Bill to increase starting teacher pay applauded by local educators
ALEXANDRIA — Legislation currently under consideration in the Indiana House of Representatives that would increase minimum salaries for the state's teachers and expand health care services for school corporation employees is enjoying widespread support among those in the profession, including several local educators.
Senate Bill 146, authored by state Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, would increase minimum teacher salaries to $45,000 from $40,000. It would also require districts to spend at least 65% of their state tuition support on teacher compensation.
The bill unanimously passed the Senate Committee on Education and Career Development and has been referred to the Indiana House for further debate.
J.T. Morgan, a fourth-grade teacher at Alexandria Elementary School, said teacher salaries and difficulties in retaining teachers frequently go hand in hand.
'Any time you can increase the minimum salary, I think that is fantastic,' Morgan said. 'Obviously, in the last several years, public education has struggled with retaining teachers and we need to fix that. Salary, of course, is a part of it.'
Alexandria has around 100 certified teachers for the elementary and the high school combined, with a current starting salary of $48,700.
Brent Baker, the superintendent for Alexandria Community Schools, said increasing the minimum salary for teachers would help decrease some financial stress.
'Teachers need to be able to have a job where they can dedicate their time to their craft and to their classroom and to their students,' Baker said. 'They shouldn't have to worry about working a second job to pay the bills.'
Baker said that although Alexandria schools are not currently struggling to find teachers, 'any time we can increase teacher pay, we should look into it.'
While lauding the idea of increasing teachers' minimum salary, Morgan wondered what can be done for longer tenured educators.
'We want to bring up the minimum salary, which I think is great,' Morgan said, 'but I think we also have to remember the teachers who have given years of experience. What are we doing for those teachers to retain them and to make them feel the worth from a financial perspective as well?'
Morgan, who has worked as a teacher since 2003, also wondered, with inflation and the cost of living rising, how comparable his starting salary would be from 2003 to 2025.
Frankton-Lapel Community Schools has 173 certified staff members, with a starting pay of $43,250 for the 2024-25 school year.
Sterling Boles, the superintendent at FLCS, said the school corporation is currently fully staffed. He said the current legislation will help administrators create and maintain environments that would both attract new teachers and help the district hold on to well-performing ones.
'With its focus on increasing teacher pay, (SB 146) would have a positive impact on our school corporation by helping us remain competitive in attracting and retaining high-quality educators,' Boles said. 'Increased salaries would make our district more appealing to new teachers entering the profession and could also encourage experienced educators to stay, reducing turnover.'
South Madison Community Schools currently employs approximately 265 teachers, with a starting pay of $50,000.
Superintendent Mark Hall said that while South Madison is always on the lookout or teachers, administrators did not have trouble filling spots for the current school year. He said the district favors increased funding for teacher salaries, viewing the measure as an investment in the district's students as well.
'I think any time we can increase funding for our teachers, that is important,' Hall said. 'I think the 65%, spending that on teacher compensation, I think that just guarantees that school districts are putting their money where it should be, which is in their teaching staffs.'
Morgan said that the emotional side of teaching is what a lot of teachers enjoy the most about the profession.
'When you have been teaching as long as some of our veteran teachers have, you are doing this because of the love you have for your students and for their successes in the classroom as well as out of the classroom,' he said. 'I tell my students all the time, 'I am here because I love and care about you and want you to be well-rounded individuals when you step out of this building.'
