Pete Hegseth reposts video that says women shouldn't be allowed to vote
Hegseth reposted a CNN segment on X on Thursday that focuses on pastor Doug Wilson, a Christian nationalist who co-founded the Idaho-based Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC), In the segment, he raises the idea of women not voting.
'I would like to see this nation being a Christian nation, and I would like this world to be a Christian world,' Wilson said.
Another pastor interview by CNN for its segment, Toby Sumpter, said: 'In my ideal society, we would vote as households. I would ordinarily be the one to cast the vote, but I would cast the vote having discussed it with my household.'
A congregant interviewed for the segment remarked that she considers her husband as the head their household, and added: 'I do submit to him.'
Hegseth reposted the nearly seven-minute report with the caption: 'All of Christ for All of Life.'
Later in the video, Wilson says he does not believe women should hold leadership positions in the military or be able to fill high-profile combat roles.
A statement from Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell on Saturday said Hegseth 'is a proud member of a church affiliated with' the CREC.
'The secretary very much appreciates many of Mr Wilson's writings and teachings.'
Hegseth and his family were in attendance at the Wilson church's inaugural service in Washington in July, according to CNN.
Doug Pagitt, a pastor and the executive director of the progressive evangelical organization Vote Common Good, told the Associated Press that the ideas in the video are views that 'small fringes of Christians keep' and said it was 'very disturbing' that Hegseth would amplify them.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Hegseth's repost on Thursday came as the Trump administration ramps up efforts to promote Christian nationalism. The push follows Donald Trump's renewed alliance with the Christian right in his second presidential term, whose moves have included an executive order creating a federal taskforce to investigate what he calls 'anti-Christian bias' in government agencies.
The president also created a White House faith office in February, saying it would make recommendations to him 'regarding changes to policies, programs and practices' and consult with outside experts in 'combating antisemitic, anti-Christian and additional forms of anti-religious bias'.
In May, Hegseth invited his personal pastor, Brooks Potteiger, to the Pentagon to lead the first of several Christian prayer services that the defense secretary has held inside the government building during working hours. Defense department employees and service members said they received invitations to the event in their government emails.
The US constitution's first amendment prohibits the government from establishing a state religion. But the US courts' administrative office says the precise definition of 'establishment' in that context historically has been unclear, especially with the constitution also protecting all citizens' right to practice their religion generally as they please.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump wants to put Washington DC under full federal control. Here's why he probably can't
President Donald Trump has repeatedly voiced intentions to place Washington D.C. under complete federal control, citing a need to curb crime. This stance comes despite city officials saying that crime rates are already on the decline. While the president holds some sway over the capital's police force and National Guard, a comprehensive federal takeover would almost certainly face legal challenges and likely be blocked in court. The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1787, established a federal capital district to serve as the permanent seat of government. It explicitly grants Congress complete legislative authority over the district. However, Congress has historically delegated a degree of day-to-day municipal governance to other bodies. How is DC governed? A federal law passed by Congress in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, allowed city residents to elect a mayor and council, who have some autonomy to pass their own laws. Congress still has budgetary oversight over D.C., however, and can overturn local legislation. Congress did that most recently in 2023, voting to overturn changes to Washington's laws that lowered penalties for some crimes. Who controls DC law enforcement? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. However, the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for federal purposes during emergencies if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Trump invoked this part of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city that necessitates federal management of the police department. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, saying the city is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, spiked in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities, according to city police data. However, violent crime dropped 35 per cent in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26 per cent in the first seven months of 2025. Trump also has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. Can Trump 'federalize' DC? It is highly unlikely. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal the Home Rule Act. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. But there are ways Trump can exert more influence over the district without fully taking it over. Trump in recent months has directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate FBI personnel, and in recent months, FBI agents around the country have been given temporary assignments to help with immigration enforcement. Trump also signed an executive order in March to make D.C. "safe and beautiful," establishing a task force to increase police presence in public areas, maximize immigration enforcement, and expedite concealed carry licenses. Can Trump evict DC's homeless population? Trump has said homeless people must move out of Washington, without offering specifics of a plan to accomplish this. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, like President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, legal experts said.
