Trump's firing of Hayden brings culture wars to the Library of Congress
Republicans have waged a yearslong battle against cultural institutions. It reached an abrupt zenith on Thursday night.
President Donald Trump's firing of Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden on Thursday marked the arrival of the conservative culture wars to the world's largest library. At its core was the intersection of Trump administration priorities — an eradication of any semblance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) from the federal government and an axing of those seen as potentially disloyal to the president — with the grassroots movement to stunt perceived progressive ideology in the nation's libraries.
Hayden had the misfortune of representing both.
When she was appointed by former President Barack Obama in 2016, she became both the first woman and Black person to lead the library. Hayden moved from the Enoch Pratt Free Library in Baltimore, where she had worked since 1993. She received bipartisan support during her Senate confirmation, but some conservatives were unhappy with her appointment.
She served through Trump's first administration, and her tenure as librarian was broadly celebrated by both sides. But decisions in recent years, as well as past donations to Democratic political candidates, kept her and the library in the crosshairs of a faction of hardline conservatives. That made Thursday's announcement unexpected but not entirely unanticipated. In fact, it was unknowingly foreshadowed earlier this week.
For months, the Trump administration has bounced from agency to agency, implementing cuts to DEI and perceived 'woke' initiatives. During a House Administration Committee hearing on Tuesday, ranking member Rep. Joe Morelle, a New York Democrat, worried that the Library of Congress would be next.
'The current administration, by virtually every measure, has declared war on cultural institutions, libraries and museums, chief among them,' Morelle said during the hearing. 'It doesn't take much imagination to see the Library of Congress next in the crosshairs, and I'm very concerned about it.'
The House Administration Committee oversees the Library of Congress.
Earlier this month, the American Accountability Foundation, a conservative research group, started a social media campaign to get Trump to fire Hayden.
Tom Jones, the group's president, said at the time that the administration needed to dismiss Hayden and 'return an America First agenda to the nation's intellectual property regulation,' according to the Daily Mail.
The group took issue with Hayden's previous donations to Obama and other Democratic candidates. Hayden also allowed the pop singer Lizzo to play a historic crystal flute that belonged to President James Madison during a concert in 2022, further drawing the ire of conservatives. A series of social media posts followed the group's announcement. The final one celebrated her dismissal.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Hayden's firing or the influence of AAF's campaign.
Morelle plans to introduce legislation that would move the appointment of librarians of Congress under the purview of Congress. Rep. Johnny Olszewski is a co-sponsor of the legislation.
'We will continue to resist President Trump's outrageous attack on our democratic norms and basic decency in Congress, the courts and in the community,' Rep. Johnny Olszewski, a Baltimore County Democrat, told The Sun in a statement. 'In the case of Dr. Hayden, if she intends to seek reinstatement, we will do whatever we can to support her efforts. We will also be cosponsoring legislation to give Congress the explicit hiring and firing authority over the nation's library.'
Hayden has not publicly commented on her dismissal.
Before being appointed to her role as the 14th Librarian of Congress, Hayden served as CEO of the Enoch Pratt Free Library from 1993 to 2016. Upon her recent termination, the library voiced support for its former executive, calling her '(a) visionary leader and tireless advocate for equity in access to information' in a news release signed by current CEO Chad Helton and Board of Directors Chair Chris Espenshade.
'Her tenure at the Library of Congress has been marked by expanded public access, modernization, and a commitment to making one of the nation's most treasured institutions more inclusive and accessible,' the release said.
Hayden has worked closely with Orioles owner David Rubenstein, who grew up in Baltimore, on efforts to boost literacy and other projects. Rubenstein was unavailable for comment on her firing on Friday, a spokesperson said.
Libraries across the country — from local public libraries to the Library of Congress — have found themselves in the crosshairs of the Trump administration's anti-DEI regime.
'What's different about today's day and age is these efforts from fringe groups have been enabled, empowered and emboldened,' Skip Auld, CEO of Anne Arundel County Public Library said. 'Libraries are places of free and open access to all the world's knowledge. These attacks have become intensified.'
In March, Anne Arundel County Public Library was criticized for hosting an LGBTQ+ event for National Transgender Day of Visibility.
