War on Gaza: Senators call on Canadian government to uphold international law as children in Gaza are 'living in hell'
On June 25, independent Canadian senator Marilou McPhedran, with 10 other senators from across the country, released a joint statement calling on Mark Carney's government to uphold international law regarding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The senators write that Canada and its allies have failed to act in the face of 'gross violations of international law through arms sales, economic relations, and diplomatic support for the State of Israel.'
But what instigated the letter?
Canada is not 'stepping up' to respond to Gaza crisis
On June 11, a group of nine humanitarian organizations — including UNICEF Canada and Save the Children Canada — briefed senators, expressing concern over a vast discrepancy in Canada's response to the crises in Ukraine compared to Gaza, particularly when surrounding children's health and safety.
'The goal wasn't to single out a particular crisis,' Emilie Galland-Jarrett, Head of Policy, Advocacy and Government Relations for Save the Children Canada told me from Ottawa. 'We wanted to see the mobilization of senators around the situation of children in Gaza and to call on Canada to stand up in ways they have for children in Ukraine."
Canada is a co-chair in an initiative for abducted Ukrainian children, for example. 'That shows moral and global responsibility on this issue,' she says.
But the government isn't showing this kind leadership across the board, Galland-Jarrett stresses. 'That's an issue. The leadership demonstrated with Ukraine can't just be specific to one crisis. We have to ensure that in all crises, Canada is stepping up.'
The senators who signed the joint statement have concluded that 'what Canada is prepared to do in one country where there is clearly an illegal war, needs to be giving the same level of support and implementing the same level of restrictions,'
Senator McPhedran tells me from British Columbia: 'This includes reaching out to the corporate community to make sure there isn't corporate complicity.'
Children in Gaza are 'living in hell'
The situation for children especially, is both desperate and dire, Rachel Cummings, Humanitarian Lead for Save the Children, tells me from Deir Al-Balah, a city in the centre of the Gaza Strip, where she has been working since February 2024.
'Everyday I see children in Deir Al-Balah and Khan Younis walking, desperate to find food and clean water. They are walking around with empty bowls but the food kitchens are pretty much closed,' she says. 'Mothers are bulking out any food they get with grass and dirty water. They're also feeding their children at night so that they have the illusion of having a full stomach before they fall asleep. Mothers tell me their children are crying all the time because they are hungry all the time.'
Children are also taking on duties associated with adults. 'Young children are caring for even younger children while their parents look for firewood.' There is no education as learning has stopped since October 7, 2023, when the war broke out.
All of this is compounded by the fact that Palestinians are living under constant bombardment and shelling, adds Cummings. '700,000 people have been displaced since [the last ceasefire] in March.'
Humanitarian aid is far from consistent, Cummings says.
'The United Nations and other humanitarian activists have been unable to bring in supplies since mid-May, and the aid is very, very restricted ... People are killed trying to receive food, which is a right. Basically, Palestinians are trying every which way to survive and children, in particular, are living in hell.'
Canada has failed to act, senator says: 'We seem to have forgotten that we have a Canadian law for 25 years ...'
There has been a mounting concern as more and more evidence comes in as to the weaponization of food and starvation in Gaza and the disproportionate impact this has had on children in particular, McPhedran says.
'We seem to have forgotten that we have a Canadian law for 25 years: The Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act,' she says. 'The purpose of that is to implement the statute of the International Criminal Court.'
McPhedran says there is a clear obligation for Canadian lawmakers to implement domestic legislation on the situation in Gaza, and that failing to do so makes Canada complicit to what is happening in the region.
The funding by the International Court of Justice triggers a responsibility to Canada as a third party.
'Failing to act on Gaza is impunity,' Galland-Jarrett adds. 'And if there is impunity in a particular context, then that opens up the door to impunity in other crises.'
Groups raise alarm on death toll, genocide in Gaza
One of the humanitarian organizations' "asks" of the government revolves around arms trade.
'We know that there are arms or parts of arms that are being manufactured in Canada and then being sold to other countries like the United States and then being sold to Israel which are being used to bomb children,' Gallant-Jarrett says.
If there is a risk that such arms might be used in a way that might violate international humanitarian law, then Canada has a responsibility to stop that arms trade, she adds. 'That's what we're asking for."
