logo
Seaside house prices tumble as end of the WFH era lures buyers back to city suburbs

Seaside house prices tumble as end of the WFH era lures buyers back to city suburbs

Daily Mail​07-05-2025
Coastal locations that were hot property during the pandemic have seen house prices fall back down to earth, as buyers going back to the office now favour affordable suburbs.
Outside of the niche central London property market, the locations with the biggest price falls since the housing market peak in late 2022 are nearly all by the sea, according to data from estate agent Hamptons.
This includes Hastings, where house prices grew by nearly a third between the second half of 2019 and the second half of 2022, peaking at £278,060.
This was impacted by the 'race for space' trend during the pandemic, when successive lockdowns encouraged some buyers to seek homes with extra space.
The three areas with the biggest price falls since the pandemic housing market peak are in central London – the City of London, Westminster, and Kensington and Chelsea, according to data from estate agent Hamptons.
But these enclaves suffered due to an array of specific factors affecting the super-wealthy, including higher taxes on second homes and the abolition of non-dom tax status.
The Covid pandemic saw a rush of buyers newly able to work from home seizing the opportunity to move further away from towns and cities, often prioritising country and coastal locations which were closer to nature.
Now, though, many workers are being asked to attend the office more regularly - which means out-of-the-way locations are less practical.
The change may also be down to additional costs for second home owners.
Buyers will have to contend with higher stamp duty on second home purchases, a policy announced in the Autumn Budget, while those who already own a second home could see their council tax bill double.
Prices in Hastings fell by 8 per cent to £209,760 between 2022 and 2024, according to Hamptons.
Those who own homes there haven't seen all their gains wiped out, though, as prices are still up 22 per cent compared to 2019.
In Thanet, home to hipster hotspot Margate as well as popular seaside resorts Ramsgate and Broadstairs, prices rocketed by nearly 27 per cent between the second half of 2019 and the second half of 2022 to reach £298,040.
Since then though, they have fallen back by 7.4 per cent to £276,050 – though buyers will still have made a 20 per cent gain.
Torridge in North West Devon has also seen price falls. The coastal district, which includes the towns of Bideford and Great Torrington, saw average prices peak at £297,010 at the end of 2022, having surged by 33.2 per cent during the pandemic. They have since fallen by 7.4 per cent to £275,130.
Eastbourne, Hertsmere, Torbay and Worthing rounded out the top ten price fallers, with Hetfordshire's Hertsmere the only one of these locations not on by the sea.
There are beach towns which have continued to grow – though they haven't maintained their pandemic momentum.
Neath Port Talbot in Wales has had the largest overall price growth of any coastal 'race for space' location between 2019 and 2024.
It saw growth of 36.2 per cent in 2019-22, followed by growth of 2.5 per cent between 2022 and 2024, meaning prices now sit at £154,970.
Convenient commutes see city suburbs boom
While they may be less aesthetically appealing than the coast, Hamptons data shows that the suburbs of big cities such as Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham are among today's biggest house price risers.
Many of these areas offer quick car or train commutes in to the city centre - helpful for those who are back in the office every day.
The data also revealed a focus on more affordable areas, with many of the places on the list having house prices well below the national average of around £268,000.
In 2023-24, Manchester's M8 postcode saw the biggest house price rise of any city location, rising 16 per cent to £207,900. It is to the north of the city centre and includes Crumpsall and Cheetham Hill.
Popular: Manchester's Crumpsall is one of the biggest house price risers of 2023-24
Liverpool's L27 postcode witnessed a 14.2 per cent jump from £131,320 to £149,920. It covers Netherley, a suburb to the south east of the city centre.
Leeds' LS2 district, which covers the city centre and Woodhouse neighbourhood, saw a 13 per cent rise to £171,730 which meant properties added just shy of £20,000 of value across the year.
Birmingham's B6 postcode, which takes in Aston, Birchfield and Witton and is the home of the Villa Park stadium, saw the fourth-largest price rise of any city postcode at 11.1 per cent according to Hamptons.
This meant properties increased in value from £151,020 to £167,760.
Best mortgage rates and how to find them
Mortgage rates have risen substantially over recent years, meaning that those remortgaging or buying a home face higher costs.
That makes it even more important to search out the best possible rate for you and get good mortgage advice.
Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C
> Mortgage rates calculator
> Find the right mortgage for you
To help our readers find the best mortgage, This is Money has partnered with the UK's leading fee-free broker L&C.
This is Money and L&C's mortgage calculator can let you compare deals to see which ones suit your home's value and level of deposit.
You can compare fixed rate lengths, from two-year fixes, to five-year fixes and ten-year fixes.
If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use This is Money and L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has 'disappointed' people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.