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump officials move to sanction lawyer who tried to block client's deportation
The US Department of Justice is seeking sanctions against a lawyer who sought to block the deportation of his client, in another sign the Trump administration is ramping up its efforts to enact mass deportations. Earlier this year, Joshua Schroeder, a California-based attorney, was able to briefly delay the deportation of his client, a Hmong man from Laos, through several court filings. The Trump administration filed a sanctions motion against Schroeder, Politico reported last week, and argued that the attorney made 'myriad meritless contentions' in his filings and a 'pattern of knowing or reckless misrepresentations'. The justice department is seeking 'substantial' monetary sanctions. Schroeder's attempt to block his client's removal were ultimately unsuccessful. The motion by the justice department comes as Donald Trump has pledged to crack down on immigration attorneys and firms engaging in 'unscrupulous behavior … that undermine immigration enforcement'. The president signed a memorandum in March instructing the US attorney general to prioritize sanctions against attorneys and firms that pursue 'frivolous, unreasonable, or vexatious' lawsuits against the government. But advocates and civil rights organizers have warned the policies are meant to hamper the work of immigration lawyers, and fear Trump is weaponizing the justice department against those opposed to his agenda. Schroeder appears to be the first attorney individually targeted by the administration following the March memo. He told Politico the sanctions motion reminded him of Trump's orders targeting large law firms associated with people the US president considers enemies, and appeared to be part of a broader strategy. 'They're able to go all the way down to the very bottom, that's where I am – no offense to myself … It's top to bottom. It's not just this elite struggle,' he told the outlet. Schroeder is a solo practitioner whose firm focuses on constitutional law, intellectual property and immigration law, and a legal scholar who has previously written about how attorneys can use habeas corpus to get immigrants out of detention. Schroeder's client is a Hmong immigrant who came to the US as a child and later served time in prison for attempted murder. He lived in Oklahoma with his wife when he was taken into custody by US immigration customs and enforcement during an April check-in. The attorney was representing his client pro bono, and in May filed an emergency motion in a Texas court to prevent his removal from the US. Schroeder argued that deporting him to Laos would put him in 'direct threat to life and limb' because of the role of the Hmong aiding the US during the Vietnam war. In his filings, Schroeder highlighted the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act in its deportation efforts, and argued the government could use that to 'apply to any immigrant or disfavored U.S. citizen'. While Schroeder was able to temporarily block his client's removal, he was moved to a facility in Guam and eventually deported in June after another judge dismissed the case, ruling that the government was deporting him not under the AEA but the Immigration Nationality Act. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The Trump administration argued that Schroeder should be sanctioned for his conduct, and that he knowingly made baseless accusations against the government and acted in bad faith, 'maintaining positions without bases in fact and law'. 'Having been warned multiple times that his client had a valid removal order, Schroeder nevertheless persisted in delaying the lawful execution of that order,' the government's filing said, adding that he 'refused to give straight answers' regarding the grounds for his claims. 'That is not the conduct of a forthright but mistaken advocate. His evasiveness evidences knowledge of his guilt and an unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions.' Schroeder told Politico he was working 'under very heightened pressure' to prevent his client from being moved outside the US. He does not expect the motion to be successful, but speculated the filing was intended to punish him and could discourage other lawyers from taking on certain cases. 'I think this motion for sanctions is not going to work, but it might do what they want it to do anyway,' he said. The Department of Justice declined to offer comment outside the filing.
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump rebukes Goldman's Solomon and bank's economics research on tariff impact
Aug 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday consumers are not paying the costs of tariffs, countering a recent Goldman Sachs' (GS.N), opens new tab research division estimate that they had absorbed 22% of the costs through June. "It has been shown that for the most part, consumers aren't even paying these tariffs, it is mostly companies and governments, many of them foreign picking up the tabs," Trump wrote in a post on social media platform Truth Social. "But David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due." Trump did not specifically mention which Goldman report he was referring to. The Wall Street investment bank declined to comment on the matter. U.S. consumers had absorbed 22% of tariff costs through June and their share will rise to 67% if the recent tariffs follow the same pattern as the earliest ones, Goldman Sachs Economics Research said in a note published on August 10. "This implies that U.S. businesses have absorbed more than half of the tariff costs so far but that their share will fall to less than 10%," analysts led by Jan Hatzius said. Hatzius did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Since February 1, when Trump kicked off trade wars by slapping levies on imports from Mexico, Canada and China, at least 333 companies worldwide have reacted to the tariffs in some manner, as of August 12, according to a Reuters tracker. Tariffs are taxes levied on imported goods to typically protect domestic industries or influence trade policies. Its financial impact can be distributed among manufacturers, retailers and consumers, depending on market conditions and supply-chain dynamics. Economists continue to study how much of the tariff cost is ultimately passed on to consumers through higher prices. Meanwhile, Trump has also been vocal about his complaints concerning corporate policies and operations since he took office in January. He met Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan on Monday, days after seeking his resignation.
