logo
ANC launches investigation into mayor's costly security measures in KwaDukuza

ANC launches investigation into mayor's costly security measures in KwaDukuza

IOL News24-04-2025

The KwaDukuza Municipality is under ANC scrutiny after new allegations of power abuse.
Image: facebook
The ANC in KwaZulu-Natal has launched an investigation into how the party-led KwaDukuza Local Municipality decided to secure the protection of the mayor's house at a cost of R173 000 a month without a police threat assessment report.
The party was reacting to the leaked March invoice where the Durban-based security company was billing the municipality for monthly costs of eight guards that are protecting the mayor's house 24 hours a day.
The ANC's investigation came at the back of the council's denial of any knowledge of police security threat analysis which could have led the council to approve the protection of the mayor's house.
In a written response, the ANC provincial spokesperson, Fanle Sibisi, said that this and other allegations circulating on social and other media platforms are quite troubling for the ANC as they directly conflict with the party's renewal and rebuilding programme. He added that these allegations undermine both the guidelines and the spirit with which the local government is expected to conduct its affairs.
'The African National Congress (ANC) in KwaZulu-Natal has noted with deep concern the various allegations of misconduct and improper behaviour levelled against the KwaDukuza Local Municipality and some of its leaders. The ANC has launched an urgent investigation to uncover the root of these allegations,' said the party.
It further said that the investigation is expected to be completed within the next seven working days and thereafter, the party will take decisive action in response.
Sibisi reiterated that the centrepiece of the provincial task team's renewal programme is service to the people of the province, adding that, to this end, the PTT will soon unveil a Renewal Charter, which represents a public commitment by all supporters, members, and leaders of the ANC to adhere to and uphold the highest standards of discipline in serving the people.
Any action, whether by a structure or a leader of the ANC, that undermines this principle of the renewal agenda will be addressed decisively, in accordance with the Constitution of the ANC and its Code of Conduct, the party said.
ActionSA finance committee member in KwaDukuza Halalalisani Ndlovu said no report was submitted to either the finance committee or council which indicated that the mayor's life was in danger.
Ndlovu said his party was calling for an investigation on how the municipality decided to spend the taxpayers money on mayor's extra security without the council approval, adding that even the council would have not approved it without a police threat assessment report. Ndlovu said that despite that the invoice shows eight guards, they were in fact 10 which means in total the mayor has 14 guards that are paid by the taxpayers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid
'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid

South Africans have mixed views over former Democratic Alliance (DA) leader Helen Zille's potential bid to become Joburg's next mayor next year. While the outspoken political leader – dubbed 'Godzille,' – won the World Mayor of the Year in 2008 for governing the city of Cape Town, many believe the two cities are worlds apart in comparison. Dada Morero is the current mayor of Johannesburg, the latest in a long list of short-lived stints by various candidates. One of them is the DA's Mpho Phalatse. Last week, Helen Zille confirmed that she was contemplating the monumental task of running for mayor of Johannesburg. The 74-year-old told the media: 'I have been approached to put my hat in the ring for mayor. I am still considering it and consulting my family.' 'GodZille' – who has been critical of the state of Joburg and its local government – revealed that she would have to make the move alone, as her family is settled in Cape Town. Helen Zille will have until 15 June to make her formal application. On social media, South Africans have been on the fence about Helen Zille possibly being Joburg's next mayor. Some, like author Khaya Dlanga, have urged the country to give her a chance to 'turn things around'. He posted: 'Let me tell you now, if she does, she will win. And not by accident. Like it or not, she has a proven record of turning a city around. Just look at Cape Town. 'You can debate her politics all you want, but she gets things done. Joburg, as it stands, is crying out for that kind of leadership. They want working traffic lights, clean streets, functioning municipalities, not endless excuses. Right now, everyone is complaining about what the ANC has done to the city. Zille offers a real, visible alternative.' However, others argued with Khaya that the DA had failed to govern Johannesburg and even Tshwane, whose mayor, Cilliers Brink, was ousted last year. X user @KobeMalebo posted: 'The DA has actually run all the key metros in Gauteng before and botched it!'. @luphumlongcayis replied: 'The DA or Zille is not some governance miracle. Just look at the City of Tshwane. Under DA leadership, the city fell into chaos: coalition collapse, unpaid workers, budget paralysis, and service delivery failure, especially in black communities and black working-class areas'. Some even pointed to Cape Town's vast divide between the rich and poor, and how the DA under Helen Zille failed to adequately address it. @papizwane2 shared: 'It's so easy to service wealthy people/areas. The true judge of service delivery is what you do for POOR people. So with that being said, how are Khayelitsha, Gugulethu, and the Cape Flats doing? Have their living standards turned around and doing better?' Another, @NkoTengimfene replied: 'The Cape Town you speak of is not the Cape Metro of the poor and working class' And @NolwAzi_Tusini added: 'What metrics are you using to judge Zille's 'success' in Cape Town when that city is so blatantly anti-poor? While many are backing Helen Zille to'save' Mzansi's financial hub, it's clear many South Africans – who reside in both Joburg and Cape Town – believe that the latter is not the benchmark for success. The public complaints around the DA-governed city and tourist hotspot are centred around the following issues… The widening gap between the wealthy and the poor. Poor service delivery in disadvantaged communities. Influx of illegal immigrants. Prevalence of crime and gang violence in townships. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Mathews Phosa's memoir is a bold narrative of political influence and resilience
Mathews Phosa's memoir is a bold narrative of political influence and resilience

