logo
Tariffs hit hard, but queer-owned brands push back with transparency and community

Tariffs hit hard, but queer-owned brands push back with transparency and community

Yahoo3 days ago

At the start of President Donald Trump's second term in January, his administration quickly followed through on his promise to increase tariffs on U.S. trading partners. It began in February with a 10% tariff increase on all Chinese imports and a 25% increase on steel and aluminum products. Tariffs escalated between China and the U.S., with the highest reaching a 145% tariff for Chinese imports.
After a 90-day pause starting March 14, during which tariffs on both countries' imports were reduced by 115%, the U.S. and China reached an agreement on June 10. Tariffs on Chinese imports settled at 55%, while U.S. import tariffs settled at 10%. For many U.S. businesses, the damage from the initial rise in tariffs has had a profound effect, especially for those in retail and apparel.
News Is Out looked at how queer-owned businesses have begun speaking out about the effect of the tariffs and what they are doing to combat rising costs, or at least how to bring consumers' attention to them.
Queer-owned apparel brand tomboyX shared a statement from CEO Leslie Garrand about the tariffs on its social media channels:
'If you're uneasy about the whole Tr*mp situation–yeah, same.
'These are unpredictable times, and we want to be real with you. Trump's wild-@ss tariffs are creating serious challenges for small businesses like ours–and starting this May, we now face sky-high tariff costs.
'The good news: Many of our products (like swim!) are less affected. So go ahead, shop away.
'The not-so-good news: Products we sustainably produce in China are now hit with tariff rates of + 145%. To help offset just a portion of this cost increase, we're introducing a temporary 'Tr*mp Tariff Surcharge' on those items starting May 1. You'll see a clear note on the product page and in your cart. (The amount varies by item, and we'll remove the charge as soon as we can.)
'Thank you for sticking with us and supporting a small business doing its best to responsibly weather the chaos. Built to endure.
-Leslie Garrard – CEO'
Since then, items on the tomboyX website that are affected by tariffs now feature a note in red that says 'Tr*mp Tariff Surcharge.' The additional fees range from around $1 up to $7.
'TomboyX has always done things the right way—high-quality underwear, sustainably made, and inclusively designed,' Garrad shared with News Is Out. 'But the new Trump tariffs put extra pressure on small, values-led brands. These added costs are major and unplanned, and shifting our manufacturing footprint takes time and money. For small businesses, it hits hard. We're grateful to our community for standing with us as we adapt.'
Queer- and female-founded apparel company Wildfang based in Portland, Oregon, has also spoken out publicly about tariffs. Wildfang CEO Emma McIlroy was interviewed on 'CBS Mornings' on April 9 about tariffs, which heavily impact the company. When asked how the steep rise in tariffs would impact her company, McIlroy shared an example.
'We had our summer order—so we make apparel, we make fashion—arrived on Monday this week. If that order had arrived today, it would have cost us $178,000 more to receive it. I don't have that money.'
When asked if those increases could be passed on to customers, McIllory said, 'I do think you're going to see businesses have to pass this on to consumers. If you were trying to maintain the same structure you have right now, it would mean an 83% increase in consumer prices. I don't think you'll see that full price increase, but that's how aggressive this would be for consumers.'
However, McIlroy shared that Wildfang is doing everything they can to mitigate the rising costs.
'So, as a small business, we're going to try everything in our power not to pass that along,' McIlroy said. 'That's going to include working with our factory partners, looking at new factories and locations to manufacture, and that's going to include cutting our own costs. Every business will try to do that. But as a small business, there aren't that many places to cut. I think a last resort is going to increase prices.'
After speaking out publicly about how Trump's tariffs could affect Wildfang, McIlroy said the response from the community and customers has been overwhelmingly supportive.
We've had tons of lovely messages of support from our community,' McIlroy told News Is Out. 'We've also had lots of notes from other business owners sharing their frustrations and fears and thanking us for speaking up and raising awareness about the topic.'
In terms of next steps, McIlroy said Wildfang is working with factories to fast-track orders during the 90-day tariff pause. 'Additionally we're working with our factories to sample in Vietnam and Indonesia to diversify our manufacturing base,' she said.
For Gay Pride Apparel owners Sergio Aragon and Jesus Gutierrez, the rise in tariffs hasn't hit the business directly, yet much remains to be seen. Gay Pride Apparel does much of its business with American printers, but tariffs could affect them in other ways.
'There is a lot of uncertainty for us about whether they'll raise their prices because they're being hit with tariffs,' Gutierrez said in a Zoom interview with News Is Out. 'And it's also very timely for us, because obviously, it's about to hit Pride. So we're trying to figure out: will our production partner raise our prices? Does that mean that we have to raise our prices on our end?'
