logo
Lab-grown food could be sold in UK in two years

Lab-grown food could be sold in UK in two years

BBC News10-03-2025

Meat, dairy and sugar grown in a lab could be on sale in the UK for human consumption for the first time within two years from now, sooner than expected. The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is looking at how it can speed up the approval process for lab-grown foods.Such products are grown from cells in small chemical plants.UK firms have led the way in the field scientifically but feel they have been held back by the current regulations.
Dog food made from meat that was grown in factory vats went on sale in the UK for the first time last month.In 2020, Singapore became the first country to authorise the sale of cell-cultivated meat for human consumption, followed by the United States three years later and Israel last year.However, Italy and the US states of Alabama and Florida have instituted bans.The FSA is to develop new regulations by working with experts from high-tech food firms and academic researchers. It says it aims to complete the full safety assessment of two lab-grown foods within the two-year process it is starting.But critics say that having the firms involved in drawing up the new rules represents a conflict of interest.The initiative is in response to concerns by UK firms that they are losing ground to competition overseas, where approvals processes take half the time.Prof Robin May, the FSA's chief scientist, told BBC News that there would be no compromise on consumer safety."We are working very closely with the companies involved and academic groups to work together to design a regulatory structure that is good for them, but at all costs ensures the safety of these products remains as high as it possibly can," he said.But critics such as Pat Thomas, director of the campaign group Beyond GM, are not convinced by this approach."The companies involved in helping the FSA to draw up these regulations are the ones most likely to benefit from deregulation and if this were any other type of food product, we would be outraged by it," she said.
The science minister, Lord Vallance, took issue with the process being described as "deregulation". "It is not deregulation, it is pro-innovation regulation," he told BBC News."It is an important distinction, because we are trying to get the regulation aligned with the needs of innovation and reduce some of the bureaucracy and duplication."Lab-grown foods are grown into plant or animal tissue from tiny cells. This can sometimes involve gene editing to tweak the food's properties. The claimed benefits are that they are better for the environment and potentially healthier.The government is keen for lab-grown food firms to thrive because it hopes they can create new jobs and economic growth. The UK is good at the science, but the current approvals process is much slower than in other countries. Singapore, the US and Israel in particular have faster procedures.Ivy Farm Technologies in Oxford is ready to go with lab-grown steaks, made from cells taken from Wagyu and Aberdeen Angus cows.The firm applied for approval to sell its steaks to restaurants at the beginning of last year. Ivy Farm's CEO, Dr Harsh Amin, explained that two years was a very long time to wait."If we can shorten that to less than a year, while maintaining the very highest of Britain's food safety standards, that would help start-up companies like ours to thrive."
Dr Alicia Graham has a similar story. Working at Imperial College's Bezos centre in west London, she has found a way to grow an alternative to sugar. It involves introducing a gene found in a berry into yeast. This process enables her to produce large amounts of the crystals that make it taste sweet. It doesn't make you fat, she says, and so is a potential sweetener and healthy substitute in fizzy drinks.In this case I am allowed to taste it. It was incredibly sweet and slightly sour and fruity, reminding me of lemon sherbet. But Dr Graham's firm, MadeSweetly, is not allowed to sell it until it gets approval."The path to getting approval is not straightforward," she tells me. "They are all new technologies, which are not easy for the regulator to keep up with. But that means that we don't have one specific route to product approval, and that is what we would like."The FSA says it will complete a full safety assessment of two lab-grown foods within the next two years and have the beginnings of a faster and better system for applications for approvals of new lab-grown foods. Prof May of the FSA says the purpose of working with experts from the companies involved as well as academics is to get the science right."It can be quite complex, and it is critical that we understand the science to make sure the foods are safe before authorising them."But Ms Thomas says that these high-tech foods may not be as environmentally friendly as they are made out to be as it takes energy to make them and that in some cases their health benefits are being oversold."Lab-grown foods are ultimately ultra-processed foods and we are in an era where we are trying to get people to eat fewer ultra-processed foods because they have health implications," he said."And it is worth saying that these ultra-processed foods have not been in the human diet before."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BBC bosses draw up plans to win trust of Reform UK voters
BBC bosses draw up plans to win trust of Reform UK voters

