Grandmothers arrested at Palestine protest ‘robustly deny any criminal offence'
Sue Pentel and Martine McCullough were arrested earlier this year by police investigating an incident of criminal damage at a Barclays Bank in the city.
Ms Pentel, 72, was detained by officers along with Martine McCullough, aged in her 50s, on May 24 while protesting outside the bank in Castle Place over an incident at a previous protest at the bank on April 26.
The two attended Musgrave Street police station in Belfast city centre on Wednesday morning for the pre-arranged interview under caution.
Fellow campaigners staged a protest in solidarity with the women outside the station, with applause and calls of 'we're with you' as they arrived.
Solicitor Padraig O Muirigh, who represents the two women, said they 'robustly deny that they have committed any criminal offence'.
'Our clients have been involved in peaceful protests against the ongoing genocide in Gaza which has been ongoing now for 628 days,' he said.
'Today's interviews under caution follow their arrests on the 24th May 2025.
'My clients robustly deny that they have committed any criminal offence and maintain that they should not be subjected to criminal investigations for exercising their right to peaceful protest against the atrocities being committed in Gaza.'
He added: 'Our clients will robustly contest their innocence and defend their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights to freedom of assembly and expression if a decision is made to prosecute them.'
Jewish grandmother Ms Pentel is a high-profile campaigner against Israel's military offensive on Gaza.
Videos circulated online of the arrest of Ms Pentel indicate the alleged offence related to the placing of stickers on the bank's ATM machine.
Barclays has been a target for pro-Palestine protesters who claim the bank is linked to companies supplying weapons to Israel.
Barclays has previously addressed the criticism, saying it provides financial services to nine defence companies supplying Israel but does not directly invest in such firms.
The bank has said it has become the target of a disinformation campaign over its ties to defence companies.
Speaking earlier on Wednesday, Ms Pentel said they are 'proud to peacefully protest outside Barclays'.
'We've been doing it for the last eight months,' she said.
'To protest the genocide, to protest the violence, to protest the way that Israel feels its OK to starve children, to stop humanitarian aid while the world looks on.
'Well, we won't look on, we won't remain silent.'
She added: 'We understand that we've been asked to be interviewed under caution, and we're voluntarily going in about an incident on April 26 and all we can say is we're proud to demonstrate with our amazing colleagues every week outside Barclays.
'We have the right to peacefully protest, we want to thank our solicitor Padraig O Muirigh for his time and advice.
'We have the right to peacefully protest and we will continue to do it until the genocide stops.
'We're two grandmothers, when our grandchildren ask us what we did, we know what we'll say, we stood up, we spoke out, we weren't silent, and as a Jewish person I am absolutely ashamed of anybody either Israeli Jewish or London Jewish or wherever who doesn't stand up and who thinks this is OK.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Global outrage mounts as funeral held for five journalists killed by Israel
The death of the prominent Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif, killed along with four colleagues in an Israeli airstrike on Sunday, prompted condemnation from around the world, as hundreds of mourners carried their bodies through the streets of Gaza City. Sharif, one of Al Jazeera's most recognisable faces in Gaza, was killed while inside a tent for journalists outside al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City on Sunday night. Seven people were killed in the attack, including the Al Jazeera correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and the camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa, according to the Qatar-based broadcaster. On Monday, the Guardian visited the site where the journalists were killed. Wadi Abu al-Saud, a Palestinian journalist who was near the tent when the Israeli strike occurred on Sunday, said the attack happened at 11.22pm, just after he had finished filming his latest news bulletin. 'I entered the tent opposite theirs, raised my phone to make a call, and then the explosion occurred, Saud said. 'A piece of shrapnel hit my phone. I looked back and saw people burning in flames. I tried to extinguish them. Anas and the others had died instantly from the strike.' In two videos of the aftermath of the strike, Saud can be seen carrying the bodies of those killed. 'From now on, I will not continue the coverage,' he said. 