logo
House Republicans include a 10-year ban on US states regulating AI in ‘big, beautiful' bill

House Republicans include a 10-year ban on US states regulating AI in ‘big, beautiful' bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans surprised tech industry watchers and outraged state governments when they added a clause to Republicans' signature ' big, beautiful ' tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade.
The brief but consequential provision, tucked into the House Energy and Commerce Committee's sweeping markup, would be a major boon to the AI industry, which has lobbied for uniform and light touch regulation as tech firms develop a technology they promise will transform society.
However, while the clause would be far-reaching if enacted, it faces long odds in the U.S. Senate, where procedural rules may doom its inclusion in the GOP legislation.
'I don't know whether it will pass the Byrd Rule,' said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, referring to a provision that requires that all parts of a budget reconciliation bill, like the GOP plan, focus mainly on the budgetary matters rather than general policy aims.
'That sounds to me like a policy change. I'm not going to speculate what the parliamentarian is going to do but I think it is unlikely to make it,' Cornyn said.
Senators in both parties have expressed an interest in artificial intelligence and believe that Congress should take the lead in regulating the technology. But while lawmakers have introduced scores of bills, including some bipartisan efforts, that would impact artificial intelligence, few have seen any meaningful advancement in the deeply divided Congress.
An exception is a bipartisan bill expected to be signed into law by President Donald Trump next week that would enact stricter penalties on the distribution of intimate 'revenge porn' images, both real and AI-generated, without a person's consent.
'AI doesn't understand state borders, so it is extraordinarily important for the federal government to be the one that sets interstate commerce. It's in our Constitution. You can't have a patchwork of 50 states,' said Sen. Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican. But Moreno said he was unsure if the House's proposed ban could make it through Senate procedure.
The AI provision in the bill states that 'no state or political subdivision may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems.' The language could bar regulations on systems ranging from popular commercial models like ChatGPT to those that help make decisions about who gets hired or finds housing.
State regulations on AI's usage in business, research, public utilities, educational settings and government would be banned.
The congressional pushback against state-led AI regulation is part of a broader move led by the Trump administration to do away with policies and business approaches that have sought to limit AI's harms and pervasive bias.
Half of all U.S. states so far have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, according to a tracker from the watchdog organization Public Citizen.
Most of those laws were passed within the last year, as incidents in democratic elections around the globe in 2024 highlighted the threat of lifelike AI audio clips, videos and images to deceive voters.
California state Sen. Scott Wiener called the Republican proposal 'truly gross' in a social media post. Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat, authored landmark legislation last year that would have created first-in-the-nation safety measures for advanced artificial intelligence models. The bill was vetoed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fellow San Francisco Democrat.
'Congress is incapable of meaningful AI regulation to protect the public. It is, however, quite capable of failing to act while also banning states from acting,' Wiener wrote.
A bipartisan group of dozens of state attorneys general also sent a letter to Congress on Friday opposing the bill.
'AI brings real promise, but also real danger, and South Carolina has been doing the hard work to protect our citizens,' said South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, a Republican, in a statement. 'Now, instead of stepping up with real solutions, Congress wants to tie our hands and push a one-size-fits-all mandate from Washington without a clear direction. That's not leadership, that's federal overreach.'
As the debate unfolds, AI industry leaders are pressing ahead on research while competing with rivals to develop the best — and most widely used —AI systems. They have pushed federal lawmakers for uniform and unintrusive rules on the technology, saying they need to move quickly on the latest models to compete with Chinese firms.
Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, testified in a Senate hearing last week that a 'patchwork' of AI regulations 'would be quite burdensome and significantly impair our ability to do what we need to do.'
'One federal framework, that is light touch, that we can understand and that lets us move with the speed that this moment calls for seems important and fine,' Altman told Sen. Cynthia Lummis, a Wyoming Republican.
And Sen. Ted Cruz floated the idea of a 10-year 'learning period' for AI at the same hearing, which included three other tech company executives.
'Would you support a 10-year learning period on states issuing comprehensive AI regulation, or some form of federal preemption to create an even playing field for AI developers and employers?' asked the Texas Republican.
Altman responded that he was 'not sure what a 10-year learning period means, but I think having one federal approach focused on light touch and an even playing field sounds great to me.'
Microsoft's president, Brad Smith, also offered measured support for 'giving the country time' in the way that limited U.S. regulation enabled early internet commerce to flourish.
'There's a lot of details that need to be hammered out, but giving the federal government the ability to lead, especially in the areas around product safety and pre-release reviews and the like, would help this industry grow,' Smith said.
It was a change, at least in tone, for some of the executives. Altman had testified to Congress two years ago on the need for AI regulation, and Smith, five years ago, praised Microsoft's home state of Washington for its 'significant breakthrough' in passing first-in-the-nation guardrails on the use of facial recognition, a form of AI.
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop.
Ten GOP senators said they were sympathetic to the idea of creating a national framework for AI. But whether the majority can work with Democrats to find a filibuster-proof solution is unclear.
'I am not opposed to the concept. In fact, interstate commerce would suggest that it is the responsibility of Congress to regulate these types of activities and not the states,' said Sen. Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican.
'If we're going to do it state by state we're going to have a real mess on our hands,' Rounds said.
——————
O'Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island. AP writers Ali Swenson in New York, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, South Carolina, and Trân Nguyễn in Sacramento, California contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Auditor general's report on company behind ArriveCan to be released today
Auditor general's report on company behind ArriveCan to be released today

