Talk show host Jimmy Kimmel reveals he has Italian citizenship
Article content
During the podcast episode, Silverman, a fellow comedian, was talking about how a lot of people she knows are thinking about which countries they could get citizenship from in order to leave the U.S. over unhappiness with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration.
Article content
Article content
Article content
That is when Kimmel said he had Italian citizenship.
Article content
Article content
'I did get Italian citizenship. I do have that,' Kimmel said. 'What's going on is … as bad as you thought it was gonna be, it's so much worse. It's just unbelievable. I feel like it's probably even worse than (Trump) would like it to be.'
Despite that, Kimmel also said that he believes that people who once supported Trump and have now changed their minds should not be condemned.
'The door needs to stay open,' Kimmel said. 'If you want to change your mind, that's so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that's so hard and so rare to do, you are welcome.'
Article content
This comes almost a month after CBS announced 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' got cancelled, and Trump suggested that Kimmel was next.
Article content
'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert! Greg Gutfeld is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show,' Trump said on a post on Truth Social.
Article content
Article content
Article content
To that, Kimmel posted on Instagram 'I'm hearing you're next. Or maybe it's just another wonderful secret.' This refers to Trump's relation to Jeffrey Epstein, and the phrase he wrote to Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003.
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
29 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump takes over Washington D.C. police, brings in National Guard
WASHINGTON, D.C.: U.S. President Donald Trump this week deployed 800 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., temporarily assuming control of the city's police department—an extraordinary assertion of presidential authority in the nation's capital. The move, which bypasses the city's elected leadership, reflects a second-term governing style marked by aggressive use of executive power, often in defiance of political norms and with few modern precedents. Trump defended the intervention as a necessary measure to "rescue" Washington from what he described as rampant lawlessness. "Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals," he said at the White House. While violent crime spiked in 2023, official data shows it has since dropped sharply, down 35 percent in 2024 and another 26 percent in the first seven months of 2025. This is the second time this summer that Trump has sent troops into a Democratic-led city. In June, he ordered National Guard forces to Los Angeles without California Governor Gavin Newsom's approval, prompting a federal court case in San Francisco over whether he violated U.S. law. Trump has also warned that other Democratic strongholds, including Chicago, could face similar action. During his campaigns, Trump's "law and order" rhetoric often targeted majority-Democratic cities with large Black populations, including Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington. In recent days, hundreds of federal officers and agents from more than a dozen agencies have been deployed across the capital. Attorney General Pam Bondi is overseeing the police department during the federal control period. The U.S. Army said the Guard's role would include administrative, logistical, and law enforcement support, with 100–200 troops on duty at any given time. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser rejected Trump's depiction of a city overrun by crime, noting that violent crime is at its lowest in over three decades. While acknowledging that federal law grants the president broad powers in emergencies, she maintained her administration would cooperate with federal authorities while disputing his claims. City Attorney General Brian Schwalb called Trump's move "unlawful" and said legal options were being explored. Trump invoked a section of the District's Home Rule Act that allows the president to take over the police force for 30 days during an "emergency." He has also hinted at removing D.C.'s local autonomy entirely and imposing complete federal control. At the same time, his administration has cut the National Capital Region's security funding by 44 percent, reducing it by US$20 million this year. The president further pledged to clear homeless encampments from federally owned land in the city, without specifying relocation plans. While federal authorities can remove encampments from national parkland, they cannot legally expel people from the city solely for lacking shelter. The D.C. National Guard—2,700 troops under presidential command—has been deployed in the capital before, including during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and the 2020 racial justice protests.
Global News
30 minutes ago
- Global News
Putin says U.S., Russia could make nuclear arms deal
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that the United States was making 'sincere efforts' to halt the war in Ukraine and suggested Moscow and Washington could agree on a nuclear arms deal as part of a wider effort to strengthen peace. Putin was speaking to his most senior ministers and security officials on the eve of a summit in Alaska with U.S. President Donald Trump, who is pressing for an end to the war. He said in televised comments that the U.S. was 'making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict.' This was happening, Putin said, 'in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole – if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons.' Story continues below advertisement His comments signaled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump in Anchorage for the first Russia-U.S. summit since June 2021. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Russia and the United States have by far the biggest nuclear arsenals in the world. The last remaining treaty between them that limits the numbers of these weapons is due to expire on February 5 next year. The New START treaty covers strategic nuclear weapons – those designed by each side to hit the enemy's centers of military, economic and political power – and caps the number of deployed warheads at 1,550 on each side. Both are likely to breach that limit if the treaty is not extended or replaced. 2:49 Trump warns 'severe consequences' if Putin doesn't end war in Ukraine In a symptom of nuclear tensions between the two sides, Trump this month said he had ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia because of what he called threatening comments by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev about the possibility of war between the two countries. The Kremlin played down the move but said 'everyone should be very, very careful' with nuclear rhetoric. Story continues below advertisement Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov said earlier that Putin and Trump will also discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-U.S. economic ties, as well as the prospects for ending the war in Ukraine. Ushakov told reporters that the summit would start at 1930 GMT, which would be 1130 a.m. local time in Anchorage, with the two leaders meeting one-on-one, accompanied only by translators. He said delegations from the two countries would then meet and have a working lunch, and the presidents would give a joint news conference. Ushakov said it was 'obvious to everyone' that Ukraine would be the focus of the meeting, but broader security and international issues would also be discussed. He added: 'An exchange of views is expected on further developing bilateral cooperation, including in the trade and economic sphere. I would like to note that this cooperation has huge, and unfortunately hitherto untapped, potential.' Ushakov, who is Putin's foreign policy adviser, said the other members of the Russian delegation would be Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's special envoy for investment and economic cooperation. —Reporting by Dmitry Antonov and Moscow bureau, writing by Mark Trevelyan, editing by Philippa Fletcher)\
CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
As Canada wildfires choke U.S. with smoke, Republicans demand action. But not on climate change
The Statue of Liberty is visible through haze due to Canadian wildfire smoke during sunset Aug. 5, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura) The sternly worded statements and letters are filled with indignation and outrage: Republican U.S. lawmakers say Canada has done too little to contain wildfires and smoke that have fouled the air in several states this summer. 'Instead of enjoying family vacations at Michigan's beautiful lakes and campgrounds, for the third summer in a row, Michiganders are forced to breathe hazardous air as a result of Canada's failure to prevent and control wildfires,' read a statement last week from the state's GOP congressional delegation, echoing similar missives from Republicans in Iowa, New York, North Dakota, Minnesota and Wisconsin. They've demanded more forest thinning, prescribed burns and other measures to prevent fires from starting. They've warned the smoke is hurting relations between the countries and suggested the U.S. could make it an issue in tariff talks. But what they haven't done is acknowledge the role of climate change — a glaring and shortsighted omission, according to climate scientists. It also ignores the outsized U.S. contribution to heat-trapping gases from burning fossil fuels like coal and gas that cause more intense heat waves and droughts, which in turn set the stage for more destructive wildfires, scientists say. 'If anything, Canada should be blaming the U.S. for their increased fires,' said Jennifer Francis, a climate scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. On Tuesday, the Canadian government announced almost $46 million in funding for wildfire prevention and risk assessment research projects. But Corey Hogan, parliamentary secretary to the federal energy and natural resources minister, said international cooperation is needed. 'There's no people that want to do more about wildfires than Canadians,' Hogan said. 'But I think this also underlines the international challenges that are brought on by climate change ... we need to globally tackle this problem.' The country has 'been fighting wildfires in this country at unprecedented rates since 2023,' when Canada saw its largest wildfire on record, said Ken McMullen, president of the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs. This year's first fire started in April, one of the earliest on record, and 2025 is now the second-worst year. As of Thursday, more than 700 wildfires were burning across the country, two-thirds of them out of control, with more than 28,000 square miles (72,520 square kilometres) burned in 4,400 wildfires so far this year, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. That's almost five times the surface area that's burned so far in the U.S. this year. Most wildfires are started by people, sometimes on purpose but mostly by mistake, though McMullen said lightning is the culprit in many of Canada's fires, especially in remote areas. McMullen said he has no interest in debating the role of climate change, but data show that something has changed. Sloughs and basins have dried up and water that once lapped at people's back doors in Canada's lake communities now is often hundreds of feet away. 'People can make up their own mind as to why that is,' he said. 'But something clearly has changed.' Denying climate change U.S. President Donald Trump has called climate change a hoax — a belief echoed by many in the GOP — and his administration has worked to dismantle and defund federal climate science and data collection, with little to no pushback from Republicans in Congress. He's proposed to revoke the scientific finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare — the central basis for U.S. climate change action. He's declared a national energy emergency to expedite fossil fuel development, canceled grants for renewable energy projects and ordered the U.S. to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, aimed at limiting long-term global warming to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels. The Associated Press reached out to more than half a dozen Republicans who criticized Canada but none returned phone calls or emails. Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine said the wildfires are jeopardizing health and air quality in her state, too, but faulted Republicans for failing to meet the crisis head on — beginning by acknowledging climate change. 'Rather than accept this reality and work together to find proactive, common-sense solutions for preventing and mitigating these fires, Republicans are burying their heads in the sand,' she said. Wisconsin Rep. Gwen Moore, a Democrat, criticized her Republican colleagues' letter to Canada's U.S. ambassador, saying those 'who are in denial about climate change shouldn't be writing letters prescribing people's actions to try to contain it.' Difficult solutions McMullen, the Canadian wildfire expert, said battling the fires isn't as simple as many seem to believe. The country and its territories are vast and fires are often in remote areas where the best — and sometimes only — course of action if there are no residents or structures is to let them burn or 'it is going to just create another situation for us to deal with in a year or two or 10 or 20 years from now,' McMullen said. Prescribed burns to clear underbrush and other ignition sources are used in some areas, but aren't practical or possible in some forests and prairies that are burning, experts said. McMullen has advocated for a Canadian forest fire coordination agency to help deploy firefighters and equipment where they're needed. But as for stopping worsening fires, 'I don't think there's much they can do,' said University of Michigan climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck. He noted that hotter temperatures are melting permafrost in northern Canada, which dries out and makes the vast boreal forests far more likely to burn. Instead, the two countries should collaborate on climate change solutions 'because our smoke is their smoke, their smoke is ours,' Overpeck said. 'As long as this trend of warming and drying continues, we're going to get a worsening problem. 'The good news is ... we know what the cause is ... we can stop it from getting worse.' ___ Tammy Webber, The Associated Press The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
