Reckless pro-Palestine protesters break into warehouse and damage nearly £1m of military equipment destined for UKRAINE
A SWARM of pro-Palestinian protesters caused nearly £1million worth of damage to military equipment which had been earmarked for Ukraine.
Some 150 dim-witted activists wielding hammers and spray paint went on a warehouse rampage - reportedly causing severe damage to several tanks.
4
CEO of OIP Land Systems Freddy Versluys said the vandals caused severe damage to the tanks at his warehouse (pictured)
Credit: Reuters
4
Pro-Palestine protesters smashed up computers and damaged the facility (stock)
Credit: Reuters
4
The firm has provided around 260 armoured vehicles to Ukraine since Putin's invasion
Credit: Getty
They raided hangars and smashed up computers at the facility in Belgium owned by OIP Land Systems - who produce military equipment for Ukraine.
But the idiotic protesters, dressed in white overalls and masks, wrongly believed that the equipment was being shipped to Israel,
Taking part in the Stop Arming
Israel
campaign, they first broke into and ransacked the warehouse's offices in Tournai.
The dopey demonstrators then headed for the storage units before vandalising the facility and the critical equipment inside it.
READ MORE WORLD NEWS
They brought along disc cutters and hammers during the frenzy on Monday which "severely damaged some vehicles", the firm's CEO Freddy Verslyus said.
He branded the group of vandals "Hamas sympathisers".
The
next
shipment of military aid which - was reserved specifically to help Volodymyr Zelensky fend off Russia's meatgrinder invasion - has now been delayed.
OIP Land Systems specialises in the maintenance, repair, and modernisation of
Most read in The US Sun
Since the Vladimir Putin's bloody invasion, the company has already delivered around 260
Versluys said: "The
next
delivery is now delayed by at least a month.
Vladimir Putin rages 'all of Ukraine is ours' as he threatens to seize key city while Kyiv slams tyrant as 'deranged'
"That's all these Hamas sympathisers will have achieved with their actions."
The fuming CEO also announced his intention to file a complaint against unknown parties following the huge £1million damage bill.
The military company was reportedly targeted by the protesters because it is owned by Israeli defence company Elbit Systems.
The activists reportedly believe that Elbit supplies 85 per cent of the Israel Defence Force's drones, and most of their ground military equipment.
But the raging protesters were left mortified after the firm's CEO claimed that his company had not produced defence systems for Israel in over 20 years.
At least 30 people were arrested following the embarrassing raid, Stop Arming Israel said.
Tournai police arrived to the scene supported by Borinage cops who also came with riot control vehicles.
A helicopter was also scrambled during the mindless rampage.
Some activists fled to neighbouring villages in order to escape, before being chased down by cops.
OIP Land Systems has provided defence products to
Ukraine
on several occasions.
The military equipment provided includes
It comes after two
The men were seen breaking into
The UK's defence ministry slammed the "vandalism of
4
Leopard 1 tanks are seen in the hangar in Tournais, Belgium
Credit: Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Iran condemns Trump's 'disrespectful and unacceptable' comments on Khamenei
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned Saturday the "disrespectful and unacceptable" comments from Donald Trump, after the US president claimed to have saved Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei from an "ugly and ignominious death". "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt supporters," Mr Araghchi posted on his account on social media platform X. "The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults," the foreign minister said. The United States carried out strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites last weekend, with no consensus as to how effective they were. With those strikes, Washington joined Israel's bombardments of Iran's nuclear programme in the 12-day conflict launched on 13 June. The foreign minister's condemnation on Saturday came after Mr Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he had saved the Iranian leader from assassination, accusing Khamenei of ingratitude. "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life," Mr Trump posted. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'" Mr Trump also said that he had been working in recent days on the possible removal of sanctions against Iran, one of Tehran's main demands. "But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more," Mr Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table. Iran has denied it is set to resume nuclear talks with the United States, after Mr Trump said that negotiations would begin again next week.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 28th: On lack of action in Brussels, doing the right thing and choice language