'I will return to my life as a citizen. The truth has died and the coverage has ended.' The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) admitted carrying out the attack, claiming Sharif was the leader of a Hamas cell responsible for rocket attacks against Israel – an allegation that Al Jazeera and Sharif had previously dismissed as baseless. It was the first time during the war that Israel's military has swiftly claimed responsibility after a journalist was killed in a strike. Pro-Israel advocates on social media hailed the killing of Sharif and posted photos handed out by the IDF of photos the journalist took with the former Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, taken before Hamas's attack on 7 October. Sara Qudah, the Middle East and north Africa director at the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), said: 'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom.' In July, Sharif told CPJ that he lived with the 'feeling that I could be bombed and martyred at any moment'. Reporters Without Borders condemned the 'acknowledged murder by the Israeli army' of Sharif in Gaza and called on the international community to intervene. Keir Starmer's spokesperson said: 'We are gravely concerned by the repeated targeting of journalists in Gaza. Reporters covering conflicts are afforded protection under international humanitarian law and journalists must be able to report independently without fear, and Israel must ensure journalists can carry out their work safely.' The UN human rights office condemned the targeting of the journalists' tent, saying it was 'in grave breach of international humanitarian law'. Al Jazeera said the attack was 'a desperate attempt to silence voices in anticipation of the occupation of Gaza' and called Sharif 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists'. People gathered at Sheikh Radwan cemetery in the heart of the Gaza Strip to mourn the journalists, whose bodies lay wrapped in white sheets at al-Shifa hospital before their burial. Friends, colleagues and relatives embraced and consoled one another. The area where the attack took place was crowded with media workers on Monday, some speaking to cameras or mobile phones, others taking photos. Islam al-Za'anoun, a news correspondent for Palestine TV and several Arab channels who participated in the funeral, said Sunday's attack was 'a turning point in the world of journalism'. She said: 'Despite all the threats he received and the Israeli media's incitement against him, al-Sharif continued reporting. Now one question haunts me: Who will be next on the list? Will it be me?' Bilal Abu Khalifa, a presenter at Al Jazeera, said he had met Sharif four days ago. 'He told me he was in danger,' Abu Khalifa said. 'I asked him not to go out or appear publicly too often. He gave me a very simple answer: Bilal, I will not leave Gaza except to the sky! I will not leave Gaza even if I am killed. I know I am on the assassination list, but I will continue to expose the crimes of the Israeli army against my people and show the world, and everyone who stands by them, the truth.' In a final message, which Al Jazeera said had been written on 6 April and which was posted to Sharif's X account after his death, the reporter said he had 'lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification.' He continued: 'Allah may bear witness against those who stayed silent, those who accepted our killing, those who choked our breath, and whose hearts were unmoved by the scattered remains of our children and women, doing nothing to stop the massacre that our people have faced for more than a year and a half.' After the Hamas attacks on 7 October 2023, Israel barred international journalists from entering Gaza – one of the rare moments when international reporters have been denied access to an active war zone. Since then, the task of documenting the war has fallen heavily on Palestinian journalists, often at the cost of their lives – themselves caught in its devastation, displaced multiple times, their homes reduced to rubble, friends and relatives killed, and at times queueing for food at perilous distribution points. According to Gaza's government media office, 238 journalists have been killed by Israel since the war started. CPJ said at least 186 journalists had been killed in the Gaza conflict. Israel denies deliberately targeting journalists. In a report released this year, the Watson School of International and Public Affairs' costs of war project said more journalists had been killed in Gaza than in both world wars, the Vietnam war, the wars in Yugoslavia and the US war in Afghanistan combined.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Labour can't let this Thames Water torture run on
