doesn't say, 'Oh, you have to be black,' or, 'You have to be a woman,' or, 'You have to be gay.' … Discrimination means you're treating me different,' he says on 'CUOMO.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store