Sir, – Your newspaper today (June 27th) provides a stark juxtaposition as to the situation in Gaza, and the hypocrisy of the EU. Your reporters in Brussels set out the lack of action by the EU to sanction Israel for its failure to allow aid into Gaza (' Government briefs 'like-minded' EU states on Occupied Territories Bill '). We see where states who are 'sympathetic' to Israel effectively veto anything more than carefully crafted words, as being the strongest action possible. The hope being that these words will bring the Israeli government to its senses and allow aid, at appropriate levels, to be let into the enclave, and maybe a ceasefire. And as if to show the Israeli government holding two fingers to the EU, your Reuters report sets out how Israel has stopped any aid being allowed into the north of Gaza ('Israel halts aid to northern Gaza as clans deny Hamas is stealing it'). Those strong words from Brussels really hit the mark! READ MORE The hypocrisy of the EU is then laid bare with unanimity easily forthcoming in extending sanctions against Russia for their invasion and ongoing war with Ukraine. While Mr Netanyahu can strong arm those leaders who are 'sympathetic' to Israel, the EU will never take collective action against Israel. It is time for those EU states who are minded to take action against Israel, in the form of concrete sanctions, must do so unilaterally. – Yours, etc, PHILIP BRADY, Donnycarney, Dublin. Sir, – I read with interest Dr Ed Abrahamson's letter (June 26th). His analysis of Ireland's relationship with Israel in light of ongoing events in Gaza and the political discussions of the same in Ireland was revealing. I was particularly interested in his view that the 'deep freeze' he describes between Ireland and Israel may never end. He posits that the fracture in the relationship between the two countries may affect the economy and also gives an example of the welfare of patients in Irish hospitals who may be deprived of medical advances which come from Israel. It is true that the Government and many politicians have spoken out on issues in Gaza and many people in Irish society are very upset and angry about what is unfolding. For many across society, this has meant taking a stand and speaking up for what we consider to be wrong in terms of current events. Surely to be human and to have moral courage and clarity means that taking a stand on any issue should come down to moral considerations alone? The view that being seen as taking a stand against Israel's current actions might affect us in a material way is a factor to be borne in mind, is to totally miss the point and the moral clarity that taking a stand on any issue demands. Moral courage is the willingness to take a potentially costly moral action simply because it is the right thing to do. I learned this lesson very early in childhood when I was visiting Dublin with my parents and ran towards the door of Dunnes Stores on Henry Street and my father gently pulled me back and said 'We are not going in there, never cross a picket, do you hear me now ? never.' He gently explained about South Africa, apartheid and oranges and how these people were doing what was right, even though it would affect them directly in their income. I was fortunate to have such an early lesson and the clarity and admiration with which he spoke about those Dunnes Stores workers has stayed with me as a seminal memory, almost 40 years later. Taking a stand means doing the right thing even if the consequences of that stand affect you directly, the world is often transactional and full of compromise and moral cowardice. Doing the right thing means we abandon such obfuscation and speak with the same clarity and simplicity as though we are speaking to a child, explaining the difference between right and wrong and why doing the right thing matters even if it affects you directly. – Yours, etc, JACKIE GORMAN, Athlone, Co Westmeath. Sir, – Justine Mc Carthy is to be congratulated on her forensic account of how the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has exceeded her legal mandate and undermined the role of the EU high representative and the rights and responsibilities of individual member states in relation to foreign policy ( 'What gives Ursula von der Leyen the right to egg on Binyamin Netanyahu with his killing crusades ?' June 27th). The big question is what can be done about it? A motion of censure is due to be tabled by a number of MEPs in respect of the 'Pfizergate'controversy. This concerns Ms von der Leyen's professed inability to release copies of texts between her and the Pfizer chief executive officer during the Covid crisis. There are also issues arising in relation to the alleged bypassing of the European Parliament and the increasing centralisation of power in the commission. It is now clear that the Fianna Fáil MEPs who voted against von der Leyen's reappointment were absolutely correct in their judgment. Given the Government's strong position on the recent report on Israel's violations of human rights within the EU trade deal, all our MEPs should now consider supporting this motion and help trigger a substantive and comprehensive debate in the European Parliament on this important issue. – Yours, etc, MARTIN Mc DONALD, Dublin 12. Contactless travel Sir, – Dr Mark Thompson asks why it will take so long to introduce contactless payment on public transport (Letters, June 27th). His question is, however, like the line judges in Wimbledon, redundant (' No line judges at Wimbledon: you cannot be serious ,' June 27th). We don't