Farage's Reform UK reached a 'tipping point' - and it's worrying news for Labour
Analysis of the local election results by the Electoral Reform Society shows Reform getting an almost 10-percentage point 'winner's bonus' in their haul of council seats last Thursday compared to their vote share
Reform UK have reached a 'tipping point' where Britain's electoral system works for them rather than holding them back.
Nigel Farage's party has long opposed the First Past the Post (FPTP) voting system which holds back challenger parties.
But analysis of the local election results by the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) shows Reform getting an almost 10-percentage point 'winner's bonus' in their haul of council seats last Thursday compared to their vote share.
Across 22 of the 23 councils contested last Thursday, Reform won just under 31% of the vote but garnered just over 40% of the seats, leading to a 'winner's bonus' of 9.8 points.
In the 2013 local elections - when Ukip got its strongest vote - the party got just 5% of the council seats available, despite winning 20% of the vote.
The ERS analysis shows that just a 12.2-point increase in Reform's vote share in 2025 compared to UKIP's in 2013 has resulted in a huge 35.5-point increase in council seat share.
Darren Hughes, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society, said: "It is clear from these results that UK elections are turning into a random lottery to see which party will get the 'winner's bonus' under First Past the Post. "
But in worrying news for Labour, Keir Starmer's party suffered the greatest electoral penalty from the FPTP system at the local elections, seeing a difference of -8.2 points, with its 14% vote share yielding just 5% of council seats.
Labour benefited from the system hugely in last year's general election, turning a slim lead in votes to a huge commons majority.
The FPTP system saw Labour win a landslide 63% of the seats in Westminster on just 34% of the vote [2], leading to the most disproportional parliament in British history.
Mr Hughes added: "At these local elections we again saw that people are voting in an increasingly multi-party way and our two-party voting system is simply unable to cope.
"That is why it is throwing out distorted results that don't represent the way people voted with parties winning majorities on councils on just over a quarter of the vote.
"This just underlines the need to move to a fairer, proportional electoral system for town halls, as well as Westminster, that accurately reflects the way people vote in the seats parties receive.
"Rather than gifting different parties massive electoral bonuses that don't represent the votes they won, the only bias the electoral system should have is to the voters."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
34 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Polls opens in Holyrood by-election that Swinney says is ‘two-horse race'
Polling stations are now open in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse seat following a high profile campaign dominated by the rise in support for Reform. The by-election is taking place following the death of the SNP MSP Christina McKelvie, who had been receiving treatment for breast cancer. Today is polling day in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. @KatyLoudonSNP has shown she would be an outstanding MSP. This is now a two-horse race between @theSNP and Farage.#VoteSNP to stop Farage and for a better Scotland. Vote Katy Loudon. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) June 5, 2025 She had held the seat since 2011, winning it comfortably in the 2021 Scottish election with a majority of 4,582 over Labour. But SNP leader and Scottish First Minister John Swinney has said it is now Reform UK that is the main threat to his party there – claiming the contest is a 'two-horse race' between the two parties. Mr Swinney, who has made several campaign visits to the area, has spent much of his time attacking Mr Farage and his party. Reform has also come under attack from Labour, with a furious row prompted by an online ad which alleged Scottish leader Anas Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community. Labour branded it 'racist', but as the war of words between the parties escalated, Mr Farage used a rare visit to Scotland earlier this week to accuse Mr Sarwar of 'sectarian politics'. It's polling day! Great opportunity to show the momentum we have, vote @CllrRossLambie and @reformparty_uk Vote Reform. Get Reform — Reform UK Scotland (@ReformUKScot) June 5, 2025 Mr Sarwar still insists his party's candidate Davy Russell can win the seat, despite him coming in for criticism over his failure to take part in a TV debate. Speaking on Wednesday, the Scottish Labour leader branded Mr Farage a 'pathetic, poisonous little man'. Hitting out at his rivals, Mr Sarwar added: 'Reform have chosen a campaign of dirt and smear, the SNP have lacked all ambition, the best they can offer is 'vote SNP to stop Farage'.' Mr Swinney was adamant that people need to vote for SNP candidate Katy Loudon if they want to 'stop Farage'. Stop SNP waste. Stop SNP incompetence. Stop SNP failures. Elect the local champion that can beat them. Vote Scottish Labour. — Anas Sarwar (@AnasSarwar) June 4, 2025 The First Minister insisted: 'People face a simple choice in this by-election. 'They can either vote for the SNP – elect an SNP MSP – or they will end up with a Reform MSP. That's the simple choice.' The election comes as polls show a surge in support for Mr Farage's party in Scotland. While Reform has not yet won an election north of the border, one poll last month suggested it could come in second to the SNP in the May 2026 Holyrood election. Polls are open in the constituency until 10pm, with the result expected to be known in the early hours of Friday.