The event, one of more than 6,000 held across the county's library system each year, drew criticism from across the state and U.S. Rep. Andy Harris, a Republican who represents the Eastern Shore.
Harris said taxpayer dollars and federal funding should not support such events or the institutions hosting them. In an X post, he called for re-examining federal support for libraries and later told The Sun that the federal government should withhold tax dollars until lawmakers ensure recipients are not promoting LGBTQ+ events.
'If the Anne Arundel County Public Library insists on programming like this, then my position would be that they shouldn't receive any federal taxpayer dollars,' Harris told The Sun. 'If they want to do this with state dollars, they want to do this with local dollars, that's the business of the state or Anne Arundel County. But I would object, as the majority of American taxpayers would, to the use of federal tax dollars for an entity that runs this kind of programming.'
The library receives about $25,000 in federal funding per year, according to the library's director of marketing and communications, Christine Feldmann, none of which contributed to the event.
Days later, the Trans Pride Party drew 30 members of the Maryland Republican Party to the Glen Burnie Library in protest of what they called 'grooming.' They were met with roughly 100 counter-protesters.
Auld, a friend of Hayden's for more than 30 years, called her sudden termination 'a casualty of the Trump administration's effort to dismantle all cultural institutions' that are trying to educate and provide safe spaces.
Nearly 250,000 people attended Anne Arundel County Library's 6,781 programs hosted in fiscal year 2024. In a county of about 600,000 residents, nearly 280,000 people own a library card, Auld said.
The United States Naval Academy Nimitz Library, which serves the 4,400 Midshipmen on campus, has also been involved in a DEI battle.
The Annapolis military school released a list of 381 books and literary works last month that were removed from its library as part of a review of diversity, equity and inclusion materials. The review followed directives from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's office to evaluate and eliminate works focused on DEI.
Some titles included 'How to Be an Antiracist' by Ibram X. Kendi, 'White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America' by Anthea Butler, 'Writing/teaching: Essays Toward a Rhetoric of Pedagogy' by Paul Kameen, and 'I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings' by Literarian Award recipient Maya Angelou.
Naval Academy Public Affairs did not respond for comment.
_____
Jeff Barker contributed to this report.
_____
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
20 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Says Musk Will Face ‘Very Serious Consequences' If He Backs Democrats
President Donald Trump on June 7 warned that Elon Musk could face 'serious consequences' if he decides to back Democratic political candidates in upcoming elections. While Musk campaigned for Trump's 2024 presidential run and was a key member in the Trump administration's fight against fraud and waste, the two were involved in a public spat this week, apparently fueled by their disagreements over Trump's budget priorities in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump vowed to help US farmers. These four say his policies are ‘wreaking havoc'
Donald Trump may have won the votes of the US's most farming-dependent counties by an average of 78% in the 2024 election. But the moves made by his administration in the past few months – imposing steep tariffs, immigration policies that target the migrant labor farmers rely on, and canceling a wide range of USDA programs – have left many farmers reeling. 'The policies of the Trump administration are wreaking havoc on family farmers. It's been terrible,' said John Bartman, a row crop farmer in Illinois. Bartman is owed thousands of dollars for sustainable practices he implemented on his row crop operation as part of the USDA's Climate-Smart program. And he's not the only one. Other farmers across the country are reporting that the Trump administration's policies have destroyed their markets by ending programs that help farmers sell their produce to local schools and food banks; implementing draconian immigration policies that destabilize the farm labor pool; and generally creating volatility that makes it hard for farmers to plan ahead. One group of farmers, the Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York, joined organizations like Earthjustice and the Natural Resources Defense Council in suing the USDA for removing department webpages focused on climate change, arguing that the move was unlawful and undermines farmers' ability to adapt and respond to climate threats. (On 13 May, the coalition declared a kind of victory when the government committed to restore the purged content; the government is set to provide more information about the restoration process on 11 June.) Some farmers, such as Bartman, loudly oppose Trump. 