
Why won't the BBC report on Israel's nuclear weapons?
The broadcaster has quietly updated a story which wrongly claims the 'real answer is we do not know' if Israel has nuclear weapons.
However, the BBC claim – which relies on the fact that the Israeli government has not officially acknowledged its nuclear capabilities – remains even in the updated version of a story purported to offer answers to readers' questions on the Iran-Israel conflict.
Israel launched air strikes on Iran on June 13, targeting nuclear sites, residential areas, scientists and military leaders, days before the US was due to hold talks with the nation about its nuclear programme.
The BBC has reported extensively on the escalating conflict, but has largely failed to mention Israel's nuclear weaponry – despite a focus on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
READ MORE: Israel accused of 'hypocrisy' by expert after calling hospital strike 'war crime'
One article published on June 16 examining Iran and Israel's militaries talks about Iran's nuclear programme being targeted but fails to mention Israel's.
Another, first published on June 13 and updated since, includes extensive discussion of Iran's nuclear projects, including a map showing key facilities across the country, but does not mention Israel's nuclear weaponry at all.
A third, a BBC Verify story on 'Iran's secretive nuclear site' published on June 18, makes no mention of Israel's own secretive nuclear sites.
On Wednesday evening, the BBC published another story on the conflict under the headline: 'Your questions answered on the Israel-Iran conflict.'
The final question in the article, coming after multiple dealing with Iran's nuclear capabilities, is: 'Does Israel have nuclear weapons?'
The BBC's original answer read: 'The real answer is we don't know.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Image: Archive) 'They have not confirmed or denied the presence of a nuclear capability.
'It takes three components to have a nuclear weapon: First, uranium enriched to 60% purity. Second, the ability to build a warhead. And third, a way to deliver that warhead to a target.
'As it stands, there is no overt declaration by Israel on any form of nuclear capability.'
Israel's nuclear programme has been a matter of public knowledge since the 1980s, when whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu told The Sunday Times about it in detail, leading the paper to conclude that Israel had some 200 nuclear warheads.
Vanunu was kidnapped from Italy and imprisoned in Israel for espionage and treason after speaking about his time working at the Dimona nuclear research centre in the Negey desert.
Archive image, originally broadcast on Israeli TV in 2005, of the secret Dimona nuclear research facility
A declassified 1971 spy satellite image, taken by the US, showing the Dimona nuclear facilityIn November 2023, after Israel's renewed siege of Gaza began, Israeli government minister Amichai Eliyahu said that dropping a nuclear bomb on the Palestinian region was an option.
The tacit admission that the Israeli government has nuclear capabilities led to his suspension as a minister.
The most recent Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor report, published in March, concluded that Israel controls around 90 nuclear warheads, all of which are ready for use. These weapons have an estimated yield of 2.5 megatons, or 165 Hiroshima-bomb equivalents.
The facts are such that The New York Times reported, without qualification, that "Israel has its own secretive nuclear weapons program".
So why can't the BBC?
Of course we know. FFS. pic.twitter.com/ww234lfnzI — Marc Mulholland (@katheder) June 18, 2025
Instead, the broadcaster's meek suggestion that Israel's nuclear weapons are not public knowledge was called out on social media. 'Of course we know. FFS,' Oxford University historian Marc Mulholland wrote.
James Butler, the co-founder of Novara Media, added: 'This is actively misinforming the audience.
'Everybody knows Israel has nukes. And: it has never been a signatory to the non proliferation treaty. And: IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] inspectors have never visited the site at Dimona.'
Others questioned the BBC's claim that uranium 'enriched to 60% purity' is needed for a nuclear weapon.
As nuclear expert Dr Kaitlin Cook wrote in The Conservation this week: 'Countries with nuclear weapons tend to use about 90% enriched, 'weapons-grade' uranium. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has enriched large quantities of uranium to 60%.'
The BBC's updated version of the story corrects this error, but leaves in the claim that it is not known whether Israel has nuclear weapons.
READ MORE: BBC chief responds to landmark report exposing bias on Gaza
It now states: 'There are estimates that it has about 90 nuclear warheads. But the real answer is we do not know. It has neither confirmed nor denied a nuclear capability,
'Israel is not part of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which was a global agreement to prevent more nations acquiring the bomb.
