logo
House Republicans include a 10-year ban on US states regulating AI in ‘big, beautiful' bill

House Republicans include a 10-year ban on US states regulating AI in ‘big, beautiful' bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans surprised tech industry watchers and outraged state governments when they added a clause to Republicans' signature ' big, beautiful ' tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade.
The brief but consequential provision, tucked into the House Energy and Commerce Committee's sweeping markup, would be a major boon to the AI industry, which has lobbied for uniform and light touch regulation as tech firms develop a technology they promise will transform society.
However, while the clause would be far-reaching if enacted, it faces long odds in the U.S. Senate, where procedural rules may doom its inclusion in the GOP legislation.
'I don't know whether it will pass the Byrd Rule,' said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, referring to a provision that requires that all parts of a budget reconciliation bill, like the GOP plan, focus mainly on the budgetary matters rather than general policy aims.
'That sounds to me like a policy change. I'm not going to speculate what the parliamentarian is going to do but I think it is unlikely to make it,' Cornyn said.
Senators in both parties have expressed an interest in artificial intelligence and believe that Congress should take the lead in regulating the technology. But while lawmakers have introduced scores of bills, including some bipartisan efforts, that would impact artificial intelligence, few have seen any meaningful advancement in the deeply divided Congress.
An exception is a bipartisan bill expected to be signed into law by President Donald Trump next week that would enact stricter penalties on the distribution of intimate 'revenge porn' images, both real and AI-generated, without a person's consent.
'AI doesn't understand state borders, so it is extraordinarily important for the federal government to be the one that sets interstate commerce. It's in our Constitution. You can't have a patchwork of 50 states,' said Sen. Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican. But Moreno said he was unsure if the House's proposed ban could make it through Senate procedure.
The AI provision in the bill states that 'no state or political subdivision may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems.' The language could bar regulations on systems ranging from popular commercial models like ChatGPT to those that help make decisions about who gets hired or finds housing.
State regulations on AI's usage in business, research, public utilities, educational settings and government would be banned.
The congressional pushback against state-led AI regulation is part of a broader move led by the Trump administration to do away with policies and business approaches that have sought to limit AI's harms and pervasive bias.
Half of all U.S. states so far have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, according to a tracker from the watchdog organization Public Citizen.
Most of those laws were passed within the last year, as incidents in democratic elections around the globe in 2024 highlighted the threat of lifelike AI audio clips, videos and images to deceive voters.
California state Sen. Scott Wiener called the Republican proposal 'truly gross' in a social media post. Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat, authored landmark legislation last year that would have created first-in-the-nation safety measures for advanced artificial intelligence models. The bill was vetoed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fellow San Francisco Democrat.
'Congress is incapable of meaningful AI regulation to protect the public. It is, however, quite capable of failing to act while also banning states from acting,' Wiener wrote.
A bipartisan group of dozens of state attorneys general also sent a letter to Congress on Friday opposing the bill.
'AI brings real promise, but also real danger, and South Carolina has been doing the hard work to protect our citizens,' said South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, a Republican, in a statement. 'Now, instead of stepping up with real solutions, Congress wants to tie our hands and push a one-size-fits-all mandate from Washington without a clear direction. That's not leadership, that's federal overreach.'
As the debate unfolds, AI industry leaders are pressing ahead on research while competing with rivals to develop the best — and most widely used —AI systems. They have pushed federal lawmakers for uniform and unintrusive rules on the technology, saying they need to move quickly on the latest models to compete with Chinese firms.
Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, testified in a Senate hearing last week that a 'patchwork' of AI regulations 'would be quite burdensome and significantly impair our ability to do what we need to do.'
'One federal framework, that is light touch, that we can understand and that lets us move with the speed that this moment calls for seems important and fine,' Altman told Sen. Cynthia Lummis, a Wyoming Republican.
And Sen. Ted Cruz floated the idea of a 10-year 'learning period' for AI at the same hearing, which included three other tech company executives.
'Would you support a 10-year learning period on states issuing comprehensive AI regulation, or some form of federal preemption to create an even playing field for AI developers and employers?' asked the Texas Republican.
Altman responded that he was 'not sure what a 10-year learning period means, but I think having one federal approach focused on light touch and an even playing field sounds great to me.'
Microsoft's president, Brad Smith, also offered measured support for 'giving the country time' in the way that limited U.S. regulation enabled early internet commerce to flourish.
'There's a lot of details that need to be hammered out, but giving the federal government the ability to lead, especially in the areas around product safety and pre-release reviews and the like, would help this industry grow,' Smith said.
It was a change, at least in tone, for some of the executives. Altman had testified to Congress two years ago on the need for AI regulation, and Smith, five years ago, praised Microsoft's home state of Washington for its 'significant breakthrough' in passing first-in-the-nation guardrails on the use of facial recognition, a form of AI.
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop.
Ten GOP senators said they were sympathetic to the idea of creating a national framework for AI. But whether the majority can work with Democrats to find a filibuster-proof solution is unclear.
'I am not opposed to the concept. In fact, interstate commerce would suggest that it is the responsibility of Congress to regulate these types of activities and not the states,' said Sen. Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican.
'If we're going to do it state by state we're going to have a real mess on our hands,' Rounds said.
——————
O'Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island. AP writers Ali Swenson in New York, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, South Carolina, and Trân Nguyễn in Sacramento, California contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia's $44 Billion AI Boom: The Catalyst Wall Street Is Missing
Nvidia's $44 Billion AI Boom: The Catalyst Wall Street Is Missing

