logo
Fifteen pages of public records reform. McKee's administration doesn't like any of it.

Fifteen pages of public records reform. McKee's administration doesn't like any of it.

Yahoo27-05-2025
The perennial push to reform Rhode Island's public records law faces opposition from Gov. Dan McKee's administration. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)
Lawsuits, federal funding cuts, organizational chaos and a workload that could 'grind government to a halt' are among the dire predictions given by state agencies, including the governor's office, in response to proposed reform to Rhode Island's public records law.
Advocates expected the administration to come out in force against the Access to Public Records Act reform bill this year, which is nearly identical to the iteration that died in committee in 2024. They were not wrong.
A dozen state agencies, including Gov. Dan McKee's office, flooded the Senate Committee on Judiciary with letters of opposition ahead of a May 22 hearing on legislation by Sen. Lou DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat.
McKee isn't budging on changes to public records law. Neither are reform advocates.
To Steven Brown, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union and part of the ACCESS/RI coalition championing records reform, the administration's protest exposes not-so-pure intentions.
'I don't think we can give them any longer the benefit of the doubt that these objections are in good faith,' Brown said in an interview Tuesday. 'So many of them are bogus. It's a misreading of the bill that's incredibly disingenuous.'
The legislation at its core aims to clarify and update the 1978 law, which was last revised in 2012. The 15-page omnibus bill encompasses 48 changes, from minor language tweaks to major updates meant to protect and expand access to affordable public information. The legislation also integrates new data sources like traffic accidents, police body-worn camera footage and text messages between officials, into what's subject to public scrutiny.
Among the chief concerns by McKee's administration is a proposed requirement that public bodies 'shall' waive fees to retrieve and hand over public records when a requester can prove the records are in the public interest. The existing law says the records 'may' be provided for free if they benefit the public.
State agencies defended fees as a way to recoup a portion of the substantial time and effort it takes state workers to find and collect data. The prospect of waiving fees, while simultaneously requiring state officials to document the specific legal explanation for redacted portions of documents in a 'privilege log,' threatens to 'grind government to a halt,' Jonathan Womer, Rhode Island Department of Administration director, wrote in a May 22 letter to lawmakers.
Claire Richards, executive counsel for McKee's office, also took issue with this provision.
'Since every request made by a member of the public could be considered 'in the public interest' the provision could result in a fee waiver for every request,' Richards wrote in her May 22 letter. 'The ability to impose fees for the search, retrieval and redaction of documents searches is an important function in the APRA process.'
Brown countered that the bill, as well as federal law under the Freedom of Information Act, offers a specific definition for what meets the public interest standard. He also debunked state agencies claims that expanding public records could violate attorney-client privilege, and expose confidential personal information for residents served through state health and human service programs. Similar privacy concerns accompanied proposed reforms meant to hold law enforcement accountable, specifying that internal investigations be subject to public disclosure, though identifying information can be redacted.
Public safety officials remained vehemently opposed.
'Often, these are minor infractions for violations of policy,' Sid Wordell, executive director of the Rhode Island Police Chiefs' Association, told lawmakers during the May 22 hearing. 'If we make every single one of those available, that's going to be the next big thing on social media.'
Wordell continued, 'discipline is meant to correct the behavior of the individuals we still feel are an asset to the agency.'
But opponents have not offered an alternative way to incorporate internal police investigations into the state's public records law.
'All we heard when we met with them last year was 'no no no,'' said DiPalma, sponsor of the Senate bill. The House companion is led by Rep. Patricia Serpa, a West Warwick Democrat.
Only two of the 16 groups representing state agencies, educational institutions, and cities and towns pitched solutions to their concerns.
