The new American workplace crisis: Return-to-office mandates lead to a working mom exodus
Workforce trends and gender gaps
Fortune's analysis integrates these workforce shifts with a broader view of corporate America's changing priorities. Our coverage finds:
While flexible and remote work previously enabled women—particularly mothers—to remain employed, return-to-office requirements have pushed many out, with CEOs openly acknowledging greater losses of female talent.
Surveys show that women who work from home report less feedback and mentorship than their in-office peers, raising new barriers to career advancement.
Mothers working remotely often face the 'motherhood penalty'—less pay, fewer raises, and limited promotion prospects—while those forced back in person are sometimes left with only the option to quit.
Despite a recent record in female workforce participation, the disappearance of flexibility risks lasting damage to women's financial independence and retirement readiness.
Women flee the workforce
Labor force participation of mothers with young children dropped from 69.7% to 66.9% between January and June 2025.
212,000 women age 20 and older have left the workforce since January—compared with 44,000 men who joined it.
Full-time office requirements among Fortune 500 firms rose to 24% in 2Q25, up from 13% at the end of 2024.
Flexibility vanishes; mothers exit
This pullback follows the widespread rollback of remote and flexible work policies that initially ushered many mothers back to the job market. Major corporations and the federal government have now instituted strict return-to-office mandates, requiring five-days-a-week in-person attendance. For many mothers, the loss of flexibility means a logistical and financial reckoning. JPMorgan Chase, AT&T, and Amazon, among others, ramped up their in-office requirements in 2025, with Fortune reporting that the share of Fortune 500 companies with full-time mandates nearly doubled since late 2024.
Employers report difficulty replacing departed female talent, with overall productivity suffering as a result.
Childcare costs and cultural shifts bring complications
Compounding these changes are rising childcare costs, closures of childcare centers due to lapsing federal aid, and a noticeable trend toward traditional gender roles. Social media movements like #tradwife encourage women to prioritize home and children, amplified by calls from political leaders for more parents to stay home.
For many families facing unaffordable childcare, the decision is an economic necessity rather than a cultural choice. Black women and those with college degrees have been hit especially hard. The unemployment rate for Black women climbed to its highest in nearly four years; federal layoffs and the dismantling of diversity initiatives eliminated stable jobs that disproportionately supported minority women.
Why it matters
Experts interviewed by both the Washington Post and Fortune warn that these trends, if left unchecked, will have 'huge implications' for women's lifetime earnings, career prospects, and retirement security. With breaks in employment history, women frequently return to lower-paying jobs and face diminished opportunities for advancement.
Studies, including a 2024 University of Pittsburgh analysis, similarly show that aggressive return-to-office mandates have led to a loss of senior employees—many of them women—threatening productivity and competitiveness.
For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ali Noorani will replace Jim Canales as Barr Foundation president
'I am deeply humbled and grateful for the opportunity to lead the Barr Foundation at this moment and to build on its exceptional reputation as an institution that boldly stands in its values of deep and authentic partnership and investment in community,' he said in a Wednesday statement. His appointment marks a major transition at Barr. Its current president Jim Canales will step down after an 11-year tenure, during which he expanded the foundation dramatically and Advertisement In a statement, Hostetter praised Noorani for his 'humility, curiosity, and the long-term view that investing in potential and empowering people in communities always requires.' 'Throughout the search, Ali's enthusiasm for Barr's core issues of arts, climate, and education was palpable, as was his readiness to propel Barr into its next chapter,' she continued. Advertisement Founded in 1997, Barr has invested $1.7 billion to charitable causes in arts, education, climate resiliency, and racial justice. Under Canales, the foundation grew its grantmaking from $55 million to $130 million a year and more than doubled the size of its staff, now around 50 people. (Barr also supports the Globe's In a On Wednesday, he touted Noorani's 'instinctual strategic acumen and personal warmth that make him a tremendous asset as Barr seeks to meet the needs of this moment and beyond.' Jim Canales, the longtime president of the Barr foundation, will step down and transition to chair of the board by the end of the year. Matt Kalinowski Nonprofits across the state have taken an outsized role in upholding the state's social safety net this year, as federal programs intended to protect the vulnerable have been rolled back by the White House. The Boston Foundation With his background in immigration, Noorani may be uniquely equipped to handle the moment, supporters said in a statement. Advertisement 'In a time of extraordinary turbulence and disquiet, I can think of no better leader to take the helm of the Barr Foundation than Ali Noorani,' said Sam Gill, president of the New York-based Doris Duke Foundation. 