'I've met some Democrats who'll say: 'You farmers deserve this. You voted for him.' Well, I didn't vote for the guy. The programs that have been impacted the most are targeted towards farmers that care about the environment.' Others, such as those living near North Carolina farmer Patrick Brown, are experiencing 'buyer's remorse', said Brown, 'but they don't want to say it because they voted for the current administration'. No matter who they voted for, farmers across the country are living in the new reality created by the Trump administration's agricultural policies. The Guardian spoke to four farmers about what it's like trying to grow crops, feed people, and keep their operations afloat in 2025. John Bartman, Bartman FarmMarengo, Illinois I am a vegetable and grain farmer; we're mostly a row crop operation. My family has been farming in Illinois since 1846; we have the oldest continuous running vegetable stand in McHenry county. I farm 900 acres. I try to use the least amount of fertilizer and herbicides that I can. Three main policies have been impacting us. Number one is the cancellation of USAID. That's about a billion dollars worth of grain that the United States purchases from farmers like me, and they give it to third world nations who are hungry. To kill that program is a disaster. It's morally bankrupt, and it hurts farmers' bottom line. Another thing that's very pressing is the payment freezes to farmers from the USDA. I was involved in the Climate-Smart practices. We were paid to implement stewardship practices that the USDA has been preaching since the Dust Bowl. The added benefit is these practices combat climate change. That's what the current administration doesn't want anything to do with. I'm supposed to be paid close to $100 an acre. Then the current administration came in and put a freeze on everything. $100 an acre may not sound like much, but there are some years where we're happy if we make $20 an acre off of things. I have an operating loan that I haven't been able to pay off because I was counting on this money. I have rent that's due. I have seed costs. I have chemical costs. I try to explain to people, if I were a repair person, and I went to my local grade school and fixed their furnace, and in the meantime, a new school board was elected, I still deserve to be paid. I've signed a contract with the USDA. The full faith and credit of the United States is at risk, because if Uncle Sam will renege on a farmer, they'll renege on anybody. The third one is the tariff situation. China is and has been our number one export for soybeans; 100% of the soybeans that I grow are exported. During Trump's first administration, half of all the soybeans that China purchased were from the United States. By the end of his first administration, it was down to a quarter. Now Brazil has taken over our role as the number one importer of soybeans into China. From an environmental standpoint, that means more deforestation in the Amazon. Mexico purchases 40% of all the corn in the United States. And he wants to have a trade war with Mexico? Mexico can just as easily buy their grain from Argentina and Brazil. The USDA has also canceled a lot of contracts for food pantries and school districts to purchase from local farmers, and that's absolutely devastating. I was just in Springfield, Illinois, testifying and hearing testimony from other farmers. Many of them are first-generation farmers, and that program gave them an outlet for their produce. It's so sad listening to them saying, 'I finally had my dream of owning my own farm and making a living at it. Now I don't know what I'm going to do, because my market has dried up.' Shah Kazemi, Monterey MushroomsSanta Cruz county, California People don't recognize that we either have to import our labor, or import our food. We operate five farms right now: in California, Tennessee, Texas and Mexico. We have close to 2,000 employees. Our business has been totally dependent on migrant workers, just like all other ag businesses in this country. Without them, there is no food on anybody's table. In 1983 we acquired a farm in Loudon, Tennessee. At the time we didn't have one migrant worker in that plant. By the early 1990s we had about 20% migrant workers, and by the early 2000s we had 85%, because nobody wants to do that kind of work any more in this country. When you're bent over picking strawberries, cucumber, lettuce, zucchini, whatever the crop is – try to do that for eight hours. See how your back feels, how the rest of your body feels. Farming is hard, physical work. These are skilled workers, harvesting at a certain rate to stay productive; you have to know your trade. A skilled mushroom picker can pick about 75 to 80 pounds an hour, and some of them exceed 100 pounds an hour. A new picker comes in, their productivity is in the 20s, and it will take six to eight months to get them up to 50. So if you had to replace a guy that's picking 80 pounds an hour with people who are picking in the 20s, you need three or four of them. We have a lot of respect and admiration for these people. They're really underappreciated. I have a friend who is in the farming business. About a month ago, there was an Ice [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] raid in the area. The following day, most of his employees didn't show up. Even the people who have been here for a long time, they're listening to the news and hearing that people with green cards are being deported. The fear factor has been heightened significantly. That's what has happened with the new administration coming in. If we don't have enough workers, we cannot harvest our crops. And if you don't harvest, then it's all wasted. The uncertainty and erratic decision making creates volatility in the marketplace. And now we're concerned about where we're going to get future workers. What's going to happen a year from now, as some of these people get deported, or they feel so fearful