
Climate 200 Teals, Independents Surge Across Multiple Electorates
It's not just Labor that's staging a return in the 2025 federal election.
The Climate 200-backed 'Teals' and other independents, who first shook the system in 2022, continue to be an influential force eroding the traditional dominance of the two major parties.
While several seats remain undecided, current counts highlight the staying presence of independents who are not only absorbing a major fraction of the primary vote, but are also playing a significant role directing preferences.
Teal Independents Surging in Once-Safe Seats
The safe Labor seat of Bean in the Australian Capital Territory is facing a strong challenge from Teal independent Jessie Price, who is pushing sitting Labor MP David Smith to the brink.
As of May 7, the vote count has see-sawed between both candidates in the seat Labor won in 2022, with a two-party preferred 25.9 percent margin.
This time, Price has won 26.7 percent of the primary vote in her first outing, taking support from the Greens, Liberal Party, and other minor parties.
In the once-safe Liberal seat of Bradfield in northern Sydney, the high-profile clash between Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian and Teal independent Nicolette Boele continues.
Related Stories
5/1/2025
4/23/2025
Kapterian holds a razor-thin lead with 50.1 percent while Boele trails closely at 49.9 percent—a mere 195-vote difference.
While Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's seat of Dickson saw local Teal, Ellie Smith, absorb 12.5 percent of the primary vote, which was likely redirected to victorious Labor candidate Ali France.
Backed by over $10 million from Simon Holmes à Court's Climate 200, Teal candidates—mostly professional women with local community roots—have proven their staying power.
Climate 200 backs independents have largely campaigned on their support for stronger climate change issues, and have appealed to working professional voters and women looking for alternative candidates.
A early morning moped rider passes political signage outside Bondi Surf Bathers' Life Saving Club polling booth in Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia on May 3, 2025.
LisaNot Just the Teals
Muslim Votes Matter candidates in western Sydney also managed to capture large swathes of the electorate, but fell short of winning.
In Watson, independent Ziad Basyouny secured 15 percent of the primary vote on his first outing against Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, who won 49 percent.
While pharmacist, Ahmed Ouf, managed to secure 20 percent of the primary vote against Education Minister Jason Clare's 46.45 percent in the sat of Blaxland.
Former party members were also able to drag a portion of voters with them.
In New South Wales (NSW), Independent Andrew Gee, who left the Nationals in 2022, retained his seat as an independent after winning 23.9 percent of the primary vote.
Overall, Gee secured a two-party preferred vote of 56.3 percent over the Nationals new candidate Sam Farraway on 43.7 percent, a swing of over 15 percent in a seat previously considered safe for the Nationals.
Farraway's primary vote dropped by 17.4 percent.
While in the eastern Victorian seat of Monash, two independent candidates including Teal Deb Leonard, and former Liberal Party MP Russell Broadbent secured 17.3 percent and 10.3 percent of the vote, respectively.
The Liberal Party's candidate Mary Aldred is currently leading with 32.4 percent of the vote.
A Reckoning for the Two-Party System
Graham Young, executive director and pollster at the Australian Institute for Progress, says the trend is driven by eroding confidence in the two-party system.
'In fact, you could probably use the independent vote to measure the implied competence of the 'uniparty,'' Young told The Epoch Times.
He noted that about one-third of voters opted for a candidate outside the Coalition or Labor this election.
'In the early 70s, fewer than 10 percent voted for minor parties and independents,' he said.
Though preferences often bring votes back to major parties, Young sees the initial support for independents as a clear protest against policy and representation failures.
Traditionally, independents were hyper-localised, like Ted Mack in North Sydney or Cathy McGowan in Indi.
But the new wave, specifically the Teals, were backed by strategic funding and professional campaigning.
'They target mostly upper-middle-class seats held by the Liberal Party that have a low Labor vote, but where a significant minority of Liberal voters are not aligned with the party on mostly three issues—climate change, women in politics, and corruption,' Young said.