It's not just tariffs giving Gutierrez and Aragon pause, it's also a challenging economy.
'We know the economy is a little bit rough right now to begin with,' Gutierrez said. 'Our pricing is already pretty high compared to a normal T-shirt. So we're trying to juggle it all. And I think it's all been so volatile—just changing every day—that it hasn't really hit us in one way or another. It's almost kind of still up in the air for us.'
Gay Pride Apparel's partners have been working with the company to keep shipping costs down and keep lines of communication open.
'But the good thing is, our business partners and our suppliers have been really transparent with us and working with us,' Aragon said. 'There are different workarounds they're doing to help us avoid it.'
When asked their thoughts on tomboyX's approach of including a clear note about tariffs, Gutierrez applauded the company's transparency.
'I love it,' Gutierrez said. 'I mean, as you mentioned earlier, we're very transparent with our customers, and I think it's because it's just us two. We have a two-way conversation with our customer and our community. So seeing tomboyX do that was really fun and felt like something we would do. We actually saw it and were like, 'Oh, should we consider doing something?' But we don't know how it's going to affect us yet.'
Gutierrez and Aragon are considering what to do next and if tariffs really begin to negatively impact the company. While some companies are looking at having to pass on increases, Gay Pride Apparel is also looking at an alternative.
'But as people are raising their prices and responding to this, we were talking about maybe lowering our prices and making less money per sale per product, but becoming more accessible,' Gutierrez said. 'Because truthfully, we're struggling. Everyone struggles. How do we meet our customers where they're at?'
On a positive note as a queer-owned business, Gay Pride Apparel is seeing an increase in consumers supporting the company as an alternative to those that have changed their stances on support for Pride, diversity and inclusion, like Target and Walmart.
'They'll straight up call it out,' Gutierrez said. 'On Threads specifically, we'll get tagged randomly in posts that are like, whether it's a boycott post or it's a Pride-related kind of 'tag your favorite queer business.' And then people are like, 'Oh, I only shop at Gay Pride Apparel now because the rest of them are abandoning us,' or 'I only stick to companies who are here all year, such as Gay Pride Apparel.' They'll even say, 'I'm trying to support, even if it's 20% more, 30% more, to buy the shirt—I'll support Gay Pride Apparel over XYZ.''
While not U.S.-based business, Canadian company GrrrlL Spells does a lot of business with consumers in the U.S. Last year, Grrrl Spells made headlines as one of the queer- and trans-owned businesses when their partnership with Target was drastically reduced and their labels were removed from remaining products.
Creator and designer of GrrrlL Spells, En Tze Loh, shared their experience as a Canadian brand.
'Even though we're a Canadian business, the majority of our online customers are from the states,' Loh said. 'The de minimis exemption allowing orders under $800 to enter the U.S. tariff-free was removed specifically for products manufactured in China, now subjecting them to an absurdly high tariff fee regardless of where it's shipped from. We design all of our own products but get them manufactured both locally and abroad including China, and unfortunately many of our products will now be subject to those tariffs when delivered to U.S. customers.'
As a result, Grrrl Spells has pulled back on shipping certain products to the U.S.
'We have decided to stop shipping any of our items that were manufactured in China to the U.S. as we don't believe anyone should have to pay these extreme fees, which drastically decreases our sales. Enamel pins, which are our most popular product, do not have any North American manufacturers at all and they are mostly produced in China, so sadly there isn't an alternative.'
During a time that should see the company's biggest spikes, Grrrl Spells is preparing for a slower season.
'We are definitely anticipating a much quieter Pride month and year due to the tariffs and decline of the economy in general as we've already been feeling the effects of it since the year began. We're trying our best to adapt to the changes and find alternatives in order to keep going but it has been challenging.'
Loh also wants consumers and LGBTQ+ people to know how grateful they are for their support.
'We would like to send so much love and strength to every queer and trans person during these wild times and thank you so much to everyone who has supported us throughout all these years,' Loh said. 'We need the support of each other more than ever right now. While we may not be able to ship many of our current goods to the U.S. at the moment, we're working on a new collection for Pride with items that we will be able to ship tariff-free, so please stay tuned!'
This story was produced by News Is Out and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Political violence is threaded through recent U.S. history. The motives and justifications vary
Political violence is threaded through recent U.S. history. The motives and justifications vary