they go back to their home country? Who's going to replace them? We need to have a program that lets people come in who can do the work, and then at the end of whatever the term is, they can go back home. They have a guest worker program in Canada that works significantly better than what we have here. Nobody pays any attention to the farmers, and we are the people who put food on the table every day. And the migrant workers, those are the hands that pick the crops that you eat. Josh Sneddon, Fox at the ForkMonee, Illinois I got into farming because I love to cook. When I was in New Jersey and I was getting my food from local farmers, ranchers and fishermen, the quality of the food was so much better that my spice cabinet became essentially salt and pepper, because the food was good enough [on its own]. I took my entrepreneurial spirit and applied it to my interest in building a local food system driven by higher-quality foods, greater accessibility, and a climate smart focus on our food system. Fox at the Fork is a 10-acre regenerative farm – we grow fruit and nut trees like pecans, persimmons and currants, while also stewarding approximately one acre of land intensively in annual vegetables. It's my fifth year in business. In prior farm bills and administrations, the USDA supported individuals like me who are considered 'beginning farmers'. That's one of their historically underserved categories. The USDA [formerly] created and reinforced programs that supported individuals who hadn't had the same opportunities – Bipoc, LGBTQ+, beginning, veteran farmers – to have an equitable shot at growing and establishing small-scale food businesses in their communities. Being considered a beginning farmer was part of the criteria that has helped me secure NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service] grants, one of them being a Conservation Stewardship Program contract. That's a five-year contract that recognizes all of the conservation practices we implemented. For us, that's about [protecting] native prairie; cover cropping; building bird boxes to bring back native kestrels and owls. Almost all federal grants require that some of the money spent is yours and is not reimbursed. So farmers have a stake in the game; it's not just the government giving out corn and soy subsidies. The other program that really helped our farm last year [that has been canceled under the current administration] is the LFPA, the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. It was getting up to $25m [in Illinois] that had been obligated to the state for food distribution organizations like food banks, who provide food to the community and pay a fair market value to us farmers. I also have a Reap contract – the Rural Energy for America Program – which is another program that faced direct cuts. At the end of last year, I spent approximately $79,000 to install solar, having already received approval and signed paperwork. That grant is a 25% reimbursement through the USDA reap, which is for me, $19,784. I'm still waiting for that. Not receiving that $19,784 has slowed what investments I'm going to make for the year. It's hard to predict the long-term impacts, but the short-term impact is more anxiety, fewer investments on the farm, and likely greater effort trying to get my food placed in the community at a fair market price. Patrick Brown, Brown Family FarmsWarren county, North Carolina I'm a fourth-generation row crop farmer. My home farm is about 165 acres. I also grow industrial hemp fiber and produce – watermelons, leafy greens, tomatoes, sweet corn. We're an impoverished community, and we don't have access to a lot of food, so I try to get healthy options to children especially. We were participants for the past two years in a USDA project – which has just gotten terminated – providing fresh food to local schools. We also created a non-profit to help create a path for young kids that want to become farmers. And I also am a director of a non-profit called Nature for Justice, and we were awarded a USDA Climate-Smart contract to help farmers with conservation practices. All my projects that were funded by the federal government have been terminated during the current administration. It's caused us to pivot. We're so used to not having anything – as a minority farmer, that's the way things have always been. But when you sign a government contract, you feel some sense of, 'this can't be taken away.' I was doing two projects: one for cover crops and nutrient management, and the other one to plant trees to help with erosion and chemical drift, and to create habitat for wildlife. We did all this work and invested all this money, all for them to say, as of 29 January, the project is no longer in place. We were expecting to get over $65,000 this year from work we did in 2024. They claim that I will eventually get the money, but who knows how long that will be held up? Plus, the announcements made during this administration through the secretary of agriculture are not getting down to the rural community offices that represent small farmers. It's almost as if things are announced on social media, and then the offices hear about it. And our local NRCS offices and our Farm Service Agency offices are more understaffed than they've been in 20 years. The technical assistance is non-existent. The main thing we need right now is for our local legislators to speak up for us. A lot of them are being quiet. But we need to advocate against the wrongdoing that is being done to farmers.