need contactless payment; we need a simple Berlin-style smart phone ticketing app. Once downloaded you can buy a ticket that lasts for two hours on any form of public transport. You can buy a ticket immediately before you board a bus, tram or train. You don't have to tap machines at stations, on buses or trams. Random inspection polices the time-based system. With a Berlin-style app, payment is easy and foolproof. Unlike the traditional Wimbledon fans upset by the removal of the line judges, the Berlin app does not need to replace the cumbersome existing infrastructure. Better, it does not need the addition of contactless payment which is rapidly becoming a legacy technology. – Yours, etc, SEAN KEAVNEY, Dublin 15. Sir, – Ken Buggy bemoans the delay by the National Transport Authority introducing contactless payment on public transport here (Letters, June 27th). He suggests that if Ryanair were involved it would be in place 'tomorrow' and with 'no shopping bags'. He should be careful what he wishes for; Ryanair might refuse buggys as well. – Yours, etc, PAUL MURPHY, Drumcondra, Dublin 9. Sir, – Dr Marc Thompson rightly takes the Government to task regarding the lack of contactless payment on our public transport system. He wonders why there's no joined-up strategy, and why we can't deliver 'infrastructure at a scale and speed which the citizens deserve'. There can hardly be something called 'joined-up strategy', without joined-up thinking, and, regarding what the citizens deserve, that particular horse has long bolted, and the citizens' expectations do not appear to have any purchase in the minds of those in the corridors of power. – Yours, etc, PETER DECLAN O'HALLORAN, Belturbet, Co Cavan. Remembering Mount Charles Sir, – The sad news of the death of Henry Mount Charles brought to my memory a little incident which showed his wide field of interests and concerns, In the 1990s, the issue of the closure of the Phoenix Park racecourse arose. My sister, May, was very concerned about the closure and started a campaign collecting signatures of protest. Without any contact from my sister, Mount Charles wrote to her offering any help he could give. May was surprised and very pleased to receive such unexpected support. That same day, we read the dreadful news that Mount Charles' beloved Slane Castle was on fire. So he didn't get the wished-for opportunity to record his views on the racecourse closure. A man of many streams. – Yours, etc, EILEEN LYNCH, Dublin. Aesthetics and architecture Sir, - The article (' Cost to take priority over 'aesthetics' in future State infrastructure projects ,' June 27th) could be interpreted as the Government abandoning its national policy on architecture published in 2022. 'Aesthetics' are not something nice to have but an essential component of public buildings and an easy target to blame for high costs. In fact, the architectural and special quality of the children's hospital is one of the few positives that counterbalances negativity around the high cost. The real drivers of cost are not standards and aesthetics but rather the delays in procurement and planning. Each year a ¤1 billion project is delayed adds about ¤70million to the cost and we regularly see these public projects take countless years to go from the start to commencement of construction. We don't need soviet-style grey boxes to put our sick children in. It won't solve the cost-control issue either. – Yours, etc, JOE KENNEDY, FRIAI, Co Dublin. Sir, – It is well established that the long-term consequences of ignoring aesthetics in the construction of major infrastructure, such as hospitals, include reduced usability, lower satisfaction, and higher costs in the long run. At least Jack Chambers' (Minister for Public Expenditure) false dilemma of cost versus aesthetics adds a new entry to the bingo card of construction costs in contemporary Ireland: Beauty! – Yours, etc, DR CONNELL VAUGHAN, Lecturer in Aesthetics, Technical University, Dublin. Shine on Sir – British prime minister Keir Starmer's Irish chief of staff Morgan McSweeney appears to be losing his shine (' Irish fixer under fire as welfare rebellion looms in U K,' June 27th). According to army protocols and even Collins Dictionary, 'polished shoes make its wearer look more presentable and can elevate a person's public standing'. A tin of black should do it then. – Yours, etc, MARION WALSH, Dublin 4. Capping judicial review legal costs Sir, – Recent commentary blames judicial review for delays in infrastructure and housing projects, prompting proposals to cap legal costs for successful applicants at ¤35,000 (' Government plans for €35,000 fees cap to halt High Court delays to building projects, ' June 20th and ' Failure to tackle objectors will have dire results, ' June 27th). Judicial review exists not to frustrate policy, but to meet Ireland's obligations under the Aarhus Convention which requires access to environmental justice to be 'fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive'. Given our inordinately expensive legal system, capping legal fees at €35,000 would effectively deny access to justice for many – including individuals, community groups and NGOs. Meanwhile, the State would remain free to spend unlimited sums on its own legal team. This imbalance undermines