Winnipeg Free Press

time29 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Auditor general's report on company behind ArriveCan to be released today

OTTAWA – The latest probe into the company behind the controversial ArriveCan app is among four reports being released today by Canada's auditor general. Karen Hogan looked into all contracts awarded and payments made to GC Strategies for its work on the app to determine whether they were in line with government policy and whether the government got value for taxpayers' money. In September, the House of Commons unanimously agreed to ask Hogan to look into the contracts and her report is set to be tabled in the House around 10 a.m. ET. As of March 2024, GC Strategies — a two-man team which last week was banned from entering into contracts or real property agreements with the federal government for seven years — had received $100 million in federal government contracts since 2011. Hogan's previous report on the app's development found it did not deliver the best value to taxpayers and concluded that three federal departments disregarded federal policies, controls and transparency in the contracting process. GC Strategies received nearly a third of the $60 million total cost of the ArriveCan project, despite being awarded contracts through non-competitive processes. Hogan also will table a report today on Canada's plans to purchase F-35 fighter jets and whether the Department of National Defence ensured the aircraft would be delivered on time and on budget. Another report will look at whether the government provides adequate office space for public servants while minimizing costs to taxpayers. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Canada's environment commissioner Jerry DeMarco will also table four reports today, including an audit of the National Adaptation Strategy, the federal government's $2.1 billion initiative to help communities withstand the impacts of climate change. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025.

Apple vs. Amazon: Which Warren Buffet AI Stock Is the Better Buy Today?
Apple vs. Amazon: Which Warren Buffet AI Stock Is the Better Buy Today?

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Apple vs. Amazon: Which Warren Buffet AI Stock Is the Better Buy Today?

The race to the top of the artificial intelligence (AI) mountain is on, and the usual suspects are in the running. Two of the top AI companies today are also two of the stocks in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio. Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is one of Warren Buffett's favorite companies, and he's called it a better business than his other favorites, Coca-Cola and American Express. It's the largest position in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio, accounting for 21.6% of the total. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), on the other hand, was purchased by one of Berkshire Hathaway's investment managers, not Buffett himself, although Buffett has admitted his admiration for founder Jeff Bezos. Amazon stock accounts for only 0.8% of the portfolio. It's clear which company works better for Buffett, but which one is better for your portfolio? Apple: The sticky ecosystem Many investors know that Buffett loves an undervalued stock. But when explaining how he chooses stocks, he calls himself a business picker, not a stock picker. When explaining what he loves in a great business, he invariably talks about moats and capital deployment. "I didn't go into Apple because it was a tech stock in the least," he explained when he first bought it. "I mean, I went into Apple because to certain conclusions about both the intelligence with which the capital would be employed, but more important, about the value of an ecosystem and how permanent that ecosystem could be, and what the threats were to it, and a whole bunch of things." To explain how he thinks, he said that even though he made a mistake by not buying Alphabet back when it was still Google, he saw that it had displaced an earlier search engine called Alta Vista and figured it could be displaced, as well. In other words, at the time, it wasn't clear that it would have the moat that it has today, essentially making it impossible for any competition to come close to its status in the near term. However, Buffett has said that, to have a moat that's investment-worthy, "You have to have some very, very, very special product, and which has ecosystem, and the product's extremely sticky, and all of that sort of thing." Apple's AI is all about reinforcing its ecosystem to keep its loyal customers. It's another way the consumer-tech giant enhances its ecosystem and becomes even more sticky. Buffett first bought shares of Apple stock in 2016 and built up his position for a few years before selling about half of it last year, but it didn't balloon to about half of the total portfolio strictly because Berkshire Hathaway bought more shares. When he first bought it, Buffett said that he owned about 5% of shares outstanding but expected that to increase to about 6% to 7% through Apple's share-buyback program alone. That's one of the reasons Buffett loves stock repurchases as a stock feature. His stake in Apple has increased by billions of dollars simply because the company bought back its own shares. Does the investing thesis still apply? Absolutely. I will point out, though, that Apple is a lot more expensive today than it was when Buffett bought it, and it doesn't present the same value at its current price. AAPL PE Ratio data by YCharts. Amazon: The opportunity Amazon's AI business and ambitions are completely different than Apple's. While it also uses AI throughout its own business, its greatest AI opportunities are in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing segment, which is all about empowering the company's massive client base. As far as AI goes, Amazon's opportunity to generate sales seems to vastly outdo Apple's. If Buffett loves Apple because it's a consumer-product powerhouse as opposed to a tech giant, Amazon's investing thesis is in its tech prowess, which isn't in Buffett's wheelhouse. Amazon is already seeing massive benefits from investing in AI. It's a multibillion-dollar business, but CEO Andy Jassy sees the opportunity as much bigger. It's growing in the triple digits, and Jassy said: "Before this generation of AI, we thought AWS had the chance to ultimately be a multi-hundred billion dollar revenue run rate business. We now think it could be even larger." He envisions how AI can make people's everyday tasks much easier. Amazon is heavily investing in the building blocks for developers to create game-changing AI-enabled apps. What's also enticing about Amazon is its other businesses. As far as being a tech company or not, Amazon is the largest e-commerce company in the country, with a strong moat around its leading consumer-goods business. That's likely what got Amazon into the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio, and like Apple, that's its own self-reinforcing, sticky ecosystem. As for the stock price, in contrast with Apple, Amazon's valuation is near its 10-year low. AMZN PE Ratio data by YCharts. There are good reasons to buy either of these stocks today, but Amazon looks like the better buy right now. Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Jennifer Saibil has positions in American Express and Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

