ANC launches investigation into mayor's costly security measures in KwaDukuza
The KwaDukuza Municipality is under ANC scrutiny after new allegations of power abuse.
Image: facebook
The ANC in KwaZulu-Natal has launched an investigation into how the party-led KwaDukuza Local Municipality decided to secure the protection of the mayor's house at a cost of R173 000 a month without a police threat assessment report.
The party was reacting to the leaked March invoice where the Durban-based security company was billing the municipality for monthly costs of eight guards that are protecting the mayor's house 24 hours a day.
The ANC's investigation came at the back of the council's denial of any knowledge of police security threat analysis which could have led the council to approve the protection of the mayor's house.
In a written response, the ANC provincial spokesperson, Fanle Sibisi, said that this and other allegations circulating on social and other media platforms are quite troubling for the ANC as they directly conflict with the party's renewal and rebuilding programme. He added that these allegations undermine both the guidelines and the spirit with which the local government is expected to conduct its affairs.
'The African National Congress (ANC) in KwaZulu-Natal has noted with deep concern the various allegations of misconduct and improper behaviour levelled against the KwaDukuza Local Municipality and some of its leaders. The ANC has launched an urgent investigation to uncover the root of these allegations,' said the party.
It further said that the investigation is expected to be completed within the next seven working days and thereafter, the party will take decisive action in response.
Sibisi reiterated that the centrepiece of the provincial task team's renewal programme is service to the people of the province, adding that, to this end, the PTT will soon unveil a Renewal Charter, which represents a public commitment by all supporters, members, and leaders of the ANC to adhere to and uphold the highest standards of discipline in serving the people.
Any action, whether by a structure or a leader of the ANC, that undermines this principle of the renewal agenda will be addressed decisively, in accordance with the Constitution of the ANC and its Code of Conduct, the party said.
ActionSA finance committee member in KwaDukuza Halalalisani Ndlovu said no report was submitted to either the finance committee or council which indicated that the mayor's life was in danger.
Ndlovu said his party was calling for an investigation on how the municipality decided to spend the taxpayers money on mayor's extra security without the council approval, adding that even the council would have not approved it without a police threat assessment report. Ndlovu said that despite that the invoice shows eight guards, they were in fact 10 which means in total the mayor has 14 guards that are paid by the taxpayers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Higher education minister keeps up stonewalling on 'SETA panel'
Higher education and training minister Nobuhle Nkabane continues to dig in her heels over the submission to parliament of the names of the 'independent selection panel' she relied on to make controversial appointments to SETA boards last month. Nkabane had until the close of business on Wednesday to submit records and minutes of the meeting of the 'independent panel' that she says advised on the appointments of the chairpersons of Sector Education and Training Authorities that she was last month ordered to reverse by the presidency. But at the eleventh-hour on Wednesday, it emerged that Nkabane wrote a letter dated June 10 to Tebego Letsie, an ANC MP who chairs the portfolio committee on higher education, asking that the June 10 deadline be extended by a further 20 days, to June 20. The higher education committee had given her the deadline of June 11 last week after she refused to disclose the names and full details of her 'independent panel' at a heated meeting, with Nkabane citing the Protection of Personal Information Act. Nkabane landed in hot water several weeks ago after it emerged that she had appointed controversial and politically connected people to chair the boards of the SETAs. Among them were Buyambo Mantashe, the son of minerals minister Gwede Mantashe who was once deputised by Nkabane in that portfolio. Also on the controversial list were former KZN premier Nomusa Ncube-Dube, former KZN MEC Mike Mabuyakhulu and Johannesburg MMC Loyiso Masuku. The move has pitted Nkabane against President Cyril Ramaphosa, who first ordered her to withdraw the names and most recently also asked her to submit a report to him on the matter. Sources in the higher echelons are adamant that Nkabane's stonewalling on this issue is slowly catching up with her and she will soon run out of options, with some casting doubt on the existence of the 'independent selection panel'. In her letter to Letsie, which has since been shared with all members of the higher education committee, she placed on 'record and confirm my full intention to comply with the portfolio committee's request'. Again citing the POPIA and the Promotion of Access to Information Act, Nkabane said she needed more time to ensure that the information she was preparing to send to parliament would be disclosed in a lawful manner. She told her oversight committee that she had been 'assured that I am legally permitted to disclosed the panellists' details in a lawful manner'. 