Democrats ditch woke jargon to win back Trump voters
Prominent party figures warned that said phrases beloved by its activist base like 'Latinx' had isolated ordinary voters and fuelled shattering losses in the last year's elections.
They also fear the party's emphasis on issues such as pronouns exhausted the electorate.
Kamala Harris, who lost the 2024 presidential election to Mr Trump, was criticised during her brief campaign for nonsensical 'word salad' responses she gave during interviews.
'Some words are just too Ivy League-tested terms,' Ruben Gallego, the Arizona senator, told The Washington Post.
'I'm going to p--- some people off by saying this, but 'social equity' – why do we say that? Why don't we say, 'We want you to have an even chance'?'
Mr Gallego, who defeated Kari Lake, a candidate endorsed by Mr Trump, in his senate race, said he had once been instructed to describe his background as 'economically disadvantaged' rather than 'poor'.
'Not every person we meet is going to have the latest update on what the proper terms are,' he continued.
'It doesn't make them sexist or homophobic or racist. Maybe they are a little outdated, but they have a good heart.'
He said the term 'Latinx', which avoids gendering Latinos or Latinas, is 'stupid' and claimed that few Hispanics actually use it.
Joe Biden, the former US president, has previously claimed it was 'hard to get Latinx vaccinated' because they were scared of being deported.
Policy papers produced by Mr Biden's administration also refer to 'justice-involved populations' rather than prisoners, and 'previously-incarcerated individuals' instead of ex-convicts.
Andy Beshear, the Kentucky governor who won two terms in the red-leaning state, said Democrats had fallen into using phrases like 'substance abuse disorder' instead of addiction.
'I believe that over time, and probably for well-meaning reasons, Democrats have begun to speak like professors and started using advocacy-speak that was meant to reduce stigma, but also removed the meaning and emotion behind words,' he said.
'It makes Democrats or candidates using this speech sound like they're not normal… It sounds simple, but what the Democratic Party needs to do is be normal and sound normal.'
'Democrats trip over themselves in an attempt to say exactly the right thing,' said Allison Prasch, an associate professor of rhetoric, politics and culture at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.
'Republicans maybe aren't so concerned about saying exactly the right thing, so it may appear more authentic to some voters.'
Elissa Slotkin, the Michigan senator, said she had once won over a group of sceptical Teamster union members by calling them 'motherf---ers'.
'They love it…. That is a different way to enter the room,' she said.
She has previously criticised progressive politicians, like Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, for railing against the 'oligarchy', claiming the term means little to ordinary voters.
In March, Pennsylvania senator John Fetterman urged his party to talk 'like regular people', adding: 'Most people are not sure what an oligarch is.'
During last year's election campaign, the Trump campaign and Republicans sought to paint Democrats as out-of-touch and beholden to a radical activist wing.
Ms Harris was frequently mocked for her 'word salad' responses to interview questions. One New York Times commentator complained she relied heavily on 'jargon' and 'rehearsed turns of phrase' while she 'winds her way slowly toward an answer'.
In a town hall event a fortnight before election day, Ms Harris appeared to address the issue, conceding she struggled to answer questions, was 'kind of a nerd', and was not always 'quick on her feet'.
Several commentators said her lack of clarity meant she ended up on the wrong side of the culture war. One of Mr Trump's most effective attack adverts ended with the tagline: 'Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you.'
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Monday, Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor who is considered a potential contender for the Democratic nomination, urged his party to focus on issues like education over gender identity.
'I'm empathetic and sympathetic to a child trying to figure out their pronoun, but it doesn't trump the fact that the rest of the class doesn't know what a pronoun is,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Roasted For Advising Gavin Newsom 'Don't Be A Crazy Person'
Wednesday may not have been the most fantastic day forJD Vance. Not only was the vice president heckled with'couch sex' comments from Free DC and pro-Palestinian activists during an event highlighting President Donald Trump's militarized takeover of the city's police, but he ended up with the internet equivalent of egg on his face for some 'advice' he tried to giveCalifornia Gov. Gavin Newsom. Related: During an interview with Fox News hostLaura Ingraham set to run this evening, Vance was asked about Newsom's recenttrolling of Trump and his MAGA followers. However, Ingraham's question tried to frame Newsom as simply copying Trump's style, hoping for the same results as the president — not an attempt to give Trumpers a satirical taste of their own medicine. But Ingraham couldn't provide that context when she asked Vance, 'How lost are the Democrats right now?' Although it was a softball question, Vance still managed to screw things up when he offered this piece of advice: 'Stop sounding like crazy people.' Yes, that was the super-secret tip from a guy whose boss isnotorious for nonsensical remarks. Related: Vance continued: 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow gonna mimic Donald Trump's style ― I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success, which is that he's authentic,' he said. 'Don't be a crazy person, be authentic.' JD Vance: "This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow gonna mimic Donald Trump's style -- I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success, which is that he's authentic." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 20, 2025 Vance's 'don't be a crazy person' comment was the sort of unintentionally ironic chum that gets social media sharks swimming around looking for snark opportunities. That sound you hear? It's the sound of deep, deep roasting. "Trump is authentically crazy!" - JD Vance — Tyler Black, MD (@tylerblack32) August 21, 2025 So Trump's strength is that he is fundamentally unhinged and not just faking it? — Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) August 20, 2025 BWAHAHA. Please. He's authentically crazy and stupid. — William Turner (@Wbtesq) August 20, 2025 Vance Accidentally Acknowledges Daddy Sounds Like Crazy Person — Matt Chatham (@chatham58) August 20, 2025 JD would never dream of mimicking President Trump's style! — Gary Peterson 🇺🇸 (@GaryPetersonUSA) August 20, 2025 Trump's so authentic he had to invent a fake university to teach people how real he is. — Nate Lichtman (@27KeysToTheRace) August 20, 2025 I'm guessing the Trump camp has some polling which is starting to concern them. MAGA is getting bigly mad about Newsom all of a sudden… — Christopher Hoare (@Chris_Hoare) August 20, 2025 Nobody's mimicking Trump. We're mocking him. That's what satire is... sorry if it went over your head. — Peter (@_e_tto_) August 20, 2025 Of course, Newsom was obliged to mock Vance's comments ― that's how this works, people ― and he did it with faint praise. 