He likens the model to a political franchise rather than true independents.
'If they can peel off enough Liberals, and marry them to tactically voting Labor and Greens voters, they have the potential to win these seats on preferences.'
Teals Featured Heavily Across Many Seats
In Wentworth, high-profile teal MP Allegra Spender has comfortably retained her seat against Liberal candidate Ro Knox. Spender achieved 56.7 percent, ahead of Knox's 43.3 percent, securing a second term in this once-blue-ribbon seat.
In Flinders, Victoria, the Teal independent Ben Smith is now the main challenger to Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie.
While in Kooyong, independent Monique Ryan, is locked in a see sawing battle with Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer.
In the neighbouring Goldstein, former Liberal MP Tim Wilson looks likely to secure his former seat against incumbent Teal Zoe Daniel.
While in Wannon, regional western Victoria, Shadow Minister Dan Tehan narrowly retained his seat against Teal independent Alex Dyson, and Labor's Agriculture Minister Julie Collins has just managed to fend of anti-salmon farming campaigner and Teal Peter George in Franklin, Tasmania.
Collins retained the seat with 57.3 percent against George's 42.7 percent.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
8 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump says Elon Musk will face 'serious consequences' if he backs Democratic candidates
President Donald Trump told NBC News on Saturday that Elon Musk would see "serious consequences" if he backs Democratic candidates who challenge Republicans supporting the "big, beautiful bill." "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump told NBC News' Kristen Welker in a phone interview. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," he continued, without giving specifics on what that would look like. Trump also said that he thinks his relationship with Musk is done after their public feud erupted this week. "I gave him a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration and saved his life in my first administration," Trump said. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Trump added. When asked whether he thinks his relationship with Musk is over, he said, "I would assume so." Trump also accused Musk of being "disrespectful to the office of the president." Trump's remarks are among his most extensive public comments yet on his feud with Musk, and the latest sign that the president is not interested in mending his relationship with the onetime ally. Musk has been a vocal critic of the Trump-backed spending bill that moved through the House last month. Earlier this week, Musk called the spending bill a "disgusting abomination" that will lead to exploding federal budget deficits. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," he wrote in a separate X post. Musk's criticism of the spending package — which is now being considered in the Senate — is in part what spurred the clash between the two men. Trump told NBC News that he is still "very confident" that the bill will be passed by July 4, and that he doesn't think Musk could derail the bill. "If you look at the Republicans, we've never been more unified," Trump told NBC News. "The bill is fantastic."

Los Angeles Times
8 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Israel backs anti-Hamas militia known for looting aid in Gaza. Here's what we know
JERUSALEM — Israel is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in Gaza in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. But officials from the U.N. and aid organizations say the military is allowing them to loot food and other supplies from their trucks. One self-styled militia that calls itself the Popular Forces, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, says it is guarding newly created, Israeli-backed food distribution centers in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting U.N. trucks. Gaza's armed groups have ties to powerful clans or extended families and often operate as criminal gangs. Aid workers allege Israel's backing of the groups is part of a wider effort to control all aid operations in the strip. Israel denies allowing looters to operate in areas it controls. Here's what we know about anti-Hamas armed groups in Gaza: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a social media video Thursday that Israel had 'activated' clans in Gaza to oppose Hamas. He didn't elaborate how Israel is supporting them or what role Israel wants them to play. Netanyahu's comments were in response to a political opponent accusing him of arming 'crime families' in Gaza. Clans, tribes and extended families have strong influence in Gaza, where their leaders often help mediate disputes. Some have long been armed to protect their group's interests, and some have morphed into