Would you want toilet rolls and kitchen towels as a wedding gift?
THEY may not be the sort of gifts that would send the recipients into throes of ecstasy, but at least they're going to be of use.
Bypassing the usual crystal wine glasses, fine china tea sets and his and hers jewellery, Tesco has launched a wedding gift registry featuring everyday items like loo roll, bin bags and shower gel.
The supermarket chain's Really Useful Stuff bundle also includes toothpaste, kitchen towel, antibacterial hand wash and shampoo.
If you ask me it's a great idea. Unlike many wedding presents these items won't end up at the back of a cupboard for years, but will go straight into everyday use.
Wedding gifts are problematic, both for the couple on the receiving end and for friends and family. When I got married we invited only a handful of guests, all close family, who asked what we wanted.
Our presents included a microwave oven, a duvet cover, a lovely glass vase (also still in use) and a gorgeous wooden salad bowl, all, bar the oven, still in use today.
My now sister-in-law, who had been living in China, gave us a pot of Chinese rice wine, traditionally drunk by the bride and groom to bring good luck. We were delighted with everything.
But had we had a big wedding with a large number of guests, I can say for certain we would have stipulated no gifts, to avoid accumulating 18 sets of bath towels, 13 toasters and ten personalised chopping boards.
As a guest, choosing a present, especially if you're not familiar with the couple's lifestyle, can be tricky. It's not only about what to buy, but how much to spend. You don't want to break the bank, but neither do you want to appear a cheapskate.
Most couples already own a toaster when they tie the knot. Picture: Pixabay
This sort of dilemma is perhaps even worse with wedding lists. These place people in a quandary. I've been to a few weddings where people's names are flagged up beside the gift they have chosen, so everyone knows who has opted for the set of three tea towels as opposed to the 13-piece Ultimate Le Creuset Cookware set.
We were once invited to a wedding, prior to which the John Lewis gift list contained numerous ludicrously expensive items such as a sofa and a dishwasher. It was a morning suit affair too, so I was thankful that we managed to come up with a fictitious trip to Tasmania that sadly clashed with the date. We sent a gift voucher based on what we could afford.
Wedding lists, and indeed presents generally, are intended to equip the happy couple for their new start in life, but nowadays most couples have already been living together for some while - as my partner and I had for more 12 years - so their household needs have already been met before tying the knot.
Research carried out for Tesco found that many couples are ditching items typically associated with wish lists, like fine china and furniture, in favour of more practical goods. Cost increases mean the average couple now takes a year to pay off their wedding, which could be behind their desire to receive household essentials rather than luxuries.
I like the traditional Greek wedding idea of pinning money on the bride and groom's clothing or throwing it towards them as they dance. It's a fun was of giving, with no way of anyone - guests or newlyweds - knowing how much anyone has donated.
We recently attended a lovely wedding, at which there was no obligation to give anything, but if we so wished we could donate towards the couple's honeymoon, which we were happy to do.
