Pakistan tests missile weapons system as tension mounts
India bans imports from Pakistan amid tension over tourist killings
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's military said it carried out a 'training launch' of a surface-to-surface missile weapons system on Saturday, further heightening tensions with India after last month's deadly attack in disputed Kashmir. New Delhi has blamed Islamabad for backing an attack on tourists last month in Indian-administered Kashmir, sparking a fresh stand-off between the nuclear-armed neighbors.
Pakistan's military said Saturday it conducted a 'successful training launch of the Abdali Weapon System', a surface-to-surface missile with a range of 450 kilometers. 'The launch was aimed at ensuring the operational readiness of troops and validating key technical parameters, including the missile's advanced navigation system and enhanced manoeuvrability features,' Pakistan's military said in a statement. It did not say where the test took place.
The missile training launch comes after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he has given his military 'full operational freedom' to respond to the attack in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists. Pakistan has denied any involvement in the attack and called for an independent probe. This week Islamabad warned of an imminent air strike from its neighbor, and has repeatedly made clear it will respond with force to any aggression by India.
International pressure has been piled on both New Delhi and Islamabad—who have fought several wars over the disputed Kashmir region—to de-escalate. Neighboring China has urged 'restraint', with the European Union warning Friday that the situation was 'alarming'. In an interview with Fox News, US Vice President JD Vance called on India to respond to the attack in a way 'that doesn't lead to a broader regional conflict'. He also urged Pakistan to 'make sure that the terrorists sometimes operating in their territory are hunted down and dealt with'.
'Message to the world'
Analysts in Pakistan told AFP the missile launch was a warning shot. 'It clearly indicates that we have resources to counter India. This is not a message only for India but the rest of the world that we are well-prepared,' said Hasan Askari Rizvi, a military analyst. On Friday, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff General Syed Asim Munir presided over a meeting of his top commanders about the 'current Pakistan-India standoff', a military statement said. Munir 'underscored the critical importance of heightened vigilance and proactive readiness across all fronts'. Since the attack—the deadliest in Kashmir on civilians in years—India and Pakistan have exchanged tit-for-tat diplomatic barbs and expulsions, and shut border crossings.
The two sides have exchanged gunfire for nine consecutive nights along the militarized Line of Control, the de facto border, according to Indian defense sources. Muslim-majority Kashmir, a region of around 15 million people, is divided but claimed in full between Pakistan and India. Rebels on the Indian side have waged an insurgency since 1989, seeking independence or a merger with Pakistan. India regularly blames its neighbor for backing gunmen behind the insurgency. Islamabad denies the allegation, saying it only supports Kashmir's struggle for self-determination and regularly denounces rights abuses in the region.
India bans imports
Meanwhile, India said on Saturday it had banned the import of goods coming from or transiting via Pakistan and barred Pakistani ships as tensions rise between the nuclear-armed neighbors in the wake of a deadly attack on tourists in the disputed Kashmir region. India's Directorate General of Foreign Trade said in a notification that the ban would take effect immediately. 'This restriction is imposed in the interest of national security and public policy,' it said.
Suspected militants killed at least 26 people in last week's attack on a mountain tourist destination in the Pahalgam area of the Kashmir valley. The Muslim-majority Himalayan region is claimed by both India and Pakistan, and has been the focus of several wars, an insurgency and diplomatic standoffs. India has accused Pakistan of involvement in the attack, which Islamabad denies. Pakistan has said it has 'credible intelligence' that India intends to launch military action. Pakistan's retaliatory measures have included halting all border trade, closing its airspace to Indian carriers and expelling Indian diplomats.
