Maggie Chapman survives vote on key Holyrood committee role
Chapman's fellow members on the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee voted to oppose a Conservative-tabled motion to remove her on Tuesday morning.
It comes after the Green MSP told a protest, organised by trans rights activists in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling that sex is biological under the 2010 Equality Act, that the court's decision had been motivated by 'bigotry, prejudice, and hatred'.
READ MORE: Former health minister Susan Deacon joins Scotland Office
The comments sparked a backlash from Scotland's legal profession, with both the Law Society and the Faculty of Advocates speaking out against Chapman, who is deputy convener of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee.
The motion to remove Chapman – who attended Tuesday morning's meeting remotely – was lodged by Conservative MSP Tess White, who said her Green counterpart's comments had been "dangerous and incendiary" and that there "must be boundaries".
The Tory MSP pointed to Chapman's refusal to apologise for the remarks about the Supreme Court, saying she was "devoid of remorse".
Speaking in her own defence, Chapman said that rights for women and trans people were "going backwards" and pointed to analysis from the Good Law Project and others raising questions about whether the court's ruling met obligations under international human rights law.
Maggie Chapman spoke to the Holyrood committee remotely due to attending the STUC conference in Dundee (Image: Holyrood TV) The Green MSP argued that the ruling had happened amid a "culture war" in which trans people are demonised by politicians and parts of the media.
Though the Supreme Court has the right to issue a ruling, Chapman said, she did not have an obligation to agree with it, pointing to previous court rulings that went on to be condemned, such as the pardoned miners.
There are five members on the committee other than Chapman and White: SNP MSPs Karen Adam (who is the convener), Marie McNair, and Evelyn Tweed, Scottish Labour's Paul O'Kane, and Tory MSP Pam Gosal.
O'Kane told the committee that he wanted to give Chapman the opportunity to withdraw her remarks about the Supreme Court and unequivocally uphold the independence of the judiciary. If she would not take it, the Labour MSP said, he would vote to remove her from her role.
READ MORE: Senior Whitehall officials pushing for the Open to return to Donald Trump's Turnberry
McNair said she believed that Chapman had not been speaking at the protest in her role as deputy convener of the committee, did not think her comments were an issue for the committee, and so would not support the Tory motion to remove her.
Chapman spoke again and said she respected the rule of law and the judiciary, but stopped short of apologising for her comments on the Supreme Court. White then asked Chapman to show remorse for a final time, to which the Green MSP replied that she had said all she wished to.
The MSPs on the committee then voted by four to three to reject the motion. The SNP and Green MSPs voted as a bloc, as did the Tory and Labour MSPs.
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson previously explained the process: 'An MSP can be removed from sitting on a committee by agreement to a parliamentary motion.
'The motion would need to be lodged by the committee and a majority of members of the committee would need to agree on the need for this motion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Reeves to splash billions of pounds on NHS and schools - but other cuts loom
Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that some vital public services will lose out on funding in next week's Spending Review - 'I'm not able to say yes to everything' Rachel Reeves will pour cash into the NHS, schools, security and firing up the economy as she hit back at fears of fresh austerity for cash-strapped public services. The health service is expected to be the big winner in Wednesday's Spending Review, with a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget - amounting to around £30billion in additional funding by 2028/29. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. But other vital services will feel the squeeze, with painful cuts expected in areas like local government and policing. On Wednesday, the Chancellor will spell out how much cash will be allocated for day-to-day budgets over the next three years. Speaking to the Sunday Mirror in her Leeds West and Pudsey constituency, she said: "This is a far cry from what you would have had if you'd had another five years of the Conservatives - £300billion above that. Under our plan, spending will increase every year in this Parliament. "I tell you what austerity is, it's what George Osborne did, where spending fell by 2% every year when he was Chancellor and [David] Cameron was Prime Minister. Spending will grow at close to 2% every year under the plans that I will lay out." There will be a £190billion increase in funding for day-to-day spending over the period, funded partly by tax hikes in the Budget in the autumn. A shake-up of borrowing rules has also freed up around £113billion for capital investment for big ticket items like homes, transport and energy projects. Security will be top of the agenda as "we live in a changed world, everyone can see that," the Chancellor said. "The first duty of any government is to keep its people safe." The Government has already promised to hike defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027/28, funded through a raid on the foreign aid budget. The NHS will get a big cash injection to help the Government meet its commitment to slash waiting lists currently around 7.4million. Her other focus will be growing the economy to drive up living standards for ordinary Brits. But Ms Reeves admitted some areas will lose out. "I'm not able to say yes to everything, and there are things that I would like to do, but we don't have the money to do them," she said. "But your readers will remember two and a half years ago when a Conservative Prime Minister and Chancellor crashed the economy. "As a result, they paid more for their mortgages and more in their rents, and readers who run their own business, particularly small businesses, found that the cost of running their business went up as inflation and borrowing rates went through the roof. "So we have to say no to some things, because we've got to make sure that that stability is returned to the economy." This week, the Chancellor confirmed plans to rip up Treasury rules blamed for favouring investment in prosperous areas in the South of England. Instead, some £15.6billion will be handed to mayors to improve trams, trains and buses outside of London. Ms Reeves said: "It means that people can be able to stay in the place where they grew up, the place they want to