I wonder, does anyone still stock up their 'bottom drawer'- traditionally the place that a young, unmarried woman would put things - mostly household items like towels and tablecloths - to use once she was married?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
What Matheus Cunha brings to Manchester United: Confidence, direct dribbling and a striker's instinct
It's fair to say that things haven't quite gone to plan at Manchester United of late. A drab Europa League final defeat to Tottenham Hotspur, coupled with a 16th-place finish in the Premier League, means that there will be no European football for Ruben Amorim's side next season, sparking fears that a summer overhaul could be compromised without the allure of Champions League nights at Old Trafford. Advertisement In that regard, United's move for Matheus Cunha — after meeting the release clause of £62.5million ($84.4m) in his Wolves contract — is an encouraging flicker of life. The 26-year-old was one of the division's standout performers last campaign, with his 15 goals and six assists accounting for well over a third of his team's goal returns. His quality is evident, but here The Athletic drills into the numbers to see how he could fit into Amorim's plans. First and foremost, with Alejandro Garnacho likely to leave the club this summer, United are suddenly light on impactful options to fill one of the attacking roles behind the striker in the manager's preferred 3-4-2-1 system. Mason Mount and Amad have shown promising signs of stepping up, but both have had their injury troubles, and Bruno Fernandes — should he not to leave the club during the transfer window — needs more reliable support as he has shouldered the creative burden. Cunha fits the bill with his consistent output, versatility and availability. As we can see from the graphic below, he would be comfortable operating from the left-sided No 10 role at United, but is also happy to pick up spaces on the opposite side and play up front as an out-and-out centre-forward. He's also played around 70 per cent of all available Premier League minutes since he joined Wolves two and a half years ago, with only a handful of minor impact injuries and disciplinary issues — which we'll get to later — keeping him out of the squad. Whichever role he plays, Cunha is always keen to get forward — he is one of the most direct attacking players in the top flight. It's a profile that United sorely lack, being over-reliant on the positivity and quality of Fernandes to kick-start moves with more adventurous passing from deep. The scatterplot below outlines the Premier League players who are progressive — or put simply, who move the ball towards the opposition goal — with the highest proportion of their passes and carries. Advertisement Only four midfielders and forwards look forward with their passes more often than Fernandes but most of his team-mates are notably hesitant to move things on with the ball at their feet. Cunha, on the other hand, stands out as a double threat, both a confident dribbler and daring passer whenever the opportunity arrives. A fine example of Cunha's confidence came against struggling Leicester in April as the Brazilian helped himself to a goal and two assists. From a Wolves goal kick, Cunha drops into midfield from his No 10 role and senses the opportunity to run at a stretched defence. His first touch wrong-foots Wilfred Ndidi, before he bursts through the midfield line and bears down on goal, shooting wide from the edge of the box. Though he arguably makes the wrong final decision, that ability to create something from nothing with ambitious dribbling is something that can help United to be more dangerous from fast breaks, as well as to break down man-to-man pressing structures — more prevalent than ever in the Premier League — more effectively. That same game highlighted the positional freedom given to Cunha by Wolves, with him being allowed to drift across the attacking third to affect the game. Later in that first half, he ambles over to the right flank from his starting position on the opposite side, pushing wing-back Nelson Semedo inside. Again, he is quick to look towards goal, taking two touches before swinging a low cross for striker Jorgen Strand Larsen, who diverts the ball just wide. Ten minutes after the break, Cunha is wide on the left receiving the ball after good hold-up play from Strand Larsen. Once more, a couple of touches are all he needs to get the ball out of his feet as he glides towards goal and slides a pass through to the Norwegian to score. Such fluidity and variety of movement was encouraged under Vitor Pereira at Wolves, where Cunha was often the offensive inspiration with his technical quality and off-the-cuff style. But that may need to be curbed slightly at United, where he will likely need to share the limelight with the similarly free-spirited Fernandes. Advertisement Analysis from Mark Carey for The Athletic in March showed both players to be in the top three for overall 'usage rate', a metric that outlines how often a player completes the last action in a sequence for their team. That could be a shot, cross, take-on, pass — successful or otherwise — to highlight how much responsibility each player takes in trying to make things happen. That influence shines through further when we look at the percentage of team actions carried out by players. As we can see below, Cunha was responsible for almost 30 per cent of Wolves' shots on goal last season, and he was similarly talismanic when it comes to