Globe and Mail

time12 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Nvidia's $44 Billion AI Boom: The Catalyst Wall Street Is Missing

Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is facing a $15 billion revenue hit due to China export bans. But newly reported megadeals could unlock a new wave of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven growth. Discover why Nvidia's financials still flash green, which geopolitical risks to watch, and whether now is the time to invest -- or run. Stock prices used were the market prices of June 4, 2025. The video was published on June 10, 2025. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Rick Orford has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Nvidia Stock Can Vault to $220 or Plunge to $100, Based on Select Wall Street Analysts -- but Both Price Targets Completely Overlook a Key Catalyst
Nvidia Stock Can Vault to $220 or Plunge to $100, Based on Select Wall Street Analysts -- but Both Price Targets Completely Overlook a Key Catalyst

Globe and Mail

time27 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Nvidia Stock Can Vault to $220 or Plunge to $100, Based on Select Wall Street Analysts -- but Both Price Targets Completely Overlook a Key Catalyst

More than 30 years ago, the advent and proliferation of the internet kicked off the greatest leap forward in technological innovation for businesses in a long time. Though a number of next-big-thing innovations have come along since the internet revolutionized how businesses interact with consumers and sell their products and services, none have come close to matching its long-term addressable potential... until now. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) represents the next great tech advancement that has the ability to alter the long-term growth trajectory for corporate America. Empowering software and systems with AI solutions to make decisions without human intervention gives this technology a jaw-dropping addressable market, which the analysts at PwC have pegged at $15.7 trillion (globally) by 2030. Although a long list of companies has benefited from Wall Street's hottest trend, it's semiconductor titan Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) that's become the face of the AI revolution. As is often the case with businesses on the leading edge of a game-changing innovation, predictions are all over the map. Whereas one Wall Street analyst foresees the most pivotal of all tech stocks soaring to $220 per share, another believes it'll plummet to just $100 per share. Yet what's most interesting is that Wall Street's high- and low-water price targets both completely overlook what can arguably be described as the biggest catalyst for Nvidia. Is Nvidia a $5 trillion dollar business? Make no mistake about it, the overwhelming majority of Wall Street analysts and investors believe Nvidia stock is headed higher. But none of these price projections speaks louder than analyst Ivan Feinseth at Tigress Financial, who foresees Nvidia shares adding 55% and heading to $220. If Feinseth is accurate, Nvidia's market cap would near $5.4 trillion. For context, Nvidia had a market valuation of $360 billion when 2023 began. Feinseth's Street-high price target is predicated on sustained strong demand for Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs). The Hopper (H100) and successor Blackwell GPUs account for the lion's share of the GPUs currently deployed in AI-accelerated data centers, and demand for this hardware hasn't shown any signs of slowing. As a general rule, when the demand for a good or service outstrips its supply, the price of said good or service is going to climb until demand tapers off. In Nvidia's case, its GPU orders are backlogged, which has allowed the company to charge a healthy premium for its hardware, relative to its direct external competitors. The end result has been a significant uptick in the company's gross margin, compared to prior to the AI revolution taking shape. Feinseth's $220 price target, which was issued in late January, came after a short-lived plunge in Nvidia stock caused by the debut of China-based DeepSeek's R1 large language model (LLM) chatbot. DeepSeek is alleged to have used