'Ali's passion, intelligence, experience and humanity make him the perfect steward for the next chapter in Barr's legacy of investing in the human, natural and creative potential of our communities and our American society.' Diti Kohli can be reached at
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal
President Trump's trade and energy policies are recalibrating the global economic order — and not by accident. Under his leadership, trade is no longer simply about moving goods. It is a tool of strategic policy — one that drives industrial revival, and shapes strategic, economic and national outcomes. Trump's approach is disruptive but methodical. Tariffs create negotiating power, leading to trade agreements that reduce deficits and rewire supply chains. When combined with U.S. energy exports and capital markets, this strategy doesn't just rebalance trade — it reinvigorates American industry. As a senior negotiator on the U.S.-China Phase I Trade Agreement in Treasury during Trump's first term, I saw firsthand that what critics dismissed as 'erratic', 'chaotic' and 'unpredictable' was, in fact, deeply strategic. President Trump's instincts, honed by decades of high-stakes dealmaking, informed a broader strategy. He approached policy like a grandmaster playing three-dimensional chess: every tariff, handshake and message was a calculated move to reassert American economic leadership. Just as in Trump's first term, this administration began by confronting structural imbalances. The 2024 U.S. goods trade deficit hit $1.2 trillion — its highest in history. In response, Trump used executive authority to impose reciprocal tariffs — not as an end in themselves, but as tools to bring others to the table. Starting in early 2025, Trump's targeted tariffs compelled negotiations to rebalance trade relationships and repatriate supply chains. Japan agreed to reduce average industrial tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent and pledged $550 billion in U.S.-bound investment. The European Union followed suit, agreeing to a framework that includes a baseline 15 percent tariff on industrial goods, expanded market access for U.S. energy, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, and a commitment to $420 billion in foreign direct investment into the U.S. And, most recently, the United States also reached a trade agreement with South Korea: Seoul will face a 15 percent duty, reduced from a threatened 25 percent, in exchange for a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S.-owned projects and purchase $100 billion in American liquefied natural gas and energy products. Indonesia and the Philippines opened markets for U.S. agriculture and energy, while committing to major purchases, including 50 Boeing aircraft. Vietnam accepted 20 percent tariffs and tighter controls on transshipped Chinese goods. Negotiations continue with India, Taiwan and others. Together, these countries now account for $809 billion — or 67 percent — of the 2024 U.S. trade deficit. Once deals with India and Taiwan are finalized, that coverage will exceed three-quarters. A mere 5 percent improvement across these relationships could slash the annual deficit by up to $95 billion. Beyond deficit reduction, these agreements reset incentives. They punish transshipment, enhance transparency and support rules-of-origin provisions that favor North American manufacturing. The result? Companies are investing in new U.S. production — auto components, semiconductors, specialty steel and energy systems. And job creation follows capital. Analysts estimate that up to 1.5 million advanced manufacturing jobs could be brought back to American soil over five years — a far cry from Barack Obama's declaration that some U.S. manufacturing jobs were gone forever. Trade reform paves the way for yet another explosion in growth: deploying U.S. energy and capital into newly aligned partner markets. Programs like America Crece and Asia EDGE, flagship infrastructure growth initiatives during Trump's first term, demonstrated the power of this model. This programming identified and unlocked growth opportunities in our partner countries using American energy exports and American equipment, employing American workers, and financing through American capital markets. In Latin America alone, we identified over $300 billion in infrastructure projects with U.S. private capital in the lead. In Vietnam, we identified $8 billion in near-term energy exports and $50 billion in longer-horizon infrastructure