McPhedren adds that it's very clear in the law that the kind of evidence that is now available shows extensive and clear documentation of the death, damage and destruction happening across Gaza — from the Palestinian health authority, to UNICEF, to special rapporteur Francesca Albanese — with complicity and impunity of third-party countries and corporations. The death toll in Gaza due to strikes by Israel grows daily, with the health ministry estimating at least 58,000 casualties. People in Gaza are killed waiting for aid, water, in churches and neighbourhoods previously marked "safe zones."
Humanitarian groups and scholars have described what is happening in Gaza as a genocide.
'The international obligations we have make it very clear that stopping genocide ... is not only the responsibility of those directly involved, but also third parties like Canada,' she says.
'This is an aspect of this whole assault on the Palestinian people that is probably not appreciated so in our letter we address that there is supposed to be an arms embargo that hasn't really happened.'
Senator: Carney government 'sidestepping' international responsibility
'I do think that Canada, represented by Global Affairs Canada, represented by our Prime Minister and by our Foreign Affairs Minister, that there is a pattern of avoidance in acknowledging the extent of which we are complicit in the assault of Palestinians," McPhedran says.
"I believe there is a sidestepping on the part of officials in Canada and on the part of the Carney cabinet.'
What is worrying to the Senator is that just this past February, there was a shipment of arms. 'We know that — and this was from Global Affairs Canada — that there were new military export permits to Israel. This was long after promising that as a country, we wouldn't do that.'
McPhedran adds that there is an "obligation" for the government to answer questions from parliamentarians and the media about military supplies and funding sent to Israel.
"A choice [is] being made not to give specific answers to these tough questions ... Furthermore, the funding by the International Court of Justice triggers a responsibility to Canada as a third party.'
Canada is also signatory to the Arms Trade Treaty, which means that the government is obliged to block arms exports if there are substantial risks the goods could be used to commit serious human rights abuses. 'What the senators are asking for is that Canada follow our legal obligations and through international treaties to which we have been a party and honour the commitment made in those treaties.'
Senator: We've seen actions against Russia — the same needs to happen with Israel
McPhedran asserts that, at minimum, they should be receiving a detailed response from Global Affairs Canada about a two-way arms embargo.
'There's been a very limited response to us and to the media and that puts us in a very regrettable position. As senators and parliamentarians we are entitled to information from the government of Canada — particularly on something as important as Gaza.'
McPhedran makes another observation: 'Minister [Anita] Anand has a theme and one of her themes in statements is protection. Three weeks ago, she made a very strong statement about additional sanctions in relation to Russia's war on Ukraine. It would be wonderful to see her take a similar approach against the aggression on the people of Gaza by Israel.'
Galland-Jarrett is appealing to the government for leadership on this issue. 'We expect the government to adequately fund humanitarian responses to crises with a children's rights lens and an understanding of how children are affected.'
Humanitarian organizations like Save the Children also want to see Canada bring up the issue of children in global spaces, whether it's the General Assembly or other U.N. spaces. 'In statements about different crises, we want to see it actually mention the impact on children in particular,' Galland-Jarrett says.
We've seen Canada step up in other ways, she emphasizes.
'Our main argument is that international law applies across the board; it's not supposed to be politicized. Humanitarian aid isn't supposed to be politicized."
In recent days there was a conversation that Prime Minister Mark Carney had with Gabriel Boric, the president of Chile on the need to recognize and respect human rights, Senator McPhedran points out.