slower and less-costly hardware from Nvidia to develop its LLM. Feinseth's lofty price target demonstrates confidence that Nvidia will be able to maintain its superior pricing power. Will Nvidia shares plunge 30%? On the other end of the spectrum is Seaport Global Investors analyst Jay Goldberg. In late April, Goldberg became the only analyst covering Nvidia to rate its stock as a "sell," and initiated a $100 price target. Based on where Nvidia shares ended the session on June 6, Goldberg's price target intimates a decline of almost 30%. Goldberg doesn't foresee Wall Street's AI darling losing its leading position as the preferred company powering AI-accelerated data centers. But he does believe that AI optimism is fully priced into Nvidia stock given a few variables. To begin with, Goldberg notes that many of Nvidia's top customers by net sales are internally developing AI-GPUs and solutions of their own. Even though these chips won't represent external competition for Hopper, Blackwell, or any successor GPUs, they're going to be notably cheaper and more readily accessible than Nvidia's premium-priced and backlogged hardware. This is potentially problematic to Nvidia landing new orders from its current top customers. Goldberg also believes that enterprise customers will branch out and purchase from other hardware providers. For instance, Advanced Micro Devices ' less-costly Instinct MI300X series GPUs, as well as Broadcom 's custom AI-accelerating chips, could siphon away some of Nvidia's monopoly like data center market share over time. With enterprise spending on AI-data center infrastructure expected to slow in 2026, per Goldberg, Nvidia stock is currently pricey. Wall Street's high- and low-water price targets are completely missing this key catalyst While Feinseth and Goldberg both make compelling cases, their arguments -- along with the dozens of other analysts and institutions that have placed a price target on shares of Nvidia stock -- completely overlook a historical catalyst associated with next-big-thing trends and innovations. Though the internet proved to be a game-changing technology, it wasn't a universal winner from the get-go. It took years for businesses to figure out how to optimize their marketing and sales to consumers and other businesses. In other words, it took time for the internet to mature as a mainstream innovation. Since the advent of the internet, we've witnessed a number of other high-profile trends, technologies, and innovations come along that have also endured an early stage bubble-bursting event. This includes (but isn't limited to) genome decoding, business-to-business commerce, nanotechnology, 3D printing, cannabis, blockchain technology, and the metaverse. For more than 30 years, investors have consistently overestimated the timeline to mainstream adoption and/or utility for game-changing innovations. In short, investors aren't giving these hyped trends the proper time or channels to mature. Although Nvidia's sales have skyrocketed from $27 billion to more than $130 billion between fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2025 (its fiscal year ends in late January), most businesses are nowhere close to optimizing their AI solutions as of yet, or even generating a positive return on their AI infrastructure investments. This points to the growing likelihood of an AI bubble forming and, at some point, bursting. To be objective, this doesn't mean Nvidia won't be a long-term winner. The proliferation of the internet eventually sent the stock market soaring. While Feinseth's price target may not be achievable in the near-term, it's certainly within the realm of possibilities as businesses learn how to properly utilize AI solutions and generate a profit from their aggressive AI investments. But this historical correlation between next-big-thing trends and bubble-bursting events also suggests Goldberg is likelier to be right in the coming quarters -- albeit not for the reasons put forth in his research note in late April. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Is Up 53% in 2025. Here's How It Could Keep Soaring.
This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Is Up 53% in 2025. Here's How It Could Keep Soaring.

