Recall Parliament to debate Netanyahu's Gaza plan, Green MP urges
Mr Netanyahu's office has unveiled new principles for military action which include 'the demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip', 'Israeli security control in the Gaza Strip' and 'the establishment of an alternative civil administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority'.
The Israel Defence Forces 'will prepare for taking control of Gaza City while distributing humanitarian assistance to the civilian population outside the combat zones'.
More than 61,000 people have been killed during Israeli military action in Gaza, according to Gaza's health ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its count, in a conflict which began after a Hamas-led attack killed around 1,200 people in southern Israel on October 7 2023.
Among the count are at least 13 people killed in southern Gaza on Thursday as they sought aid in an Israeli military zone.
'Netanyahu's brutal plan to take control of Gaza is yet another declaration of intent to commit war crimes and will lead to untold catastrophic civilian suffering,' Ms Chowns said.
'The UK must do far more than simply express disapproval.
'We need to recall Parliament immediately to hold the UK Government to account, to urgently assess whether we are meeting our obligations under the Genocide Convention and to enact immediate measures — including sanctions on the Israeli cabinet and suspension of all military co-operation and arms sales — to prevent further atrocities.
'The consequences of delay will be measured in countless innocent lives lost.'
The North Herefordshire MP also called on the Government to publish its risk assessment of genocide in Gaza or a timeline for evidence-gathering.
She also urged ministers to use diplomatic channels to press for a ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian access into Gaza, safe release of the remaining hostages and an international inquiry into allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity by Israel.
Critics of Mr Netanyahu's plan include Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who said the Israeli government risked bringing 'more bloodshed'.
He said: 'The Israeli government's decision to further escalate its offensive in Gaza is wrong and we urge it to reconsider immediately.
'This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages.'
German chancellor Friedrich Merz said Israel 'has the right to defend itself against Hamas's terror' and added working towards a ceasefire and release of the hostages were a 'top priority' for the government in Berlin.
But 'the even harsher military action by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip, approved by the Israeli cabinet last night, makes it increasingly difficult for the German government to see how these goals will be achieved', he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
21 minutes ago
- Metro
Netanyahu 'will have blood of hostages on his hands' if more are killed in Gaza
Benjamin Netanyahu's hands 'will be soaked with the blood of the hostages' if his plan to seize control of all of Gaza leads to the deaths of any more, one captive's mother has warned. Israel said Friday it will intensify its 22-month war with Hamas by taking over Gaza City, stirring fears for Palestinian civilians and hostages still held in the shattered enclave. The military campaign has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, displaced most of the population, destroyed much of the infrastructure and pushed the territory toward famine. Families of Israeli hostages rallied again on Saturday to pressure Prime Minister Netanyahu's government into striking a deal for their return. Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan is held in Gaza, called on Israelis to 'help us save the hostages, the soldiers and the state of Israel … Shut the country down.' Addressing Netanyahu, she said: 'If you conquer parts of the Strip and hostages are murdered, we will go after you in the squares, in the elections, and at any time and place.' Speaking outside of the Defense Ministry headquarters in Tel Aviv, she said: 'We will remind the people of Israel, day and night, that you could have brought a hostage deal and you decided to kill them. 'Your hands will be soaked with the blood of the hostages.' Far-right allies in Netanyahu's coalition have been pushing for a total takeover of Gaza as part of his vow to eradicate Hamas militants. However, the military has warned this could endanger the lives of the remaining hostages. Opposition leader Yair Lapid called the decision to send Israeli forces into Gaza City a disaster, saying it defied the advice of military and security officials. He accused far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich of dragging Netanyahu into a prolonged campaign that would result in the deaths of hostages and soldiers. Netanyahu told Fox News Channel's Bill Hemmer in an interview that aired on Thursday that Israel did not want to keep the Gaza Strip, but to establish a 'security perimeter' and to hand over the territory to Arab forces. The announcement from the prime minister's office early on Friday, following Thursday's security cabinet meeting, said the military would take Gaza City, but did not say if Israeli forces would take all of the enclave. Israel's cabinet is expected to endorse the Gaza City plan. Israeli media have said 900,000 people now live in Gaza City, including many who have been displaced by the military. 'Where should we go? Do we throw ourselves in the sea?' said Maghzouza Saada, a displaced Palestinian from Gaza's north. More Trending Before the war, Hamas' most powerful fighting units were believed to operate in northern Gaza, including Gaza City. There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom Israeli officials believe 20 are alive. Most of those freed so far emerged as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Talks toward a ceasefire that could have seen more hostages released collapsed in July. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Blind man in wheelchair among more than 200 arrested at Palestine Action protest MORE: I can predict exactly how the world will respond to Israel's Gaza takeover MORE: Lineup announced for Brian Eno's Palestine benefit concert at Wembley Arena
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Latest Mark Latham smear targets one of Australia's most popular politicians - even as HE faces the most vile of allegations: PVO
Airbus Albo keeps the champagne flowing Just when it seemed Albo's government had run out of new ways to insult voters' intelligence, it found another: allowing senior public servants to keep flying business class on short flights, despite clear advice in favour of ending the costly perk.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The Nazis would have been proud of Hamas's vile propagandists