the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law and the principle of 'equality of arms' in legal proceedings. Instead of undermining this essential right, we should address the real issue: Ireland spends just 0.07 per cent of its GDP on its legal and judicial system – the lowest in Europe. Chronic underfunding, not judicial review, is the main cause of court delays. – Yours, etc, TONY LOWES, Friends of the Irish Environment, Co Cork. GAA and the Mayo board Sir, – The choice of language used by the Mayo County GAA Board in sacking its management team was disgusting. Exactly what might be expected of the owners of an English Premier League club when sacking a manager; and indeed, even then not always so. Gaelic football is an amateur sport. An amateur sport that is now garnished with the worst aspects of corporate professionalism and elitism. Major fixtures behind pay walls. Highly paid officials. Corporate boxes. Exorbitant ticket prices. All totally based on the efforts of unpaid amateur players. GAA president Jarlath Burns needs to have a chat with his full-time permanent officials. Pundits speak of managers losing the dressingroom. If GAA HQ are not careful, they may well lose a lot more than that. Mayo are a proud GAA county. An apology should issue from headquarters . And an assurance that county management teams will be treated with respect in future. An opening phrase that a manager 'has been relieved of his duties with immediate effect' undermines whatever weasel words may follow. – Yours, etc, LARRY DUNNE, Rosslare, Co Wexford. Wouldn't do a tattoo Sir, – Despite multiple back-packing trips to Thailand where guest houses often had tattoo artists in situ, despite several weekends in Amsterdam where impulsivity reigned and despite 40 plus years as a biker surrounded oftentimes by bearded brethren covered in ink, I have never felt the desire, nor the need, to get a tattoo. And now at 62, taking gravity into consideration and looking at my inked friends (bar one who is an ultra marathon runner with a lean taut physique) I am happy I didn't follow the herd. Speaking of which, is that a sheep or a cloud on your shoulder? And why does that wolf on your back look like he got implants in Turkey? – Yours, etc, LORCAN ROCHE, Dublin. Choice language Sir, – My oh my, how far the standards of The Irish Times have fallen. I am still in shock having seen the word 'arse' in one of Fidelia's Crosaire clues in this morning's paper. Where do we go from here? – Yours, etc, MJ Tomlin, Dublin.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Mick Clifford: Defective pistol holsters a smoking gun for An Garda Síochána
The shooting accident occurred on June 11, 2020. The detective involved was from the special detective unit. He had been assigned to the Israeli ambassador's residence on routine protective work. At around 4.30pm, his gun was accidentally discharged. He suffered injuries to his lower body that were significant but not life-threatening. It then emerged that concerns had been expressed in An Garda Síochána about holsters issued to armed members before the detective shot himself. When Detective Garda Colm Horkan was murdered with his own weapon a week later, these concerns were elevated and multiplied. An issue arose immediately as to whether or not the accident was in any way attributable to the quality of the holster the detective was wearing. There had been mumblings among some armed gardaí about the holster. A batch of these holsters had been acquired from a saddlery in the east of the country. The leather material was softer, and a safety feature that was part of the previous issued holster was off-centre and didn't cover the handle of the firearm. As a result, the firearm could be grabbed from within the holster by somebody else or, in some instances, the firearm could fall out of the holster. On the day after the incident outside the embassy, the detective's firearm, hip holster, magazines, and loose and spent rounds were delivered to the Garda National Technical Bureau for forensic examination. This is standard practice. The bureau routinely examines firearms and ammunition in criminal investigations. It has accredited testing and calibration laboratories that have achieved the IOS 17025 standard. The Garda Technical Bureau examines firearms and ammunition in criminal investigations. Picture: Colin Keegan When that was awarded in 2016, then commissioner Nóirín O'Sullivan noted that 'achieving accreditation to this standard means that the Garda Technical Bureau is providing a high quality forensic investigation service to An Garda Síochána, the Criminal Justice System, and the public. This will help improve and ensure trust among the public in the criminal justice system'. So it was that the holster and other items were examined in conditions conforming to the highest standard. The ambassador residence incident occurred at least a year after a protected disclosure had been made over concerns about the holsters, among other issues. Included in that protected disclosure was an allegation about the method and reason for procuring the supplier of the controversial holster. There were also fears expressed about the safety of the holsters. Concerns were expressed elsewhere, including from the firearms training unit within the force and the corresponding unit in the training college in Templemore. On June 16, five days after the accidental shooting, an email was sent between officers from these respective units. 