Los Angeles Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Political violence is threaded through recent U.S. history. The motives and justifications vary

The assassination of one Democratic Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband and the shooting of another lawmaker and his wife at their homes are just the latest addition to a long and unsettling roll call of political violence in the United States. The list, in the last two months alone: the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington, D.C.; the firebombing of a Colorado march calling for the release of Israeli hostages; and the firebombing of the official residence of Pennsylvania's governor — on a Jewish holiday while he and his family were inside. Here is a sampling of other attacks before that — the assassination of a healthcare executive on the streets of New York City late last year; the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally during his presidential campaign last year; the 2022 attack on the husband of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) by a believer in right-wing conspiracy theories; and the 2017 shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) by a gunman at a congressional softball game practice. 'We've entered into this especially scary time in the country where it feels the sort of norms and rhetoric and rules that would tamp down on violence have been lifted,' said Matt Dallek, a political scientist at Georgetown University who studies extremism. 'A lot of people are receiving signals from the culture.' Politics have also driven large-scale massacres. Gunmen who killed 11 worshipers at a synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018, 23 shoppers at a heavily Latino Walmart in El Paso in 2019 and 10 Black people at a Buffalo, N.Y., grocery store in 2022 each cited the conspiracy theory that a secret cabal of Jews was trying to replace white people with people of color. That has become a staple on parts of the right that support Trump's push to limit immigration. The Anti-Defamation League found that from 2022 through 2024, all of the 61 political killings in the United States were committed by right-wing extremists. That changed on the first day of 2025, when a Texas man flying the flag of the Islamic State group killed 14 people by driving his truck through a crowded New Orleans street before being fatally shot by police. 'You're seeing acts of violence from all different ideologies,' said Jacob Ware, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who researches terrorism. 'It feels more random and chaotic and more frequent.' The United States has a long and grim history of political violence, including presidential assassinations dating to the killing of President Abraham Lincoln, lynchings and other violence aimed at Black people in the South, and the 1954 shooting inside Congress by four Puerto Rican nationalists. Experts say the last few years, however, have reached a level not seen since the tumultuous days of the 1960s and 1970s, when political leaders the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., President Kennedy, Malcolm X and Robert F. Kennedy were assassinated. Ware noted that the most recent surge comes after the new Trump administration has closed units that focus on investigating white supremacist extremism and pushed federal law enforcement to spend less time on anti-terrorism and more on detaining people who are in the country illegally. 'We're at the point, after these six weeks, where we have to ask about how effectively the Trump administration is combating terrorism,' Ware said. One of Trump's first acts in office was to pardon those involved in the largest act of domestic political violence this century — the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob intended to prevent Congress from certifying Trump's 2020 election loss. Those pardons broadcast a signal to would-be extremists on either side of the political debate, Dallek said: 'They sent a very strong message that violence, as long as you're a Trump supporter, will be permitted and may be rewarded.' Often, those who engage in political violence don't have clearly defined ideologies that easily map onto the country's partisan divides. A man who died after he detonated a car bomb outside a Palm Springs fertility clinic last month left writings urging people not to procreate and expressed what the FBI called 'nihilistic ideations.' But each political attack seems to inspire partisans to find evidence the attacker is on the other side. Little was known about the man police identified as a suspect in the Minnesota attacks, 57-year-old Vance Boelter. Authorities say they found a list of other apparent targets that included other Democratic officials, abortion clinics and abortion rights advocates, as well as fliers for the day's anti-Trump 'No Kings' parades. Conservatives online seized on the fliers — and the fact that Boelter had apparently once been reappointed to a state workforce development board by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz — to claim the suspect must be a liberal. 'The far left is murderously violent,' billionaire Elon Musk posted on his social media site, X. It was reminiscent of the fallout from the attack on Paul Pelosi, the former House speaker's then-82-year-old husband, who was seriously injured by a man wielding a hammer. Right-wing figures falsely theorized the assailant was a secret lover rather than what authorities said he was: a believer in pro-Trump conspiracy theories who broke into the Pelosi home echoing Jan. 6 rioters who broke into the Capitol by saying: 'Where is Nancy?!' No prominent Republican ever denounced the Pelosi assault, and GOP leaders including Trump joked about the attack at public events in its aftermath. On Saturday, Nancy Pelosi posted a statement on X decrying the Minnesota attack. 'All of us must remember that it's not only the act of violence, but also the reaction to it, that can normalize it,' she wrote. After mocking the Pelosis after the 2022 attack, Trump on Saturday joined in the bipartisan condemnation of the Minnesota shootings, calling them 'horrific violence.' The president has, however, consistently broken new ground with his bellicose rhetoric toward his political opponents, whom he routinely calls 'sick' and 'evil,' and has talked repeatedly about how violence is needed to quell protests. The Minnesota attack occurred after Trump took the extraordinary step of mobilizing the military to try to control protests against his administration's immigration operations in Los Angeles during the last week, when he pledged to 'HIT' disrespectful protesters and warned of a 'migrant invasion' of the city. Dallek said Trump has been 'both a victim and an accelerant' of the charged, dehumanizing political rhetoric that is flooding the country. 'It feels as if the extremists are in the saddle,' he said, 'and the extremists are the ones driving our rhetoric and politics.' Riccardi writes for the Associated Press.