receiving the ball in dangerous areas, passing the ball into the box and carrying the ball forward. There's only one ball on the pitch, and United will soon have two players who like to use it as much as they can in the final third. Of course, Cunha could ease the weight on Fernandes' back — and maybe one day step into his role — but the pair will need to be conscious of their positional discipline and selflessness in attacking situations if they are to dovetail as seamlessly as their technical quality suggests they should. One of the other great benefits of signing Cunha is that he has experience of playing in a similar 3-4-2-1 shape under Pereira and Gary O'Neil. But Cunha brings more to his new club than they currently have in that No 10 role, namely two-footed unpredictability, varied running and a goalscorer's instinct around the box. We've already seen how he likes to drop deep to get on the ball, but Cunha is also quick to spot an opportunity to run in behind, as we saw during his match-winning display at Fulham. Wolves settle into their build-up shape, dropping midfielders Andre and Joao Gomes into the back three to tempt the press. Strand Larsen is occupying two centre-backs, which opens up the space for Cunha to exploit. What follows is an example of Cunha's technical ability and composure around the penalty area, as well as his potential to hurt teams with runs from deep. He takes down Mario Lemina's lofted pass perfectly with his right, before lifting a finish over Bernd Leno for the equaliser. Similarly against Ipswich, Cunha is first to react as Strand Larsen falls to the ground after an aerial duel, showcasing those striker instincts that could come in at United. While full-back Harry Clarke appeals for a foul, Cunha manages to steal a march in frame two, before offering himself for the through ball. Advertisement He collects on his left, steadies himself, and powers a shot in at the near post with his weaker foot. Cunha can play up top — he mostly did at Wolves before the arrival of Strand Larsen — but he can also offer support with direct running into the box if the likes of Rasmus Hojlund and Joshua Zirkzee aren't finding those spaces. Cunha isn't prolific on his weaker side, having only attempted 26 of his 209 Premier League shots with his left, but the above finish, along with a sensational curling effort from the edge of the box at Anfield this season, underlines that the threat is there. He has drastically overperformed in front of goal this season, with only Chris Wood and Bryan Mbeumo finishing more clinically in relation to their expected goals, helped by a league-leading five goals from outside of the box. But even if Cunha's goal tally drops at United, his positivity and a desire to drag the team up the pitch can only help to inject some conviction into an unconvincing front line. Cunha's up for the @PremierLeague goal of the month! ✨ — Wolves (@Wolves) May 2, 2024 Disciplinary problems are a concern, as Cunha saw the red mist and was sent off against Bournemouth in the FA Cup. He was also suspended after an altercation with a member of staff after a game against Ipswich. Whether United can control those outbursts and integrate him into a harmonised dressing room, will be crucial considerations away from the cameras. On the pitch, however, this is a move that makes sense. There is flair to Cunha's game. He is forward-thinking, flashy and happy to say: 'fine, I'll do it myself'. He also trusts himself from distance, when outnumbered, and on his weaker foot. United need a player high on confidence who is willing to step up alongside Fernandes to stamp some authority on a stuttering attack, and there aren't many others in the Premier League as self-assured as him.
Entrepreneur
19 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Doing nothing is still doing something
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Every week, I speak to people who've just sold a business, inherited a lump sum, or hit a major milestone. Suddenly, they're staring at a big question. What should I do with this money? More often than not, their answer is nothing. In a world that feels defined by rolling uncertainty – from elections to interest rates, inflation to geopolitical unrest – many smart, accomplished individuals convince themselves that pressing pause is the prudent move. They tell themselves they'll wait for the next election, the next Bank of England announcement, or until the latest crisis in the Middle East or the US blows over. But here's the uncomfortable truth, doing nothing is still doing something – and very often, it's the wrong thing. We saw this play out at the start of the year when Donald Trump's likely return to the White House and the prospect of fresh tariffs sent ripples through global markets. Investors froze, and while the tariffs have been shelved (for now), the real damage had already been done – not to portfolios, but to behaviour. This is decision paralysis in action. And in my experience, it's most acute among entrepreneurs and high-net-worth individuals post-exit, many of whom are navigating wealth independently for the first time. It's human nature to crave certainty, especially when it comes to money, but if you're waiting for a time when everything is calm, clear, and safe before investing or making a financial decision, I've got bad news – that day is never going to arrive. Markets move, the political climate is noisy, the global economy is always in flux. If you're frozen by fear, your money isn't standing still – it's