NGO, ADR move Supreme Court challenging revision of electoral rolls in Bihar
It added that the documentation process requirements of the directive, lack of due process, as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said SIR of Electoral Roll in Bihar, further make this exercise bound to result in the removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls, leading to their disenfranchisement.
Seeking to quash the direction of ECI's SIR order of 24, June 2025, the ADR said, the ECI, by doing so, has shifted the onus of being on the voters' list from the State to citizens.
It has excluded identification documents such as Aadhar or ration cards which further make marginalised communities and the poor more vulnerable to exclusion from voting.
"The Declaration as required under the SIR process is violative of Article 326 in so far as it requires a voter to provide documents to prove his/her citizenship and also citizenships of his/her mother or father, failing which his/her name would not be added to the draft electoral roll and can be deleted from the same," the ADR said.
Terming the ECI's order as unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar, the petitioner, ADR said that with close proximity to state elections which are due in November 2025, there are lakhs of citizens (whose names did not appear in 2003 ER) who do not possess the documents as required under the SIR order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Govt slams Opposition for spreading lies over Maharashtra election data
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) slammed the Opposition for disrupting Rajya Sabha proceedings, saying it was spreading lies on the Maharashtra election data, a day after research organisation CSDS issued a public apology acknowledging errors in its poll data. Follow the Parliament Monsoon session Day 20 LIVE: August 20, 2025 As the Rajya Sabha reassembled post-lunch to discuss the Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill 2025, Opposition MPs staged protests demanding a discussion on alleged "vote chori" (vote theft) in the recent Maharashtra Assembly elections. Despite Vice-Chairperson Bhubaneswar Kalita's repeated appeals to maintain decorum, Opposition members continued raising slogans of "vote chori bandh karo" (stop vote theft). Also Read | Parliament passes bill to set up IIM in Guwahati Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said, "We are raising this issue every day. We want to share about 'vote chori'... This is an important issue... We have to save democracy and the Constitution." Mr. Pradhan made his opening remarks on the bill amid the sloganeering. When the Chair did not accede to their demand, Opposition members staged a walkout from the Upper House. The Union Minister continued his speech and said, "Opposition is doing harmful work as they are not letting Parliament function. Parliament functions with help of poor taxpayers' money." He accused the Opposition of wanting to discuss "one fact posted by one person in the CSDS related to the Maharashtra election with malafide intention". "There is one person who has deliberately spread confusion in the country and the Opposition, especially Congress, is further circulating it," the Education Minister said. Aiming CSDS, which receives funding from the government's Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), Mr. Pradhan said, "Taking funds from the Government of India, it is not proper to challenge democracy." The Minister noted that ICSSR has taken cognisance of the issue and will take appropriate action. "The head of that institution (CSDS) has issued a public apology saying the facts were wrong," Mr. Pradhan added. The Education Minister accused the Opposition of creating a negative atmosphere and preventing meaningful legislative discussions. "Can Congress tell whether it supports IIM Guwahati or not?" he questioned, adding that the Opposition's stance has "hurt Assamese people".
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Death Knell For Democracy': Opposition On Bill Allowing Removal Of PMs, CMs Over Allegations
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi and Congress MP Manish Tewari mounted sharp attacks on the Constitution Amendment Bill introduced in Parliament. Owaisi charged that the legislation would transform India into a 'police state,' warning it undermines democratic principles by giving sweeping powers to executive agencies. He cautioned that such provisions would erode the right of people to elect their leaders and place ministers at the mercy of agencies. Echoing similar concerns, Congress leader Manish Tewari said the Bills were 'squarely destructive' of the Constitution's basic structure. He warned they opened the door to arbitrary misuse of power and violated fundamental safeguards. Read More
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Nation also remembers …': Amit Shah hits back at oppn uproar on new bills, cites Indira-era 'PM privilege' amendment
NEW DELHI: Union home minister Amit Shah on Wednesday accused the opposition of resisting the proposed bills on removing tainted ministers, in order to "remain outside the reach of law". In a social media post on X, Shah hailed Prime Minister Narendra Modi for introducing a constitutional amendment which provide for the removal of a prime minister, Union minister, chief minister or state/UT minister if they are arrested or kept in custody on serious criminal charges for 30 consecutive days. "On one hand, Prime Minister Shri Narendra ji has introduced a constitutional amendment to bring himself within the ambit of the law, while on the other hand, the entire opposition, led by Congress, has opposed it to remain outside the law's reach, run governments from jail, and cling to power," the home minister said. Shah also recalled when the Indira government introduced a constitutional amendment to grant prime ministers such a privilege that no legal action could be taken against them. "The nation also remembers the time when, in this very esteemed House, the then Prime Minister Smt. Indira Gandhi ji, through Constitutional Amendment No. 39, granted the Prime Minister such a privilege that no legal action could be taken against them," he added. "Seeing the Modi government's commitment against political corruption in the country and the public's outrage, today I introduced a Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament with the consent of the Lok Sabha Speaker, which ensures that important constitutional posts, such as Prime Minister, Chief Minister, and ministers of the central and state governments, cannot run the government while in jail," he added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Shah said that the objective of the three bills is to "raise the declining level of morality in public life" and bring integrity to politics. "No person, while arrested and in jail, can govern as Prime Minister, Chief Minister, or a minister of the central or state government," Shah said. "When the Constitution was framed, our Constitution makers could not have imagined that in the future, there would be political figures who would not resign on moral grounds before being arrested. In recent years, an astonishing situation has arisen in the country where Chief Ministers or ministers have continued to run the government immorally from jail without resigning," he said. "This bill also includes a provision that allows an accused politician to seek bail from the court within 30 days of arrest. If they fail to obtain bail within 30 days, on the 31st day, either the Prime Minister at the central level or the Chief Ministers in the states will remove them from their posts, or they will automatically become legally ineligible to perform their duties. If such a leader is granted bail after the legal process, they may resume their position," he further said. Earlier in the day, Amit Shah tabled the One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment Bill, 2025, the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha. The bills were referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament consisting of 21 members of the Lok Sabha, to be nominated by the Speaker, and 10 members of the Rajya Sabha, to be nominated by the Deputy Chairman. Several opposition MPs opposed the bills amid loud sloganeering, prompting Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to adjourn the House till 3 pm. Opposing the bills, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi said, "I stand to oppose the introduction of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025, the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, and the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025. This violates the principle of separation of powers and undermines the right of the people to elect a government. It gives executive agencies a free hand to act as judge and executioner based on flimsy allegations and suspicions. "
