
U.S. broadens search for deportation agreements, striking deals with Honduras and Uganda, documents show
The documents indicate Uganda in East Africa recently agreed to accept deportees from the U.S. who hail from other countries on the continent, as long as they don't have criminal histories. It's unclear how many deportees Uganda would ultimately accept under the arrangement with the U.S. government.
Honduras' government has also agreed to receive deportees from other Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America, including families traveling with children, the documents show. The government of Honduras agreed to a relatively small number of deportations — just several hundred over two years — but the documents indicate it could decide to accept more.
Both agreements are based on a "safe third country" provision of U.S. immigration law that allows officials to reroute asylum-seekers to countries that are not their own if the U.S. government makes a determination that those nations can fairly hear their claims for humanitarian protection.
The two bilateral deals outlined in the internal documents are part of a large-scale diplomatic effort that President Trump's administration has staged to strike deportation arrangements with nations across several continents, including those with problematic human rights records. The administration has argued those agreements are key to its mass deportation campaign, since there are some migrants who can't easily be deported to their home countries because of strained diplomatic relations or other reasons.
At least a dozen countries have already accepted or agreed to accept deportees from other nations since the second Trump administration took office, and U.S. officials have been aggressively courting other governments. Internal government documents show the Trump administration has also asked countries like Ecuador and Spain to receive these so-called third country deportees from the U.S.
Representatives for the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to requests to comment on CBS News' reporting.
A senior State Department official said, "We don't comment on the content of private diplomatic negotiations, but the State Department is doing everything possible to support the President's policy of keeping Americans safe by removing illegal aliens who have no right to be in the United States."
Earlier this summer, the Supreme Court gave the Trump administration the green light to deport migrants to third countries with a minimal degree of notice and due process. The decision paved the way for the administration to continue expanding a practice it has relied on since the beginning of Mr. Trump's second term.
In February, the Trump administration convinced Costa Rica and Panama to take in several hundred African and Asian migrants who had claimed asylum along the U.S.-Mexico border. Then, in March, the U.S. flew more than 200 Venezuelans accused of gang membership to El Salvador, where they were held incommunicado for months at a notorious prison until they were returned to Venezuela last month under a prisoner swap.
The administration has also sent immigrants convicted of violent crimes and who hail from Cuba, Jamaica, Mexico, Laos, Myanmar, Yemen and other countries to violence-torn South Sudan and the tiny southern African kingdom of Eswatini. Guatemala, Kosovo and Rwanda have announced they will receive deportees from the U.S. who come from other nations.
Last week, the State Department said the U.S. had signed a "safe third country" asylum agreement with Paraguay. Mexico, under an arrangement that predates Mr. Trump's second term, accepts the return of some Latin American migrants who crossed the U.S. southern border illegally.
Human rights advocates have strongly denounced the Trump administration effort, saying migrants could be deported to countries where they could be harmed or returned to the place they fled. Some of the countries persuaded to sign deportation agreements have been plagued by reports of human rights abuses.
In a report released last week, the State Department described "negative developments in the human rights situation in Uganda," citing unlawful killings, "arbitrary" arrests, disappearances and a lack of action from the government to curb human rights abuses. The report also noted, however, that Uganda has worked with United Nations officials to provide humanitarian protection to refugees.
Doris Meissner, who oversaw the now-defunct Immigration and Naturalization Service under the Clinton administration, said the U.S. government has long faced difficulties deporting some migrants due to diplomatic constraints. But she noted efforts to deport them to third countries were generally undertaken in "exceptional" cases only.
Meissner suggested the Trump administration may be employing different sources of leverage — like threats of visa sanctions and funding commitments — to persuade as many countries as possible to take in deportees from other nations.
Noting deportations to third countries remain relatively limited in scale, Meissner said a main driver behind the Trump administration's diplomatic efforts is a desire to send a message of deterrence to those in the U.S. illegally, one that highlights the possibility that they could be sent to distant countries where they have no ties.
"The broader reason beyond that is fear and intimidation and ultimately, incentivizing self deportation," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
LAUSD teachers, students hold rally for high school student detained by immigration agents
Los Angeles Unified School District teachers and students gathered outside of the district's downtown headquarters on Tuesday to rally in support of a high school student who is currently in the custody of federal immigration agents. Benjamin Marcelo Guerrero-Cruz, 18, was detained by immigration agents on Aug. 8 while he was walking his family's dog in Van Nuys, according to Unión del Barrio, a community organization representing Latino people living in the U.S., according to their website. "We promise you, if you continue to mess with our students, we will fight back," said Ron Gochez, the organization's president. He was one of many who spoke during Tuesday's rally. They're calling for his release so he can begin his senior year at Reseda High School, but he remains in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. One of Guerrero-Cruz's neighbors was also on hand at the demonstration. She says that she saw the moment he was detained. "How can any of us turn a blind eye to cruel, unjust treatment happening right in front of us? Where is the compassion? Where is the humanity?" she said. Lizette Becerra, an LAUSD educator who was formerly one of Guerrero-Cruz's teachers, told the rally that she visited him at the Adelanto Detention Center and that he said the agents had initially asked for someone else. "He said that 'without any warning,' men came up to him and grabbed him by the arm, started asking him for this other person, and they said, 'Are you this person?'" Becerra said, while speaking to the crowd. "He said, 'No, I'm not.'" But, according to her account, agents had then detained him. She also alleged that they had arrested Guerrero-Cruz without a warrant and had let his dog go free. "They took his dog, and at some point, from inside the car, he saw them unclip the dog and someone stomped on the ground so that the dog would run free," Becerra claimed. She also described the conditions that Guerrero-Cruz was living in since his detainment. She said that he's residing in a crowded cell, where he has to sleep next to a toilet. She said that he's lost about 20 pounds because he's unable to eat due to anxiety. "He should be in a classroom with us. He does not need to be in detention. Our students need to be safe," Becerra said. In response to a request for comment on the incident, the Department of Homeland Security shared a statement that said Guerrero-Cruz was an "illegal alien from Chile" who had overstayed a visa by more than two years. They say that he was required to leave the U.S. in 2023, and that he would remain in ICE custody "pending removal." "The allegations about CBP officers are FALSE, and it is lies like these that are contributing violence against our officers," the statement said. "Our officers acted professionally throughout the encounter. Guerrero-Cruz tied the dog to a tree after his mother refused to come and retrieve it. ... Under normal conditions, CBP would be able to call animal control and wait for them to help, however because of the increase in assaults, obstruction of operations, and rhetoric ... in the LA area they are unable to do this." Demonstrators say that they plan to continue holding rallies to push for Guerrero-Cruz's release so he can be reunited with his family and classmates.


Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why China Is Dunking On The Trump Administration's New TikTok Account
As TikTok fast approaches another potential ban in the U.S., the Chinese government is refusing to let its algorithm be sold. Future Publishing via Getty Images As the Trump administration approaches the end of its third legally dubious extension of the TikTok sale-or-ban law, the Chinese Communist Party is making one thing very clear: the app's For You algorithm, developed by the app's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, will not be sold anytime soon. That's because last time ByteDance tried to sell the algorithm — under threat of a TikTok ban during President Trump's first term — the Chinese government changed its export rules at the last minute to prevent the company from making the sale. Today, the CCP reiterated its stance on a TikTok sale in an editorial in the state-owned media outlet China Daily. The editorial began by applauding the Trump White House for creating an official TikTok Account — and gloating at the inconsistency between the White House's actions and Congress's ban of TikTok for national security reasons last year. 'TikTok's appeal and effectiveness as a communication channel has not been lost on even the White House,' it opened. 'That the White House launched its own account on the app less than one month before the third extended deadline expires only serves to expose the hypocrisy of the U.S. side's alleged 'security' charges against TikTok.' Then, the editorial went on to remind readers that ByteDance, as a Chinese company, 'must comply with Chinese laws and regulations,' and that Chinese law 'prohibits the export of core technologies such as short video algorithms, drawing a red line for the TikTok transaction.' The editorial expressed hope that Trump would indefinitely extend his non-enforcement of the binding U.S. law that requires TikTok to be sold to a non-Chinese company or banned in the U.S. The Chinese government's stance does not necessarily mean that Trump and ByteDance will abandon efforts to make some kind of a deal. But it does mean that sale of the For You algorithm — which is core to TikTok's function and appeal — won't be on the table. TikTok has been planning for this eventuality. In May, Reuters reported that the company was working on creating a U.S.-only clone of the For You algorithm, which could be used in a potential separation of U.S. TikTok from the existing app. (It is unclear whether the Chinese government would take issue with TikTok launching a U.S. only algorithm, if that algorithm is based in whole or in part on the Chinese asset whose sale the CCP has barred.) In July, The Information reported that the company was working on a separate U.S. TikTok app, to be launched in early September, before Trump's impending September 17 deadline. If TikTok does proceed with launching a U.S.-only app, it will have to be powered by an algorithm of some kind. The Chinese government is suggesting that algorithm can't be ByteDance's trademark For You Page. The status of a clone algorithm is still up in the air, both technologically and legally. So TikTok may be — at least in the short-to-medium term — somewhat stuck. In the meantime, Trump may do what he has done before and grant yet another extension, allowing the company to continue operating in the U.S. in violation of binding U.S. law. But Trump's own Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, has been singing a different tune, saying that TikTok will go dark in September unless the Chinese government approves a sale. Trump and the Chinese government might also agree to a non-sale sale: an agreement that allows functional Chinese control over TikTok to continue, but gives Trump the cosmetic win of closing a deal of some kind. Such a deal would likely violate the law that Congress passed last year — but the burden would fall on Congress and the courts to require compliance. As the third extension moves toward expiration, one of two things seems certain: either Trump will continue to flout the law and allow TikTok to remain under Chinese control, or TikTok will change — somewhat dramatically — because the tech that has defined it will be out of reach. More From Forbes Forbes With Trump's TikTok Ban On Hold, ByteDance Is Quietly Launching AI Apps By Emily Baker-White Forbes TikTokers Are Claiming Credit For Trump's Parade Attendance By Emily Baker-White Forbes Trump's Deadline For A TikTok Deal Is Almost Up. Here Are 5 Things To Watch By Emily Baker-White

Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Moscow Draws Hard Line Over Security Guarantees for Ukraine
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said any Western security guarantees for Ukraine in an eventual peace deal could only be enacted with Moscow's cooperation—essentially rendering them useless against another Russian invasion. Lavrov's remarks, at a Wednesday press conference with the Jordanian foreign minister, ran counter to the Trump administration's assertion that President Vladimir Putin agreed to European and U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine at the Alaska summit on Friday. They were also a potent sign that Moscow's position on the war hasn't shifted despite a surge in diplomatic engagement in recent days.