
Diaspora gather for Europe's first Palestinian art museum in Edinburgh
A small collection box inside the main entrance of the non-profit, volunteer-run gallery offers a reminder: "It's not just human lives being erased in Palestine - art and culture are also targets."
The date is significant: May 15 marks Nakba Day, when Palestinians commemorate the loss of their homes, lands, and sometimes lives in the creation of Israel.
Read More:
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was adopted in 1947, splitting the land into the new Jewish state and a Palestinian one.
Around 56% of what was then British Mandatory Palestine was to be allocated to Israel, despite Arabs making up two-thirds of the population and, at the time, owning roughly 90% of the land.
The plan was rejected by the Palestinians and neighbouring Arab states, and its adoption led to a bloody civil war which went largely unchecked by the British.
On March 10 1948 this time Haganah, the main Zionist paramilitary group, implemented Plan Dalet to establish control of key areas by expelling Palestinians and destroying their villages.
Soldiers were given lists of settlements, along with a detailed description - access roads, quality of land, water springs, main sources of income, level of hostility - and its fate: destruction, occupation, or expulsion.
Ilan Pappé, an Israeli historian, wrote: "The plan decided upon on 10 March 1948, and above all its systematic implementation in the following months, was a clear case of what is now known as an ethnic cleansing operation."
Israel declared its independence on May 14, and the following day a coalition of neighbouring Arab states invaded.
By the time of the armistice in March 1949 Israel controlled around 78% of what had been Mandatory Palestine, with more than 700,000 Palestinians forced out of their homes. They call this 'al-Nakba', the catastrophe.
A short film is shown with a timeline of the fate of more than 600 Palestinian villages.
Hamada Elkempt, Under Observation, 2024 (Image: Hamada Elkempt)
Faisal Saleh, founder of Palestine Museum, says: "To the refugees in the room, watch for your village - mine is April 25."
On the floor is a map of historic Palestine, showing the destroyed villages and the sites of close to 50 massacres. News of mass killings, such as those at Deir Yassin, greatly added to the number of Palestinians fleeing their homes.
One of the refugees stands on the map, gesturing to the north and the coast of the Mediterranean sea: "They wanted control of the farming areas. The Zionist slogan was 'a land without a people for a people without a land' and this is what they tried to create."
The Palestinians were overpowered, he says, with only one or two rifles per village. As for the Arab coalition, they were focused on stopping the Palestinians fighting.
Jane Frere, who runs a community project which sews the names of the dead in Gaza onto banners speaks after a short film about the work.
In it, the final name she places onto the banner is the husband of a woman who left for Lebanon to deliver their baby. The child's father, a doctor, was killed in Gaza.
The art in the gallery, however, is altogether lighter. A landscape painting of an olive grove, kites flying in a clear blue sky, a woman in a headscarf standing in the sun-kissed sea.
Nabil Anani, In Pursuit of Utopia, 2020 (Image: Ziad Anani/Zawyeh Gallery) On one wall are pictures drawn by children from Gaza, bright, crayon drawings.
As Mr Saleh told The Herald: "There are not a lot of gory scenes and scenes of violence whatsoever. It's just regular, the kind of art you'd see in a typical modern art museum. We are trying to show that Palestinians are human, just like everyone else.
"In general, we really are not very political."
Some things are, of course, hard to ignore.
When a speaker thanks Mr Saleh for his hard work in establishing the space he waves a hand and says: "Please, we are hanging out and having a good time - people are dying in Gaza."
This is not an attempt to bring down the mood, but rather an example of the deep connection those of the diaspora, most wearing keffiyehs and other traditional clothing, feel to the land. Many wear keys around their necks, a symbol of the hope to return to their former homes.
One of the speakers is a Palestinian woman who was forced from her village at the age of four.
Speaking in Arabic, with translation by Mr Saleh, she explains: "The Arab countries told the Palestinians, 'go out and we'll take care of everything'."
Her family left their home with little more than the clothes on their back - "like you see them now" - and fled to Gaza. There were no houses for them to go to. Initially there weren't even tents. That winter it snowed in Gaza.
At the age of 81 she's seen every year of the conflict. She recounts praying in her home as a missile shattered the window above her, the screams of her children, the deaths of friends and family. Things now are worse than she's ever known.
