
Bumrah must play the second Test come what may
England won the first Test but Shubman Gill's India were not losers. Almost 500 runs in the first innings and close to 400 in the second innings was just an unbelievable performance from this young, inexperienced Indian batting line-up. Jasprit Bumrah was the sole Indian bowler who consistently posed a challenge to the England batters at Headingley (Reuters)
Every batter in this line-up is a T20 star, an impact player for their respective franchises. I also believe that T20 cricket is constantly working against your Test batting skills, so for this team to put up such an impressive Test batting performance, not once but twice, after an extensive 2-1/2 months of IPL cricket was just incredible.
It makes me proud of the cricket environment we have in which young cricketers come up the ranks having great T20 skills and exceptional ability for Test cricket at the same time.
India were unfortunate that on day five morning Leeds turned cold and the sun went behind the clouds, which meant the dry pitch wasn't getting drier and the cracks weren't widening.
Bumrah and Siraj bowled their hearts out but the pitch just went to sleep, and only woke up when there was a passing shower, and the sun finally came out in the afternoon.
This was why in that phase Prasidh Krishna was able to get the ball to move in the air to get Crawley out, and then got the ball to jag back to bowl Pope. If the pitch had reacted to Bumrah and Siraj like this in the morning, it would have been a different story for India.
But I am a bit concerned about India's immediate future in this series because despite getting five individual 100s and Bumrah taking five wickets in the first innings, England still managed to beat India.
India's late order collapses didn't help but they aren't a big issue for me. It's eventually about the final score; earlier, there were top-order collapses.
In both scenarios, India were still getting 400 runs, but earlier India's bowling was able to make the 400 runs count.
England chased 371 in the final innings quite comfortably, and that has to be quite disconcerting for India. The fact remains this bowling attack is not what it was four years back.
Bumrah's bowling performance in the second innings also threw light on the fact that in easy batting conditions he has reached a stage where putting in 30 overs with the same intensity twice in four days is just not possible anymore.
I also believe Siraj has reached a point of no return. I don't see him reaching the heights he did four years back.
No matter how the weather and the pitch conditions are for the second Test, India will have to go to Kuldeep Yadav, focusing only on the bowlers' inherent quality.
I was really disappointed with Jadeja's modest returns in the final innings. There may have been a dropped catch here and there, but in favourable conditions with a nice rough to work outside off, Jadeja toiled for 24 overs for just one wicket.
This is unbecoming of a senior lone spinner in the side who is on his fifth tour of England.
Shardul Thakur will go out and Kuldeep will come in for the next Test. Also, India cannot get too complacent about their batting after an inspiring batting performance at Headingley.
They may want to bolster their batting but still have some seam support, however negligible, and getting a batting all-rounder in Nitish Reddy may not be a bad idea.
He was phenomenal as a batter in Australia propping the lower order up, wasn't he?
Bumrah must play the second Test come what may, only because of how England chased down 371. Without Bumrah, India will have to get 500s to compete and that's an unfair expectation from this batting line-up.
As a bowler he has reached such heights that even a 40% fit Bumrah will make this Indian bowling attack look better than one without him.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tennis-Teenager Andreeva ousts Tauson in three sets for Bad Homburg quarter-final spot
BAD HOMBURG, Germany, June 25 (Reuters) - Third seed Mirra Andreeva survived a first set slip-up to battle past Denmark's Clara Tauson 3-6 6-3 6-1 on Wednesday for a spot in the Bad Homburg Open quarter-finals. HT Image With Wimbledon starting on Monday, Russian teenager Andreeva got a 109-minute workout on grass against the big-serving world number 23 before racing through the third set. "I knew this match would be tough. This was the fourth time we played this season. This year we have played on every surface," Andreeva said "I just tried to stay calm -- I don't know if I managed -- and fight for every point. I just fight." Andreeva, seventh in the world, found herself in trouble when she was broken in the seventh game with power baseliner Tauson going on to win the first set. The Russian, who kept punching her thigh in frustration throughout the match, initially had trouble controlling the Dane's powerful and accurate serve but did earn her first break of the match to go 4-2 up in the second set and level. She did not have to wait long for another break and she got three in a row to cruise through the third set. She will next face Czech Linda Noskova, who ousted Donna Vekic of Croatia, a Wimbledon semi-finalist last year, 2-6 6-2 6-4. Russia's Ekaterina Alexandrova battled past Maria Sakkari in three sets to book her quarter-final spot where she will face fourth-seed Iga Swiatek of Poland. The world number 18 broke the Greek once in the first set but it was enough to win it 6-3. Both players held serve with Sakkari improving her own to level after a successful tiebreak. But she failed to convert any of her eight break points throughout the match and conceded the third set to Alexandrova who unleashed a total of 13 aces. Beatriz Haddad Maia needed five match points before subduing Ukraine's seventh-seed Elina Svitolina 3-6 6-4 7-6(7) in a tight match, with the Brazilian next facing Italian second seed Jasmine Paolini. (Reporting by Karolos Grohmann, editing by Pritha Sarkar)