Daily Maverick

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Mathews Phosa's memoir is a bold narrative of political influence and resilience

This book is an elegy to a beloved political party and a failing, if not failed state. Mathews Phosa is devastating in his truthfulness, and stunning in his attempt to be generous to friend and foe alike. To bring her children up and to provide them with as much supplementary home-schooling support as she could, Reshoketjoe Phosa, Mathews Phosa's mother, indefinitely postponed the start of her own career as a professional nurse. She was a natural-born entrepreneur, a biscuit vendor and a maker and seller of ladies' hats as well as a prize-winning retailer of a popular brand of pyjamas. His father, Paul Phosa, was a teacher, principal and a serial builder of schools in many villages scattered around Nelspruit. This thanks to his artisan training in carpentry, building and plumbing, as well as his training as a teacher. When Mathews Phosa was of school-going age, his parents sent him back to their own roots — a farm called Polen near Mokopane — where he was raised by his grandfather Mathews Phosa Senior, after whom he was named. Grandpa Phosa was a devout Christian and a strict disciplinarian who was determined to shelter, cushion and shield his grandson from the 'contamination' and the dangers of South African politics. But guess what: as soon as Matthew Phosa 'broke free' from Grandpa's leash and became a high school student at Maripi High School in 1967, he dived headlong into the furious river of South African (student) politics, only to come up for air 50-something years later. Phosa's political memoir Witness to Power is an attempt to narrate and to review, in 18 chapters, his 50-something year journey into politics. More than a Witness We must resist Mathews Phosa's spirited, if also poetic, attempt to have us believe that he was a mere 'witness to power' as the title of his latest book and its contents seem to suggest. I put this to Phosa as we talked about his most recent work, Witness to Power: A Political Memoir, at the 'VC Book of the Month' conversation held at the Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria Campus, on 3 June 2025. The noun 'witness' conjures up the image of a curious spectator, a disinterested onlooker, a passive observer, an innocent bystander, an outsider who happened to be eavesdropping, from time to time, or someone compelled, by force of law, to testify. Phosa was and is none of the above. Not only has he been influential in the ANC, but his influence has been both national and international — putting him on first-name terms with several African presidents. In this book, he takes special pride in his unofficial role as ANC deal-breaker, kingmaker and king-breaker, as well as his informal roles as adviser and confidante to former presidents Nelson Mandela and Jacob Zuma as well as his close relationship with Thabo Mbeki in exile. He fondly recalls his camaraderie with Cyril Ramaphosa, a fellow student at Turfloop in the 1970s. Phosa puts a high premium on his relationship with Mandela, who, he suggests, sought his advice on who to appoint as deputy president of the country in 1994. At that time, Phosa voted for Mbeki, we are told. But things would later change. More than three decades of influence Phosa bitterly laments in various chapters of his book how former president Mbeki refused to reappoint him for a second term as premier of Mpumalanga. He ruminates over his time as treasurer-general of the ANC, member of the National Executive Committee and his failed attempt to become deputy president and president of the ANC. After the ANC's 2007 Polokwane conference when an increasingly (self?) isolated Mbeki 'ruled the country as a lone ranger' and 'began to run programmes parallel to the ANC's national programme', Phosa took the lead in the formulation and tabling of the unprecedented NEC motion to recall Mbeki in September 2008. This happened moments after Phosa had discreetly approached Zuma, 'two seats away from me… and asked him, 'Mr President, do you still need Thabo?'' Later when Phosa 'witnessed corruption and State Capture under the Zuma presidency on a scale that we could not have imagined when we ascended to power in 1994', he did more than just speak against it. When Zuma sought his advice on whether to resign or not to resign in their marathon meeting during the night of 13 February, 2018, Phosa advised and persuaded Zuma to resign, which he did publicly, the next day. Clearly, Phosa cannot meaningfully be described as a mere 'witness to power'. Admittedly many may, and some will, disagree with Phosa's version of what went on in the corridors of power and his precise role in it. But few will deny that he has been influential. For more than 30 years, Phosa has been a wielder of power even if he did not get to exercise as much power as he may have fancied, for as long as he might have preferred. For the poet that Phosa is, it is possible that his idea of being a 'witness to power' is intended metaphorically — as a teaser rather than a clincher, not so much to denote as to provoke, and not so much impose as to evoke. Indeed, part of the original meaning of the noun 'witness' is taken from the classical Greek word from which we have inherited the word 'martyr'. In its original meaning, a martyr is someone unafraid to bear witness even in the face of torture and at the risk of death. While Phosa may not be regarded as a martyr by any stretch of the imagination, perhaps his fearless denunciation of comrades and foes on matters of corruption and political principle has frequently exposed him to the dangers of character assassination, at least. Ready to wield power – again? The heart of this 18-chapter book is in chapters seven (Premier of Mpumalanga), eight (Trouble in [Mpumalanga] Paradise) and nine (Out of the Fold). These are easily some of the most emotional chapters in the book. Phosa seems to regard his tenure as premier as both the zenith and the nadir of his political power. Though he claims that the matter is water under the bridge, the incident of 24 April 2001 — when the then minister of police Steve Tshwete announced on national television that Phosa, Ramaphosa and Tokyo Sexwale were involved in a plot to harm and/or overthrow Mbeki, only to withdraw the allegations on 4 December, 2001 — appears to remain at once a sticking point and a turning point. Throughout his book, Phosa tries hard to maintain an air of objectivity and generosity, often finding reason to say something good about all the main characters in his book, with mixed results. Between, above and beneath the lines, behind and in front of the seemingly benign adjectives and adverbs that are occasionally summoned to describe friend and foe with kindness, the smell of anger, disappointment and fury is palpable across the pages of this book. This book is an elegy to a beloved political party and a failing, if not failed state. Phosa is devastating in his truthfulness, and stunning in his attempt to be generous to friend and foe alike. As he winds the book down to a hopeful end, Phosa says: 'In my own journey I have tasted both success and failure. After serving my term as premier of Mpumalanga, I was elected to the NEC of the ANC and later served as treasurer-general for a term. My nomination for deputy president did not succeed, nor did my later campaign for the presidency of the party. In success and failure, I have learnt a few lessons about the nature of politics in South Africa. … I stand ready to make a contribution again.' This passage is part of a repeated refrain in this book of anger and ferocity. Surely, this book is about more than a mere 'witness to power'! But could it be a political manifesto through which Phosa is announcing his readiness to stand (again) for election and for leadership? Could this be Phosa's version of Barack Obama's The Audacity of Hope (2006), which was an integral but disguised part of the election manifesto that catapulted him into the US presidency in 2008? Phosa's Witness to Power may be a statement of farewell to political innocence, but nothing in it intimates, let alone announces, a loss of appetite for political power. DM