There'd be no politics without juicy questions. So, how about this one: would it be better for Sir Keir Starmer & co to plunge Thames Water into the special administration regime (Sar) now? Or postpone that treat until just before the next election? Maybe that sounds hypothetical. But it's still the sort of puzzler that should be bubbling up in ministers' minds, despite the rescue deal being advanced by Thames's senior creditors. Yes, the A-class crew with £13 billion of the £16 billion senior debt are trying to put together a takeover that avoids all need for a Sar. And they say they are making progress over a fix for a business drowning in £17.7 billion of net debts and regulatory gearing of 84.4 per cent, rather more than the 'notional' 60 per cent favoured by Ofwat, the hapless regulator being axed after the Cunliffe review. Yet, even if a deal gets done, it'll only work if it's watertight: brimful of the sorts of pledges Daniel Kretinsky was forced into with his bid for Royal Mail. Ministers can't allow a creditor-friendly fudge that melts just as voters go to the polls. And that risk has only gone up since rival bidder KKR threw in the towel in June. It has left the creditors' bid the only game in town: 'a beauty contest judged by the ugliest contestant', as one observer put it. True, any deal outside of a Sar would require approval from 75 per cent of Thames's A-class creditors. Yet, two things would give you more faith in a non-Sar solution. First, if there was tension in the bid process overseen by the Thames chairman Sir Adrian Montague. And, second, if two of the key players driving the creditors' bid weren't Elliott and Silver Point: two hedge funds that bought in late to Thames's distressed debt and want a quick turn. Neither look ideal owners for a business that its present boss Chris Weston says 'will take at least a decade' to fix. Thames was duffed up last month by MPs on the environment committee, with its chairman, Alistair Carmichael, pointing to a lack of 'transparency' over the bid process and telling Montague: 'It is certainly not clear to me just in whose interests you are all working.' Montague defended himself, saying that KKR's bid was 'by far the strongest'; that it had demanded 'exclusivity', despite Ofwat's reservations over having one bidder; and that, since KKR pulled out, the creditors were 'making reasonable progress with their proposition'. Yet, there's plenty in this process that's odd. Despite granting KKR exclusivity, Thames also agreed to pay for all its due diligence, not typical in bids. Once it had walked out, too, Thames gave that research and a 290-page KKR report to the creditors. What happened next? Well, one of the losing bidders — CKI Infrastructure — is said to have told Montague that with KKR out of the frame it wanted back in for its own offer. It also asked to see KKR's due diligence. Montague's response? To tell CKI to talk to the creditors, with him admitting to MPs that 'we facilitated meetings'. The creditors span 100-plus institutions but a committee of 15 is leading their bid. They include the two hedge funds, plus Apollo, Pimco, Royal Bank of Canada and Assured Guaranty. CKI, which owns UK gas and electricity distribution networks as well as Northumbrian Water, is said to have met the two hedge funds, Apollo and Pimco. Their response to its plan to put in a bid? Well, apparently, to tell CKI to get lost, only in far fruitier language. The creditors deny that they dropped any F-bombs. Or that their key motivation with any bid is keeping the haircut on their debt to the minimum, even if they'd balk at the sort of waterboarding CKI is believed to think necessary of up to 50 per cent. The creditors would also say that CKI refused to share its plan; that it didn't want them co-investing with fresh equity; and that they'd worked jointly on some KKR due diligence anyway. There's a chance, too, that the creditors deliver a viable bid that the government and new regulatory regime approves. But their sighting shot looked a try-on: £3 billion of fresh equity and £2.25 billion of new debt, with a mere £3.2 billion haircut on their loans and all lower-ranking debt zeroed. Plus, being let off £1 billion of fines for past efforts on the pollution front. Whatever Cunliffe's calls for pragmatism to avoid a 'doom loop', there is an obvious riposte to that: why not cut another £1 billion off their debt? The creditors would also say that, with all debt holders given a pro-rata chance to participate in new equity, no hedge fund would hold a stake as big as 10 per cent. And a new board, under chairman Mike McTighe, would ensure orderly sell-downs of equity. The creditors also hope for a deal by the end of next month. The Treasury is keen to avoid a Sar, too, given that it would add to Rachel Reeves's problems. But the regime exists for a reason. Better to take the pain now and impose a buzzcut on the squealing creditors than let them string everyone along, not least Thames's 16 million customers, with a self-serving deal. Cut the debt via a Sar and there are credible long-term owners waiting in the wings, not least CKI. The government does have a choice. It needs to tell the creditors that if there's no workable deal by October, it's pulling the plug. Better a Sar than endless water torture. Orsted becalmed Life had stopped being a breeze for Orsted long before Donald Trump took power. But no question he's made things worse: he's the key reason for a $9.4 billion rights issue that sent its shares down 30 per cent. Halting construction of Equinor's Empire Wind project off New York spooked investors in Orsted's Sunrise Wind scheme, leaving it unable to sell down its stake. Trump has made his dislike of 'big, ugly windmills' clear, claiming: 'They kill the birds, they kill the whales.' There's no evidence for his latter claim. But Sunrise's do seem to be killing off Orsted investors.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