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Leg-spin bowling is becoming extinct: V V Kumar
V V Kumar Vaman Viswanath Kumar, fondly known as V V Kumar, may have stepped away from playing cricket nearly 50 years ago, but the sport has never left the Tamil Nadu leg-spin great. Kumar, who will celebrate his 90th birthday on Thursday, still breathes cricket: he tosses the ball as accurately as a present-day spinner would before his run-up, recites stats from yesteryear as if those matches happened in the recent past, keeps track of live action and stays associated with the sport by mentoring youngsters. Kumar, a former India international with two Test appearances in 1961, was the linchpin of the Tamil Nadu (then Madras) bowling attack for two decades, picking up an astonishing 599 first-class wickets. During his 22-season-long domestic career, he formed a deadly spin combination with S Venkataraghavan, making Tamil Nadu contenders, although they could not achieve Ranji Trophy glory. In an interview with Shrivathsan S, he discusses his illustrious career and how leg-spin bowling is becoming a diminishing art. Excerpts: You turned out to be one of the leading Indian spinners of your time. When and how did you fall in love with leg-spin bowling? When I was in Class IX, I was intrigued by the game. However, playing cricket was not easy, as the equipment was expensive. I obtained a golf ball, which was sold for four annas (25 paise). My slow-bowling career was based on what I learned playing with a golf ball. Because it's so small, it's hard to grip and spin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ¡Revoluciona tu mundo digital con recomendaciones tech! Mandarina - Tráfico Más información Undo The depressions on its surface prevent it from turning the way it should, but it causes deviations. That idea stuck with me, and I thought, 'Why not try the same with a bigger ball?' That's how it all began. How has the art of leg-spin bowling changed over the years? Since 2008-2009, the theory and execution of leg-spin have been different. Leg-spin is becoming extinct. In white-ball cricket, especially T20 cricket, you are asked to contain rather than look for wickets. If you do the same in Test cricket, you will be taken to the cleaners. At those times, the concept of leg-spin was different. It was about drawing the batter in, outsmarting him, and getting him out. If leg-spin bowling is to regain its old glory, it will take a considerable amount of time. It can only be restored with Test cricket, nothing else. There was a certain thrill in watching a batter step out only to get back to the crease in confusion, unsure of what had just happened. Moments like those were gratifying because you knew you'd outwitted him with sheer craft. Could you list some of your memorable dismissals? When I played for Prime Minister's XI against Australia in Bengaluru in the 1960s, the visitors had Ian Redpath on their team. Even when I was bowling well outside the off-stump, he played the ball on the leg side. I then decided to pitch the ball outside leg-stump, forcing him to be locked to the crease. I got him stumped because he was unable to move. The dismissal gave me great satisfaction. In my first Test against Pakistan in Delhi, Imtiaz Ahmed danced down the pitch only to see his off-stump disturbed. I flighted the ball more compared to the previous deliveries in that over. It was one of the great dismissals of my career. Did you believe you could have played more international cricket? I had a wrist issue and was not 100% fit to play against England (at the Brabourne Stadium in Mumbai), but I was asked to. I felt that it was not a risk I was supposed to take in a Test match, but I was told I would be able to adapt. I bowled defensively in the first innings and didn't take a wicket. I was then told I was being held in reserve for the next match and not given an over in the second innings. The sacrifice of playing the Brabourne Test cost me my India career; that is what happens when you play for someone else. But not playing another match for India did not deter me. By making use of every opportunity I got, I established myself as one of the top spinners in the country. However, I did not get the recognition. You played in the same era as the famed spin quartet … Erapalli Prasanna, Bishan Singh Bedi, and Venkataraghavan were already top-class, while B S Chandrasekhar was still finding his footing. He was raw in the early days but had great potential. 'Tiger' (Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi) had the trump card in Chandra, while Pras is the greatest off-spinner I have ever seen. In situations that were not conducive for India to win, it was Chandra who did the job for the team. No batter could master Chandra. The spin quartet under Tiger made India a force to be reckoned with in Test-match cricket. What do you make of the current Tamil Nadu senior men's set-up? I have been following their matches (Ranji Trophy). The players have to change their mindset to a great extent. I have seen batters play inappropriate strokes to balls, including bad ones. In the bowling department, they cannot rely on just one bowler. Another issue is a lack of consistency. By the time you reach the knockouts, you need to have built that rhythm. You should be going in with the mindset, 'I'm just as good as you; let's see what happens'. But I feel that confidence is missing when they face strong teams. How impressed were you with ace offie Ravichandran Ashwin? He is a great bowler, but I cannot compare him to anyone else. To get into the bracket of highest wicket-takers as an off-spinner is a recognition in itself. He is great in his own way.