The National

time2 days ago

  • The National

BBC bosses draw up plans to win trust of Reform UK voters

Minutes from a meeting of the broadcaster's editorial guidelines and standards committee from March show that BBC News CEO Deborah Turness gave a presentation in which she discussed plans to alter "story selection" and "other types of output, such as drama" to win the trust of Reform voters. The minutes, which were reported by The Byline Times, also show the committee identified "the importance of local BBC teams" to their plan to win over supporters of Nigel Farage. There is reportedly a belief that the coporation's news and drama output is creating "low trust issues" with Farage backers. The minutes states: "The CEO, News and Current Affairs provided the Committee with a presentation on plans to address low trust issues with Reform voters. READ MORE: Richard Murphy: What to expect from Rachel Reeves's spending review "The committee discussed the presentation. Committee members recognised the importance of local BBC teams in the plan, given their closeness to audiences. "Directors discussed how story selection and other types of output, such as drama, also had a role to play. An update on progress would return to a future meeting." The committee includes former GB News executive Robbie Gibb, who is also a former director of communications at Number 10 and an outspoken Brexiteer. Gibb was appointed to the board by former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2021. He was identified by former BBC Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis in 2022 as an 'active agent of the Conservative party'. Farage has repeatedly used his own GB News platform to attack the BBC, calling it a 'political actor' and threatening to boycott the corporation. In language also used by the BBC Editorial Committee, the Reform leader suggested that BBC editors were using 'story selection' in order to target his party. In an incident last year, Farage refused to appear on the BBC until the broadcaster apologised for allowing members of the public to ask him questions during a special episode of Question Time. READ MORE: UK sends spy plane over Gaza as Madleen threatened by Israel Byline Times said BBC staffers it spoke to are concerned about the plan to win over Reform voters, due to the risk of increasing allegations of bias. The BBC has previously been criticised by some viewers for heavily featuring Reform UK politicians on its programmes, despite the party only having a handful of MPs. In July last year, sociology professor Tom Mills – author of The BBC: The Myth of a Public Service – claimed the BBC were giving such a platform to Farage because they are such a big part of a 'political establishment which has drifted to the right'. 'I think the simple answer to why they [the BBC] like Nigel Farage is they are much more comfortable with an anti-establishment figure on the right than the left. It's as simple as that," he said. 'He's on their political spectrum and the political spectrum for the BBC runs from the centrists out to Nigel Farage. 'They still see those guys [like Farage] as being rogue figures of the establishment, but they are just given legitimacy by the fact that there's lots of voices they [the BBC] see to be legitimate in these media organisations which speak from a similar sort of perspective.' The BBC has been approached for comment.

Angus Robertson tears into BBC coverage of Hamilton by-election count
Angus Robertson tears into BBC coverage of Hamilton by-election count

The National

time5 days ago

  • The National

Angus Robertson tears into BBC coverage of Hamilton by-election count

Speaking live on BBC News just after midnight on Friday, Angus Robertson first took issue with the broadcaster allowing rumours from Labour that they were in with a chance of winning the vote to set the narrative of the coverage. He then also called out the BBC for having spent the first 30 minutes of its by-election special – which was shown on BBC One Scotland and BBC News – without mentioning Christina McKelvie, the Scottish Government's minister whose death left an empty seat at Holyrood. BBC host Martin Geissler introduced Robertson and asked about suggestions from Labour sources at the count that their party could be on for a better result than had been expected. Geissler asked: 'Are you shocked by what you're hearing tonight?' Robertson said: 'Well, I mean, for a start, who knows? Because the truth of it is none of us know because the ballot boxes have just been opened, the verification count has just taken place. 'Somebody saying something to a journalist suddenly turns the narrative of the entire media coverage of the build-up towards the result before we actually know any facts. 'So the first thing I would say is that we should hold our horses and wait till we actually have samples, which the political parties all have, of a size big enough to be able to make an accurate prediction. I don't think any of the parties do." Geissler then said: 'If you are wrong … if you are run close by Labour, if you lose this to Labour, it's a bad night for the SNP, right?' Robertson then said: 'I'll come to that question in a second, but one name hasn't been mentioned here so far, which is Christina McKelvie. 'We're having a by-election, because one of my colleagues died. I firstly think that's a bit odd, that hasn't been mentioned once so far. 'Secondly, I think in fairness to everybody in the panel, I don't think anybody would have wanted to have the by-election because she was a fantastic MSP and the voters would have their say in the normal course of events.' The SNP minister added: 'Let's understand we're having a by-election because somebody died far too young.' Speaking to the BBC from the count, Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie acknowledged that no one had wanted there to be a by-election and paid tribute to McKelvie. Baillie further declined to express as much confidence in a Labour victory as anonymous sources from the party had done, saying that people "across the political spectrum are turning to Reform" who she called an "unknown factor".

Maesglas Fish Bar, Newport given four-star food hygiene score
Maesglas Fish Bar, Newport given four-star food hygiene score

South Wales Argus

time5 days ago

  • South Wales Argus

Maesglas Fish Bar, Newport given four-star food hygiene score

The Maesglas Fish Bar on Cardiff Road was inspected by a food safety officer on April 8, 2025. The takeaway was rated under three categories: hygienic food handling, cleanliness and condition of facilities and building, and management of food safety. The food safety officer found the shop's hygienic food handling practices, including preparation, cooking, reheating, cooling and storage, to be of a good standard. The cleanliness and condition of facilities and building, including the layout, ventilation, hand washing facilities and pest control, were rated as generally satisfactory. The report said the management of food safety, which covers the system or checks in place to ensure that food sold or served is safe to eat, evidence that staff know about food safety, and the food safety officer has confidence that standards will be maintained in future, was good. This led to an overall food hygiene rating of four. The ratings range from zero to five, with zero meaning urgent improvement is necessary or they may risk closure, and five meaning standards are excellent. The Food Hygiene Rating Act 2013 became law in Wales on March 4, 2013, and requires all businesses selling food in Wales - including pubs, cafes, restaurants, hotels, takeaways, schools, hospitals, canteens, care homes and corner shops – to display hygiene ratings in a prominent place, and to provide the information verbally if requested over the phone. Inspections are carried out by the local authority officers, and ratings are updated on the FSA website. Businesses have the right to appeal against ratings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store