Desperate people clamouring around a truck begging for food. An emaciated child on death's door. Women, girls, children, babies: no innocent is immune from Israel's psychotically cruel campaign of bloodlust in Gaza. It is unbearable to see. Who can stand by and watch such crimes? This, at any rate, is what most of the world's media, from the most respectable broadcaster to the grimiest freesheet, is eager for you to think. It is also what Hamas wants you to think. As long-term masters of some of the most cynical propaganda the world has ever seen, Hamas is succeeding in its plan with resounding success. Keir Starmer last week appeared to speak for the whole of Britain when he said that scenes from Gaza fill us with 'revulsion' – against Israel, of course. Largely because of such images of suffering, Starmer wants to reward the forces of Palestinian terror with the recognition of a state. 'I think people are revolted at what they are seeing on their screen,' he said. The next day he spoke of 'starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime'. Pictures. Images. Screens. These are what appear to be deciding Israel's – and the Palestinians' – legal status on the world stage. It is not that there isn't immense suffering in Gaza. There is. Hundreds of thousands of Gazans are in dire straits, have lost family members, are in pain, injured, hungry, homeless, desperate, scared, the terrorist group's blood-soaked grip always around their necks. It's a tragedy. But a lot of what sets the world alight is massaged, manipulated and in many cases downright fake. One of the most iconic images of the last few weeks, which helped consolidate the false worldwide consensus that Israel has become a rogue, genocidal state while the Palestinians deserve a state, was the skeletal boy allegedly nearly starved to death by an Israeli blockade, held in his mother's arms. What the great and the good left out in their haste to publish this picture, posed as a tableau reminiscent of Mary holding Jesus, was that the boy suffered from a congenital disease. It was later quietly acknowledged by The New York Times – way too late – that he had pre-existing health problems and they would have highlighted this if they had known before publication. We see lots of pictures of desperate people clamouring for food banging pots and pans. Some of these might represent the strangled reality on the ground. But as the German tabloid Bild bothered to discover, one of the most prominent pictures of such clamouring hunger in recent weeks has photographer Anas Zayed Fteiha, a freelance journalist commissioned by the Turkish news agency Anadolu, snapping the photos in the manner of a director. Fteiha, as Bild reveals, isn't quite the impartial documentarian suggested, but an activist whose agency answers straight to Turkey's Hamas-sympathising president, Recep Erdoğan. Fteiha's social media profile is informative. His Instagram page includes a video captioned 'F** Israel' plus a painting by an arch-anti-Semite. He is publicly committed to the 'free Palestine' end game. But his pictures, notable for their perfect lighting and close-ups of idealised suffering, especially of children and mothers, were swallowed without question, disseminated in New York Magazine, CNN, the BBC, plenty of German papers and more. The wildfire success of such lies tells you much less about people's gullible compassion than about how far Hamas now rules the global playbook of anti-Semitism, Israel-hating and Israel-blaming. Let us be clear. For the terrible suffering in Gaza, the blame falls squarely on Hamas's manifold crimes. Hamas invaded Israel, knowing that, with its tunnels, weaponry and soldiers embedded in homes, schools and hospitals and behind civilians, Gazan civilians would take the brunt of Israel's inevitable response. The terror group's continued stranglehold in the Strip and refusal to hand back the hostages is the only thing prolonging the war and suffering, all of which could have ended long ago. Aid distribution systems have been corrupted, smashed or perverted, keeping food from some who badly need it, and ensuring it goes to those with the right connections. None of this is because of Israeli cruelty. All of it is because of Hamas's cruelty and infinite scheming. The truth has never mattered, though. Hamas knew Israel would be blamed, ostracised, and punished on the world stage on a scale never seen before, its very legitimacy called into question amid irreparable diplomatic crises. It was easy; Hamas was just kicking at a door its own predecessors helped kick open. Hamas is finessing and darkening a tradition of propaganda built by Yasser Arafat, a master of the fabricated sympathetic picture, such as that during Israel's 2002 operation in the West Bank that showed him alone and besieged in his compound. He sat at his desk with only candlelight to see by – an image the world lapped right up – only for lights to go right back on after the shoot. As the historian Richard Landes describes in his essential book, Can the Whole World Be Wrong? Lethal Journalism, Antisemitism and Global Jihad, one of the defining images of the 21st century, the signal 'icon of hatred' against the Israel and the Jews, was the 'eyewitness' film apparently capturing Muhammad al-Dura, a defenceless 12-year-old boy, being shot in cold blood by the IDF, while held in his father's arms, on September 30 2000. It spread like wildfire. Analysis of the footage later contradicted this narrative. The IDF didn't kill the boy. But by the time it was corrected, the damage had been done. Nobody cared, then, or now. This laid down a grotesquely immoral media-age template that has been used ever since. Those of us who have followed media bias against Israel for many years are well versed in the absolutely central role of 'Pallywood' – the well-known industry in the Palestinian territories that oversees the staging of fake news footage of Palestinian children and women suffering at the hands of Israel, producing a stream of emotive imagery for the world's media. No true imagery produced by Israel, or even the true, boastful footage from Hamas of the Israeli hostages it has starved and murdered at close range, can even begin to counter Pallywood's work. The use of emotive imagery to peddle genocidal ideology is hardly new. Leni Riefenstahl, the director of the Third Reich's propaganda films (who lived to the age of 101), offers an interesting comparison. Whereas Pallywood stages suffering, Riefenstahl's art pretended that even those bound for Auschwitz were just fine and dandy. She cast gypsies as frolicking extras, then said they all survived the Holocaust. Not only were they sent to Auschwitz, Riefenstahl was thought, in some cases, to have helped them on their way though she denied it all. While people were tortured, executed after show trials, or sent to the gulag, the Soviet propaganda department ensured a constant flow of idealised images of healthy, happy, sturdy people: courageous, righteous, industrious, reproductive and the biggest lie of all: finally free. What makes the global hook, line and sinker acceptance of Hamas propaganda so surreal is that it comes a century after Stalin took power, and nearly a century after Hitler did. What has history taught us? Sadly, those in Israel who know the answer are ignored and vilified, and those outside Israel who know the answer are now too old to provide it.