'No Kings' organizers say protests drew large crowds: Here are their estimates
'No Kings' organizers say protests drew large crowds: Here are their estimates

USA Today

time28 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'No Kings' organizers say protests drew large crowds: Here are their estimates

'No Kings' organizers say protests drew large crowds: Here are their estimates Show Caption Hide Caption Millions march in 'No Kings' protests across country Millions marched in cities and towns across the U.S. in "No Kings" protests to rally against the Trump administration. Organizers of the "No Kings" rallies that swept across the nation June 14 said the protests drew large crowds that marched against the Trump administration. The American Civil Liberties Union, a part of the coalition that put on the demonstrations, said in a late Saturday, June 14 statement that more than five million people participated in over 2,100 rallies and protests. Political organizing group Move On, who was a partner in the "No Kings" rallies, echoed the 5 million person estimate in a fundraising email. Jeremy Pressman, the co-director of the Crowd Counting Consortium – a Harvard University and University of Connecticut project that estimates political crowds – told USA TODAY June 15 that it will take "some time" to complete an estimate on the "No Kings" rallies. The Los Angeles Times reported that "tens of thousands" of people demonstrated in the city roiled by Trump's recent immigration enforcement. The New York Post reported that 50,000 people showed up in New York City, where President Donald Trump was born. "Today's protests are a resounding message that people across the nation will not be intimidated by President Trump's fear tactics," ACLU Chief Political & Advocacy Officer Deirdre Schifeling said in the statement. "Americans are brave, democracy loving people and will not sit idly by as the Trump administration feeds our Constitution into the shredder — nor will the ACLU." 'No Kings' protests across US largely peaceful The mostly calm marches, organized under the theme that no individual is above the law, coincided with the day Trump presided over a military parade on the streets of the nation's capital. A demonstration in Northern Virginia, about 70 miles from Washington, D.C., was met with violence when a man intentionally drove an SUV through a crowd of departing protesters, striking at least one person, police said. Police in Los Angeles hit protesters with batons, fired tear gas and ordered a large crowd in downtown to disperse; authorities said they were responding to people throwing "rocks, bricks, bottles," and "fireworks" at officials. In Minnesota, organizers canceled protests across the state out of an abundance of caution after a shooter targeted local lawmakers, killing one and her spouse at their home and injuring another lawmaker and his spouse at their residence. In a statement, the "No Kings" group said it was adhering to guidance from Minnesota State Patrol and Gov. Tim Walz, who urged people not to attend any rallies Saturday. Contributing: N'dea Yancey-Bragg, Sarah D. Wire, Jeanine Santucci, Jonathan Limehouse, Jay Calderon, Brian Day, USA TODAY.

Trump wanted a military spectacle. Instead, he got a history lesson.
Trump wanted a military spectacle. Instead, he got a history lesson.

Washington Post

time31 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump wanted a military spectacle. Instead, he got a history lesson.