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Lessons from Leeds: The loss at Headingley has given India enough reasons to pause and reflect
AP Team India has a lot to learn from There exists, in theory anyway, a minuscule minority that learns life's most vital lessons without having to pay a heavy price on the way. For the rest, it is failure that is the greatest teacher, being knocked down but not out the builder of resilience, and making sub-optimal choices the reminder of how different things might have been. The Indian cricket team, beaten at Leeds in the first Test, have been given plenty of reasons to pause and reflect. And, it will not be without regret and what-ifs. What if they had not dropped catches left, right and centre, giving batsmen second chances and more on a good batting surface? What if the lower order had shown more fight and not collapsed to 7 for 41 in the first innings and 6 for 31 in the second? What if they had picked a seam-bowling allrounder or a batting seamer in whom they showed more faith than Shardul Thakur? What if Shubman Gill had imposed himself more on the state of play as captain? Well, when a team has one bad session and is wiped out, the most appropriate response is to forget all about it and regroup. But, how does this team move to Edgbaston with some sense of having gained perspective when so much went in their favour and yet they lost? Opening the batting in England is considered one of the toughest assignments in cricket, and yet Yashasvi Jaiswal (101) and KL Rahul (137) scored centuries in either innings of the game. Gill, who needed runs under the belt before he could lead from the front, was a picture of control, all silken shots and perfect balance, scoring 147 in his maiden outing as captain in the format that matters the most. Rishab Pant broke too many records to enumerate in these pages here, but 134 and 118, twin centuries in England, is worth underscoring, for no other Indian has managed this. Then there is the biggest factor of them all. Jasprit Bumrah, the most difficult bowler to face in any format at the moment, delivered with the reliability of a banker, picking up 5 for 83 in the first innings. When Bumrah has the ball in hand, the game looks different, irrespective of the state of the pitch or the overhead conditions. He has the weapons in his arsenal and the acute game sense to get the best batsmen in the world out even when they are well set. With all this going swimmingly well for India, they still lost. Just where does this team go from here, knowing that Bumrah is slated to play only two more of the remaining four Tests, with the side trailing 0-1? Gautam Gambhir, the head coach, rightly points out that the support for Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj has to be picked from a group that is almost completely inexperienced at Test level. The selectors see enough quality in that group, but the only way they mature and grow is by playing in different conditions, in pressure situations, against quality opposition. And, this will mean bearing short-term batting line-up has lost the combined skill, wisdom and stature of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma. Sai Sudarshan was on debut, and Karun Nair was making a comeback after more than eight years. Sudarshan is undoubtedly one for the future, and Karun has earned his place back after showing tremendous never-say-die spirit and putting up runs on the board. But seeing their names on the team sheet is not going to intimidate any opposition bowlers just yet. Ravindra Jadeja is by far the lead slow bowler India will pick, especially when playing only one of the kind, which is likely to be the case all series. England prefer pitches that allow batsmen to hit through the line, giving themselves the best chance of staying true to their positive-atall-costs approach. This leaves Jadeja with the dual task of giving his captain control and picking up wickets when the fast bowlers need respite. These facts explain why this England tour is going to be no walk in the park for the Indian team. But Gill and Co. have not shown up for a study tour or to give England invaluable World Test Championship (WTC) points on a platter. The challenge for Gill is to find a way to tilt the odds in India's favour. While he grows into his role as captain and leader, Gill will have to coach, cajole and crack the whip to get the best out of his players. Gill will have to lean on the street smarts of Pant, his deputy, to create the heat of the contest on the field, even when things are not going India's way. Gill will have to keep scoring his runs while picking a playing XI that can optimally balance putting enough runs on the board and taking 20 wickets. Welcome to the hot seat, skipper. Leading India is indeed an honour and a privilege, but the key to lightening his burden lies in learning lessons without getting battered in the process