'For these reasons and in acknowledgment of the panellists' rights to privacy, I have written to each of the members of the selection and evaluation panel and advised them of my intention to comply with the portfolio committee's request. 'However, it remains unlikely that my engagements with them will be completed by the 11 June 2025 deadline. In the circumstances, and to allow the panel members an opportunity to respond to my letter or exercise whatever right they may have, I request an extension of the deadline to 30 June 2025.' The higher education committee was expected to discuss its response to Nkabane's deadline request in the coming days.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
'They are left out because they criticised Ramaphosa'- Analysts on exclusion of key foundations from National Dialogue
Political analysts are of the view that the Thabo Mbeki, Nelson Mandela, and Ahmed Kathrada foundations were 'excluded' from the National Dialogue process announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa, because of their criticism over Ramaphosa's administration. 'I think they are left out because they have been critical of Cyril Ramaphosa's presidency,' said Siyabonga Ntombela, a political analyst from the University of KwaZulu-Natal. 'These foundations have conducted parallel dialogues to discuss the failures of the ANC under Cyril Ramaphosa, the same way they did under (former) President (Jacob) Zuma.' The alleged exclusion comes after concerns about the makeup of the dialogue, with critics also expressing concern over the lack of youth representation. Professor Theo Neethling also expressed concern over the exclusion of not only the Mbeki, Mandela, and Kathrada foundations but also the FW de Klerk Foundation. 'I am disappointed that these foundations appear to have been excluded from helping shape the format of the planned national discussions,' Neethling said. 'Their significance and value as credible NGOs could offer invaluable input and insight.' He also emphasised the importance of involving business leaders and captains of industry, adding that their economic expertise was crucial to the dialogue's success. 'Before we get carried away with enthusiasm, we must ask: Who exactly constitutes the 'national' in this National Dialogue? Where will these dialogues take place? Who will participate, and how will role-players be selected?' he said. 'These critical details remain unclear and must be transparently addressed.' Ramaphosa officially launched the National Dialogue initiative, aimed at reshaping South Africa's future amid rising inequality, unemployment, crime, and systemic corruption. A National Convention will be convened on August 15, bringing together leaders from political, civil, religious, traditional, and business sectors. Ramaphosa said that this is not a one-off event, but the start of a phased, participatory process that will include local consultations, sectoral discussions, and provincial gatherings. The process will culminate in a second national convention in early 2026, where a comprehensive national program of action is expected to be adopted. 'At every turning point in our history, from ending apartheid to building democracy, it has been dialogue that led us forward,' Ramaphosa said. 'This is a call to every South African - young and old, rural and urban, from all communities - to help define our common future.' Ramaphosa announced the formation of an Eminent Persons Group to oversee and guide the process. Among the appointees are Bishop Barnabas Lekganyane of the Zion Christian Church, Grace Bishop Engenas Lekganyane of the St. Engenas Zion Christian Church, former COSATU general secretary Bheki Ntshalintshali, and Springbok captain Siya Kolisi. Those absent from the list were any of Ramaphosa's predecessors or leaders from the foundations. The foundation have consistently slammed Ramaphosa's administration on issues relating to corruption, accountability and governance. Despite the concerns, Ntombela said there was nothing wrong with the composition of the group. 'These are just categories of political, social, and economic organization,' he said. 