The diaspora, men and women, old and young, are sobbing as she tells her story.
"What you see from Gaza now is only the areas where the journalists can go," she says. "And they are killing most of the journalists."
The woman was able to leave on a visa to visit family in Scotland, and she thanks the nation for its hospitality and solidarity.
She ends with two sentences: "May God bless you. May God never show you the things we have seen."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
What happened to Piers Morgan
'What happened to Piers Morgan?' asked a Spectator writer last weekend. The answer, according to slavishly pro-Israel commentator Jonathan Sacerdoti, is that I'm now 'dark, degraded, dismal and debased' – because I've become more critical of how Israel is prosecuting its war in Gaza. For a long time on my YouTube show Uncensored, I defended the country's right to defend itself after 7 October attacks. But I now believe Benjamin Netanyahu's government has crossed the 'proportionality' line with its recent food and aid blockade and relentless bombardment of civilians. Self-evidently, Israel is failing in its mission to eliminate Hamas and get the remaining hostages released. Its forces have been killing and starving a horrendous number of children as they go after the terrorists – and if finance minister Bezalel Smotrich is to be taken at his genocidal-sounding word, its new mission is to kick all Palestinians out of Gaza, which would constitute ethnic cleansing. Even former Israeli prime ministers now say it's committing war crimes. When I defended Israel, I was subjected to a ferocious onslaught from pro-Palestinian trolls who branded me a 'Zionist genocide-enabler'. Now, I've had an equally vile barrage of abuse and threats from pro-Israeli trolls branding me a 'Jew-hating anti-Semite'. How can I be both? Amid the pro-Israeli hate, I criticised Dawn French for offensively downplaying 7 October as just 'a bad thing' in a mocking video, and I described the insufferably tedious Greta Thunberg as an attention-seeking narcissist for preposterously claiming she'd been kidnapped by the IDF on her puerile selfie-yacht stunt. I was instantly attacked as an Israeli stooge by the same pro-Palestinian trolls who'd been lauding me and praised by the pro-Israeli trolls who'd been howling 'Hamas lover!' at me for days. 'You can't win, Piers,' I hear you say. But for a journalist to be attacked by both sides in a war of this historical complexity is a win. It means I'm doing my job properly. The answer to 'What happened to Piers Morgan?' is that I'm right where I want to be. 'Cambio de Tercio tonight? x' read the anonymous text as I attended the Champions League final. I was intrigued; that's my favourite Spanish restaurant in London. 'Who's this?' I replied. 'I'm in Munich.' 'Rishi.' I've regularly texted with our former prime minister, and Cambio is also one of his favourite restaurants, so this made perfect sense. 'Ah! You've got a new number. Are you there tonight? Let's have dinner soon.' 'I have a new number. Would love dinner. Will you be in LA over the summer?' (Rishi and I, with our wives, dined together in Beverly Hills last August.) 'Great,' I replied, 'And yes, will be in LA.' He then said he'd get one of his advisers, a mutual friend, to sort the date. 'PSG ripping Inter Milan to pieces,' I added. 'I'm watching on TV,' he said. 'I was rooting for Inter, always backing the underdog!' Again, very Rishi. It was only the next day that I spotted the 'x' at the end of his initial message and alarm bells rang. Rishi and I are friendly, but not 'x' friendly. Sure enough, our mutual friend confirmed it wasn't him. Coincidentally, during my trip to Qatar to attend the Emir's state dinner for President Trump, one of the latter's aides reminded me of the time a prankster once chatted to The Donald on the phone by pretending to be me. Incredibly, the imposter persuaded the White House switchboard to put 'me' through to Trump and they had a lengthy conversation. Obviously, all hell broke loose when one of his team later asked me how the call had gone and I said I hadn't made any calls. The aide said they assumed the fake chat would get leaked somewhere, and prompt several firings, but nothing ever appeared. Which raises the question, as with the fake Rishi: why do it? Five years ago, on a family villa holiday in Saint-Tropez, we were burgled by a gang that broke in while we were asleep. A local detective revealed they were ruthless teenage girl thieves with petite mains or 'little hands'. This week, Deadline Hollywood announced that Universal Studios and Working Title had won a 'ten-way bidding war' to land a rights deal in the 'six-figure against seven figures' for my wife Celia's new novel Little Hands, about a gang of girl thieves operating on the French Riviera. And they say crime doesn't pay. I'm 33-1 to be London's next mayor. In light of Sir Keir Starmer's winter fuel allowance U-turn, broken tax promises and unachievable plan to build 1.5 million new homes during this parliament, if I ever do become a politician, my only pledge will be to make no pledges.