'We are trying to prepare them for the real world and even though my students are just fourth graders, we are laying that groundwork for them now.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Press
2 hours ago
- American Press
NCAA settlement fallout: McNeese has NIL plan as it enters new economic era
The term student-athlete died on Friday. For years, the NCAA has attempted to distinguish its players from professionals, emphasizing that they are students first. That mirage now seems lost forever. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken gave final approval to the landmark settlement in the House vs. NCAA antitrust lawsuit, which had been ongoing for five years, ending nearly a year of negotiations and revisions. The $2.8 billion, 10-year settlement will pay past players for missed name, image and likeness opportunities and allow colleges to pay current players directly starting July 1. As schools of all levels throughout the country scramble to figure out what's next, McNeese State officials say they are ready for the future. 'It's a new and exciting time for college athletics,' McNeese Director of Athletics Heath Schroyer said. 'My staff and I have been working for over a year to prepare. We've considered how these changes will impact McNeese athletics and also how we can best position ourselves.' Schroyer said McNeese will buy into the program, while other Football Championship Subdivision and Southland Conference schools will consider opting out. Houston Christian is likely one of those. 'We've decided to opt in and bring our collective/NIL in-house and participate in revenue sharing,' he said. 'We'll keep the same scholarship numbers this first year for each sport. During this first year, we will evaluate both our financial situation and the national landscape.' With the NIL becoming entirely in-house, the Ranch Collective, which previously ran the program, will transition into a new role, said Keifer Ackley, assistant AD for NIL and Student-Athlete at McNeese. 'This will allow us to streamline the process,' Ackley said. 'This will make us more transparent.' The Ranch Collective is likely to transition into a more marketing-focused tool for the university, he said. For now, it appears all programs will remain, but this is a fluid situation on all levels, and McNeese's goal, Schroyer said, remains to move up to the Football Bowl Subdivision level if the opportunity arises. There is also no telling what will come next as lawsuits are expected to be filed over a variety of concerns. 'Sometimes these decisions aren't popular with everyone, and that's OK,' Schroyer said. 'I get it. The only constant in life is change; college athletics have undergone significant changes in the last few years, and this trend is likely to continue.' NCAA President Charlie Baker wrote an open letter after the settlement: 'Approving the agreement reached by the NCAA, the defendant conferences and student-athletes in the settlement opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports,' Baker wrote. 'This new framework that enables schools to provide direct financial benefits to student-athletes and establishes clear and specific rules to regulate third-party NIL agreements marks a huge step forward for college sports.' Earlier this spring, Baker spoke to McNeese athletes about the future of college sports and seemed shocked by the number of players who had transferred to the school. As part of the settlement, McNeese, along with the other FCS schools, will be required to pay $180,000 this year and between $25,000 and $300,000, which the NCAA will deduct from the funds it provides to the school. Helping to pay for that will be a 12-game football schedule the FCS is expected to add in future years. The final decision on the extra game will be made in the last week of June. The settlement is a victory for power conference schools, which easily have the resources to cover the money and compete in what is now an unlimited bidding war. 'The approval of the House settlement agreement represents a significant milestone for the meaningful support of our student-athletes and a pivotal step toward establishing long-term sustainability for college sports, two of the Southeastern Conference's top priorities,' SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey said. 'As the journey to modernize collegiate sports continues, we remain focused on identifying and implementing innovative opportunities for our student-athletes across all sports while maintaining the core values that make collegiate athletics uniquely meaningful.' While it's not clear how it will all play out, McNeese says it expects to pivot with whatever comes next.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Plaid Cymru has called for the First Minister of Wales to condemn the UK government for 'betraying Wales' on rail funding. Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut
The First Minister of Wales has been accused of doing 'absolutely nothing' to protect pensioners, following a UK Government U-turn on winter fuel payment cuts. Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, called for Eluned Morgan to apologise to the pensioners affected by the change last winter, arguing the Welsh Government should have stepped in to support those in need. Speaking during First Minister's Questions on Tuesday, Mr Millar said the cut had forced vulnerable people to choose between heating and eating. Baroness Morgan, leader of the Welsh Labour Government, said she was 'absolutely delighted' that the UK Government had reversed the cut for many. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners, with anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year now getting the payment automatically. The decision last July to restrict the winter fuel payment to the poorest pensioners was intended to save around £1.5 billion a year, with more than nine million people who would have previously been eligible losing out. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, announced the partial U-turn on Monday, following significant backlash from charities, opposition MPs and the Government's own backbenchers. Speaking in the Senedd, Mr Millar said: 'Yesterday we saw a screeching U-turn on the winter fuel allowance by Rachel Reeves, after considerable pressure from the Conservative Party. 'You will know that over half a million Welsh pensioners were deprived of their winter fuel payments last year, leaving some very vulnerable people with the unenvious choice of having to choose between heating and eating – it's an absolute disgrace. 'You are meant to stand up for Wales but what did you actually do in terms of this winter fuel allowance? You did absolutely nothing.' Mr Millar argued Baroness Morgan should have implemented a Welsh winter fuel payment or stood up to Sir Keir Starmer and demanded the payment be restored sooner. Baroness Morgan responded that she was 'absolutely delighted' that Sir Keir Starmer had listened to pensioners in Wales and across the country. 'I'm really pleased that because we have made representations to the Prime Minister on this issue that he has changed his mind and that will make a difference to hundreds of thousands of pensioners across Wales this winter, in a country where we do have more older people and housing which is more difficult to heat. 'I don't think that it's bad to listen to people and then to make sure that you respond to them.' Baroness Morgan had previously pushed back against the cut, having called for a 'rethink' in early May, saying it was something 'that comes up time and again'. At the time, the Government said there would 'not be a change to the Government's policy'. On Monday, Ms Reeves suggested that the 'stability we've brought back to the economy' meant the Government was able to change the eligibility threshold for winter fuel payments.