gangs involved in smuggling drugs or running protection rackets. After seizing power in 2007, Hamas clamped down on Gaza's gangs — sometimes with brute force and sometimes by steering perks their way. But with Hamas' weakening power after 20 months of war with Israel, gangs have regained freedom to act. The leadership of a number of clans — including the clan from which the Abu Shabab group's members hail — have issued statements denouncing looting and cooperation with Israel. Besides the Abu Shabab group, it is not known how many armed groups Israel is supporting. The Abu Shabab group went public in early May, declaring itself a 'nationalist force.' It said it was protecting aid, including around the food distribution hubs run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a mainly American private contractor that Israel intends to replace the U.N.-led aid network. Aid workers and Palestinians who know the group estimate it has several hundred fighters. The Abu Shabab group's media office told the Associated Press it was collaborating with GHF 'to ensure that the food and medicine reaches its beneficiaries.' It said it was not involved in distribution, but that its fighters secured the surroundings of distribution centers run by GHF inside military-controlled zones in the Rafah area. A spokesperson with GHF said it had 'no collaboration' with Abu Shabab. 'We do have local Palestinian workers we are very proud of, but none is armed, and they do not belong to Abu Shabab's organization,' the spokesperson said, speaking on condition of anonymity in accordance with the group's rules. Before the war, Yasser Abu Shabab was involved in smuggling cigarettes and drugs from Egypt and Israel into Gaza through crossings and tunnels, according to two members of his extended family, one of whom was once part of his group. Hamas arrested Abu Shabab but freed him from prison along with most other inmates when the war began in October 2023, they said, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. Abu Shabab's media office said he was summoned by police before the war but wasn't officially accused or tried. It also said claims the group was involved in attacking aid trucks were 'exaggerated,' saying its fighters 'took the minimum amount of food and water necessary.' The head of the association in Gaza that provides trucks and drivers for aid groups said their members' vehicles have been attacked many times by Abu Shabab's fighters. Nahed Sheheiber said the group has been active in Israeli-controlled eastern parts of Rafah and Khan Younis, targeting trucks as they enter Gaza from the Kerem Shalom crossing with Israel. Troops nearby 'did nothing' to stop attacks, he said. Sheheiber said that when Hamas police officers have tried to confront gangs or guard truck convoys, they were attacked by Israeli troops. One driver, Issam Abu Awda, said he was attacked by Abu Shabab fighters last July. The fighters stopped his truck, blindfolded and handcuffed him and his assistant, then loaded the supplies off the vehicle, he said. Abu Awda said nearby Israeli troops didn't intervene. These kinds of attacks are still happening and highlight 'a disturbing pattern,' according to Jonathan Whittall, from the U.N. humanitarian coordinator, OCHA. 'Those who have blocked and violently ransacked aid trucks seem to have been protected' by Israeli forces, said Whittall, head of OCHA's office for the occupied Palestinian territories. And, he added, they have now become the 'protectors of the goods being distributed through Israel's new militarized hubs,' referring to the GHF-run sites. The Israeli military did not reply when asked for comment on allegations it has allowed armed groups to loot trucks. But the Israeli prime minister's office called the accusations 'fake news,' saying, 'Israel didn't allow looters to operate in Israeli controlled areas.' Israel often accuses Hamas of stealing from trucks. Muhammad Shehada, a political analyst from Gaza who is a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said he doesn't believe Israel's support for armed groups is aimed at directly fighting Hamas. So far there has been no attempt to deploy the groups against the militants. Instead, he said, Israel is using the gangs and the looting to present GHF 'as the only alternative to provide food to Palestinians,' since its supplies get in while the U.N.'s don't. Israel wants the GHF to replace the U.N.