logo
Fifteen pages of public records reform. McKee's administration doesn't like any of it.

Fifteen pages of public records reform. McKee's administration doesn't like any of it.

Yahoo27-05-2025
The perennial push to reform Rhode Island's public records law faces opposition from Gov. Dan McKee's administration. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)
Lawsuits, federal funding cuts, organizational chaos and a workload that could 'grind government to a halt' are among the dire predictions given by state agencies, including the governor's office, in response to proposed reform to Rhode Island's public records law.
Advocates expected the administration to come out in force against the Access to Public Records Act reform bill this year, which is nearly identical to the iteration that died in committee in 2024. They were not wrong.
A dozen state agencies, including Gov. Dan McKee's office, flooded the Senate Committee on Judiciary with letters of opposition ahead of a May 22 hearing on legislation by Sen. Lou DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat.
McKee isn't budging on changes to public records law. Neither are reform advocates.
To Steven Brown, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union and part of the ACCESS/RI coalition championing records reform, the administration's protest exposes not-so-pure intentions.
'I don't think we can give them any longer the benefit of the doubt that these objections are in good faith,' Brown said in an interview Tuesday. 'So many of them are bogus. It's a misreading of the bill that's incredibly disingenuous.'
The legislation at its core aims to clarify and update the 1978 law, which was last revised in 2012. The 15-page omnibus bill encompasses 48 changes, from minor language tweaks to major updates meant to protect and expand access to affordable public information. The legislation also integrates new data sources like traffic accidents, police body-worn camera footage and text messages between officials, into what's subject to public scrutiny.
Among the chief concerns by McKee's administration is a proposed requirement that public bodies 'shall' waive fees to retrieve and hand over public records when a requester can prove the records are in the public interest. The existing law says the records 'may' be provided for free if they benefit the public.
State agencies defended fees as a way to recoup a portion of the substantial time and effort it takes state workers to find and collect data. The prospect of waiving fees, while simultaneously requiring state officials to document the specific legal explanation for redacted portions of documents in a 'privilege log,' threatens to 'grind government to a halt,' Jonathan Womer, Rhode Island Department of Administration director, wrote in a May 22 letter to lawmakers.
Claire Richards, executive counsel for McKee's office, also took issue with this provision.
'Since every request made by a member of the public could be considered 'in the public interest' the provision could result in a fee waiver for every request,' Richards wrote in her May 22 letter. 'The ability to impose fees for the search, retrieval and redaction of documents searches is an important function in the APRA process.'
Brown countered that the bill, as well as federal law under the Freedom of Information Act, offers a specific definition for what meets the public interest standard. He also debunked state agencies claims that expanding public records could violate attorney-client privilege, and expose confidential personal information for residents served through state health and human service programs. Similar privacy concerns accompanied proposed reforms meant to hold law enforcement accountable, specifying that internal investigations be subject to public disclosure, though identifying information can be redacted.
Public safety officials remained vehemently opposed.
'Often, these are minor infractions for violations of policy,' Sid Wordell, executive director of the Rhode Island Police Chiefs' Association, told lawmakers during the May 22 hearing. 'If we make every single one of those available, that's going to be the next big thing on social media.'
Wordell continued, 'discipline is meant to correct the behavior of the individuals we still feel are an asset to the agency.'
But opponents have not offered an alternative way to incorporate internal police investigations into the state's public records law.
'All we heard when we met with them last year was 'no no no,'' said DiPalma, sponsor of the Senate bill. The House companion is led by Rep. Patricia Serpa, a West Warwick Democrat.
Only two of the 16 groups representing state agencies, educational institutions, and cities and towns pitched solutions to their concerns.
