Toronto residents 'antsy' after drone flies too close to their windows: 'It's creepy'
In downtown Toronto, it's not uncommon to see drones flying above public spaces. In parks and at special events, their loud buzzing — like a mechanical insect — can often be heard before they're seen.
But what can you do when drones are flying around your home? Or hovering by your bedroom windows?
That's exactly what happened to Janet (not her real name) earlier this year, when over the course of several days, a drone was flying around her apartment building in Toronto.
The first time she spotted it was late at night, when her roommate was home. They went to the balcony to try and film it, even throwing snow to shoo it away. The next night, Janet was home alone, partially undressed, when she heard the buzzing outside her window.
'I jump out of my bed, topless, and I see the face of the drone, level with my eyes,' she tells Yahoo Canada. 'What the f-ck do you do?,' she asks. 'What do you do and who do you tell?'
Janet crouched down and texted the building's group chat, but she didn't contact police.
What do you do and who do you tell?
A few nights later, a drone was spotted again hovering around several windows of the property. The building's group chat soon made a coordinated attempt to confront the drone's alleged owner, who was stationed in a nearby park. Police were called and the suspect, Graham Kelly, was eventually arrested and charged with two counts of voyeurism-related charges. He is due to appear in court in July.
Janet says she now feels 'antsy' being alone in her apartment, and she sometimes still thinks she hears the drone outside her window.
'I haven't been in the apartment alone that much since,' she says. 'Rather than looking at the cityscape, I keep my blackout curtains down.'
Drones can easily bought from outlets like Amazon, Best Buy and Canadian Tire. They range in sophistication and capacity of what they can do. Some are used as toys to be raced. Others can film video, and map, survey and monitor environments.
According to Transport Canada, all drone operators in Canada need to receive a drone pilot certificate to operate a drone over 250 grams. A person operating a drone must carry their licence while doing so, otherwise they can be fined up to $1,000. This is a printed or electronic document issued by Transport Canada. Acquiring a licence involves an online exam for the basic tier, and a flight test for more advanced operations.
The most popular drones for recreational use weigh more than 250 grams and cost anywhere from a few hundred dollars to a few thousand. Drones under 250 grams won't fly for long — 31 minutes or less depending on environmental conditions, according to Philip Ferguson, a space systems engineer and the director of the University of Manitoba's StarLab, a research group that frequently uses drones and researches drone regulations and policy.
Ferguson says when it comes to flying drones, there's an additional federally regulated legal constraint about how close it can get to unsuspecting bystanders.
'You need to be 30 metres away from any non-participating person,' he says. 'You're not allowed to fly a drone over top of the public with a standard drone licence. But people do that all the time.'
You're not allowed to fly a drone over top of the public with a standard drone licence. But people do that all the time.
Ferguson notes that in Manitoba, where wildfires are currently burning out of control, firefighters have had to ground their helicopters as a result of drones being in their airspace. Transport Canada has strict rules around drone no-fly zones, like near airports.
Ferguson says other licence-related activities like hunting and driving are easier to monitor by law enforcement compared to flying a drone.
'There's police there to make sure we're obeying the rules of the road, but there aren't many people walking around a park or apartment complex making sure people are abiding by drone regulations,' he says. 'But it doesn't mean the rules don't exist.'
Drone sightings near residential buildings are becoming more commonplace, especially for city dwellers. In a recent post titled 'Flying drones around apartment windows' on a Toronto subreddit, a user in Etobicoke who had seen a neighbour fly a drone around their apartment window wondered if it was legal.
'Is this something that should be taken up with our landlord or police?' user No-Benefit3802 asked. 'I don't want this guy to be homeless, but it's getting creepy at this point'
'I'm in Mississauga and I live in a condo apartment and there is a drone that is being flown around our building frequently,' lama1122 wrote. 'I shut my blinds because it's creepy!'
Toronto Police say that while they don't receive many calls to their Communications Centre about drones, there are certain circumstances when it may be appropriate to call 9-1-1, particularly if the incident is time-sensitive or may involve criminal activity, such as mischief or voyeurism.
If someone reported a drone hovering outside their window, for example, an officer would likely be dispatched to try to locate both the drone and its operator, begin an investigation, and lay charges if warranted.
