South Korea's Ruling Party Wants to Allow Companies to Issue Stablecoins: Bloomberg
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung's Democratic Party submitted a bill to parliament that would allow qualifying companies to issue stablecoins, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.
The Digital Asset Basic Act is aimed at improving transparency and encouraging competition in cryptocurrency, Bloomberg said. Companies would be able to issue their own stablecoins provided they have at least 500 million won ($368,000) in equity capital and can guarantee refunds through reserves as well as receiving approval from the Financial Services Commission.
Lee, voted in as president last week, made a number of promises to South Korea's crypto industry during his election campaign, appealing to the nation's 15 million crypto investors. Among them, he said the country should support a won-based stablecoin market "to prevent national wealth from leaking overseas," the Korea Herald reported.
Stablecoins are tokens pegged to the value of a traditional financial asset, such as a fiat currency, with the U.S. dollar being comfortably the most prevalent. Their stability provides a counterweight to the volatility of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin BTC and ether ETH, allowing users to hold capital in digital assets without having to worry about wild swings in price.
The sector, which is dominated by Tether's USDT, has experienced a surge in interest this year thanks to, among other factors, progress toward regulation of the sector in the U.S.
The strength of the stablecoin sector has been highlighted in the last week by the strong performance of USDC issuer Circle's stock (CRCL) following its initial public offering (IPO). The shares more than quadrupled during the first three days of trading. In addition, market cap of the sector reached $250 billion for the first time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
David Hogg faces possible ouster from DNC after re-election vote
The Brief The DNC voted to hold a new election for two vice chair positions, including David Hogg's. A Credentials Committee complaint alleged the February vote violated party procedures. Hogg says the move is politically motivated amid his calls to challenge party leadership. David Hogg may lose his seat as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee after the party voted to redo its February officer election, citing procedural concerns — and stoking deeper tensions over Hogg's confrontational approach to party reform. DNC members voted overwhelmingly this week to re-run the elections for two vice chair roles, including the one held by Hogg, a 25-year-old activist and rising progressive voice. The resolution passed with 75% of ballots cast in favor, following a complaint from party activist Kalyn Free alleging that the original election process violated DNC parliamentary rules and disadvantaged women of color candidates. The re-election will be held June 12–17. Hogg is eligible to run again but could lose his position depending on the outcome. The backstory The complaint, submitted after the Feb. 1 officer vote, argued that the DNC's tabulation method violated the party's charter and failed to follow proper procedure. Last month, the DNC Credentials Committee agreed, voting to recommend a re-vote. While DNC officials emphasized the decision was based on procedural fairness — not personalities — the re-election comes at a politically sensitive time for Hogg. Big picture view Hogg, who rose to national prominence as a survivor of the 2018 Parkland school shooting, has since become a forceful advocate for generational change in the Democratic Party. Through his PAC "Leaders We Deserve," he pledged to raise $20 million to primary challenge older Democrats in safe blue districts — a move that drew internal criticism. Earlier this year, leaked audio from a private Zoom call revealed DNC Chair Ken Martin expressing frustration with Hogg's efforts, telling him, "You essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to." Following that conversation, Martin offered Hogg a choice: step down from his DNC role or stop organizing primary challenges through his PAC. While Hogg declined to step down, he now faces an electoral threat to his position. What they're saying Hogg has framed the re-vote as "an expedited plan to remove me as vice chair," adding that while the vote was "based on how the DNC conducted its officers' elections, which I had nothing to do with, it is also impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party." Kalyn Free, the party member who initiated the complaint, pushed back on that interpretation, telling Fox News Digital, "This was never about Malcolm Kenyatta or David Hogg. For me, this was about ensuring that the Democratic Party lives up to our ideals as the only political party to believe in and stand up for election integrity and a free and fair democracy." Kenyatta, who received the most votes in the February election and also holds a vice chair role, criticized the idea that the story should center on Hogg at all. "Any story about this that neatly places this into a narrative about David Hogg is wrong," Kenyatta said. "I worked my a– off to get this role and have done the job every day since I've held it… Even though he clearly wants it to be [about him]." What's next The DNC's new vote will include only those candidates who were eligible for the third ballot in February: Hogg, Kenyatta, Kalyn Free, Jeanna Repass, and Shasti Conrad. According to DNC rules, one vice chair position must be held by a male, while the other can be held by a candidate of any gender. Voting will begin June 12. The Source This article is based on official statements from the Democratic National Committee, reporting from Politico and Fox News Digital, and direct quotes from DNC officials and candidates involved in the election dispute. The re-vote was initiated after the DNC Credentials Committee found violations of procedure in the original February election. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race