Jennifer Harrington, general counsel and legislative liaison for the Narragansett Bay Commission, the quasi-public agency that oversees wastewater collection and treatment for 350,000 state residents, suggested striking two pieces of contention related to posting meeting documents online ahead of time and requiring a requestor agree to extending a records fulfilment beyond the standard 20-days.
Randy Rossi, executive director of the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns, offered amendments for each of the 10 sections of concern to local municipal officials in his May 22 letter.
While John Marion, executive director for Common Cause Rhode Island, acknowledged concessions might need to be made for some type of reform to advance, he was not willing to concede all of the provisions under scrutiny.
'We're not going to disembowel the bill,' Marion said in an interview Tuesday. 'We're not going to water the bill down so much that it's meaningless just to find compromise.'
Womer's letter identifies opposition to 15 individual clauses of concern, while Richards' six-page letter attacks seven provisions, some of which constitute entire sections of the 15-page piece of legislation.
DiPalma said he was disappointed by the continued opposition from McKee's office, which he blamed for leading the administration-wide criticism.
'I have no facts and data to support this, but it seems like it was completely orchestrated by the governor's office,' DiPalma said in an interview Tuesday.
Brown shared DiPalma's suspicions.
'I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption,' he said.
Laura Hart, a spokesperson for McKee's office, acknowledged requests for comment but did not immediately provide a response Tuesday.
DiPalma was also disheartened that a new section meant to assuage municipal government concerns about 'vexatious requests' — those submitted by bad actors solely to disrupt government operations — was seemingly dismissed by the governor's office, acknowledged only in a footnote of Richards' letter.
The newly added section of the bill, the only change made to this year's version compared with last year, lays out a court process for chief executives of public bodies to challenge and, potentially not fulfill or be reimbursed for the cost of fulfilling, disruptive requests as determined by a Superior Court judge.
But Richards wrote that forcing public bodies to initiate legal action to get out of fulfilling vexatious requests was an 'unworkable solution' requiring more time and resources than available.
'I was a little taken aback by that,' DiPalma said. 'It almost seemed like it was dismissive.'
DiPalma's usual optimism and ever-insistent promise of getting his legislative priorities 'over the goal line' was noticeably absent when asked about public records reform.
'We have to be realistic about what's possible and what's probable,' DiPalma said. 'It's a tough hill to climb.'
DiPalma held a kernel of hope that forthcoming meetings with Senate President Valarie Lawson and Senate Majority Leader Frank Ciccone, both of whom are cosponsors on the legislation, might yield progress.
However, a hearing on Serpa's companion bill in the House State Elections and Government Committee has not yet been scheduled and House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi has remained noncommittal.
These groups and state agencies wrote to lawmakers to express concerns with proposed updates to state public records law.
Peter Alviti Jr., Rhode Island Department of Transportation directer
Terrence Gray, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management director
Megan Jackson, legislative liaison for the Rhode Island Office of the Public Defender
Dr. Jerry Larkin, Rhode Island Department of Health director
Richard Leclerc, Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals director
Kimberly Merolla-Brito, Rhode Island Department of Human Services director
Claire Richards, executive counsel for Gov. Dan McKee's office,
Wayne Salisbury Jr., Rhode Island Department of Corrections director
Liz Tanner, Rhode Island Commerce secretary
Thomas Verdi, Rhode Island Department of Revenue director
Col. Darnell Weaver, Rhode Island Department of Public Safety director and Rhode Island State Police superintendent
Jonathan Womer, Rhode Island Department of Administration director
The committee also received written opposition from The Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay Commission, the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns, and the town of Lincoln.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beto O'Rourke slams Trump admin, compares 2025 America to 1933 Germany
Beto O'Rourke slams Trump admin, compares 2025 America to 1933 Germany