Jennifer Harrington, general counsel and legislative liaison for the Narragansett Bay Commission, the quasi-public agency that oversees wastewater collection and treatment for 350,000 state residents, suggested striking two pieces of contention related to posting meeting documents online ahead of time and requiring a requestor agree to extending a records fulfilment beyond the standard 20-days.
Randy Rossi, executive director of the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns, offered amendments for each of the 10 sections of concern to local municipal officials in his May 22 letter.
While John Marion, executive director for Common Cause Rhode Island, acknowledged concessions might need to be made for some type of reform to advance, he was not willing to concede all of the provisions under scrutiny.
'We're not going to disembowel the bill,' Marion said in an interview Tuesday. 'We're not going to water the bill down so much that it's meaningless just to find compromise.'
Womer's letter identifies opposition to 15 individual clauses of concern, while Richards' six-page letter attacks seven provisions, some of which constitute entire sections of the 15-page piece of legislation.
DiPalma said he was disappointed by the continued opposition from McKee's office, which he blamed for leading the administration-wide criticism.
'I have no facts and data to support this, but it seems like it was completely orchestrated by the governor's office,' DiPalma said in an interview Tuesday.
Brown shared DiPalma's suspicions.
'I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption,' he said.
Laura Hart, a spokesperson for McKee's office, acknowledged requests for comment but did not immediately provide a response Tuesday.
DiPalma was also disheartened that a new section meant to assuage municipal government concerns about 'vexatious requests' — those submitted by bad actors solely to disrupt government operations — was seemingly dismissed by the governor's office, acknowledged only in a footnote of Richards' letter.
The newly added section of the bill, the only change made to this year's version compared with last year, lays out a court process for chief executives of public bodies to challenge and, potentially not fulfill or be reimbursed for the cost of fulfilling, disruptive requests as determined by a Superior Court judge.
But Richards wrote that forcing public bodies to initiate legal action to get out of fulfilling vexatious requests was an 'unworkable solution' requiring more time and resources than available.
'I was a little taken aback by that,' DiPalma said. 'It almost seemed like it was dismissive.'
DiPalma's usual optimism and ever-insistent promise of getting his legislative priorities 'over the goal line' was noticeably absent when asked about public records reform.
'We have to be realistic about what's possible and what's probable,' DiPalma said. 'It's a tough hill to climb.'
DiPalma held a kernel of hope that forthcoming meetings with Senate President Valarie Lawson and Senate Majority Leader Frank Ciccone, both of whom are cosponsors on the legislation, might yield progress.
However, a hearing on Serpa's companion bill in the House State Elections and Government Committee has not yet been scheduled and House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi has remained noncommittal.
These groups and state agencies wrote to lawmakers to express concerns with proposed updates to state public records law.
Peter Alviti Jr., Rhode Island Department of Transportation directer
Terrence Gray, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management director
Megan Jackson, legislative liaison for the Rhode Island Office of the Public Defender
Dr. Jerry Larkin, Rhode Island Department of Health director
Richard Leclerc, Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals director
Kimberly Merolla-Brito, Rhode Island Department of Human Services director
Claire Richards, executive counsel for Gov. Dan McKee's office,
Wayne Salisbury Jr., Rhode Island Department of Corrections director
Liz Tanner, Rhode Island Commerce secretary
Thomas Verdi, Rhode Island Department of Revenue director
Col. Darnell Weaver, Rhode Island Department of Public Safety director and Rhode Island State Police superintendent
Jonathan Womer, Rhode Island Department of Administration director
The committee also received written opposition from The Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay Commission, the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns, and the town of Lincoln.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2 Ex-Candidates Arraigned on Absentee Ballot Misuse Charges in Bridgeport, Connecticut
2 Ex-Candidates Arraigned on Absentee Ballot Misuse Charges in Bridgeport, Connecticut