Globe and Mail

time27 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Is Up 53% in 2025. Here's How It Could Keep Soaring.

The first half of 2025 has been a topsy-turvy period for the overall stock market. Rising profits driven by the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution have pushed the market up, while fear of an escalating trade war keeps pulling it back down. When the market opened on June 9, the benchmark S&P 500 index was up by just 2% from where it started the year. As an education platform that lives on our smartphones, Duolingo (NASDAQ: DUOL) doesn't have to pay taxes on imported goods. Knowing this, markets have pushed the stock up by a whopping 53% in 2025. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Savvy investors know that high-flying stocks have a dangerous tendency to come crashing back down. To see why Duolingo stock could keep soaring, let's look at what's been driving it higher. Accelerating profits Duolingo's free-to-use education app grew daily active users by 49% year over year to reach 46.6 million during the first three months of 2025. That is a lot of daily users for a company that employed just 830 people at the end of 2024. Duolingo isn't the first language education application to gain lots of popularity, but it's the first I've seen that consistently grows sales faster than marketing expenses. First-quarter revenue grew 38% year over year to $231 million. Over the same time frame, sales and marketing expenses rose just 34% to a reasonable $26.7 million. In the first quarter, total operating expenses rose just 33% year over year to $140 million. With its top line growing faster than expenses, first-quarter operating income surged 44% year over year to $23.6 million. DUOL Revenue (Quarterly) data by YCharts Duolingo's operating profit margin rose to 10.2% in the first quarter and could expand much further. It isn't unusual to see software subscription businesses with few employees and asset-light business models boast of operating margins above 20%, such as Veeva Systems. Some software businesses, like Adobe, regularly report operating margins above 30%. Now that Duolingo has an enormous base of more than 10 million paying subscribers, it's not unreasonable to expect rapidly expanding profits over the next few years. The AI tools driving growth Duolingo's most expensive subscription tier, called Max, offers some unique AI driven features that could keep its growing subscriber base locked in for the long run. The flagship video call feature allows learners to chat out loud with a bot named Lily. Soon, subscribers to the top tier will be able to review past conversations and receive voice messages from Lily. Video calls could do a lot to expand Duolingo's user base to folks who are not attracted to its gamified learning approach. It's anecdotal, but I would like to practice the foreign language I already speak fluently when I'm not in the target language country. Duolingo's gamified lessons make me nauseous, but I'd still consider a Max subscription if my target language, Thai, were available. In addition to video calls with Lily, Duolingo Max subscribers also have access to the company's Explain My Answer feature, which provides personalized feedback to answers they provide during lessons, whether the answers were right or wrong. Max subscribers also get to roleplay real-world conversations, such as ordering coffee in Paris. Why it's not too late At a glance, Duolingo shares appear wildly overvalued at a recent price of 249 times trailing 12-month earnings. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest the stock is still at a reasonable valuation once you consider the potential pace of earnings growth over the next few years. DUOL PEG Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts Duolingo stock appears undervalued if we look at its forward price-to-earnings-growth or PEG ratio. This metric divides the trailing PE ratio by the rate of earnings-per-share growth expected by Wall Street in the year ahead. With a recent forward PEG ratio of 0.38, this stock's seemingly high valuation is more than justified by projected earnings growth. Before plowing more of your available cash into Duolingo stock, it's important to remember that expectations are sky high. If management puts out a quarterly earnings report that mildly suggests earnings growth could decelerate, investors who buy at recent prices could suffer swift and heavy losses. If you can't handle this high degree of risk, it's best to wait for a more attractive entry point. Should you invest $1,000 in Duolingo right now? Before you buy stock in Duolingo, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Duolingo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store