'It takes three components to have a nuclear weapon: first, uranium enriched to 90%, second, the ability to build a warhead, and third, a way to deliver that warhead to a target.
'As it stands, there is no overt declaration by Israel on any of the above.'
In a war started by Israel and ostensibly focused on whether Iran intends to develop nuclear weapons, you might expect the BBC to deal with Israel's nuclear capabilities more bravely. Truth, after all, is not whatever the Israeli government says it is.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Irish leaders call for ‘immediate de-escalation' between Iran and Israel
Irish premier Micheal Martin said Iran should make clear it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium. Irish deputy premier Simon Harris, who is also the minister for foreign affairs, said work was ongoing at EU level to engage with citizens in Israel and Iran who may wish to leave. Iran and Israel have been striking each other's territory for a week, deepening the crisis in the Middle East. Israel said it launched an attack to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, far in excess of the levels required for power stations and a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. After a missile attack on a hospital in southern Israel, defence minister Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'absolutely should not continue to exist'. US President Donald Trump has also reportedly been considering involving the US by targeting a uranium enrichment facility in Iran. Asked what role Ireland can play in the crisis, Mr Martin said Ireland and the EU can urge 'restraint and de-escalation'. 'The world needs stability and it needs peace – and dialogue is the way to resolve the nuclear issue in terms of Iran,' the Taoiseach told RTE Radio. 'Iran has been a malign actor in the Middle East for quite a long time in terms of supporting Hezbollah, Hamas the Houthis – it's a theocratic autocratic state. 'But there was dialogue on the way between Iran and the United States on that issue, I think that should restart. 'I think Iran should make it very clear that it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium, or indeed progress to developing nuclear bomb capacity.' Meanwhile, Mr Harris said there was a 'massive effort' at EU level to support citizens and diplomats in Iran and Israel. He said the EU was engaging with Germany, France and the UK to persuade the Iranians back into talks. 'It is almost impossible to overstate the potential danger of this, if there ends up being involvement of other countries, or indeed spill-over into other countries,' he said on Thursday. 'Ireland, whilst far away in one way, does obviously have a number of citizens in both countries, have a significant number of troops in Lebanon, is very concerned about the situation in Palestine, so there's quite a lot of moving parts in this.' He told RTE Radio: 'Nobody wants to see Iran with nuclear capabilities. 'Everybody is aware of the dangers that Iran poses, but at the same time, the way you resolve these issues is through the talks that were scheduled to take place and which were obviously ultimately postponed as a result of Israeli (incursion).' He said Irish embassies had contacted citizens in Iran and Israel on Wednesday who would like to leave when the opportunity arises. There are around 29 Irish citizens and 12 dependants in Iran, and 200 Irish citizens in Israel. 'There's the massive effort at a European level to make sure we try to provide support to our own citizens and our own diplomats in what is becoming a really dangerous environment and a really difficult environment in which to operate from and function from as well,' he told RTE Radio. He said that as the airspace is closed in Iran, evacuation would mean going over the land border, and for those in Israel it means travelling to Jordan or Egypt. 'There are a number of options available to us. We're working very closely with a number of member states, and we're also having to now, in a very serious way, also look at how we best support our diplomats, because the situation is deteriorating quite significantly in terms of being able to effectively operate in the country, and also obviously safety and security issues,' he said.


