
Why calling an election now helps Doug Ford and his Ontario PCs
While Premier Doug Ford insists that U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threat is why he's calling an election 15 months ahead of schedule, there are plenty of reasons why the timing is politically advantageous to Ford and his Ontario PC Party.
Ford will visit Ontario's lieutenant-governor today to make the formal request that kickstarts the provincial campaign, with election day set to be Feb. 27.
Here's why calling the election now helps the Progressive Conservatives, with insights from party insiders.
1. Campaign readiness
Even though the early election rumours began swirling last May when Ford first refused to rule out a snap vote, there's evidence the other parties are nowhere near as ready as the PCs to contest an election.
The PCs blew the other parties out of the water in fundraising in 2023 and 2024. That money helps pay for the advertising needed to reach voters during the campaign and supports the voter outreach and data gathering work that is crucial to winning elections.
As for polling, PC campaign organizers would not have pushed for the early call if they felt their poll numbers were not in strong shape relative to Marit Stiles's NDP and Bonnie Crombie's Liberals.
Ontario announces new primary health-care plan 2 days before election call
11 hours ago
Duration 2:25
Ontario has announced $1.4 billion in new funding to connect every Ontario resident with a primary health-care provider by spring 2026. That comes two days before Premier Doug Ford is set to trigger a 28-day election campaign. CBC's Lorenda Reddekopp has the details.
"Anytime you are leading in the polls is a good time to call an election," said Andrew Brander, a former campaign manager for Ontario PC and federal Conservative candidates, now vice president at public affairs firm Crestview Strategies.
"Probably the biggest advantage to Doug Ford calling an election now is that we haven't seen much from the opposition in terms of being able to really define themselves," said Brander in an interview.
The PCs "have been election-ready since the first day of this mandate," said Laryssa Waler, Ford's former director of communications, now leading the public affairs firm Henley Strategies.
"The PCs are ready to go," said Waler in an interview. "They've been knocking on doors every day for years."
Ford's party has nominated more candidates than any of its rivals. (No party has nominated a full slate for all of Ontario's 124 ridings yet. There's still time: the nomination deadline to get on the ballot will be Feb. 13.)
2. Justin Trudeau's resignation
Multiple sources inside the PC party say as late as early January, Ford was reluctant to call an election early. This was weeks after Trump won and began talking about slapping tariffs on Canada.
What tipped Ford from reluctance to enthusiasm: Justin Trudeau's Jan. 6 announcement that he would resign as prime minister and was proroguing Parliament.
Trudeau's announcement not only created a leadership vacuum in Ottawa that Ford could exploit, it also guaranteed there would be no federal election to interfere with a provincial campaign until at least late March, and kicked off a federal Liberal leadership race.
Because of the strong overlap between the federal and provincial Liberal parties, that leadership race is now absorbing resources — experienced political organizers, volunteers and donations — that could otherwise help Crombie's Ontario Liberals.
"There are only so many people in Ontario who know how to run elections and who know how to raise money and who know how to be campaign managers," said Waler.
Tom Allison, a veteran Liberal campaign organizer, was set to be campaign chair for the Ontario Liberals but is now managing Chrystia Freeland's leadership campaign.
Ontario's booze expansion rollout could cost taxpayers $1.4B, FAO says
17 hours ago
Duration 3:49
3. Ford vs. Trump
The role of chair of Canada's premiers rotates every year. The timing for Ontario's premier to take a turn at the head of the table couldn't have worked out better for Ford.
In response to Trump's tariff threat, Ford has emerged as a protector of not only Ontario, but also Canada, says Waler.
"I think that even voters who were maybe not previously accessible to the Ontario PC Party have looked at Doug Ford and said, 'He's got our best interests at heart. He's going toe-to-toe with Donald Trump.'"
Trump will hardly be negotiating with a mere premier of a province in a country that he often dismisses as the 51st state. Still, Ford is scheduled to travel to Washington twice during the election campaign, and that's a visual the PCs will want to use in their efforts to portray him as the leader Ontario needs.
Also, if Trump follows through on his tariff threat and Ontario's economy is badly damaged, by the time the province's regularly scheduled election date rolls around in June 2026, voters could be in a mood to take it out on Ford.
4. Advertising advantage
By calling the election early, the PCs benefit from pre-campaign advertising in a way that they couldn't on Ontario's normal election timetable of a vote every four years.
Provincial election law caps party spending on ads during the six months before the start of a scheduled general election campaign. In the case of a snap election like this, the pre-campaign spending cap doesn't apply.
The cash-flush PCs have flooded the airwaves over the past year with party-funded ads promoting Ford and attacking Crombie.
"The PC's have have poured millions of dollars into these advertising campaigns," said Brander. "The Liberals really didn't have the resources to push back on that hard enough, early enough."