cn844n379y5o (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)
James Cook Scotland editor • @BBCJamesCook BBC Nicola Sturgeon's memoir Frankly is now on sale, slightly earlier than expected after newspaper serialisations and interviews teased some tantalising extracts. True to its title, the book has Scotland's former first minister writing candidly about the highs and lows of her time in office including challenges she says had a serious impact on her mental health. So with the full text now available, what are the key things we have learned? Transgender controversy After more than eight years in power, and eight election victories, Sturgeon saw final months in office marred by rows about trans issues. It was, she writes in her memoir, a time of "rancour and division". Sturgeon now admits to having regrets about the process of trying to legislate to make it easier to legally change gender, saying she has asked herself whether she should have "hit the pause button" to try to reach consensus. "With hindsight, I wish I had," she writes, although she continues to argue in favour of the general principle of gender self-identification. Spindrift Isla Bryson was jailed in 2023 after being convicted of rape Sturgeon also addresses the case of double rapist Adam Graham who was initially sent to a female prison after self-identifying as a woman called Isla Bryson. It was, writes Sturgeon, a development "that gave a human face to fears that until then had been abstract for most people". As first minister she sometimes struggled to articulate her position on the case and to decide which, if any, pronoun to use to describe Bryson. "When confronted with the question 'Is Isla Bryson a woman?' I was like a rabbit caught in the headlights," she writes. "Because I failed to answer 'yes', plain and simple... I seemed weak and evasive. Worst of all, I sounded like I didn't have the courage to stand behind the logical conclusion of the self-identification system we had just legislated for. "In football parlance, I lost the dressing room." Speaking to ITV News on Monday Sturgeon said she now believed a rapist "probably forfeits the right" to identify as a woman. JK Rowling JK Rowling posted a selfie of herself wearing a T-shirt describing Sturgeon as a "destroyer of women's rights" The former first minister also criticises her highest profile opponent on the gender issue, Harry Potter author JK Rowling, for posting a selfie in a T-shirt bearing the slogan "Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights". "It resulted in more abuse, of a much more vile nature, than I had ever encountered before. It made me feel less safe and more at risk of possible physical harm," she writes. Sturgeon adds that "it was deeply ironic that those who subjected me to this level of hatred and misogynistic abuse often claimed to be doing so in the interests of women's safety". Rowling has been approached for comment. Her relationship with Alex Salmond Sturgeon's mentor and predecessor as first minster, Alex Salmond, is mentioned dozens of times in the book, often in unflattering terms which reflect their estrangement after he was accused of sexual offences. Salmond won a judicial review of the Scottish government's handling of complaints against him and in 2020 was cleared of all 13 charges but his reputation was sullied by revelations in court about inappropriate behaviour with female staff. Sturgeon lambasts Salmond's claim that he was the victim of a conspiracy, saying there was no obvious motive for women to have concocted false allegations which would then have required "criminal collusion" with politicians, civil servants, police and prosecutors. "He impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy," she writes, adding: "He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all". The claims have been angrily rejected by Salmond's allies. The former SNP leader died of a heart attack in North Macedonia last year, aged 69. The independence referendum Nicola Sturgeon recalls a "totally uncharacteristic sense of optimism" as Scotland prepared to vote on whether to become an independent nation on 18 September 2014. It was arguably the defining event of her professional life and, in her view, a chance to "create a brighter future for generations to come". The campaign was tough, she says, partly because of what she calls unbalanced coverage by the British media including the BBC and partly because Salmond left her to do much of the heavy lifting. "It felt like we were trying to push a boulder up hill," she writes. PA Media Sturgeon claims Alex Salmond showed little interest in the "detail" of the independence white paper A key period in the lead-up to the poll was her preparation, as deputy first minister, of a white paper setting out the case for independence. At one point, she says, the magnitude of the task left her in "utter despair" and "overcome by a feeling of sheer impossibility". "I ended up on the floor of my home office, crying and struggling to breathe. It was definitely some kind of panic attack," she writes. Sturgeon says Salmond "showed little interest in the