It has also warned that any attempt to prevent the flow of river water promised under a decades-old treaty would be considered an act of war. On Saturday, India said Pakistani-flagged ships would not be allowed to visit any Indian port, and Indian flagged-ships would not visit any ports in Pakistan. 'This order is issued to ensure safety of Indian assets, cargo and connected infrastructure, in public interest and for interest of Indian shipping,' the Directorate General of Shipping said in a statement. Trade between the two nations has dwindled over the last few years. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
17 hours ago
- Arab Times
Fake News And Nationalism: India's Media War On Truth
NEW DELHI, June 8: India's mainstream news media, once celebrated for their fearless reporting and democratic spirit, are now facing a crisis of credibility that has drawn concern from international observers, rights organizations, and even their journalists. The decline is not just a matter of perception but is playing out in real time, with recent events exposing deep-rooted issues of sensationalism, political alignment, and the unchecked spread of misinformation. The latest wave of misinformation occurred against the backdrop of escalated India–Pakistan military tensions. Indian mainstream media like Aaj Tak, Zee News, NDTV, and Times Now were accused of disseminating unverified videos, AI-generated images, and false casualty figures. A report by a fake‑news watchdog exposed multiple instances of such errors—old or unrelated images being misrepresented as evidence of the Pahalgam tragedy A Shifting Landscape: From Watchdog to Megaphone Over the past decade, India's largest news channels and newspapers have come under fire for aligning too closely with propaganda narratives and sidelining dissenting voices. The shift has raised alarms about the erosion of press freedom in the world's largest democracy. According to Reporters Without Borders, India now ranks 159 out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index—its lowest position ever. 'India's media has gradually turned into an echo chamber for the state,' a senior RSF analyst observed, highlighting the growing skepticism both domestically and abroad. Behind this transformation lies a media industry dominated by powerful conglomerates with deep political and financial stakes. Critics argue that this ownership structure has compromised editorial independence, replacing investigative journalism with polarizing debates, celebrity coverage, and sensational rhetoric. The result is a press that increasingly prioritizes loyalty over accountability, as noted by a foreign correspondent based in New Delhi. The Misinformation Maelstrom: When Newsrooms Become Amplifiers The dangers of this new media reality were laid bare during a recent military standoff between India and Pakistan. In the early hours of May 9, a WhatsApp alert from the Indian public broadcaster falsely claimed that Pakistan's army chief had been arrested in a coup. The message was quickly picked up by an Indian journalist, broadcast across major news channels, and began trending on social media. The entire story was fabricated; no coup had occurred, and the supposed 'arrested' general was soon promoted. This incident was not an isolated lapse. During the crisis, Indian newsrooms became saturated with unverified claims and outright fabrications, shaping public perception at a time of heightened national security tensions. Channels broadcast images from unrelated conflicts, repurposed visuals from plane crashes and video games, and reported dramatic victories without evidence. Former Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao described the environment as one of 'hypernationalism and abnormal triumphalism,' fueled by a lack of official information and a rush to fill the vacuum with spectacle. Media critic Manisha Pande of Newslaundry called it 'the most dangerous version of what a section of TV news channels have been doing for a decade … completely unchecked.' Journalists admitted to airing stories based on unverified WhatsApp messages and influencer posts, while anchors declared dramatic developments with no factual basis. A Crisis of Trust—and a Glimmer of Hope The fallout from these episodes has been profound. The unchecked spread of misinformation and the willingness to prioritize sensationalism over verification have eroded public trust in mainstream media, both in India and internationally. Even as Pakistani media engaged in its own misinformation campaigns, the Indian press's lapses were particularly glaring given its democratic heritage. Yet, amid the spectacle, a core group of Indian journalists and independent platforms—such as The Wire, and Article 14 —continue to uphold the values of rigorous, ethical reporting, often at great personal and professional risk. Global outlets like The New York Times, BBC, and Al Jazeera have also expanded their India coverage, offering alternative perspectives and counter-narratives. Looking Ahead: Can Indian Media Reclaim Its Role? As India approaches future elections and navigates complex domestic and global challenges, the question remains: Can its mainstream media reassert its independence and restore public trust, or will it continue its drift into partisanship and spectacle? The answer may well determine not just the fate of the press, but the health of Indian democracy itself.
Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
Irish, Swiss univs cut Zionist links, Norway, Germany keep ties
DUBLIN/OSLO/BERLIN: Ireland's prestigious Trinity College Dublin said on Wednesday that it would cut all links with the Zionist entity in protest at 'ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law'. The university's board informed students by email on Wednesday that it had accepted the recommendations of a taskforce to sever 'institutional links with (the Zionist entity), (Zionist) universities and companies headquartered in (the Zionist entity)'. The recommendations would be 'enacted for the duration of the ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law', said the email sent by the board's chairman Paul Farrell, and seen by AFP. The taskforce was set up after part of the university's campus in central Dublin was blockaded by students for five days last year in protest at the Zionist entity's actions in Gaza. Among the taskforce's recommendations approved by the board were pledges to divest 'from all companies headquartered in (the Zionist entity)' and to 'enter into no future supply contracts with (Zionist) firms' and 'no new commercial relationships with (Zionist) entities'. The university also said that it would 'enter into no further mobility agreements with (Zionist) universities'. Trinity has two current Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Zionist universities: Bar Ilan University, an agreement that ends in July 2026, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends in July 2025, the university told AFP in an