live, where their families are, but still be able to access some of those great jobs paying decent wages in the city, and they will be able to commute in easily and affordably in a way that isn't possible today. "That narrows down the options for lots of people about the jobs they do. Also for young people, it narrows down the options about where to go to college, what apprenticeship to take up. "And I don't want people's options to be narrowed. I want people's options and opportunities to be broadened and their aspirations to know no limits." But she acknowledged that voters are sceptical and said there was "no time to waste" in delivering for parts of the country betrayed by Boris Johnson's levelling up boasts. "We've got to get on with [it]", she said. "I don't want people waiting for another decade before they see improvements in their area. "We've spoken about a decade of national renewal, but there's no time to waste. We're getting started." Pressed on whether she would deliver where the Tories failed, she said: "Yes, and the reason that I can say that to Mirror readers is because I know that there's a lot of cynicism that things have been promised in the past." She added: "I'm as cynical as the next person when it comes to these promises, but we've set out five years worth of funding this week." Ms Reeves admitted she'd had to take tough decisions, including hiking national insurance contributions for businesses in the autumn Budget and plans to slash £5 billion from the welfare bill. Labour MPs are in revolt over the decision to make up most of the welfare savings from cuts to Personal Independence Payments (Pip), which help disabled people with the added costs of daily life. Ms Reeves said that difficult decision had allowed her to plough cash into public services and invest in the future. She said: "We are choosing investment rather than decline. The previous government chose decline. That is not the path that we're choosing. We're going to renew Britain and make working people better off in the process." Ms Reeves said she recognised the last few years had been tough for ordinary Brits but added: "We're beginning to turn the corner because of the choices that we've made." 'We will reduce child poverty' Rachel Reeves said driving down child poverty is a "moral mission" and insisted Labour would lift more kids out of hardship. The Chancellor said the decision this week to extend free school meals to more than 500,000 additional pupils next year was a statement of intent. From next September, all children in families receiving Universal Credit will get a free school lunch - in a major victory for the Mirror's campaign to end hunger in the classroom. But the Government is under intense pressure to commit to more drastic action to end the scourge of child poverty. A long-awaited strategy has been delayed to the autumn amid mounting calls from Labour MPs for an end to the Tory two-child benefit limit, which has been blamed for pushing families into poverty. Asked if she was listening to these calls, Ms Reeves told the Sunday Mirror: "I joined the Labour Party when I was 17 years old, because my experience at my local state school was that my sixth form was two prefab huts in the playground joined together. "Our school library was turned into a classroom because there were more students than space and never enough textbooks to go around." She added: "There were loads of girls that I was at school with who did not have the opportunities. They went to school every day and probably felt that the government didn't care very much about communities like ours and families like theirs. "When Tony Blair talked about 'education, education, education', that really resonated with me, because I strongly believe that whatever your parents do, whatever income your family's got coming in, whatever your background, you deserve a really good start in life. "And I know that kids who are going to school in empty bellies, who don't have a space at home to do their homework, who don't have the opportunities of books at home, and where the mums and dads don't have the security of a job that pays a decent wage, that they just don't have the opportunities that other kids do. And that's what I came into politics to do something about." She added: "We will lift more children out of poverty. We will reduce child poverty. That is a moral mission for all of us."
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Reform UK are 'chancers' and no friends of working people says GMB chief
The General Secretary is expected to praise Labour's employment bill - but urge the party to 'think again' on other issue Reform UK are 'chancers and bankers' who are no friends of working people, GMB Chief Gary Smith will say in a speech to the union's annual congress today. The General Secretary is expected to praise Labour 's employment bill - but urge the party to 'think again' on other issue. The union's annual congress is taking place in Brighton this week. 'Let's get one thing clear,' Mr Smith will tell union members in a keynote speech today. 'Mr Farage and his ex-Tory soulmates are no friends of workers. They've spent a political lifetime attacking trade unions and the rights we have all fought so hard for. Decent pay, better conditions, protections we cherish.' He'll add: 'By the way, why is it always the posh, private schoolboys who want act like they're working-class heroes. Do they really think we can't see the bankers, the chancers, the anti-union blowhards? 'If Reform are so pro-worker, why did they just vote against protections against fire and rehire? Why did they vote against sick pay for all workers? Why did they vote against fair pay for carers? Why did they vote against trade union rights to access and organise in places like Amazon? 'Now they are going to run town halls. And, the first thing they want to do is sack council workers.' Mr Smith will say it was time to call Reform UK out for their 'sneering, snooty attitude' to public sector pensions. 'Go ask a local authority care worker, refuse collector, street cleaner, school support staff member if they think they're meagre pension is gold-plated,' he will say. 'Reform's abuse and name-calling of low-paid public sector workers is an utter disgrace. 'Of course, Mr Farage has also threatened the NHS. And, he is notoriously weak about Putin." On Labour, Mr Smith will add: 'The new Employment Rights Bill biggest, most positive step in trade union rights in 50 years. 'But, Labour aren't making it easy to rally to their banner. Congress, it is less than a year since Labour won its landslide. There was a feeling of real hope, real change. Where there could be a common endeavour in rebuilding our country. Where GMB was willing to play our part. 'But mistakes have been made. My message to the Government .....is simple – listen. Listen to GMB. Listen and think again.'