'As you are aware this issue was raised before with [another officer] about this particular make of holsters and pouch,' the mail read. 'This softer style was supposed in both Sig and Wather [makes of firearms] configuration. It proved dangerous… I concur with your recommendation that this make of holster and pouch should be withdrawn for safety reasons.' The following day, just before midnight on June 17, Det Garda Horkan stopped a man on a motorbike in the centre of Castlerea, Co Roscommon. The man, Stephen Silver, was apparently driving erratically. Just after the garda approached him, a struggle ensued. Det Garda Horkan's official firearm came loose from its holster and Silver managed to get his hands on it. He fired up to 15 shots, at least four of which hit Det Garda Horkan, killing him. Silver then waited until gardaí arrived on the scene five minutes later. He is now serving a life sentence for murder. Stephen Silver is serving a life sentence for the murder of Det Garda Colm Horkan. Picture: Colin Keegan Det Garda Horkan's holster was one of those acquired from the saddlery in Kildare. Early the following morning, a detective from the technical bureau examined the murder scene. He put the holster in a bag and tagged it as exhibit DOL2(a). For whatever reason, that holster was not sent to the bureau for examination. This was highly unusual. Following every shooting incident, it is the technical bureau, with its access to the IOS standard lab and practices, that is charged with conduction ballistic and associated investigations. Not in this case. Instead, the holster — but not the firearm or ammunition — was sent to another senior garda with an instruction to have it tested for serviceability. The reason for this is entirely unclear. This officer did pass it on to a sergeant who had experience with firearms training but was not an expert in either ballistics or firearms. A Garda spokesperson said the holster was tested by Forensic Science Ireland. The murder of Det Garda Horkan, in an incident where his attacker got access to his firearm, raised further concerns in sections of An Garda Síochána. One piece of correspondence from a senior officer is dated June 22, five days after the murder. 'Prior to the murder of Det Garda Horkan, the sergeants attached to firearms training were looking into problems with the official issue leather holster and magazine pouch. "I feel this now needs to be acted upon as a matter of urgency; I believe the issue had been flagged earlier and remedial work was carried out on the holster in order to make it more durable. "However, the problem still exists in that when weapons are being holstered, the leather gathers under the trigger guard and there is potential for an unintended discharge.' That letter was accompanied by further correspondence from officers in the firearms training unit recommending that 'these holsters and magazine pouches be removed from service on health and safety grounds'. Apart from all that, the technical bureau did its testing of the holster as per usual in the wake of the accidental shooting at the ambassador's residence. The murder of Detective Garda Horkan, in an incident where his attacker got access to his firearm, raised further concerns in sections of An Garda Síochána. Picture: Denis Minihane The results, while entirely removed from, and independent of, the correspondence referenced above, largely agreed with the conclusions that the holsters were dangerous. On March 4, Labour TD Alan Kelly, who has followed this story closely, read out in the Dáil what he said were the conclusions of the technical bureau examination. 'It was discovered by forensic experts attached to the Garda National Technical Bureau that the leather pistol holster issued to the member was so dangerously defective, the holster could actually engage the trigger and fire the weapon of its own accord,' Mr Kelly told the House. 'It was further identified by the ballistic experts, who operate under ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, which is the legal requirement for all forensic laboratories, that the holster was so poorly designed, the firearm could be removed from the holster with so-called retention strap fully fastened. 'This left the gun open to removal by individuals other than the Garda member carrying the firearm. This critical health and safety risk later became the subject of a warning notice from the acting head of the Garda National Technical Bureau, given the very real concerns for the safety of Garda members.' The investigation of the holster's safety was a damning indictment. It concurred with the opinions generated in the firearms unit and the training college. In addition, and again entirely separately, the protected disclosure made in 2019 raised very similar concerns. If all of this was found to be factually and forensically accurate, it would represent a major scandal for An Garda Síochána. Bad enough that one garda had accidently shot himself. If defective equipment, about which fears had been expressed, contributed to a dangerous individual getting his hands on the member's weapon and murdering