slipping backwards. One former client sold down their pension right before the Brexit vote, convinced markets would crash. The market dipped, briefly, then bounced. By the time they tried to get back in, they'd missed the rebound and locked in the loss. Others are still on the sidelines, holding out for the 'right time'. Meanwhile, the market has delivered double-digit returns. High interest rates have only added to the inertia. Plenty of people are sitting on cash, happy to earn 5% in the bank. But if you're a higher-rate taxpayer, you're pocketing closer to 2.5% – less than inflation – and over time, your 'safe' money is shrinking in real terms. Global Equities, by contrast, are up 11% over the past year – despite all the turmoil around tariffs. This hesitation isn't limited to financial investments either, we're seeing the same reluctance around property purchases. Entrepreneurs are delaying buying homes or commercial units in the hope that mortgage rates will fall or prices will soften. However, unless you have a crystal ball, trying to time the market is a game you're unlikely to win. If you've found a property that suits your needs and budget, and you can afford it, the best decision is to buy it. Your home is where you live, not a speculative asset to be perfectly timed. There's immense freedom in simply making a decision. It takes the weight off your mind and gives you back your mental bandwidth – something every founder or investor will recognise as valuable in its own right. Doing nothing might feel like the safe bet, but inaction can be far more damaging than a well-informed choice. And contrary to popular belief, you don't need to have all the answers today. What you do need is a plan. Even a basic plan creates structure, helps you map the road ahead, and protects you from making knee-jerk decisions driven by fear or headlines. Here's how to break free from the grip of decision paralysis: Zoom out: Focus on your long-term objectives, rather than tomorrow's headlines. What do you want your money to do for you over the next 10, 20, 30 years? Separate fact from fear: Emotions often drive poor decisions. If you find yourself saying "I'll just wait until…", ask whether that's a rational strategy or an emotional deflection. Get advice: A good financial planner will help you understand your goals, cut out the noise, and navigate complexity with clarity. Act with intent: Even small, deliberate steps can make a difference. Wealth isn't built from the sidelines. Entrepreneurs are used to taking calculated risks, but when it comes to managing post-exit wealth or personal finances, many find themselves out of their depth. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing – and half-understanding the tax system, the economy, or the markets can lead to costly mistakes. That's why it's so important to talk to someone. Burying your head in the sand is not a wealth strategy. The economy will always feel volatile, but the people who do best are those who act with confidence and intention – no matter the noise. You don't need to get every decision right, but you do need to make a decision. Inaction is a choice, and often, it's the most expensive one of all.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Essex Boys' triple-killer Michael Steele released from prison after 27 years
A triple killer convicted of the notorious "Essex Boys" murders has been released from prison after 27 years. Michael Steele was jailed alongside Jack Whomes in 1998 for the murders of Patrick Tate, 37, Tony Tucker, 38, and Craig Rolfe, 26. They were shot dead at point-blank range on an isolated farm track at Rettendon, , in 1995 in what prosecutors said was a row over a drug deal. The gangland executions, also known as the Rettendon Murders or the Range Rover Murders, inspired the 2000 film Essex Boys, starring Sean Bean, as well as The Rise Of The Footsoldier franchise. All three of the victims were known to police. Steele and Whomes maintained their innocence following their convictions, which were based in part on evidence from "supergrass" Darren Nicholls, who said he was the getaway driver. Their appeals were rejected and in 2006 Lord Justice Kay said there was no "element of unsafety" over the convictions. The case was also reviewed by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which decided in 2023 not to refer it back to the Court of Appeal. The Parole Board after a "marked improvement" in his behaviour and because keeping him locked up was no longer necessary to protect the public. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood challenged the decision, arguing it was legally irrational, and asked for his case to be looked at again. However, the Ministry of Justice has confirmed Steele was let out in May. An MoJ spokesperson said: "Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Craig Rolfe, Tony Tucker and Pat Tate. "This decision was made by the independent Parole Board after a thorough risk assessment. "Michael Steele will be on licence for the rest of his life, with strict conditions and intensive probation supervision. He faces an immediate return to prison if he breaks the rules." Read more from Sky News: Those conditions include staying at a designated address, giving up his passport, wearing an electronic tag and having a curfew. Other rules on using technology and speaking to the media are in place - and he won't be able to own a firearm, plane or boat. Whomes was released from jail in 2021 and is also subject to strict licence conditions