-led aid system because it claims Hamas has been siphoning off large amounts of supplies. The U.N. denies that significant amounts have been taken by Hamas. Israel has also said it aims to move all Palestinians in Gaza to a 'sterile zone' in the south, around the food hubs, while it fights Hamas elsewhere. The U.N. and aid groups have rejected that as using food as a tool for forced displacement. The Abu Shabab group has issued videos online urging Palestinians to move to tent camps in Rafah. Israel barred all food and other supplies from entering Gaza for 2 ½ months pending the start of GHF — a blockade that has brought the population to the brink of famine. GHF started distributing food boxes on May 26 at three hubs guarded by private contractors inside Israeli military zones. Israel has let in some trucks of aid for the U.N. to distribute. But the U.N. says it has been able to get little of it into the hands of Palestinians because of Israeli military restrictions, including requiring its trucks to use roads where looters are known to operate. 'It's Israel's way of telling the U.N., if you want to try to bring aid into Gaza, good luck with this,' said Shehada. 'We will force you to go through a road where everything you brought will be looted.' Frankel, Mednick, Magdy and Keath write for the Associated Press. Magdy and Keath reported from Cairo.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister
Debate and differences of opinion are permitted once again in the Liberal Party – the children are no longer in charge. Canada is no longer run by a cockwomble. What a difference a mature prime minister makes! A prime minister who does not pick the weakest for cabinet so that his PMO will be totally in charge. A prime minister who can obviously change his mind, all the way from 'net-zero' to thinking of utilizing resources. A prime minister who will not impoverish Canadians and embarrass Canada by telling other heads of state that there is 'no business case' for exporting LNG to needy nations with lots of cash to pay us. Refreshingly, we now have a natural resources minister – Tim Hodgson – who has travelled to the once-separating Alberta to support new oil and gas infrastructure to trade in overseas markets and supply energy to Eastern Canada! How novel – jobs and riches for Canadians. LILLEY: Mark Carney offers words – Pierre Poilievre's words – but we need action GOLDSTEIN: Carney can't fix Canada's underperforming economy on his own LILLEY: Trudeau lowered bar so much, Carney gets credit for being an adult Under the regime of the last ten years, ideas that may be contrary to the dogma of the PMO could not even be broached. The late Bill Graham, an experienced and tested and worldly intellect, and former Liberal leader, was once told in no uncertain terms by some kid in the PMO that his advice on a complex issue was not necessary because 'we have this, thank you very much.' This closure of the mind was aided and abetted by appointees in the PMO who did not have the wherewithal to think through even the simplest situations. Remember the SNC-Lavalin scandal? I seriously doubt that any lawyers in the new PMO will be contacting prosecutors in any Crown office in Canada in an attempt to change a decision on criminal charges. Senior and thoughtful Liberal senators were removed from the Liberal caucus – their views not needed. Only members of parliament were allowed in caucus – people who either had their positions because of the PM or wanted a promotion that only the PM could offer, gutless supplicants who would never offer up an opinion differing from the official PMO stand. The Liberal Party itself was reduced to an insignificant triviality, its supporters cowed into silence, because if you dared offer a differing viewpoint then you were considered disloyal, and banished – or at least branded as no longer a Liberal. I had turned down government appointments, and was not seeking invitations to state dinners in Ottawa, so over the last decade I could be critical of many Trudeau positions that now, after he has been dumped, many others suddenly seem to understand were idiotic. And for that difference of opinion with the Trudeau government, lifelong friends, many of whom had partaken of my hospitality over the years, who had enjoyed the perks of power from being in favour in Ottawa (gotta love those government jets), would actually turn their heads at the sight of me – or not invite me to events that I had helped create decades ago. Several dowagers of the party tried to rip strips off me. Friends tell me that the big shots of Ottawa and Montreal hate me with a passion for daring to challenge the Trudeau government. I was 'no longer a Liberal.' The truth is that I am a Liberal – I believe in well-managed government, fiscally prudent, socially progressive, encouraging of debate, with an eye on providing the freedom and impetus to build a better Canada. I believe in the rule of law – not the fiat of unnamed, well-paid, political helpers. Much to the detriment of my finances, I have volunteered tens and tens of thousands of hours of tough slugging in the service of the Liberal Party. Now that things are returning to some degree of normalcy, I would gladly do so again, and encourage others to do so – politics is a noble calling. Canada, and the debate, needs you.