'He almost got it,' the governor posted on his personal X account. He almost got it. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) August 20, 2025 Related... Dana Perino Offers Lame Defense Why Gavin Newsom Tweets Are Bad, But Not Trump's Kid Rock Goes Into Meltdown Mode After Getting Punked By Gavin Newsom's X Account Gavin Newsom's Troll Job Of Trump Is Working Incredibly Well Gavin Newsom Trolls JD Vance Over New White House 'Showdown' On Ukraine


NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
Rwanda-backed rebels killed over 140 civilians in eastern Congo, rights group says
DAKAR, Senegal — Rwanda-backed rebels killed at least 140 people in farming communities in eastern Congo in July, Human Rights Watch said in a report Wednesday, describing the killings as 'summary executions.' The group said 141 people, predominantly ethnic Hutus, were feared dead or missing after the attacks near Virunga National Park in North Kivu province, citing local experts and witness accounts. It said the killings appeared to be part of a military campaign by the M23 group, the most prominent of more than 100 armed groups in mineral-rich eastern Congo, against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a mostly Hutu armed group. Nearly 2 million Hutus from Rwanda fled to Congo after the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed 800,000 Tutsi, moderate Hutus and others. Rwandan authorities have accused Hutus who fled of participating in the genocide, alleging that the Congolese army protected them. The United States and others have been trying to achieve a permanent ceasefire since fighting between the M23 and Congolese forces escalated in January with the M23's seizure of two key cities. U.S. President Donald Trump this week asserted he had 'ended six wars' including this one, but experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. The U.N. has called the decades-old conflict in eastern Congo 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' The Human Rights Watch report says the Rwanda Defense Force was involved in the M23 operations it describes, citing U.N. and military sources and witness accounts. There was no immediate comment from the Rwandan government. 'The M23 armed group, which has Rwandan government backing, attacked over a dozen villages and farming areas in July and committed dozens of summary executions of primarily Hutu civilians,' said Clementine de Montjoye, senior researcher at Human Rights Watch. Witnesses said M23 soldiers, accompanied by Rwandan soldiers who were identified by their accents, told them to 'immediately bury the bodies in the fields or leave them unburied, preventing families from organizing funerals,' the report said. One woman described being marched in a group to a riverbank near the town of Kafuru. The group of around 70 people was lined up before the soldiers began shooting at them. Forty-seven of the dead, including children, were identified, the report added. Willy Ngoma, military spokesperson for M23, called the report 'military propaganda.' M23 was previously accused of extrajudicial killings during its seizure of major cities earlier this year. A separate report by Amnesty International on Wednesday said the rights group found that both M23 and Congolese government-sponsored militias regularly committed mass atrocities and sexual violence against civilians, including gang rape. 'Rwanda and (Congo) cannot continue shunning responsibility; they must hold all perpetrators accountable,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's regional director for East and Southern Africa.


CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom's redistricting plan
Washington — The California Supreme Court will not prevent Democrats from moving forward Thursday with a plan to redraw congressional districts. Republicans in the Golden State had asked the state's high court to step in and temporarily block the redistricting efforts, arguing that Democrats — who are racing to put the plan on the ballot later this year — had skirted a rule requiring state lawmakers to wait at least 30 days before passing newly introduced legislation. But in a ruling late Wednesday, the court declined to act, writing that the Republican state lawmakers who filed the suit had "failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time." The California legislature is set to vote on the redistricting plan on Thursday, which would send the bill to California Gov. Gavin Newsom's desk for approval. Democratic state lawmakers in California introduced a set of bills to create new district boundaries in a way they hope would flip five congressional seats, a move made in response to President Trump and Texas Republicans' push to reshape five congressional districts in Texas to favor the GOP. Democratic state lawmakers in California, who have a supermajority in the legislature, want to pass the bills immediately so they can place the proposal in front of voters in a Nov. 4 special election Democrats' proposal in California would try to flip five of the state's nine districts currently held by Republicans and make them more friendly for Democrats. California has 52 congressional districts. The changes may require an amendment to California's state Constitution to override the independent commission that's currently responsible for the state's redistricting process. The battle over district lines may influence the midterm elections next year. Republicans hold only a slim majority in the House of Representatives, and they want to hold onto it, while Democrats are aiming to take back the House. Newsom, a potential 2028 contender, has been leading the charge. "Look, what we're doing neuters, neutralizes what's happening in Texas," Newsom told reporters Wednesday. "People have this chance with this ballot — Nov. 4 — is stand up to the rule of law, stand up for coequal branches of government, stand up to, yes, Donald Trump, but also stand up in the spirit that defines this moment to people being bullied and people being intimidated." In a statement to CBS News, the GOP state lawmakers who sued over the redistricting plan said the Supreme Court's ruling is "not the end of this fight." "We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians," the statement read.