detail" of the document and she was "incandescent" when he flew to China shortly before publication without having read it. "He promised he would read it on the plane. I knew his good intention would not survive contact with the first glass of in-flight champagne," she writes. Operation Branchform Sturgeon describes her "utter disbelief" and despair when police raided her home in Glasgow and arrested her husband, Peter Murrell, on 5 April 2023. "With police tents all around it, it looked more like a murder scene than the place of safety it had always been for me. I was devastated, mortified, confused and terrified." In the weeks that followed she says she felt like she "had fallen into the plot of a dystopian novel". Sturgeon calls her own arrest two months later as part of the inquiry into SNP finances known as Operation Branchform "the worst day" of her life. She was exonerated. Murrell, the former SNP chief executive, has been charged with embezzlement. The couple announced they were separating earlier this year. Getty Images Sturgeon described her house as looking like a murder scene Leading Scotland during the pandemic ForSturgeon, the coronavirus pandemic which struck the world five years ago still provokes "a torrent of emotion". Leading Scotland through Covid was "almost indescribably" hard and "took a heavy toll, physically and mentally", writes the former first minister. She says she will be haunted forever by the thought that going into lockdown earlier could have saved more lives and, in January 2024, after she wept while giving evidence to the UK Covid inquiry, she "came perilously close to a breakdown". "For the first time in my life, I sought professional help. It took several counselling sessions before I was able to pull myself back from the brink," she writes. PA Media Nicola Sturgeon appeared visibly upset when giving evidence to the Covid Inquiry Misogyny and sexism Scathing comments about the inappropriate behaviour of men are scattered throughout the book. "Like all women, since the dawn of time, I have faced misogyny and sexism so endemic that I didn't always recognize it as such," Sturgeon writes on the very first page. One grim story, from the first term of the Scottish Parliament which ran from 1999 to 2003, stands out. Sturgeon says a male MSP from a rival party taunted her with the nickname "gnasher" as he spread a false rumour that she had injured a boyfriend during oral sex. "On the day I found out about the story, I cried in one of the toilets in the Parliament office complex," she writes. She said it was only years later, after #MeToo, that she realised this had been "bullying of an overtly sexual nature, designed to humiliate and intimidate, to cut a young woman down to size and put her in her place". Her personal life PA Media Parts of the memoir are deeply personal. Nicola Sturgeon says she may have appeared to be a confident and combative leader but underneath she is a "painfully shy" introvert who has "always struggled to believe in herself." She writes in detail about the "excruciating pain" and heartbreak of suffering a miscarriage after becoming pregnant at the age of 40. "Later, what I would feel most guilty about were the days I had wished I wasn't pregnant," she says. Sturgeon touches on the end of her marriage, saying "I love him" but the strain of the past couple of years" was "impossible to bear." She also writes about her experience of the menopause, explaining that "one of my deepest anxieties was that I would suddenly forget my words midway through an answer" at First Minister's Question Time. "My heart would race whenever I was on my feet in the Chamber which was debilitating and stressful," she says. And she addresses "wild stories" about her having a torrid lesbian affair with a French diplomat by saying the rumours were rooted in homophobia. "The nature of the insult was water off a duck's back," she writes. "Long-term relationships with men have accounted for more than thirty years of my life, but I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary. Moreover, sexual relationships should be private matters." What the future holds PA Media Sturgeon loves books and has often appeared at literary events such as Aye Write in Glasgow Nicola Sturgeon has a few regrets. These include pushing hard for a second independence referendum immediately after the UK voted — against Scotland's wishes — to leave the EUn, and branding the 2024 general election as a "de facto referendum" on independence. But now, she says, she is "excited about the next phase" of her life which she jokingly refers to as her "delayed adolescence". "I might live outside of Scotland for a period," Sturgeon writes. "Suffocating is maybe putting it too strongly, but I feel sometimes I can't breathe freely in Scotland," she tells the BBC's Newscast podcast. "This may shock many people to hear," she continues, "but I love London." She is also considering writing a novel. Nicola Sturgeon concludes her memoir by saying she believes Scotland will be independent within 20 years, insisting she will never stop fighting for that outcome and adding: "That, after all, is what my life has been about."