The top 10 cheapest market towns for first-time buyers revealed – and the most expensive
The top 10 cheapest market towns for first-time buyers revealed – and the most expensive

The Sun

time5 minutes ago

  • The Sun

The top 10 cheapest market towns for first-time buyers revealed – and the most expensive

THE top 10 cheapest market towns for first-time buyers have been revealed. New data from Lloyds Bank shows Leek is the least expensive location to put down roots for those fresh onto the property ladder. First-time buyers in the West Midlands town face paying £191,359 on average. The second-cheapest town in the list, Chesterfield, also based in the Midlands, sees first-time buyers looking at an average price of £198,054. Four other market towns from the region featured in the top 10 list, including Boston, Buxton and Grantham. Prices for first-time buyers in these locations are £211,404, £224,896 and £230,464, respectively. Northallerton, Selby and Driffield, all in Yorkshire and the Humber, appeared in Lloyds' list as well. House prices for those hopping onto the property ladder for the first time are £201,628, £202,092 and £203,160, respectively. Newport, Wales, was eighth least expensive in Lloyds' list - the average house price for first-time buyers there is £227,784. Andrew Asaam, homes director at Lloyds, said the appeal of market towns had stood the test of time with home-buyers. "These charming locations are filled with historic landmarks and architecture, quaint charm and community spirit, offering a calmer pace of life, often within the reaches of bigger towns and cities. "That 'best of both worlds' feeling has led to house prices in these areas holding up - in fact, the priciest market towns are amongst the most expensive locations, outside of Greater London, to settle into a home." The Sun's James Flanders explains how to find the best deal on your mortgage At the other end of the scale, Hitchin came out the most expensive market town for first-time buyers. First-time buyers are looking at an average price of £410,366 for a property in the East of England town. Altrincham, in the North West, was second, with buyers having to cough up £404,864 for a home. West Malling, Hertford, Saffron Walden and Wimborne also feature on Lloyds' list. House prices in these spots average out at £396,925, £392,310, £363,960 and £361,591, respectively. Thatcham was bottom of the most expensive list, but first-time buyers there are still faced with paying £349,602 to get on the ladder. Market town house prices on the rise Data from Lloyds also revealed the 10 locations where house prices for first-time buyers have risen the most since 2020. Newmarket, in the East of England, showed the biggest spike, with prices increasing by 54%, from £225,667 to £347,967, over the last five years. Prices in Goole, Yorkshire and the Humber, have risen by 47%, from £161,966 to £237,810. Macclesfield, in the North West, has also showed high house price growth since 2020, recording a 40% jump from £211,344 to £296,255. Chipping Sodbury, in the South West, saw house prices hop from £209,628 to £278,314 - a 33% hike. Beverley, Yorkshire and the Humber, and Newport in Wales have also seen property price growth of 31% and 30%, respectively since 2020. On average, the 10 market towns where house prices have grown the most since 2020 have seen prices rise by an average of 26%, from £223,061 to £280,582. How to get the best deal on your mortgage IF you're looking for a traditional type of mortgage, getting the best rates depends entirely on what's available at any given time. There are several ways to land the best deal. Usually the larger the deposit you have the lower the rate you can get. If you're remortgaging and your loan-to-value ratio (LTV) has changed, you'll get access to better rates than before. Your LTV will go down if your outstanding mortgage is lower and/or your home's value is higher. A change to your credit score or a better salary could also help you access better rates. And if you're nearing the end of a fixed deal soon it's worth looking for new deals now. You can lock in current deals sometimes up to six months before your current deal ends. Leaving a fixed deal early will usually come with an early exit fee, so you want to avoid this extra cost. But depending on the cost and how much you could save by switching versus sticking, it could be worth paying to leave the deal - but compare the costs first. To find the best deal use a mortgage comparison tool to see what's available. You can also go to a mortgage broker who can compare a much larger range of deals for you. Some will charge an extra fee but there are plenty who give advice for free and get paid only on commission from the lender. You'll also need to factor in fees for the mortgage, though some have no fees at all. You can add the fee - sometimes more than £1,000 - to the cost of the mortgage, but be aware that means you'll pay interest on it and so will cost more in the long term. You can use a mortgage calculator to see how much you could borrow. Remember you'll have to pass the lender's strict eligibility criteria too, which will include affordability checks and looking at your credit file. You may also need to provide documents such as utility bills, proof of benefits, your last three month's payslips, passports and bank statements.

Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'
Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'

The Guardian

time5 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'

Rachel Reeves' efforts to intervene in the supreme court case on the car finance scandal were 'unprecedented and disgraceful' and send a 'really bad message' to consumers that the government is willing to defend wrongdoing by banks, Treasury committee member and Lib Dem MP Bobby Dean has said. While the supreme court largely sided with finance companies on Friday – helping lenders avoid a £44bn compensation bill – Dean said the chancellor had gone too far to show she was on the side of business. That included a controversial bid to intervene in the supreme court hearing in January, in which she urged judges to avoid handing 'windfall' compensation to borrowers. That attempt was ultimately rejected. 'I thought it was pretty unprecedented and pretty disgraceful,' said Dean, who sits on an influential parliamentary committee which scrutinises City firms, regulators and the Treasury. The chancellor had also been considering overruling the supreme court's decision with retrospective legislation, to help save lenders billions of pounds, in the event that it upheld the entirety of October's court of appeal ruling, the Guardian revealed last week. 'What message does it send to consumers that the industry can do wrong, the courts can support the claim that they've done something wrong, but the government is ready to intervene and defend the industry that's done wrong, instead of defending the consumer? I think that's a really bad message to put out,' Dean said. 'I feel like this government sometimes is too keen to demonstrate it is on the side of business, and is sometimes not understanding the rights of consumer,' he added. Reeves intervention efforts followed intensive lobbying by the car loan industry, which feared that the supreme court would uphold last October's shock ruling by the appeal court. That October ruling suggested commission payments paid by lenders to car dealers were unlawful, unless explicitly disclosed to borrowers. It could have opened the door to billions of pounds of compensation claims against companies including Lloyds Banking Group, Santander UK, Barclays and Close Brothers, and result in a redress scheme that rivalled the £50bn payment protection insurance saga. Lobby group the Financing and Leasing Association (FLA) – which represents car lenders – had warned the government that a big compensation bill could push some lenders into failure, while others would offer fewer or more expensive loans to claw back their losses. That could restrict options for borrowers who relied on credit. City bosses were also warning the Treasury that ongoing uncertainty over the scandal was deterring international investment in the finance industry, and was therefore putting the UK's economic growth at risk The FLA's head of motor finance Adrian Dally said that the lobby group was 'pleased' with the supreme court's ruling, and felt its concerns had been heard by Treasury and regulators. He confirmed the FLA had been speaking with the Treasury nearly every week in the wake of the court of appeal ruling in October, including about its concerns on the car finance case. However, he rejected suggestions the Treasury had prioritised the industry over consumers. 'We absolutely disagree with that because, ultimately, this [car finance] industry is a vital part of the nation's infrastructure, and enables millions of people to get to work, to get to school, and that was put at risk by these court cases. And ultimately, we believe the industry's interests and the consumers' interests are aligned on this.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But Dean said government interventions set a 'really bad precedent if you're going to intervene on cases of consumer redress on the basis that it might damage industry, because then almost every consumer redress case would fall,' Dean said. Dean added that compensation schemes can give consumers confidence to borrow and invest, knowing will be protected when companies take advantage of customers. 'Obviously, the best industry is one where these redress systems are not needed in the first place, because people play by the rules.' The Financial Conduct Authority is due to confirm whether or not it will press ahead with a compensation scheme before the stock markets open on Monday morning. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'It is vital that consumers have access to motor finance to enable them to spread the cost of a vehicle in a way that is manageable and affordable. 'We respect this judgment from the supreme court, and we are working with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers. 'We recognise the issues this court case has highlighted, and we are already taking forward significant changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Consumer Credit Act.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store