investments. Before the Biden administration ended this programming, we executed on $2.5 billion in transactions in Panama, backed a $3.5 billion facility in Ecuador and laid the groundwork for more than $4 billion in liquefied natural gas-based investment flows into Vietnam. Japan and Taiwan are now adopting this U.S. liquefied natural gas-driven model. Their national priorities — liquefied natural gas security and grid modernization — create natural demand for U.S. energy exports and financing partnerships. Trade deals open the market; energy and infrastructure partnerships deliver the substance. Our capital markets are unmatched in size, efficiency and depth. Trump's tariff leverage opens doors. Energy exports and U.S. financing flow through them — fueling global infrastructure while anchoring demand for American industry. This energy multiplier also advances a core tenet of Trump's economic agenda: U.S. energy dominance. American liquefied natural gas, coal and refined products are now strategic assets — tools of both commercial strength and geopolitical influence. Trump's approach fuses trade, energy and finance into a cohesive doctrine. It turns deficits into investment. It transforms market access into industrial revival. And it leverages the full might of U.S. capital to strengthen allies abroad and jobs at home. If the goal is to bring back U.S. manufacturing, secure energy markets and make capital markets work for working Americans — this is the model. The chessboard is set. And America, once again, is playing to win. Mitchell A. Silk served as assistant secretary for International Markets at the U.S. Treasury during Trump's first term. He was the senior Treasury official on U.S.-China trade negotiations and helped design America Crece and Asia EDGE. He is the author of ' A Seat at the Table: An Inside Account of Trump's Global Economic Revolution,' to be published in September 2025.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump reverses course on Intel CEO amid US-China chip showdown
US President Donald Trump pivoted from calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's resignation to hosting him at the White House, turning a public rebuke over China ties into an opportunity to pull one of America's most prominent tech leaders into his orbit. Once the undisputed leader in microchip production, Intel stumbled in recent years and lost ground to Asian rivals, facing delays in advanced manufacturing. Trump confirmed the meeting via a post on Truth Social, calling the meeting a "very interesting one". Intel also confirmed that the meeting took place in a statement published on Tuesday. "Mr. Tan had the honour of meeting with President Trump for a candid and constructive discussion on Intel's commitment to strengthening US technology and manufacturing leadership," said the firm. "[We] look forward to working closely with him and his administration as we restore this great American company." As of 13.00 CEST, Intel shares were up 2.9% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, after jumping roughly 3.5% on Monday. Falling behind rivals For decades, Intel set the pace for microprocessor innovation — especially for PCs — but in the late 2010s, it fell behind Taiwan's TSMC and South Korea's Samsung in manufacturing cutting-edge chips. Repeated delays in rolling out its 10-nanometer and 7-nanometer processors damaged its reputation and eroded customer trust. Related Intel's stock tumbles after President Trump says its CEO must resign Intel announces more job cuts and drops projects in Europe in plan to save the company Intel is also caught in the ongoing US–China tech rivalry, with Washington pushing it to build domestic capacity while restricting Chinese access to advanced chips. The perceived China ties of CEO Lip-Bu Tan due to his venture capital background led to an initially frosty reception from Trump. Ties to China Trump called for Tan's resignation last week after US Senator Tom Cotton wrote to Intel's board, raising concerns over what he described as 'Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army". Tan previously led Cadence Design Systems, from 2009 until 2021, which in July reached a plea deal with the government over allegations of illegal exports to China. Cadence said it it violated export controls rules to sell hardware and software to China's National University of Defense Technology, which is linked to the Chinese military. Lip-Bu Tan is a Malaysian-born US citizen who founded the Silicon Valley–based firm Walden International in 1987 and has invested heavily in semiconductor start-ups across Asia, including extensive involvement in China. Through these investments, he became a seed investor in SMIC, China's largest chip foundry, joining its board from 2001 to 2018. SMIC later came under US sanctions for its close ties to the Chinese military. When President Trump publicly demanded Tan's resignation last week due to his alleged ties with Chinese firms, Intel shares dropped more than 3% during intra‑day trading. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