'So on one hand we see press release after press release where Canada is claiming its respect for human rights. But when we see situations related to Israel, there seems to be a different standard.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Fumes Over 'Loser' Fox News Host Moments After Her NYC Shooting Take
President Donald Trump took on Fox News host Jessica Tarlov on Tuesday after she called for gun control and honored the families of the victims of this week's deadly mass shooting in New York City. 'I can't stand Jessica Tarlov of THE FIVE. A real loser!!! DJT,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Tarlov — the resident liberal on Fox News' 'The Five' — used Tuesday's episode to note that she knows people who knew two of the victims before speaking about late NYPD Officer Didarul Islam, who leaves behind two kids and a wife who is 8 months pregnant. Tarlov later referred to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) calling on Congress to pass a federal assault weapons ban and officials' claims that the shooting suspect had a documented mental health history. Trump's post arrived in the same minute that Tarlov called for gun control on air. 'How did he get a concealed carry license even in Nevada? How are these things happening? And I don't think that it hurts the conversation or takes us backward at all to consider how we might prevent one of these things from happening,' she said. She continued, 'You will never be able to stop all of the lunatics. But if you stopped this one, we'd have four people that were alive today who certainly deserve to, and I don't see why that's a bad thing to do that.' The post from Trump — who condemned the 'senseless act of violence' in New York and expressed that his 'heart' was with the shooting victims in a separate post on Tuesday morning — arrives over a month after he slammed Tarlov for highlighting unfavorable polling numbers on 'The Five.' 'Her voice, her manner, and above all else, what she says, are a disgrace to television broadcasting,' he wrote at the time. Tarlov appears not to have backed off the topic as she used the program to highlight Trump's sour polling when it comes to immigration earlier this month. Related... Joe Rogan Calls Trump Admin Detaining Pro-Palestine Students 'Kind Of Shifty' Trump's Shifting Explanations Are Prolonging The Epstein Scandal He Wants To End Republicans Pan Trump's Idea Of Tariff Rebates


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UN conference backs two-state solution, calls on Israel to commit to a Palestinian state
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — High-level representatives at a U.N. conference on Tuesday urged Israel to commit to a Palestinian state and gave 'unwavering support' to a two-state solution, signaling widespread international determination to end one of the world's longest conflicts. The 'New York Declaration' sets out a phased plan to end the nearly eight-decade conflict and the ongoing war in Gaza. The plan would culminate with an independent, demilitarized Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel, and their eventual integration into the wider Mideast region. The meeting is taking place amid the latest reports that starvation and famine are taking place in Gaza, and growing global outrage at Palestinians not getting food due to Israeli policies and practices – which Israel denies. Planned for two days, the meeting was extended into Wednesday because representatives of about 50 countries have not spoken. Israel rejects the notion of two states Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposes a two-state solution and has rejected the meeting on both nationalistic and security grounds. Israel's close ally, the United States, is also boycotting, calling the meeting 'unproductive and ill-timed.' Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon late Tuesday sharply criticized the some 125 countries participating in the conference, saying 'there are those in the world who fight terrorists and extremist forces and then there are those who turn a blind eye to them or resort to appeasement.' The conference, which was postponed from June and downgraded from world leaders to ministers, for the first time established eight high-level working groups to examine and make proposals on wide-ranging topics related to a two-state solution. The declaration's plan says conference co-chairs France and Saudi Arabia, the European Union and Arab League, and 15 countries that led the working groups agreed 'to take collective action to end the war in Gaza.' Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan urged the rest of the 193 U.N. member nations 'to support this document' before the start of the 80th session of the U.N. General Assembly in mid-September. The declaration condemns 'the attacks committed by Hamas against civilians' in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. It marks a first condemnation by Arab nations of Hamas, whose attacks killed about 1,200, mainly Israeli civilians, and whose militants took about 250 people hostage. Some 50 are still being held. The declaration condemns Israel's attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure in Gaza and its 'siege and starvation, which have produced a devastating humanitarian catastrophe and protection crisis.' Israel's offensive against Hamas has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Plan would give Palestinian Authority governing power The conference plan envisions the Palestinian Authority governing and controlling all Palestinian territory, with a transitional administrative committee immediately established under its umbrella after a ceasefire in Gaza. 