The Army's 250th birthday parade was not the grand military spectacle that many anticipated, and for that Americans can breathe a momentary, measured sigh of relief. It was a family-friendly conclusion to a celebratory day, with events on the Mall and fireworks at the end. What had been billed as an overwhelming display of military might turned out to be a linear history lesson, from the early days of revolution to the age of robotic dogs and flying drones. A narrator made sense of it all over loudspeakers and for those watching the live stream on television, with a script that rarely strayed from the Army's disciplined sense of itself as a lethal fighting machine in the service of democracy and the Constitution. The tone was reminiscent of the wall texts and exhibits at the National Museum of the United States Army, which opened on the grounds of Fort Belvoir in November 2020, during one of the most dangerous moments in recent American history. Like Saturday's parade, the museum celebrates the Army's history, but it does so with the temperance and nuance of serious professional historians, and a well-crafted historical and cultural narrative that largely steers clear of propaganda. It opened in the waning days of President Donald Trump's first term, after he lost reelection, and only days after he fired his defense secretary, Mark T. Esper. There was, at the time, considerable anxiety that Trump might attempt to use the Army to sustain his false claims of election fraud. That Army, which has a keen sense of its own aesthetics, had been embroiled in Trump's efforts to politicize it earlier in his first administration. In June 2020, a photograph of members of the D.C. National Guard on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial went viral, during the unsettled days of national protests after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. That picture, of troops seemingly deployed and ready for combat, standing in an orderly phalanx on the steps of the memorial, recalled the horror of the 1970 Kent State shootings, when Ohio National Guard troops fired on unarmed student protesters, killing four of them. It also seemed to presage a new age of domestic militarism, with the U.S. Army loyal not to the Constitution, but to Trump personally. The same anxiety preceded Saturday's parade, especially after a speech earlier in the week by Trump at Fort Bragg, during which uniformed troops booed mentions of former president Joe Biden and California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and cheered Trump's partisan MAGA message. But on Saturday, at least, the Army stuck to its familiar themes of service, sacrifice and duty. The result was a display of civics, not power. The president was supposedly inspired to demand a military parade, an exceptionally rare event in recent U.S. history, after seeing a very different display on Bastille Day 2017, on the Champs-Élysées in Paris. Given Trump's admiration for strongman leaders in Russia and China, there was worry that the Army parade might hew to the authoritarian geometry of military spectacles in totalitarian countries, especially the absurdist mix of camp and menace favored by the regime in North Korea. But the soldiers who paraded past the presidential reviewing stand on Constitution Avenue walked with a loose-limbed gait, disciplined but not robotic, with individual soldiers integrated into the collective without losing their identity. Those riding by on tanks, trucks and other combat vehicles waved and smiled, engaging with an enthusiastic crowd. The announcer often sounded as if he were narrating a fashion show for machines rather than a military parade. The Bradley Fighting Vehicle: 'It is fast, it is tough, and it is lethal.' Parades always come with a message, which is why so many people were wary. When the American painter Childe Hassam painted a series of patriotic events, including a Fourth of July parade, before America's entry into World War I, he offered an innocent, exuberant vision of red, white and blue, all but overwhelming the individual marchers, as if flags, banners and bunting were sufficient to win a battle. But he was also positing an image of a unified America, during a period of considerable anxiety over mass immigration from European countries not deemed sufficiently Anglo-Saxon to fit a racist model of the country's emerging imperial identity. The impressionist blending of colors mimics the blurring of origins in the proverbial American melting pot. The last big U.S. military parade in Washington, held in 1991 after the Gulf War, wasn't just a welcome-home for the troops, but also an effort to allay the alienation of many Americans from their armed forces following the debacle in Vietnam. Since at least World War II, the Bastille Day review in Paris has been an even more complicated affair, a Gaullist effort to prioritize visions of orderly state power over leftist memories of modern France's birth in revolution and bloodletting. In Leni Riefenstahl's 1935 Nazi propaganda film, 'Triumph of the Will' — a terrifying compendium of parades and military spectacles — there is a scene in which Adolf Hitler walks through a vast empty space flanked by hundreds of troops. They have been reduced to the fascist ideal, mechanical dots on a relentless grid, remote and so distant from the leader to affirm the vast difference in their status: One man alone has agency, all the rest are part of the machine. Riefenstahl's image reminds us of a basic rule of thumb for analyzing a military parade: Look to the edges. Is the army of and among the people, or does it cut its own space, cleaving the throng, inhabiting its own power separate from civilian society? The U.S. Army has complicated edges; it is professional and thus apart from the civilian world, but it is also voluntary, and thus integrated into the fabric of American society. Heavy security on Saturday kept the people apart from the troops, but individual service members often seemed intent on bridging the distance, with waves and smiles. That offered a sharp contrast with the presence of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles, where the governor insists that they are not wanted or needed, where the edges of their presence are sharp and dangerous, and could be cutting. This year marks not just the 250th anniversary of the Army's birth, but also the 50th anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War, which was the all-time nadir of the military's reputation in the United States. The parade on Saturday could have done exceptional damage to a decades-long effort to climb out of that hole. The current president is extraordinarily good at creating situations that force unique message discipline on his critics. Thus, people who are deeply troubled by the unprecedented federal use of the National Guard on the streets of Los Angeles were invited to hate on an unnecessary and costly (up to $45 million estimated) but mostly benign Army celebration in Washington. But the Army proved even better at message discipline, keeping attention on its history, its service and its members. One early warning sign of a shift in the Army's allegiance will be a fraying of how it tells its own story: If it fires its historians — or attempts to coerce their compliance, as seems to be happening in other institutions, including the Smithsonian — there will be even more serious trouble ahead. But on Saturday, it kept that history in the foreground, and even the president looked bored during much of it, which isn't surprising. The Army made it about the country, not the man.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store