email. The board also said that the university 'should not submit for approval or agree to participate in any new institutional research agreements involving (Zionist) participation'. It 'should seek to align itself with like-minded universities and bodies in an effort to influence EU policy concerning (the Zionist entity's) participation in such collaborations,' it added. The University of Geneva also announced Wednesday that it has ended its partnership with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem following student protests, saying it no longer reflected the institution's 'strategic priorities'. The Norwegian parliament on Wednesday rejected moves to toughen rules on its sovereign wealth fund investing in companies operating in the occupied West Bank. Lawmakers voted by 88 to 16 against a proposal to order the fund to withdraw from companies 'that contribute to (the Zionist entity's) war crimes and the illegal occupation' of the West Bank. Norway's sovereign wealth fund, fueled by vast revenue from the country's oil and gas exports, is the biggest the world and has nearly $1.65 trillion invested around the globe. The government though is under pressure to use its financial clout to influence Zionist policy in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, where its settlement policy has been deemed illegal under international law. In a letter signed by about 50 non-governmental organizations, Norway's main union LO called on the Labour government to ensure that the fund's investments were in line with the country's legal obligations. The UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories on May 20 urged Oslo to 'fully and unconditionally divest from all entities linked to (the Zionist entity's) unlawful presence in the occupied Palestinian territory'. Francesca Albanese said Norway's fund held $121.5 billion — or 6.9 percent of its total value — in companies 'involved in supporting or enabling egregious violations of international law in the occupied Palestinian territories'. Norwegian Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg said the fund's investments 'do not violate Norway's obligations under international law'. The fund is regulated by a raft of ethical rules and has already divested from 11 companies because of their activities in the occupied West Bank. In May, it withdrew its investment in Paz Retail and Energy, which distributes fuel in Zionist settlements. Meanwhile, Germany's foreign minister said on Wednesday that the country would continue arms deliveries to the Zionist entity despite earlier suggesting that these were under review. Johann Wadephul told a heated session in parliament that the Zionist entity, amid its military campaign in Gaza, was under threat from Yemen's Houthi rebels, the Lebanese Hezbollah and Iran, and that 'Germany will continue to support (the Zionist entity), including with weapons deliveries'. Last week, Wadephul said that Germany was assessing 'whether what is happening in Gaza is in line with international law' and that arms sales to the Zionist entity would be evaluated on this basis. This brought criticism from some within Wadephul's own CDU/CSU conservative alliance, who accused him of insufficient support for the Zionist entity. On Thursday, Wadephul will welcome his Zionist counterpart Gideon Saar to Berlin. Wednesday's parliamentary session was briefly disrupted by a protester shouting 'Free Palestine' and 'No to genocide', who was then escorted from the spectators' gallery. Earlier, an MP for the far-left Die Linke party, Cansin Kokturk, was ordered to leave the chamber for wearing a T-shirt with the word 'Palestine' on it.
Arab Times
2 days ago
- Arab Times
India Unveils World's Highest Railway Arch Bridge in Kashmir
NEW DELHI (AP) — Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday inaugurated one of the most ambitious railway projects ever built in India, which will connect the Kashmir Valley to the vast Indian plains by train for the first time. Dubbed by government-operated Indian Railways as one of the most challenging tracks in the world, the 272-kilometer (169-mile) line begins in the garrison city of Udhampur in Jammu region and runs through Indian-controlled Kashmir's main city of Srinagar. The line ends in Baramulla, a town near the highly militarized Line of Control dividing the Himalayan region between India and Pakistan. The line travels through 36 tunnels and over 943 bridges. The Indian government pegged the total project cost at around $5 billion. One of the project's highlights is a 1,315-meter-long (4,314-foot) steel and concrete bridge above the Chenab River connecting two mountains with an arch 359 meters (1,177 feet) above the water. Indian Railways compared the height to the Eiffel Tower in Paris, which stands 330 meters (1,082 feet), and said the bridge is built to last 120 years and endure extreme weather, including wind speeds up to 260 kph (161 mph). Modi visited the Chenab bridge with tight security, waving an Indian tri-color flag before boarding a test train that passed through picturesque mountains and tunnels to reach an inauguration ceremony for another high-elevation bridge named Anji. The prime minister also helped launch a pair of new trains called 'Vande Bharat' that will halve the travel time between Srinagar and the town of Katra in Jammu to about three hours from the usual six to seven hours by road. Modi travelled to Indian-controlled Kashmir on Friday for the first time since a military conflict between India and Pakistan brought the nuclear-armed rivals to the brink of their third war over the region last month, when the countries fired missiles and drones at each other. The conflict began with a gun massacre in late April that left 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists, dead in Indian-controlled Kashmir. India blamed Pakistan for supporting the attackers, a charge Islamabad denied. Addressing a public rally in Katra, Modi lashed out at Pakistan and alleged Islamabad was behind the massacre. He said the attack was primarily aimed at Kashmir's flourishing tourism industry and meant to fuel communal violence. 'I promise you, I won't let developmental activities stop in Kashmir,' Modi said, adding that local industries and businesses will get a boost from the new rail connectivity. The railway project is considered crucial to boosting tourism and bringing development to a region that has been marred by militancy and protests over the years. The line is expected to ease the movement of Indian troops and the public to the disputed region, which is currently connected by flights and mountain roads that are prone to landslides. India and Pakistan each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety. Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels' goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country. India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, a charge Islamabad denies. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict.