New York Post

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Beto O'Rourke slams Trump admin, compares 2025 America to 1933 Germany

Former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke remarked how he 'can only imagine the history books' that will be written about the people of 2025, and likened it to 1933 Germany on Wednesday. The Democrat appeared with Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., on the governor's podcast 'This is Gavin Newsom,' where he commented on Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton investigating his Powered by People PAC for allegedly violating the law by assisting Texas state Democrats' travel out of the state to avoid a quorum during a redistricting standoff. Advertisement O'Rourke lauded the efforts of the Texas Democrats, calling them some of the 'very last lines of defense' of democracy. By contrast, he predicted Republicans, and by extension, the Trump administration, would be remembered similarly to the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany. 'I can only imagine the history books written 100 years from now looking at the people of 2025,' O'Rourke said. 'It's the way, you know, you and I when we were in school, we're looking at the people in Germany in 1933. That guy's named chancellor in January of that year. In 53 days, he has destroyed German democracy.' Democrat Beto O'Rourke speaks alongside elected officials gathered for a rally ahead of a public hearing on the proposed congressional redistricting on Saturday, July 26, 2025 in Houston. Houston Chronicle via Getty Images Advertisement He continued, 'The parliament or the congress, their legislature, passed these enabling laws just like the Republicans are doing in Congress today that said anything you want, you go out and do it. And he goes from being this buffoonish, clownish thug who can barely hold power to the undisputed master and dictator of the German people. And I know this s— doesn't repeat, but it sure as hell rhymes.' O'Rourke has frequently compared President Donald Trump and his administration to Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. In 2019, O'Rourke attacked Trump's family separation policy at the border and accused him of calling all immigrants an 'infestation.' 'Now, I might expect someone to describe another human being as an infestation in the Third Reich. I would not expect it in the United States of America,' O'Rourke said. O'Rourke made his comments on California Governor Gavin Newsom's 'This is Gavin Newsom' podcast. Youtube/This is Gavin Newsom Advertisement He defended his comments days later saying, 'Calling human beings an infestation is something that we might've expected to hear in Nazi Germany… Describing immigrants — who have a track record of committing violent crimes at a lower rate than native-born Americans — as rapists and criminals. Seeking to ban all Muslims — all people of one religion — what other country on the face of the planet does that kind of thing?' In 2021, O'Rourke also warned the US could become Nazi Germany within 10 years despite Trump losing the 2020 election. Fox News Digital broke the news earlier that day that Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, has called for the Justice Department to also investigate O'Rourke's PAC for potentially violating the law by raising funds for Texas Democrats fleeing the state.

Failed New Mexico GOP candidate sentenced to 80 years for organizing drive-by shootings at Democrats' homes
Failed New Mexico GOP candidate sentenced to 80 years for organizing drive-by shootings at Democrats' homes

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Failed New Mexico GOP candidate sentenced to 80 years for organizing drive-by shootings at Democrats' homes

A wannabe Republican representative in New Mexico was sentenced to 80 years in prison for organizing shootings at Democrats' homes after he was easily crushed in an election for a state House seat. Solomon Peña, 42, originally ran for the Albuquerque-based house district in 2022, but was swiftly defeated by incumbent Democrat Miguel Garcia after securing a mere 26% of the vote. 4 Solomon Peña was sentenced to eight decades in prison for organizing targeted shootings at Democratic officials' homes. Solomon Pena/X Still, Peña asserted the election was 'rigged.' 'I didn't lose nada,' he posted on his X account on Jan. 2. The sore loser quickly formed a 'sophisticated scheme' targeting elected officials in the state, US District Court Judge Kea Riggs said during his sentencing. 4 Peña previously attempted to run for a state House seat, but was defeated. AP He was arrested in January 2023 after a tense standoff with a SWAT team and accused of hiring four men to shoot at the homes of Bernalillo County Commissioners Adriann Barboa and Debbie O'Malley and state Sens. Linda Lopez and Moe Maestas, who are all registered Democrats. Peña was found guilty in March for recruiting a man and his son to target the Democratic officials. He was additionally convicted of trying to convince fellow inmates he was in jail with while awaiting trial to kill his codefendants. As the 'ringleader' of the operation, Peña tagged along on the final drive-by to Lopez's, less than a day before he was nabbed by the SWAT team. 4 Peña was arrested in January 2023 after a standoff with SWAT officials. AP The heavily armed men opened fire on the senator's house, sending multiple bullets flying through Lopez's 10-year-old daughter's bedroom window. No injuries were reported, but Lopez testified Wednesday that her children still suffer from mental health issues spurred by the shooting, including anxiety and depression, the Source New Mexico reported. 'The shooting of our home shattered what I was trying to form for my children,' Lopez said. 4 Peña plans to appeal the conviction, his attorneys said. AP Peña's attorneys spoke on his behalf and asserted that he would be appealing the conviction. Riggs, a Trump appointee, said that Peña would have likely continued on his violent rampage if he hadn't been captured by authorities — all because of his 'ego' and inability to 'believe that [he] lost an election.' Peña, an ex-con, previously served seven years in prison for theft. He was also ordered to pay a $250,000 fine. Over the last year, acts of political violence have spiked countrywide. In June, Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were assassinated at her home by deranged madman Vance Boelter, who dressed up as a police officer to trick the couple into opening their door. In April, an unemployed mechanic set Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's home on fire while his family was asleep inside. The arsonist later told police that he despised the governor and would've beaten him with a hammer himself if given the opportunity.

PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge
PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge

Boston Globe

time4 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge

'I've long understood Maine's leadership, nationally and internationally, on the issue of banning PFAS, banning biosolids, centering farms, and supporting farmers,' Comerford told reporters outside the Maine State House in Augusta Tuesday afternoon. 'I leave with a renewed fire in my belly that in Massachusetts, we have to turn off the tap for PFAS,' the Northampton Democrat added. 'We must follow Maine. There is a saying in Massachusetts, 'Where goes Maine, there goes the nation.' And so in Massachusetts, we must ban PFAS.' Advertisement The US Environmental Protection Agency on its website promotes the land application of sewage sludge, outlining environmental benefits such as 'improved soil health, carbon sequestration, and reduced demand on non-renewable resources like phosphorus.' The EPA says it defines biosolids as sewage sludge that's been treated and meets regulatory standards to be used as fertilizer. Still, PFAS are 'nearly universal' within the chemicals that the EPA detects in wastewater sludge, according to the Maine Morning Star. Advertisement When PFAS enter soil that is used to grow crops, the contamination can be passed on to farmers and consumers, according to Comerford's office, which said that small doses of PFAS are linked to cancer, harm to the reproductive and immune systems, and other diseases. The legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa calls for the creation of a statewide plan for reducing and managing sludge. It also authorizes legal and financial protections for farmers and a relief fund to help farmers who have suffered financial losses 'resulting from standard agricultural practices that may have resulted in the actual or suspected presence of PFAS in soil, water or agricultural products,' according to the bills. 'We want to encourage testing, but we have to do it in a way that people aren't going to be afraid to test,' Arena-DeRosa said. 'Right now, we're dealing with that in Massachusetts because we're worried about the cost, so we have to think about mitigation strategies and the funding that it's going to take.' The bills are awaiting a hearing before the Agricultural and Fisheries Committee. Comerford is vice chair of the panel. During their day trip on Tuesday, the Massachusetts delegation visited a PFAS-impacted farm in Arundel, attended a lunch and 'storytelling session' at the Maine State House, and participated in a roundtable discussion with farmers, advocates, and lawmakers, Comerford's office said. Massachusetts lawmakers on the trip included Reps. Arena-DeRosa, Michelle Ciccolo, Steven Owens, and Senators Comerford and Jamie Eldridge. They were joined by Maine Representatives Bill Pluecker and Lori Gramlich, and Senator Henry Ingwersen. Advertisement Pluecker said he sponsored the landmark legislation in Maine that prohibited applying sludge on farms. 'This toxic contaminant, which knows no bounds regionally, flows downhill. It poisons our water, fish, and drinking water,' he said. 'And what we need to do is stand together as politicians and activists across the states, regionally looking at how we can address this issue and how we can move the issue forward to protect farmers, wherever you may be.' Ingwersen recalled how his work confronting PFAS started in 2016 in his hometown of Arundel, where a dairy farmer discovered his property was contaminated. The farmer had to slaughter cows, pause selling products, and spend thousands of dollars out of pocket to mitigate the issue, he said. 'We know we must keep up the fight here and share what we've learned with anyone looking to do the same,' Ingwersen said. 'So I was really happy to be able to talk to our folks in Massachusetts and hopefully begin relationships we can work together on in their state.' Comerford said she asked Maine lawmakers about the lessons they've learned and about any approaches they would have done differently. 'I do feel like we've benefitted greatly from the wisdom, and the experience, and the knowledge base that Maine has built,' Comerford said. 'We have to think as upstream as we could possibly go, and that is the manufacturers, the chemical companies who make these chemicals and have polluted our rivers and polluted our food systems.' The Massachusetts chapter of the Northeast Organic Farming Association, which supports the legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa, says a relief fund 'will be critical for increasing PFAS testing and protecting farmers' business liability and their health.' Advertisement 'While it's anticipated that some farms will have higher than acceptable levels of PFAS in their soil and/or water, farmers are hesitant to test until they know they'll be protected in case they need to cease production,' NOFA/Mass The legislation is also a priority for environmental advocacy group Clean Water Action. 'Farmers across the nation are learning that the fertilizer they used may have contained high levels of PFAS, and they need our help to identify and remediate PFAS contamination to ensure that our food supply is safe,' Clean Water Action

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store