him, there would be a huge scandal. Such a scenario would not just invoke controversy among the public and the political class. Crucially, it would in all likelihood spark outrage internally within An Garda Síochána. However, the forensic examinations and opinions of experts were not the final word on the holsters' safety. As stated above, Det Garda Horkan's holster was dispatched to a senior officer who gave it onto a sergeant in his division who had experience in firearms training. He did not have access to the kind of laboratory conditions used in the technical bureau. He compiled a report suggesting that while the holster was not ideal, neither did it represent any danger to officers using it. This was contrary to the opinions expressed by others, as seen above, involved in firearms training. There was one more opinion or conclusion to throw into the mix. After the technical bureau returned its damning verdict on the examination of the holster in the ambassador residence accidental shooting, something unusual occurred. It was ordered from the upper echelons of the force that a second report be compiled. This was to be done by personnel in the Garda armoury, the unit that stores weapons, and the same unit that entered into a contract to acquire the holsters from the Kildare saddlery. No criticism The Irish Examiner understands that no criticism was ever made of the technical bureau's examination of the holster. Neither was there any suggesting that any individual officer in the bureau had erred, had any kind of conflict of interest, had done anything other than their professional duty, as per every other incident that they examined. Yet a second report was ordered. This was to be conducted by a unit that arguably was open to, at the very least, a perception of a conflict of interest. There is no reason to believe that this second report was conducted other than with the utmost integrity. In any event, the outcome was an opinion that the leather in the holster was more malleable than the model previously used, and there was an issue with a part of the stitching. Neither of these factors would render the holster dangerous in the manner that had been expressed by the technical bureau's examination or the opinions offered by personnel in the firearms training unit. There was now, within the force, a stark conflict of opinions on the safety of a holster that was used by officers involved in two shootings, one fatal. It would have been open to management within the force to seek an external expert opinion. If they were not happy with the result from the technical bureau, there was nothing to stop sending the holster to its equivalent unit in the PSNI, or one of the British policing divisions. That was not done. The holster was withdrawn later in 2020. In 2023, Mr Harris confirmed to then minister for justice Helen McEntee that all of the holsters in question had been withdrawn and shredded beyond use. Last Thursday, the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee heard that the contract for the holsters was valued at €500,000. Two postscripts to the matter that threw up other questions. A senior officer was appointed to investigate the protected disclosures made by the garda back in 2019. As part of the investigation, this officer required expert opinion on the holster. The Irish Examiner understands the officer was referred to the sergeant who had compiled the report on Det Garda Horkan's holster, the report that, to a large extent, gave the equipment the all-clear. Later again, the State Claims Agency, which oversees legal actions against state bodies like An Garda Síochána, wanted an opinion on the holster. Independent investigation call Again, it was referred to the same sergeant. A very simple question raises its head once more. Why, in both these cases, not to mind following Det Garda Horkan's murder, was the equipment not referred to the recognised authority on these matters, the technical bureau? Mr Kelly says that the whole issue around the holsters requires urgent independent investigation. Labour TD Alan Kelly says that the whole issue around the holsters requires urgent independent investigation. Picture: Stephen Collins 'I have been raising the issue of defective leather pistol holsters on issue to Garda members, for months now,' he said. 'I believe the safety of Garda members was put at risk. "Furthermore, it is abundantly clear that the concerns of those who spoke up about these defective leather pistol holsters were not welcome at the highest levels in An Garda Síochána. "Those who attempted to push this issue up the reporting structure to safeguard their colleagues have been treated appallingly. "This significant issue isn't going to go away for justice minister Jim O'Callaghan. He needs to address it and he needs to do so immediately. "There's no point in sticking his head in the sand and hoping it will go away. It won't.' A spokesperson for the Garda ombudsman Fiosrú said it cannot comment on anything to do with protected disclosures. A series of questions were submitted to the Garda press office. Each question, in general terms, received a response that An Garda Síochána would not or could not comment on the particulars. Read More Labour's Alan Kelly exposes alleged garda failures in gun safety and drug storage