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
As a former judge, I used to defend Britain's rights – mine are now at risk
Before being a judge, I represented a rape victim who was deaf and unable to speak. She was so badly traumatised that, in a cry for help, she took a kitchen knife out in public and tried to kill herself. She was arrested and brought to court. She did not get bail. The probation officer – before even meeting me – told me she had decided to oppose bail. A cruel pre-judgment: custody would immediately end her job and change her life. Law has no feeling; it embodied the passive-aggression of society to disabled people and women: it processed her, like meat for dogs. Two weeks ago, the UN Special Procedures group – 19 specialists in fields including freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of opinion and expression, and violence against women and girls – issued a statement of human rights concern about the UK, towards transsexual and other trans people. It came in response to the infamous, deeply confused decision of the UK Supreme Court in April in For Women Scotland, where trans people and the vast bulk of women and lesbians were not heard. We were judged by a court packed with non-trans pressure groups, and human rights were scarcely mentioned. In my opinion, the Supreme Court's decision forced on women the notion that they are inescapably defined by biology, presumably basic urges and wandering wombs, for sexual relationships, free association and equal rights. It reversed more than 20 years of peaceful co-existence between the trans community and others. The UK is beyond crisis: the economy is down, inflation is up; electricity and gas are unaffordable. Violence against women is up. Men are discarded, angry. Such a country becomes vulnerable to extremism and minority-blaming. In 2021, European parliament research revealed how foreign actors use media to stir LGBT+ hate. It is in Russia's interest to damage our social fabric, rendering us dysfunctional and divided, as there is evidence it did, too, with Brexit. This LGBT+ emergency is ripping apart tolerant British values. It follows the rise of the Gender Critical Ideology Movement (GCIM). I need not go into suggestions that GCIM is sometimes used as cover for people seeking LGBT+ conversion practices – or that some groups oppose banning conversion therapy towards trans people. Let us note, however, that GCIM did not seem to exist until around 2016, when UK-US movements arose preaching traditional sex roles. Let me concentrate on the immediate UK human crisis. The government ruled that people like me, previously legally female and (still!) having female anatomy, at risk of assault as with all women, must henceforth change in men's changing rooms, use men's loos in pubs and be excluded from female rape services. Despite my female birth certificate, I am apparently a 'man'. The EHRC followed suit. The police confirmed that people who are (or seem to be, one assumes) 'trans' shall be strip searched only by men, anatomy be damned. Such sexual assault of 'unfeminine' women may now be the law on the ground. Women with mastectomies are confronted, accused of 'transness'. Trans people not 'out' at work face disclosure of pariah status. Non-feminine women are confronted by other women in loos. A database has been proposed to enforce segregation. A fund has been created support civil legal enforcement of the new 'sex-based' rights. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, wants to segregate trans people in hospitals. Bridget Phillipson, our equalities minister, is MIA. I formed the Trans Exile Network for those leaving the UK now. Heterosexual families with kids, where, say, the husband is trans, have been re-designated as 'lesbian' because the court redefined 'lesbians' as well as 'women'. Nobody asked them, of course – unlike the 2004 Act, which was with national consent and consultation. Trans people are now two sexes at once: one for equalities law (I am now unable to claim equal pay rights as a woman) and one for everything else. Nobody at the top cares: it is 'clarification', says Keir Starmer, ignorantly. Now the GCIM want this rolled out across Europe. Next stop: Ireland. I've been contacted by suicidal people and the parents of kids who have been denied medical treatment. Parents fear for the future of their kids: if not helped now, they face forced puberty against their medical best interests and a harder life. Puberty delaying hormones are reversible and have been used upwards of 20 years to 'buy time' until kids are adults and can make decisions. The court must have assumed that the EHRC is neutral. More fool the court. But the biggest victim is our country – which I served as a judge for more than 18 years – and truth and humanity in public life.