Epoch Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

2 Ex-Candidates Arraigned on Absentee Ballot Misuse Charges in Bridgeport, Connecticut

Former 2023 Independent city council candidate Maria I. Hernandez and former 2021 Democrat city council candidate Elsie Mercado were arrested and charged. Two former Bridgeport, Connecticut, City Council candidates, one from 2021 and the other from 2023, were arraigned on Aug. 12 in connection with the alleged misuse of absentee ballots in the city's 2023 Democratic mayoral primary, according to court documents obtained by The Epoch Times. Chief State's Attorney Patrick J. Griffin announced the criminal charges last week.

Trump's DC move forces Democrats to again grapple with crime
Trump's DC move forces Democrats to again grapple with crime

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump's DC move forces Democrats to again grapple with crime

President Trump's use of federal resources to combat crime in the nation's capital is forcing Democrats to once again address the issue of law and order, something that has been a vulnerability for them in recent elections. Democrats were quick to note that violent crime in Washington, D.C., is down following Trump's announcement on Monday that he would federalize the city's police force and deploy the National Guard. However, Republicans see the message as a winning one as signs suggest voters are concerned about crime regardless, leading some Democrats to warn their party against falling into the same political trap some see as having damaged them in the past. 'My advice to Democrats is don't take the bait,' said Mike Nellis, a Democratic strategist and former senior adviser to former Vice President Harris. Nellis noted that voters could still feel strongly about crime even as statistics show improvement in metropolitan areas like D.C., thereby opening Democrats up to easy attacks from the GOP. 'All of the crime numbers suggest that violent crime is down in every major city. I don't think that people are going to believe that,' he said. 'I'm not saying that the numbers are wrong, it's just that the perception is what it is.' Republicans have been quick to seize on that perception. One GOP operative compared the party's messaging on crime to how it framed inflation under the Biden administration, saying: 'At the end of the day, it's how voters feel.' Polls show Republicans have the upper hand on the crime issue. According to a CNN survey released in June, 40 percent of voters said that the GOP's views on crime are closer to their own, while 27 percent said the same about Democrats. 'It's obviously a winning an argument for Republicans, especially anytime we're talking about crime in Democrat-run cities,' the national Republican operative said. Republicans have touted the president's announcement, pointing to their own experiences in the city. 'In the Navy Yard where I stay when I'm in D.C., a member of Congress was carjacked, staffers have been assaulted and robbed, an Uber eats driver was killed by two 15-year old girls in a botched carjacking and retail stores closed because they were robbed so many times,' Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.) said in a post on X. However, the president's critics and many Democrats have pointed to statistics showing that violent crime is down in the nation's capital. According to data reported by the Metropolitan Police Department, the District of Columbia saw a 15 percent drop in crime and 35 percent drop in violent crime from 2023 to 2024 following a spike in 2023. But there is still a perception among voters across the country that crime remains an issue. According to a Gallup poll conducted in March, 47 percent of respondents said they believe they worry 'a great deal' about crime and violence. That figure is down from 53 percent in March of last year. Another 28 percent of respondents said in March they worry 'a fair amount' about crime and violence, up two points from 26 percent from last year. Nellis, the Democratic strategist, encouraged the party to focus on other issues, like the economy, health care and corruption. Trump's announcement on taking action to fight crime in D.C. comes as the administration is grappling with less-than-desirable economic data. The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) released numbers on Tuesday showing inflation holding firm in July amid the implementation of the president's tariffs. And earlier this month, data from BLS economy added 73,000 jobs in July, well below economists' expectations of around 100,000. Additionally, Trump and his team have been plagued with questions about his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, which has led to rare scrutiny from his own political base. 'Trump's in a pretty tough political position,' one Democratic strategist said. 'When he's backed up against the wall, he wants to change the terrain.' In addition to focusing on hitting Trump on the economy, many Democrats are also encouraging incumbents and candidates to emphasize their own record on combatting crime. 'I don't think it's necessarily super helpful to go up to voters and be like 'here's a graph,'' said one Democratic operative. 'That is just not proven effective.' Democrats point to a number of examples of their members being tough on crime, including Reps. Don Davis (D-N.C.) and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.). In June, Davis pushed back on a move to disband the town of Snow Hill's police department, while Vasquez introduced legislation last month that would target organized crime in border communities. But Republicans argue Democrats are automatically defined by progressives members of their party who have called for defunding the police, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Democratic New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. 'Trusting a Democrat to handle crime is like asking the fox to guard the henhouse,' said Mike Marinella, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee. 'Voters know they're less safe in Democrat-run cities, and no amount of spin can cover up their long record of backing Defund the Police, Abolish ICE, and every other pro-criminal policy in the book.' The House Democratic campaign arm released their own statement, calling Republicans hypocritical on the issue. 'Firstly, the party that celebrates pardons for those who attacked Capitol Police on January 6 should never, ever be lecturing anyone about law and order,' said Viet Shelton, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. 'Secondly, no amount of desperate misdirection will hide the reality that the American people are swiftly souring on House Republicans' failed agenda of broken promises and rising prices, and will reject them in the midterms,' he continued. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) has struck a diplomatic tone with the administration, saying she will work with federal officials. 'I'm going to work every day to make sure it's not a complete disaster. Let me put it that way,' Bowser told reporters following her meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday. Some Democrats expressed concern about the precedent Trump's actions in the capital city could have on other metropolitan centers across the country. 'It's a dangerous stunt, but it's still a stunt,' Nellis said.

Black mayors and leaders decry Trump's threats to deploy National Guard in cities
Black mayors and leaders decry Trump's threats to deploy National Guard in cities

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Black mayors and leaders decry Trump's threats to deploy National Guard in cities

