WA government to spend $4 million on new driver licensing centre to reduce significant wait times
The state government will spend $4 million on a new centre to service growing demand in the Armadale and Byford areas as part of an election commitment, but it is yet to determine the exact location.
Locals must currently travel 30 to 40 minutes to access licensing services at centres in Cannington or Success.
Driving services in WA have come under fire in recent years, following reports of participants having to wait months to sit a driving test.
The Department of Transport was also forced to tighten security around test booking systems, following reports of people bulk booking and reselling test appointments.
Assistant Transport Minister Jessica Stojkovski said progress had been made to address the concerns.
'One of the issues that we were finding were essentially bots were going on and booking up a lot of the driver assessment time slots,' she said.
'There's been a lot work done by the Department of Transport to stop that practice.
'We have actually seen really good availability around the metro area and into the regions for those driver assessments.'
The Department of Transport's Chad Simeons agreed, saying it was possible to find test appointments within a week of booking.
'We've opened the Joondalup Centre which is a driver assessment centre, so that's helped a lot,' he said.
'We've put on new driver assessors as well, and in fact if I was to log on now and try and get a practical driving assessment, I can get one within a week, permitted I want to travel anywhere in the metropolitan area.'
It's in addition to extended trading hours at the Cannington, Mirrabooka and City West centres, which will be open from 7.15am to 5.30pm on weekdays during an eight-week trial.
No additional staff will be employed to accommodate the two-hour extension, but about 40 new positions have been created to assist with the increase in service demand.
The same three centres last year completed a six-day trading trial with more than 12,800 people making use of the weekend hours.
Mr Simeons said measures to relieve pressure on the industry have reduced average customer wait times from 26 minutes to 19 minutes in the past 12 months.
Ms Stojkovski said an increase in interstate migration had contributed to the boom in demand.
'When somebody comes here from interstate they do actually need to transfer over their driver's licence,' she said.
She said the state government would consider implementing extended hours elsewhere in WA as part of the trial evaluation.
A construction or project completion date has yet to be set for the new licensing centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
14 minutes ago
- ABC News
Queensland government strikes new deal with Bravus to defer royalties, expand Carmichael coal mine
The Queensland government has struck a new royalty deferral deal with the owners of the Carmichael coal mine in exchange for an expansion of its operations. The government has promised every deferred dollar will be repaid with interest by mining giant Bravus, formerly known as Adani, but won't reveal details, such as when the money will be paid. Premier David Crisafulli said Bravus would spend $50 million to open the next stage of the Central Queensland mine as part of the arrangement. The mine is expected to expand its production by 30 per cent over the next four years — reaching 16 million tonnes per annum. "That money will be used to expand the workers' village, create a new dam, a rail network hub for maintenance, and additional engineering works," Mr Crisafulli said. "More importantly, it opens the door for half a billion dollars of investment and will enable an expansion to the tune of about a third of this mine. "Today's announcement and the agreement ends years of hostility. More importantly, it will open the door for years of productivity." The former Labor government initially signed a royalty deferral deal with Bravus in 2020, which Treasurer David Janetzki suggested became subject to "proceedings". He said those proceedings would now end, with the LNP government reaching a new arrangement with the mining company. "It is clear Bravus will repay every dollar to the Queensland people with interest. That is locked in," Mr Janetzki said. Mr Janetzki would not say how much interest would be charged or when the deferred royalties would be paid. He claimed this was due to commercial in confidence arrangements agreed to under the Labor government's deal. Bravus chief operating officer Mick Crowe said the new deal would help the company build stability for the mine. "For Bravus, this is a 30 per cent expansion in our capacity," he said. "It's a big investment in the infrastructure that underpins the future. "We'll continue to grow and invest in the 1,200 people who work out here. This creates more certainty for them in the future." Shadow Treasurer Shannon Fentiman described the deferral as a "secret sweetheart deal to provide Adani with a royalty holiday". Greens MP Michael Berkman also accused Mr Crisafulli of giving Bravus a "free pass" to dig up more coal. "What are Queenslanders getting out of this deal, and if it's so great, why can't we see the details," he said. The government has insisted the only difference between the previous deal under Labor and the new deal was the $50 million investment from Bravus.