'Among them, it's possible to have youth leagues and young people's formations. I do not think the criticism is fair.' Even though some have expressed concern and doubt about the effectiveness of the dialogue, Ntombela was blunt in his assessment. 'It will be another lip service, just as other dialogues conducted in the past.' Neethling, however, said there is value in seeking a shared national vision, provided the process is genuine. 'If genuinely inclusive and meaningful, the dialogue can play a vital role in shaping a shared understanding of our challenges and exploring viable solutions,' he said. 'Such engagement can enrich our grasp of the issues and help move us closer to a broadly supported vision for the future.' He stressed that the country's most urgent need is effective strategies to stimulate economic growth. 'Without reaching consensus on this, the national dialogue initiative risks becoming yet another talk shop,' Neethling said. He said the country has faced numerous debates and deep ideological divisions in Parliament over economic and financial policies, often without resolution. 'One of South Africa's most persistent challenges is not a lack of planning, but poor implementation,' he said. 'Even the best policies or visionary ideas will achieve little if implementation barriers are not tackled head-on.' He said the ongoing issues, such as corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, limited financial resources, and capacity constraints, are all well-known problems that remain insufficiently addressed. [email protected] IOL Politics
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Meyiwa trial in turmoil again as judge sparks outrage — 'He must go'
Last week, after Judge Mokgoatlheng made a series of inappropriate remarks — first berating a defence lawyer for requesting time off to run the Comrades Marathon, then launching into a monologue about black lawyers, race relations, and his political history. The Senzo Meyiwa murder trial — already marred by controversy — has entered another crisis, with growing calls for presiding Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng to recuse himself following racially charged courtroom comments and political outbursts. Over the past decade, the case has come to symbolise dysfunction in South Africa's justice system. It has featured the arrest and public humiliation of Advocate Malesela Teffo, courtroom chaos, and persistent speculation around singer Kelly Khumalo's alleged involvement in Meyiwa's killing. Now, it faces what could be its most serious credibility blow yet: a presiding judge accused of losing impartiality. Last week, after Judge Mokgoatlheng made a series of inappropriate remarks — first berating a defence lawyer for requesting time off to run the Comrades Marathon, then launching into a monologue about black lawyers, race relations, and his political history. He also made unsolicited comments about President Cyril Ramaphosa, calling him his 'junior' and referencing shared links to the ANC and Azapo. The remarks triggered outrage both inside and outside the courtroom, with many calling them inappropriate, irrelevant, and undignified. In response, the judge issued a lengthy apology on Monday. 'If you believe that I, as a judge, am so useless, dumb, and you think you can't get a fair trial from me, please tell me, I will recuse myself,' he told lawyers in court. 'I don't want to impose myself on people who doubt my integrity, honour and dignity.' He went on to insist that he is not racist, citing his presence at the historic 1955 Congress of the People in Kliptown alongside his father. 'If I trampled on anybody's toes because of my racism... I wish to apologise for being a racist,' he said. 'But I can tell you, it's not a conscious thing about me to be a racist.' Despite his apology, public confidence is waning fast.'This judge has clearly lost the plot,' said criminal law expert Advocate Thembeka Radebe. 'It's no longer about Senzo Meyiwa. It's about Judge Mokgoatlheng, and that's a complete derailment of justice. He must go.' If Mokgoatlheng does recuse himself — or is removed — the trial would need to start from scratch for a third time. That means a new judge, re-hearing all witness testimonies, and likely several more years before a verdict is reached. For the Meyiwa family, already exhausted by nearly 10 years of legal delays, this would be yet another devastating blow. The murder of Bafana Bafana captain Senzo Meyiwa in 2014 shook the nation. What was expected to be a clear-cut trial has instead turned into a saga of dysfunction, scandal, and spectacle. Many legal analysts now warn that unless urgent corrective steps are taken — starting with the judge stepping down — the public may permanently lose faith in the justice system.'The trial has become a circus,' said Radebe. 'And justice is nowhere in sight.'