Black civil rights leaders and the mayors of several cities on Tuesday denounced the deployment of the National Guard to the nation's capital to combat crime, calling it 'fundamentally grandstanding' and 'a federal coup.' And by suggesting that other cities, also run by Black mayors, may be next, President Donald Trump was 'playing the worst game of racially divisive politics,' one rights leader said. Trump announced Monday that he would deploy 800 guard members to Washington, D.C., suggesting that the same could happen in New York City, Baltimore, Chicago and Oakland, California. 'When you walk down the street, you're going to see police or you're going to see FBI agents,' Trump said about Washington on Monday. 'And we will bring in the military if it's needed.' Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, said the president's actions and words were racially polarizing, considering crime rates in these cities are largely declining. 'This is a distraction at a time when these cities deserve credit because crime and violence are down in most American cities right now, and this is trying to distract from that success, and in effect, create a de facto police state in these cities,' Morial told NBC News. 'He's playing the worst game of racially divisive politics, and that's all it is,' Morial said. The Rev. Al Sharpton, the civil rights leader and head of the National Action Network, said in a statement that 'the people of Washington, D.C. ‒ especially those living on the streets, who need the most care ‒ will suffer, alongside the core principles of our Democracy.' And NAACP president Derrick Johnson questioned the declaration of an emergency in D.C., calling it a 'federal coup.' The White House responded to the criticisms in a statement to NBC News: 'There is nothing divisive about cracking down on crime in our nation's capital to make it safer and more beautiful for all residents and visitors from all around the world,' said White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers. 'Instead of criticizing the President's lawful actions to Make DC Safe Again, Democrat-run cities plagued by violent crime should focus on cleaning up their own streets. This is why Democrats continue to be so unpopular among everyday Americans — they think the President of the United States cracking down on crime in our nation's capital is a bad thing.' Trump federalized the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department over the weekend and called the nation's capital 'one of the most dangerous cities in the world.' It followed the fatal shooting of a congressional intern in July and the carjacking of a former Department of Government Efficiency staffer in D.C. last week, resulting in the arrest of two teenagers. Even with these violent acts, crime in D.C., has been declining for years and is currently at a 30-year low, according to the Justice Department. Nationwide, violent crime has declined, specifically murders, rape, aggravated assault and robbery, according to data released last week by the FBI. Black Americans are four times more likely to experience homelessness in their lifetimes than white Americans, according to a 2023 study published in the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. The D.C. police union, citing staffing shortages and 'mismanagement,' said it supported the federal takeover, but only in a limited, temporary capacity that resulted in a better resourced department. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said Trump's move, which he had hinted at for months, is 'unsettling and unprecedented.' The administration forced the removal of the Black Lives Matter street painting that had been prominent in the city since 2020 by threatening to hold back millions in funding if it remained. On Monday, Bowser said that the city's police chief maintains authority over the police force. But Trump said that he had appointed the administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency, Terry Cole, as the head of the Metropolitan Police Department. Morial said that while many National Guards are his friends, 'this is not an assignment they were trained for. This is not an assignment they signed up for. They're being used as political pawns. 'What the White House should be doing is restoring the SNAP cuts and restoring the Medicaid cuts, which are going to do damage to Washington, D.C., and other urban communities,' Morial said. Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott was not happy Trump mentioned his city as a potential place where the National Guard would be deployed. 'This is the latest effort by the president to distract from the issues he should be focused on — including the roller coaster of the U.S. economy thanks to his policies,' Scott said in a statement Monday. 'When it comes to public safety in Baltimore, he should turn off the right-wing propaganda and look at the facts.' Homicides are down 28% in Baltimore this year alone, reaching the lowest level of any year on record, with overall crime rates lower than it's been in more than 50 years. 'We still have real work to do to build on this progress—but that work starts and ends here in Baltimore with the local, state, and federal partners who have gotten us this far.' And as Scott pointed out, 'it's not just Baltimore.' In Chicago, violent crime also is down by more than 30% and shootings almost 40%. Mayor Brandon Johnson said the dramatic reductions occurred even as Trump cut ' $158 million in funding for violence prevention programs in cities like Chicago,' as well as Los Angeles, New York, D.C. and Baltimore. Those cuts, he said, are on top of the Trump administration dismantling the Office of Gun Violence Prevention and terminating hundreds of grants for anti-violence programs across the country. 'If President Trump wants to help make Chicago safer, he can start by releasing the funds for anti-violence programs that have been critical to our work to drive down crime and violence,' Johnson said. 'Sending in the National Guard would only serve to destabilize our city and undermine our public safety efforts.' The mayor of Savannah, Georgia, Van R. Johnson II, president of the African American Mayors Association, said that while he respects the federal government's responsibility over ensuring national security, deploying the National Guard in D.C. 'may not be the most productive approach, especially when local leaders and law enforcement are already making significant strides in reducing crime and improving community trust.' Johnson implored the Trump administration to work with mayors and to 'support solutions that strengthen law enforcement partnerships and community engagement.' Republicans backed Trump's move. Rep. James Comer, of Kentucky, chair of the House oversight committee, said in a statement: 'For years, the D.C. Council's radical soft-on-crime agenda has emboldened criminals and put public safety at risk in our nation's capital.' Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, of New York, the House Democratic leader, vehemently disagreed, saying the action will be a negative force against 'the city's youth and homeless population.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store