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority,' the declaration says. It also supports deployment of 'a temporary international stabilization mission' operating under U.N. auspices to protect Palestinian civilians, support the transfer of security to the Palestinian Authority and provide security guarantees for Palestine and Israel — 'including monitoring of the ceasefire and of a future peace agreement.' The declaration urges countries to recognize the state of Palestine, calling this 'an essential and indispensable component of the achievement of the two-state solution.' Without naming Israel but clearly referring to it, the document says 'illegal unilateral actions are posing an existential threat to the realization of the independent state of Palestine.' French President Emmanuel Macron announced ahead of the meeting that his country will recognize the state of Palestine at the General Assembly's meeting of world leaders in late September. The French Foreign Ministry on Tuesday pushed back on Israeli claims that recognition of Palestine would 'reward' Hamas, saying that 'on the contrary, it has contributed to isolating Hamas.' United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Tuesday that Britain would recognize the state of Palestine before September's meeting, but would refrain if Israel agrees to a ceasefire and long-term peace process in the next eight weeks. The countries are now the biggest Western powers and the only two members of the Group of Seven major industrialized nations to make such a pledge. A separate one-page statement titled the 'New York Call" was circulated by France, but the language was considered too strong, especially for Arab nations. It was only approved by 15 Western nations, including six that have recognized the state of Palestine and nine others: Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, Luxembourg, Malta, New Zealand, Portugal and San Marino. The statement, issued late Tuesday, says the 15 countries have recognized, 'expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration ... to recognize the state of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-state solution, and invite all countries that have not done so to join this call.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's deals with the EU, Japan may not be templates for Canada in trade talks
U.S. President Donald Trump's successive announcements of deals setting baseline tariffs on the European Union and Japan are prompting questions about whether they're a road map for Canada to follow in trade talks. Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the bones of an agreement on Sunday. It sets across-the-board tariffs of 15 per cent on most European Union exports to the United States, along with a commitment by Europe to invest $600 billion US in the American economy and spend $750 billion on U.S. energy products — although there's plenty of fine print still to come. That makes it broadly comparable to the deal Trump announced last week with Japan: a 15 per cent across-the-board tariff and a Japanese commitment to invest $550 billion in the U.S. Trump was threatening to hit Europe with 30 per cent baseline tariffs and Japan with 25 per cent on Aug. 1, so both trading blocs are selling the deals as wins. Because Canada is facing the threat of 35 per cent tariffs on some goods on the same date, does that mean Canada should be aiming for a similar agreement? Prime Minister Mark Carney certainly isn't saying so. Asked whether any forthcoming deal will be "in the ballpark" of those 15 per cent baseline tariffs, he emphasized the differences between Europe's and Canada's trading relationship with the U.S. "We are in a different position, and that is why these negotiations ... are different," Carney said on Monday, citing Canada's geographical closeness and energy exports to the U.S. "Europe, in that agreement yesterday, made commitments to buy American energy," he said at a news conference in Prince Edward Island. "America needs Canadian energy." WATCH | Canada's trade talks with the U.S. are different from Europe's, Carney says: Across-the-board tariffs 'difficult for Canada to accept' There are plenty of reasons why a 15 per cent baseline tariff rate is not something for Canada to aspire to, given that its economy is proportionally far more dependent on the U.S. market than Europe's and Japan's are. Jonathan O'Hara, an international trade lawyer in the Ottawa law office of McMillan LLP, said Canada should set its sights on a better deal than the EU or Japan negotiated since it's already so tightly integrated with the American economy. "On a broad level, having some kind of across-the-board tariffs, I think, would be very difficult for Canada to accept," O'Hara said in a weekend interview with CBC News. WATCH | Here's what's in Trump's tariff deal with the EU: Yet it appears that Canada doesn't actually face the prospect of tariffs that are truly across-the-board. That's because it has something that neither the European Union nor Japan have: an actual free-trade deal. Trump's "fentanyl emergency" tariffs, currently set at 25 per cent — which he's threatening to raise to 35 per cent on Friday — hit only those goods that don't comply with the rules of origin in the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). That means the vast bulk of Canada's exports to the U.S. are currently crossing the border tariff-free. Steel and aluminum tariffs a big question That may be why Carney's Liberal government does not feel the same sort of pressure as Europe and Japan to get a deal on Trump's timeline, said Drew Fagan, a professor at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. "Overall, the average tariff on Canadian goods going into the United States is about as low as any place in the world," he told CBC News. "What's important for us is that the [CUSMA] free-trade agreement continues to hold. Whether it will in the future, of course, is a fundamental question." The biggest exceptions to Canada's mostly tariff-free access to the U.S. are steel and aluminum, hit by Trump's 50 per cent global rate as he tries to prop up that sector at home. In their deals reached with the U.S., neither the EU nor Japan are let off the hook from that tariff. While Canada is surely angling for something better on steel and aluminum — such as the U.K.'s 25 per cent tariff, potentially headed to zero — the European and Japanese agreements suggest that will be tough to achieve. Carlo Dade, director of international policy at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, said Canada will likely face a tariff rate comparable to Europe's. "The Americans have decided to readjust the terms of trade," Dade said. "The price of access to the U.S. market is going up globally. It appears everyone is going to have to pay an increased cost." There are plenty of signs to suggest that the prospects are slim for Canada to reach a deal by Trump's deadline of Friday: Carney said the talks are complex, his top trade negotiators are downplaying the importance of the deadline and Trump himself is saying there may not be a deal at all.