News.com.au
15 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Nurse loses almost $500k in savings after Australian Fiduciaries placed into liquidation
Experts have sounded the alarm after a Perth mum lost almost half a million dollars in life savings following the collapse of a superannuation fund. Western Australia nurse, Kathryn Shannon, had set up a self-managed super fund with Simple Super and transferred over $460,000 of hard-earned money over more than three decades. But its parent company, Australian Fiduciaries Limited (AFL), suddenly collapsed this year. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission sought asset preservation orders and appointed receivers to AFL through the Federal Court in June. Ms Shannon had made additional voluntary contributions throughout her working life to ensure she could comfortably retire, but she was left blindsided. 'I don't know how this could have happened. I never imagined I would face any difficulty with anything as simple as superannuation is supposed to be,' she said in an online post. 'I feel ripped off and the superannuation system is not safe. I am stressed about the uncertainty of my financial future. 'I now have doubt and fear about what my future will look like. Due to my age, the likelihood of earning enough to retire now is not possible.' Ms Shannon said she was left with many questions. She has flagged her case with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, claiming she had been given inappropriate and incorrect information and advice. Financial adviser and founder of Pivot Wealth, Ben Nash, said while it is appealing to manage your own super fund, it can also be a trap. 'The biggest risk is that people don't fully understand what they're getting into,' he told 'You're not just choosing investments. You're running a regulated fund, with all the legal, tax, and compliance obligations that come with it. 'The risk isn't just poor investment returns. It's picking dud assets (like high-risk property schemes or private investments), failing to meet your compliance obligations, or putting your trust in the wrong hands – like in this case. 'If the trustee or platform fails, you wear the consequences. There's no government guarantee, and compensation is limited.' Fellow financial adviser and director of independent Wealth Advice, Andy Darroch, told it was similar to swimming at a beach. 'If you're in an SMSF, you might not just be swimming outside the flags, but you might be swimming on an unpatrolled beach, and crucially, you might not realise this,' he said. 'It doesn't mean you'll get into trouble, but if you do, you might not have the assistance you would have if you were between the flags on a patrolled beach, which I would say is an industry super fund.' MORE: 'Kiss your pension goodbye': Radical plan to remove Boomers Mr Nash stressed self-managed funds are not for everyone. 'SMSFs are often sold on the dream of control, flexibility, or lower fees – but the reality is more complex and far less forgiving. Unless you have at least $500,000 in super, a well-thought-out investment strategy, and a strong reason to DIY (like holding property or private investments through the fund), an SMSF is usually more admin and risk than it's worth,' the Pivot Wealth founder said. Mr Darroch agreed with his counterpart's remarks. 'You're taking higher risks, personal obligations, costs to your time and money and in exchange for this you get far worse investments than what you can get in a vastly superior, significantly cheaper and enormously less risky industry fund super fund,' he said. 'More risk, more cost, more time and a worse super fund, that's not a deal I'd recommend for anyone, regardless of balance or age.' Ms Shannon's post received dozens of comments which offered little sympathy. 'Unfortunately this is best example of someone wants SMSF without being aware of risks involved. Good faith is nice to have but doesn't help. Risk awareness is important,' one wrote. 'You do understand you made a choice to invest or put your super in them? I think it's terrible what's happened but doubt the government will bail (you) out,' another added. has reached out to Ms Shannon for comment. It is understood some 600 Australian investors have been impacted, with about $160 million put into investment schemes offered by AFL since February 2020. AFL stopped distributing units in the schemes in September 2023. On August 8, Terry van der Velde and Matthew Hudson from SV partners were appointed as liquidators to AFL and more than a dozen other entities. A hearing on the case is set for September 4 in Brisbane.
ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
ACCC to investigate energy plans that promise savings but deliver poor value
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has announced it will investigate whether energy retailers are misleading consumers by advertising energy plans that promise savings yet actually provide poor value. This investigation follows a formal complaint filed by Australian Consumers' Association (CHOICE), which raised concerns that many plans marketed as "savings" deals are far from the cheapest options available. The investigation came after consumer group CHOICE filed its first 'designated complaint' to the ACCC in May. Under a new framework that came into effect in May the previous year, CHOICE is one of three bodies that can file a 'super complaint' directly with the ACCC about issues affecting consumers. Each body can file only one complaint per year. Once it is submitted, the ACCC is required to assess and publicly respond within 90 days. CHOICE decided to use its one complaint to flag concerns that energy retailers use words like 'saver' or 'savings' to promote energy plans that are far from the cheapest available. "At a time when Australians are increasingly worried about being able to afford to keep the lights on, this has had a big financial impact," Andy Kollmorgen, Investigations Editor at CHOICE, said in a statement. CHOICE's complaint points to a major issue with how energy retailers advertise "savings" plans. "In some instances, they were even more expensive than the retailer's standing offer," says Rosie Thomas, CHOICE director of campaigns and communications. "Many consumers rely on these representations as indicators of value to inform their decision-making, but we found that many of these names and descriptions may not reflect genuine value." According to the latest national CHOICE survey, 84 per cent of households are concerned about rising electricity prices. But with so many plans marketed with promises of savings, it's hard for consumers to tell if they're actually getting a better deal. "We are concerned that consumers may be misled or deceived by plan names or descriptions of plans that offer 'savings' that are not genuine, or that consumers may be discouraged from switching to cheaper plans that are available to them," ACCC deputy chair Catriona Lowe said. "It is essential that energy retailers provide clear and accurate information about their energy plans so that consumers can make informed decisions when choosing an energy provider and plan." The confusion doesn't stop at the "savings" labels. Many energy retailers use identical names for plans that come with different rates, leading to further confusion for consumers. This issue is especially prevalent with the "better offer" and "best offer" messages on energy bills, which are meant to alert customers to cheaper plans available within the same provider. Unfortunately, these plans aren't always cheaper. A recent decision from the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) requires retailers to provide extra information under "better offer" messages when reusing plan names. "Consumers are often encouraged to shop around in order to save on their energy bills, but that's impossible to do if the information they receive from retailers is inaccurate, incomplete or designed to overwhelm," says Ms Thomas. The ACCC said that after careful consideration, the issues raised by CHOICE relating to the use of identical plan names in "better offer" and "best offer" messaging, are "most effectively addressed through the review and law reform processes currently underway by the AER and the ESC" and not an ACCC investigation. If the ACCC finds that energy retailers are breaching Australian Consumer Law following its investigation, it may take enforcement action where appropriate. It may also "prepare industry guidance or contribute to policy or law reform initiatives".