"We encourage anyone in this situation to take note of as many details as possible, including the drone's appearance, its movements, and any visible operator, and share that information with responding officers," a Toronto Police Department representative said in an email statement.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH: Protesters at DC parade justify violent tactics 'as long as they don't hurt anyone'
Protesters outside Saturday's military parade in the nation's capital did not explicitly condemn the violent tactics used at anti-Trump protests across the country in recent days, with at least one saying he "fully support[s]" the recent tactics used by protesters in Los Angeles, such as throwing rocks. "I'm following my constitutional rights, I'm out here just simply saying what I want to feel. No one here is being violent. As you can see, there's been no conflict," said a college-aged protester who declined to identify himself but spoke to Fox News Digital. "But you're not worried about being conflated with those who are doing violence?" the activist was asked. "I mean if they want to violate the Constitution, that's on them. I can't worry about that," the protester responded. "I mean, maybe I should [be worried], but I believe in this Constitution, I'm going to live by it, I'm going to support my First Amendment." A separate protester in attendance outside Saturday's parade said he "fully supported" those activists who "want to throw rocks" as long as they don't hurt anyone in the process. "Honestly – they have a right to be angry. They have a right to do what they feel like they need to do to stop this issue, to stop fascism," he said. "And, honestly, I fully support that. I fully support if they're angry and they want to go out and they want to throw rocks. As long as they don't hurt anyone, you know, I can understand, I can honestly do." The anti-Trump protests that coincided with the military parade in D.C. on Saturday saw a few isolated incidents of violence but appeared mostly peaceful. However, the weekend was preceded by violent riots in Los Angeles that spread to other cities like New York and Chicago – reminiscent of the anti-police protests following the death of Minneapolis man George Floyd in the summer of 2020. Protesters in Los Angeles threw rocks at law enforcement and several fires across the city erupted amid the chaos. There were reports of damage to federal buildings, including both immigration and non-immigration-related offices, that included graffiti threatening the lives of federal officials. At least one community care office for veterans, run by the Department of Veterans Affairs, was forced to shut down and cancel hundreds of appointments amid the violence. Many were arrested for clashing with police and the reverberations of the rioting have resulted in other tense clashes between police and activists across the country. While no deaths have been directly attributed to political violence at recent protests across the country, including Los Angeles, fatalities have occurred at some protests around the country. In Utah, an innocent bystander was shot by a man who had been a part of the protest's peacekeeping team, according to reports, while in Los Angeles a man was found dead outside a looted T-Mobile store amid the anti-ICE chaos, according to reports. The peaceful protesters in D.C. suggested they were not in favor of any violence, but they did signal that they understood why protests in recent days across the country have been so intense that they lead to violence against police officers, property and sometimes more. "I mean, I personally won't do that, but I can understand after all of this, like, people are fed up. People are fed up with how the government has been treating people," a protester told Fox News Digital Saturday. "The Republicans, the people in Congress, they do not care about people here, and so I can understand why people are that angry to do something like that, so, yeah, I fully understand." "I think it's wrong to create violence, but, like, he said, I mean I think people have been angry for a long time," a second protester added, noting he thinks Trump is the reason to blame for all the aggressive tactics, like throwing rocks, setting fires and vandalism. "What Trump is doing, he knows the polarization and the anger he's causing, so this is all part of his game plan. The National Guard in L.A., he caused that. He said go out there without Newsom saying anything. I mean, he knows what he's doing, he wants to cause a rise out of people." Another protester present Saturday, who spoke to Fox News Digital, said she believed "being abrasive" is against the interests of those seeking to make change but that "history has proven that sometimes aggression is needed." "All respect to them, I think that they are doing what they think is right, but I think being very abrasive is against our interests, actually. I think it drives away a lot of people, it doesn't really foster the conversations that we need," a protester who identified herself as Sophie said. "I don't think being aggressive is the way to go, but I think history has proven that sometimes aggression is needed, so, but I don't want to be abrasive."


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Driver dies in fiery solo crash in north Stockton
STOCKTON — A driver died after a collision with a traffic pole caused the vehicle to catch fire in Stockton, officials said Monday. Stockton police said it happened shortly after 1:30 p.m. at West Lane and East Swain Road in the northern part of the city. By the time officers arrived, firefighters were already working on putting out the flames, which police said fully engulfed the vehicle. The driver was declared dead at the scene. The individual has not yet been identified. No one else was in the vehicle. Gina Campbell The circumstances of the crash remain under investigation. As a result of the crash, the intersection of West Lane and East Swain Road was expected to be closed for an extended period.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Timeline: Key dates in NJ's legal fight over investigating clergy sex abuse scandal
New Jersey's highest court ruled on June 16 that the Attorney General's Office has the right to launch a grand jury investigation into allegations of child sex abuse in the Catholic Church. Here's a look at the long and circuitous road to the Supreme Court's momentous decision: Aug. 14, 2018 — A landmark Pennsylvania grand jury report on clergy abuse is released, documenting widespread abuse of children over decades and efforts by church officials to cover it up. Look back in NJ news: Catholic priest sex abuse investigation called for by New Jersey lawmaker Sept. 6, 2018 — Inspired by the Pennsylvania effort, New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal announces a task force to investigate clergy abuse accusations in the Garden State. The task force established a hotline, which has received over 550 reports. Feb. 11, 2019 — New Jersey's five Catholic dioceses establish a victim's compensation fund, which offered financial settlements to eligible victims who agreed not to 1, 2019 — After state legislators passed the Child Victims Act, New Jersey suspended its statute of limitations for the filing of civil lawsuits in alleged abuse cases. Hundreds who said they were victimized as children filed against the dioceses, Boy Scouts and other groups. Oct. 1, 2020 — The Camden Diocese files for bankruptcy, citing millions of dollars in liabilities owed to abuse survivors as well as revenue losses due to the COVID pandemic. May 3, 2021 — The Camden Diocese files a motion challenging the state's right to create a special grand jury to investigate clergy abuse claims. Grand jury investigation: NJ Supreme Court says state investigation of Catholic clergy sexual abuse can go forward May 25, 2023 — Mercer County Superior Court Judge Peter Warshaw sides with Camden, blocking the grand jury. Warshaw rules the special grand jury process is limited to inquiries into public officials and agencies. He also agrees to keep the challenge and his decision under seal. Feb. 5, 2025 — After a higher court lifts the order to keep the case secret, The Record and publish a report revealing the diocese's legal 28 — The state Supreme Court hears arguments from both sides, the final showdown in the long legal fight. May 7 — Days after the oral arguments, but before a decision is known, Camden's new bishop, John A. Williams, says the diocese is withdrawing its objection in a sign of good faith to abuse victims. June 16 — The New Jersey Supreme Court rules in the Attorney General's favor, allowing the grand jury investigation to proceed. This article originally appeared on Timeline: NJ clergy abuse investigation upheld by Supreme Court ruling