Daily Mirror
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'What Nigel Farage can teach Keir Starmer about politics'
Winter fuel payments. National insurance increases. Cutting the benefits of the disabled. All of them hard to sell at the best of times, but currently being sold to the voter with the same élan as Del Boy trying to offload alarm clocks that run backwards. Throw into the mix some u-turns that should have involved screeching brakes and smoking tyres, but have instead become a gentle and deadly drift towards the central reservation, and you have a toxic metaphor cocktail that won't so much knock anyone's socks off as gradually remove your shoes, your wallet, and your will to live. Meanwhile a party so minor it has 14 times FEWER MPs than the Liberal Democrats is romping all over the opinion polls, grabbing all the airwaves, and highlighting all the problems. It's stealing policies from Left and Right, appealing across the social spectrum and even making Liz Truss reach for her calculator. The only thing Keir Starmer seems to be worried about is Nigel Farage's lead in the polls, but his decision to tackle the Reform leader head-on has only made the PM look weak and puffed up his opponent's importance. As usual, Keir's doing it wrong. There is an awful lot to learn from Nigel, if you just have a rummage. 1. Nigel is true to his brand. He doesn't deviate. He doesn't try to appeal to those who are opposed to him. He just doubles down, does what annoys them harder. It helps that his schtick is being a disruptive posh oik in yellow trousers, a role any idiot can play with insane ease and the right wardrobe. Plus, Britain likes an underdog - an annoying terrier on the ankles of power, a peasant's revolt, a flick at the nose of greatness. Lovely stuff, off you go Nigel and give 'em one from me. 2. Nigel rules or walks. Through sheer force of personality he's set up three political parties, and walked out of two of them when his power waned. If he ever gets to lead a Parliamentary group bigger than what can be handled by one end of the saloon bar, he'll have so many factions, rivalries and headaches he'll change his pub again. Until then, he's centre of attention, and the centre of power. Were he ever to be PM, a chief of staff would have to kowtow or hit the road. 3. Nigel has simple targets that don't cost him anything. Leave the European Union. Brexit or bust. Cut immigration and cut taxes, even if they were both high because of Brexit. Cut the green crap, even if it's the best way to capitalise on the technological revolution so many of Nigel's supporters resent. Nigel's not the first person on earth who's been able to sell stagnation and self-harm as 'reform', but imagine what he could achieve, if only he obeyed the dictionary. 4. Nigel ignores everything. Warnings. Maths.. History. Logic and facts are of as much relevance to the British Sideshow Bob as Fermat's last theorem has to a duck. If you don't let anything stop you, then eventually every obstacle disappears, through boredom or erosion or distraction. That this man and the voter are apparently in sync has nothing to do with his everyman charm, because he doesn't have any. He's succeeding only because everybody else is flailing, and even the cat has noticed. The problem for Keir is that he doesn't have a personal brand, and he's dropped the Labour one. He deviates, not to disrupt but to appease. There he is, Billy Big Majority, but he's governing like Theresa May being racked by a hung Parliament. So he's announced an expansion of free school meals, a great win for a fantastic Mirror campaign that would have delighted his party if only he'd done it last July. And he could have, as it's not being paid for by a single penny of fiscal headroom because there isn't any. Instead, it was rushed out, 10 months into a haphazard premiership, to block questions over the winter fuel u-meander, and in so doing absolutely kiboshed the headlines for a £15bn transport investment Rachel Reeves had announced not 5 minutes earlier. Two bits of good news have cancelled each other out, and the drumbeat of inevitable tax rises in the autumn to pay for it all has got louder. A win has become a political cost, with his party in despair and the voter barely aware of anything beyond the fact the PM screwed up taking away winter fuel payments and now is screwing up handing them back again. All he had to do was say the richer pensioners must pay for free school meals, and every granny in the country would have had to suck a sweet and put up with it. Keir is paying attention to everything, so decision-making slows from a crawl to a death-spiral. The one thing Keir ignores is the voter - that shallow coalition of Labour values and middle-class, urban graduates who both loathed the Tories. When the Labour manifesto held nothing of note, everyone assumed there was a grand plan too radical to reveal in full - in truth, the plan was just to not be the Tories. Even that failed, because for the past 300 or so days every Labour minister and spad has not even bothered to butt heads with the Whitehall machine. Computer said no, and politics withered on the spot. It's not small boats making Nigel stronger: it's because voting for the other guy made not a jot of difference. The solution to this is easy. Either Nigel should take over the Labour Party, or Keir has to start acting more like Nigel. For what do we think Nigel would do, if only he had Labour values at heart rather than his own? He'd lead not ask, smash the machine not file a complaint, ghost the politics reporters and go on the edgy podcasts, line up all the cuts first and then bang out the good news and wins, over and over, because someone who SOUNDS like a success IS a success. He couldn't do the same for Reform. He grifts rather than works, applies himself only to what pleases, and will ultimately always implode, either through incompetence, insanity, or in a huff. The biggest lesson Starmer can take from Farage is that he, too, has no real policies. Both Reform and its leader are empty vessels, but voters still feel it's Labour that is hollow. They committed to nothing to get elected, and now are so non-committal that it's like watching fog thicken. Who'd vote for gruel, when there's red meat on offer? Those empty entrails will choke Starmer's premiership as surely as they will one day envelop Farage. Starmer has to learn, fast, how to bottle Eau de Nigel and leave him spluttering in his wake.
Channel 4
an hour ago
- Channel 4
Will Starmer sack Reeves or will she survive as Chancellor?
As the clock ticks down to next week's critical Spending Review, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is hitting the road, announcing infrastructure investments and focusing attention on Reform-leaning areas. Is this a last ditch effort to steady the ship? In this episode of The Fourcast, we're asking: Has Labour already lost control, just months into government? And can Keir Starmer turn things around? Joining Matt Frei in the studio is Anushka Asthana, wrapping up two decades at Westminster and releasing a new edition of her insider book Taken as Red. She offers a behind-the-scenes look at how Starmer's Labour rose – and where it may be faltering. Also joining us is political commentator Andrew Rawnsley, who was there for the early days of the Blair-Brown era. Can any government succeed in today's economic climate, or are the comparisons simply unfair?