IQM's State of Quantum 2025: Quantum Industry Must Solve Talent Shortage and Software Platforms, Not Just Qubits
IQM's State of Quantum 2025: Quantum Industry Must Solve Talent Shortage and Software Platforms, Not Just Qubits

National Post

time2 hours ago

  • National Post

IQM's State of Quantum 2025: Quantum Industry Must Solve Talent Shortage and Software Platforms, Not Just Qubits

Article content The report predicts that quantum computing market will hit over $22 billion globally by 2032 as commercial deployments accelerate. Article content Highlights how AI, high-performance computing (HPC), and quantum technology are converging to drive the next wave of growth. Article content This is the third edition of the state of quantum report by IQM Quantum Computers. Article content ESPOO, Finland — IQM Quantum Computers in collaboration with analyst firm Omdia (LON:INF), today unveiled the third edition of its State of Quantum Report, revealing that the quantum industry must address talent shortages and software development kits (SDK) gaps in order to scale beyond just qubit count. Article content As quantum computing shifts from theoretical promise to practical integration, the report projects that the global quantum computing market will reach over $22 billion by 2032 as commercial deployments accelerate. Article content The findings also show that 75% of respondents believe that defining the right applications is the most critical factor for adoption. As Dr. Jan Goetz, Co-CEO and Co-founder of IQM, noted in his foreword, 'Quantum's promise is clear, but fulfilling it requires orchestrated progress across the hardware and software stack—transforming these powerful machines from niche tools into drivers of real-world outcomes.' Article content The report also argues that progress hinges on synchronising hardware industrialisation with software platform maturity. Today, software development kit fragmentation hampers portability and slows adoption in multi-vendor settings. Article content HPC, Quantum, and AI Integration Article content The report also highlights how high-performance computing (HPC), quantum computing, and AI are converging to drive the next wave of growth. According to industry experts, investors, and users across Europe, North America, Asia, and Oceania interviewed, HPC provides the robust infrastructure and orchestration needed to integrate quantum systems into real-world environments, ensuring that quantum and classical resources work in harmony. Article content This synergy promises to accelerate adoption, amplify returns for early adopters, and transform quantum computing from a niche capability into a trusted part of the broader scientific and industrial toolbox. Article content 'Our interviewees identified three major challenges – one is getting to the level of reliability where quantum computers can be considered industrial products rather than crafted laboratory devices, another is improving the software layer to provide the sort of developer experience we see in the high-level frameworks used for AI, and a third is helping users identify opportunities to benefit from quantum computer and set up their experiments. Interestingly, the interviewees are expecting multiple quantum technologies to co-exist, with a degree of specialisation between them,' said Alexander Harrowell, Principal Analyst, Advanced Computing at Omdia. Article content Sector Readiness: 57% of survey respondents placed drug-discovery and molecular-modelling workloads as their top quantum priority list, ahead of finance and chemicals. Article content Funding: After a dip in 2023, venture funding surged again in 2024, with 58% of cumulative quantum venture funding still flowing to North American firms, with average deal sizes ($38M) triple those in Europe ($12M). Article content Challenges Ahead: Talent shortages in quantum and growth-stage funding outside the US are the two biggest systemic risks to the industry's continued growth. Article content In addition, the report also calls for three critical priorities to turn these insights into tangible outcomes: Article content Better Abstraction Layers: Bridging the gap between the physics of qubits and the practical problems that matter to businesses. Article content Unified Orchestration and Scheduling: Enabling quantum and classical HPC resources to operate seamlessly together. Article content About IQM Quantum Computers: Article content IQM is a global leader in superconducting quantum computers. IQM provides both on-premises full-stack quantum computers and a cloud platform to access its computers. IQM customers include the leading high-performance computing centres, research labs, universities and enterprises which have full access to IQM's software and hardware. IQM has over 300 employees with headquarters in Finland and a global presence in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, Spain, Singapore, South Korea and the United States. Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Media contact: Article content Article content Email: Article content Article content Article content

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store