South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Fifa warned about free speech restrictions at 2026 World Cup
The warnings follow recent US government policies under President Donald Trump, which include a travel ban affecting 12 countries, such as World Cup qualifier Iran, and heightened criticism over responses to civil unrest. The United States will co-host the tournament alongside Canada and Mexico, with California's Rose Bowl also set to host matches during the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, which starts on Saturday. Ronan Evain, executive director of Football Supporters Europe, said: "Fans travel to the World Cup to celebrate and express their passion and any attempt to curtail our fundamental rights, including the right to free speech, is a betrayal of the spirit of football. "We're particularly concerned about the potential for selective enforcement and discrimination against fans based on our perceived political views or national origin. "FIFA must obtain the necessary guarantees to ensure fans from all over the world are able to safely travel and attend the games." Human rights organisations have voiced concerns about increasing restrictions on freedom of expression, particularly regarding pro-Palestinian protests. Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said: "FIFA should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournament's integrity and use its leverage with the US government to ensure that the rights of all qualified teams, support staff, media and fans are respected as they seek to enter the United States, regardless of nationality, gender identity, religion or opinion." The US government has stated that the travel ban will not apply to players or team staff from qualified nations. However, it will prevent fans from Iran and other affected countries from attending matches in person. FIFA and the US State Department have been contacted for comment.


NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
ICE rejected Mahmoud Khalil's request to be detained closer to newborn son, emails show
After nearly three months in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention, pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil made a request to move closer to his family. It was denied by the agency last week, according to emails reviewed Wednesday by NBC News. Khalil's legal team asked in late May that he be transferred to a detention center in New Jersey to be closer to his wife and newborn son. He has been held in a Louisiana ICE facility since March. ICE's policy requires that detained noncitizen parents or legal guardians, who are primary caretakers or have custody of minor children, be held in facilities close to their children The New Orleans ICE Field Office wrote that Khalil did not fall under the criteria of the agency policy and denied the request without explanation, according to the emails. 'I am declining your request that Mr. Khalil be transferred from the Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Jena, Louisiana to a detention center in New Jersey,' an official at the field office wrote. Nora Ahmed, legal director of the ACLU of Louisiana, which is part of Khalil's legal team, called the decision 'cruel.' 'ICE's directive recognizes that the government should have no role in destroying the family unit, and yet that is exactly what is happening here,' Ahmed said. Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security immediately responded to NBC News' request for comment on the emails. Khalil's wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, a Michigan-born dentist, gave birth to the couple's son in April. Citing the ICE policy, his legal team reached out to the New Orleans office in hopes of getting him moved. The directive, issued in 2022, considers detained parents who have custody of their children as 'covered individuals' under the policy. It stipulates that covered individuals must be placed 'as close as practicable' to their minor children. It also requires ICE personnel to accommodate regular visitation between covered individuals and their minor children. 'There is no possible justification to detain Mr. Khalil at such a great distance from his minor child, in violation of ICE's own policy, when ICE maintains numerous detention facilities within driving distance of where Mr. Khalil's wife and infant son reside in New York City,' Khalil's counsel wrote in an email to the New Orleans ICE office. In an email to Khalil's legal counsel, an official at the New Orleans ICE office said that the detainee did not qualify as a covered individual. Khalil, who grew up in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria and was granted permanent U.S. resident status last year, became a widely recognized activist amid the pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University last year. In March, he was abruptly arrested outside of his student housing on campus and detained before being accused by the Trump administration of leading 'activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.' He has not been charged with any criminal conduct. ICE previously rejected Khalil's request to attend his son's birth, court documents show. 'The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' Khalil said in a legal filing last week. Khalil met his son for the first time last month, his attorneys said, just before an immigration hearing.