Whoever wins will immediately be squaring off against Republicans as they prepare for splashy hearings this summer on immigration enforcement, LGBTQ rights and former President Joe Biden's age and mental condition while in office. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As they hear from the candidates, Democrats are weighing many of the factors that were in play late last year, when Connolly, a veteran member of the committee, fended off a challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. Advertisement A look at how the race is shaping up: The age factor The debate over Biden's age coincides with a reckoning over seniority and generational change happening across the Democratic Party. Four House Democrats are running for the position: Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, the acting ranking member; Jasmine Crockett of Texas, a viral sensation; Robert Garcia, a former Los Angeles County mayor who has pitched colleagues on a government reform agenda; and Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, former president of the NAACP and civil rights advocate. Advertisement While Lynch is the most senior of the four, Democrats broadly said they are more open to breaking from seniority than they were in December, when Connolly, then 74, beat out Ocasio-Cortez, 35, for the job. Democrats are interested in how the candidates would communicate with the public, how they would help support lawmakers in battleground districts — and of course, how they would challenge President Donald Trump and his administration. How the four Democrats are making their case Crockett, 44, has pitched herself as the candidate best able to compete with Trump's pugnacious and attention-grabbing style. Democrats, Crockett has argued, often fail to connect with voters and explain why the president's actions may be harmful. She believes she can. 'It's a matter of bringing that in, having a hearing and making sure that we are translating it and amplifying it,' Crockett told MSNBC in an interview. 'Communications has to be a full-on strategy.' Garcia, 47, has focused on government reform and effectiveness, a key issue for Democrats after the Trump administration's blitz across federal agencies and mass firings of federal workers by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. Mfume, 76, has attracted support from members impressed by his longtime stewardship of the nation's oldest civil rights group. He returned to Congress after decades leading the NAACP following the death of a previous Democratic Oversight chair, the late Congressman Elijah Cummings, a fellow Baltimore Democrat. Lynch, 70, has styled himself as the acting chair and the lawmaker best positioned to take on the committee's chairman, Republican James Comer of Kentucky. 'There are some members who speak to a very narrow audience, and that's great,' Lynch said. Advertisement 'We want them to be energized and animated. But that same person is not going to go to the Rust Belt with people that are farmers, moderates, conservatives,' Lynch told The Associated Press. 'You need different voices to appeal to different constituencies.' 'I think I have a better chance of bringing back the blue-collar working people, and I have less of a chance of appealing to very younger people who are intensely invested in social media,' Lynch said. What's ahead as Democrats make their choice The vote for Oversight ranking member is scheduled for June 24 and will be conducted by secret ballot. All four candidates are speaking before multiple caucuses this week, including the New Democrats and the progressive caucus, the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. While many Democrats are undecided, others have made up their mind. Some who are privately stumping for their candidate believe it will be a tight race. That makes the public forums and private pitches even more crucial in the run-up to the vote. House progressives are divided over their preferred choice. Three members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus — Crockett, Garcia and Mfume — are vying for the ranking member seat, which makes it unlikely the caucus will back a single candidate. 'We're looking for folks that could expose this kind of corruption and hold Trump and his billionaire donors accountable,' said Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, the Progressive Caucus chair. Rep. Brad Schneider, chair of the centrist New Democrat Coalition, said he's weighing two factors: which candidate could best help Democrats win the 2026 midterm elections and whether they can successfully lead investigations into the Trump administration and 'try to repair some of the damage that's been done.' Advertisement 'The committee can be a flash point, or it can be a very effective place for us to make our point, and we want to know who's going to do best in that role to make sure the committee works to help us secure 218 (members) next November,' Schneider said. The role of seniority and the Congressional Black Caucus Some Democratic caucuses have traditionally prized seniority as a clear and reliable way for lawmakers of color to rise through the ranks. There has never been a Hispanic Oversight chairman and only one Black chairman, Elijah Cummings. 'The CBC has always stood for seniority,' said Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia. But Johnson noted that the Black Caucus has at times 'deviated' from that norm. He said many in the caucus are open to a conversation about age. 'So, Steve Lynch, I think, is the next senior member. And but as I said, other factors have to be considered and I'm sure that, along with myself, other CBC members are going through that process,' Johnson said. 'Since I've been here, seniority has had weight,' said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, who said he was undecided on which candidate to back. 'But seniority is not the only thing. And there are times and circumstances where the person with the most seniority has not won. Whether that's one of these times or not is what we're going to see.' Associated Press writer Leah Askarinam contributed to this report.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
What Australia's $2 Million Pensions Tax Means for Wealthy Savers
Many Australians are already subject to a 15% tax on their superannuation profits, but the wealthiest are facing another levy on top of that. This week on the podcast, Chris Bourke asks cross-asset reporter Richard Henderson to explain how the tax will work, who will be affected, and if Australia's super system is becoming a wealth accumulation vehicle for the rich. Read more on Australia's pension industry: Wall Street Wins More of Australia's $2.7 Trillion Pension Pot Listen and follow The Bloomberg Australia Podcast on Apple, Spotify, on YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. Terminal clients: Run {NSUB AUPOD } on your desktop to subscribe.