The PCs also get a potential boost from the taxpayer-funded government ads promoting Ontario that have appeared over the past year. Provincial law prohibits government advertising for a 60-day period before each scheduled election campaign, but that prohibition doesn't apply in this situation, when an election is called early.
Ontario's auditor general found the government spent a record $103.5 million on advertising in the 2023-24 fiscal year.
'We need a mandate from the people,' Ford says as he confirms snap election
4 days ago
Duration 3:57
CBC's Lane Harrison breaks down highlights from Premier Doug Ford's election announcement — plus, we hear from Toronto residents about how they feel heading to the polls early.
5. Getting ahead of potential Poilievre victory
Over the past 65 years, through 17 provincial elections, there's been just one time that an Ontario party formed government when its federal political cousins were in power in Ottawa. That was 2003, when Dalton McGuinty's Liberals won in Ontario while Jean Chrétien was prime minister.
That long-running historical trend is not the only reason why some Ontario PC organizers were leery of waiting for a provincial election, in the event that Pierre Poilievre leads his Conservatives to victory in a federal vote that must be held this year.
PC organizers also feared if Ford had stuck with the fixed-date election timetable, that some policies brought in by a Poilievre government could spark a backlash that would hurt the provincial party in 2026.
6. Getting ahead of potential Greenbelt charges
The early call means that unless the RCMP announces something in the next four weeks, Ford's PCs will have sent Ontarians to the polls without the spectre of any charges related to the Greenbelt affair.
The Ford government's move to allow a handpicked group of landowners to build homes in the protected Greenbelt — boosting the potential value of that land by upwards of $8 billion, according to the auditor general — dominated the first year-plus of this mandate.
While Ford eventually scrapped the plan, the RCMP is investigating how it came about, looking for any evidence of corruption.
7. Timing is everything
It also doesn't hurt Ford politically that a $200 cheque is landing in the mailboxes of pretty much every single voter in Ontario right now.
If Ford wins another majority on Feb. 27, he will be the first Ontario premier to lead their party to three straight majorities since the 1950s, when Leslie Frost did it for the PCs.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees
LONDON (AP) — The British government on Monday reversed its unpopular plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had signaled the u-turn last month after a loud outcry from the public and some members of his Labour Party who thought the relatively modest 1.5 billion-pound ($2 billion) savings were too politically costly. Treasury chief Rachel Reeves, who canceled the payment for home heating on all but the poorest retirees after Labour came to power last summer, said the benefit would be restored to 9 million people, or three-quarters of pensioners, in England and Wales whose incomes are below 35,000 pounds ($47,500). Reeves said the move was necessary last year because the previous Conservative government had left public finances in a dire state. 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government,' Reeves said. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' The payments are worth between 200 and 300 pounds ($271 and $406) a year. The reversal will cost the government 1.25 billion, Reeve said. Canceling the payments for most people last winter was blamed for contributing to Starmer's swift decline in popularity after his party came to power in a landslide. He was blamed for punishing elderly people on limited incomes who struggled to make ends meet during a cost-of-living crisis. Labour fared poorly in local elections in England last month, with many party representatives blaming the removal of the winter fuel payment. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, quickly pounced on Starmer's about-face. 'Keir Starmer has scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making,' she said. 'This humiliating u-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologize for his terrible judgment.'

Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
The problem with politicians' pet projects
Governments of all political stripes in Canada are making the most of the economic crisis triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's whiplash-inducing tariff decisions. From the Ontario PCs to the BC NDP, the economic disruption has provided cover for governments to push their pet projects to the front of the line so that they build, baby, build. Ontario Premier Doug Ford wants to construct the world's longest traffic tunnel under Highway 401 and is calling on Ottawa to scrap a federal law that assesses the environmental impact of major projects so that he can meet his long-held ambition to develop mines in the 'Ring of Fire.' B.C. Premier David Eby has already passed contentious legislation this spring to eliminate environment assessments for a string of energy projects and to fast-track approvals for critical mineral mines. He now wants Ottawa to help pay for a transmission line to connect those potential projects – and while Ottawa has its wallet open, he'd also like some substantial cash for a replacement of the aging Massey tunnel that presents a choke point on Highway 99. And the federal Liberals are talking about a fast track for nation-building projects. All of this, naturally, in the name of unlocking Canada's economic potential. New Democrats, Liberals, and Conservatives all seem to have ended up at the same place: Those sitting around a cabinet table ought to decide which projects get built in a hurry, and which ones will have to wade through the existing regulatory mire. Andrew Coyne: The premiers as nation-builders? Colour me skeptical Campbell Clark: Should Canada build a pipeline to the West or the East? Prime Minister Mark Carney's One Canadian Economy bill, introduced Friday, proposes to create an office to streamline approvals for 'nation-building' projects such as ports, critical mineral mines and trade corridors. Projects that get on the list will be prioritized – leaving behind those that don't win favour. His criteria are vague enough to allow elected officials to play favourites. Nation-building projects are those that strengthen Canada's autonomy, resilience and security, and offer 'undeniable benefits to Canada.' Projects with Indigenous backing and clean growth potential will get a boost up the ladder. Mr. Carney invited the premiers to submit their preferred projects for consideration, making for a very jolly meeting of the First Ministers on June 2 because as it happened, the leaders all had arrived with their own parochial definitions of the national interest. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew wants infrastructure funding for the Port of Churchill. Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston wants Ottawa's backing to develop offshore wind energy. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has revived her province's push for a new bitumen pipeline to the Pacific. The premise for this activity is that Canada's current regulatory framework is broken, that environmental assessments take too long, and that cabinets need special powers to ensure that projects are built in a timely way. Editorial: Ottawa should look to B.C.'s fast-track blueprint for big projects Editorial: Free the market for renewable energy in Alberta What if, instead of politicians advancing their political pet projects, they instead tackled the underlying problem? The private sector will necessarily power much of this nation-building. There is much alignment with Ottawa's ambitions, but some subtle differences. The Business Council of Canada has called for efforts to fast-track strategic infrastructure in response to the economic challenges now facing the nation as its major trading partner redraws the playing field. But the council isn't asking premiers to pick winners. It sees essential infrastructure projects as those that support energy and trade but also research and development infrastructure such as industrial labs. Business is asking governments to harmonize regulations across levels of government and eliminate bureaucratic bottlenecks that delay strategic investments. There is duplication; get rid of it. Environmental assessments can be managed more efficiently; reform the system. And the Crown can find ways to better execute the constitutional duty to consult and accommodate First Nations. Canada's productivity decline has many causes, but one of the most obvious is the penchant of governments to subsidize favoured industries rather than undertake the less glamorous work of tearing down barriers to private sector investment. A regulatory fast lane for pet projects is just a new spin on that tired and failed approach.


Canada Standard
11 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Opinion: 'Don't Look, Just Leap', Carney and Ford Agree
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford seem to think that environmental assessment laws governing new pipelines, mines, nuclear power plants, ports, power dams, and transmission lines are no longer needed. Trust us, they say. Give us and the other politicians in our cabinets unfettered discretion to decide in secret which projects are in the national interest, where free-fire special economic zones should be established, and which corporations we should accept as trusted partners in exploiting Canada's natural wealth No need for serious debate in legislatures, they say. Ontario's Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act , was whipped through the provincial legislature in eight weeks. Carney wants Bill C-5, the Building Canada Act , enacted by Parliament by Canada Day, July 1. Independent scientists, civil society, and local communities need not be consulted on new megaprojects, they say. Governments know best. Yes, Indigenous nations must be heard from on account of that pesky Constitution and Supreme Court. But those consultations must be done quickly because project approvals are guaranteed within two years to ensure certainty for investors. View our latest digests Yes, they say, Canada's boreal forest is burning, atmospheric and other rivers are overflowing, and sea levels are rising. But action to address the climate and biodiversity emergencies really must be put on hold on account of the tyrant to the south. We need to let the U.S. President-not to mention the big investment banks-know that Canada can lay steel and pour concrete as fast as his country can. Benefits to Canadians from these national interest projects must wait, as well. Beginning roughly a half-century ago, Conservative federal and Ontario governments enacted laws requiring development projects to be assessed so that their environmental effects could be avoided, or at least mitigated. Ontario's Environmental Assessment Act was enacted in 1975, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act in 1992. Premier Bill Davis amd Prime Minister Mulroney understood that bureaucrats and consulting engineers don't always get it right, and that the singular focus on economic growth can sometimes leads to ecological disaster. Look before you leap. Ensure that government decisions to approve new highways, oil sands mines, or pipelines at least consider possible adverse environmental effects. Otherwise you get Chornobyl, Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon, and the Mount Polley and Giant mines. Ontario's Bill 5 and federal Bill C-5 effectively override these environmental assessment laws for the very projects that most need assessment and public discussion. Thank goodness we have elected such wise men who truly understand that a tunnel under the 401 highway, a trans-Canada energy corridor, and new roads to the Arctic are environmentally sustainable and will generate amazing benefits to regular Canadians. As catastrophic climate change and species extinctions accelerate, Canadians may be comforted by the thought that oil and gas and mining companies and investment banks will enjoy healthy profits for at least a few more quarters. Stephen Hazell is a veteran environmental lawyer, a member of the Energy Mix Productions Board of Directors, and an advisor to two national organizations assessing the impacts of Bill C-5. Source: The Energy Mix