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Netanyahu stuns Israelis by describing ‘personal cost' of postponing son's wedding
Benjamin Netanyahu has evoked the spirit of London under the Blitz, and pointed to his own family's sacrifice amid the blood, toil, tears and sweat of his nation: the second postponement of his son's wedding. The Israeli prime minister's remarks, solemnly delivered to the cameras against the backdrop of a missile-struck hospital building in the southern city of Be'er Sheva, set off a howl of derision that echoed around the Hebrew-language internet, at the height of a war that Netanyahu unleashed on Friday. The stunning comments also added grist to the arguments of his critics that the prime minister is increasingly cut off emotionally from the daily realities of Israel and the region, after more than 17 years in office. Seeking to underline his family's shared hardship with ordinary Israelis, Netanyahu adopted a Churchillian tone when pointing out that this was not the first time his son Avner's wedding had needed to be postponed, and that Avner's fiancee was also disappointed, not to mention the thwarted mother of the groom, Netanyahu's wife, Sara. 'It really reminds me of the British people during the Blitz. We are going through a Blitz,' Netanyahu said, referring to the wartime Nazi bombing of Britain in which 43,000 civilians died. 'There are people who were killed, families who grieved loved ones, I really appreciate that,' he went on. The Israeli authorities say that 24 Israeli civilians have so far been killed. Washington-based human rights activists have estimated the Iranian civilian death toll to be 263. 'Each of us bears a personal cost, and my family has not been exempt,' Netanyahu said at the Soroka hospital, which was struck on Thursday morning by an Iranian missile, causing light injuries. 'This is the second time that my son Avner has canceled a wedding due to missile threats. It is a personal cost for his fiancee as well, and I must say that my dear wife is a hero, and she bears a personal cost.' Avner Netanyahu's wedding was first scheduled in November and had to be postponed for security reasons. Then it was due to take place on Monday, despite threat of opposition protests. Reports that the prime minister was going to take a few days off for the event may have contributed to Iran's complacency on Friday morning when the leadership was taken unawares by Israel's aerial attack. The Israeli backlash to Netanyahu's nuptial comments was instant and furious. Anat Angrest, whose son Matan has been held hostage since the Hamas attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, observed that the suffering 'didn't go unnoticed by my family either'. 'I have been in the hellish dungeons of Gaza for 622 days now,' Angrest said in a post on the social media platform X. Gilad Kariv, a Knesset member for the Democrats, called Netanyahu a 'borderless narcissist'. 'I know many families who were not forced to postpone a wedding, but who will now never celebrate the weddings that were once meant to take place,' Kariv said. He was contemptuous of Netanyahu's claim that his wife, Sara, notorious in Israeli for her expensive tastes, was a hero. 'The doctors who leave home for night shifts are the heroes,' Kariv said. 'The teachers who keep our children together on Zoom and phone calls are the heroes.' Amir Tibon, an Israeli journalist, argued that public figures whose children had been killed in combat would never draw attention to the fact. 'But there are no surprises with Netanyahu,' Tibon said. 'Even in moments when a personal example is most needed, he is first and foremost concerned with himself.'


The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump denies report that he has approved US attack plans against Iran
Donald Trump has denied a report in the Wall Street Journal that he has approved US plans to attack Iran, saying that the news outlet has 'no idea' what his thinking is concerning the Israel-Iran conflict The Journal reported late on Wednesday that Trump told senior aides a day earlier that he had approved attack plans but was delaying on giving the final order to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear program. The report cited three anonymous officials. On Thursday, Trump responded to the report, posting on Truth Social: 'The Wall Street Journal has No Idea what my thoughts are concerning Iran!' But Trump's decision is dependent on whether the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) would destroy the Fordow uranium enrichment site, a US official told Axios. Fordow, which is built into a mountain south of Tehran, is a target of Israel's, but they lack the 'bunker-buster bombs' and aircraft needed to destroy it; the US has access to both. 'We're going to be ready to strike Iran. We're not convinced yet that we're necessary. And we want to be unnecessary, but I think the president's just not convinced we are needed yet,' a US official told the outlet. A day earlier, on Wednesday, Trump told reporters: 'I have ideas on what to do but I haven't made a final – I like to make the final decision one second before it's due. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' he added, referring to direct involvement. 'The next week is going to be very big, maybe less than a week.' Iran's mission to the UN issued a statement saying: 'Iran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT with a has-been warmonger clinging to relevance.' Uncertainty around direct US involvement in the conflict comes as the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, called Trump 'a great friend of Israel' and thanked him 'for standing by us'. The Pentagon has sent multiple warships to the Middle East, including three navy destroyers and two carrier strike groups, while the state department has ramped up assistance to US citizens advised to leave the region. Trump's denial of the Journal's report comes as a heated split in the Make America great again coalition over support for a strike on Iran appeared to be cooling. Both the former Fox primetime host Tucker Carlson and former White House political strategist Steve Bannon had expressed concern that another Middle East military engagement in Iran would run counter to Maga's 'America First' policies. Bannon said on Wednesday that Trump could win over Maga doubters if he made the case for Iran engagement directly to the American people. Trump also said that Carlson called him to apologize for saying that he 'is complicit in an act of war'. 'Tucker's a nice guy. He called and apologized the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong and I appreciated that,' Trump said on Wednesday from the White House.