Mr Lesufi, you have 72 hours to put this motion into… motion
Mr Lesufi, you have 72 hours to put this motion into… motion

Daily Maverick

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Mr Lesufi, you have 72 hours to put this motion into… motion

ActionSA is crowing about proposals the Gauteng government will definitely, certainly, assuredly get to, soon. It's rather touching – the trust ActionSA has in the power of the Gauteng provincial legislature. The other day, ActionSA's website trumpeted a great victory. The minority party motioned two motions, one to do with traffic lights and the other to do with provincial oversight. And both motions were unanimously adopted! Hooray. Unanimity surely does not happen very often in our legislatures, whether provincial, national or any other kind. The piece on the ActionSA website, signed by Funzi Ngobeni, the party's provincial chairperson in Gauteng, states eloquently: 'The first motion, introduced by Emma More MPL, calls on the Gauteng provincial government to urgently address the persistent failures of traffic light infrastructure. The impact of malfunctioning traffic lights on road safety, productivity and the economy is staggering. Every 37 minutes wasted in traffic costs commuters approximately R28,000 annually.' Wow. R28,000! Divide that by 37 (why didn't they do that?) and you get R756.75 wasted every minute. Why does R756.75 per minute feel like more than R28,000 every 37 minutes? Is it simply because I, for one, though I'm one of many, am terribly bad at maths, or is it because that odd number – 37 – confuses the mind in some special way that only prime numbers can? Whatever the case, I can imagine there would have been some questions about the enormity, or failing that, the enormousness, of R28,000, especially in a province where, the Auditor-General informed us recently, the huge Johannesburg metro dispenses R2.8-billion in 'unauthorised expenditure' every year. That's an unauthorised R100,000 (if my calculations are correct) for every 37 minutes you've spent waiting at a broken traffic light. Personally, if I'd waited 37 minutes at a traffic light that was clearly nonfunctional, I'd surely have to check myself into the nearest mental health facility to see whether I really am a true Joburger. Most of us don't even wait 37 milliseconds. But let us not get distracted by personal matters. Rather, let us reconsider those numbers. R2.8-billion in unauthorised expenditure every year? Calculated differently, that's R100-million for every ANC member of the Gauteng provincial legislature. Yes, there are indeed 28 ANC members of the provincial legislature, and I'm beginning to feel a conspiracy theory of the Da Vinci Code kind coming on… What's it with all the 2s and 8s? Next there'll be a link to the 28s gang! Still, the numbers, fascinating though they are, are not my main point here. Nor is the fact that the ActionSA motions were 'unanimously adopted' – the second one, about giving MPLs more oversight, too. Are all the parties in the Gauteng legislature in a coalition? That would certainly solve some problems. Anyway, that unanimity is pleasing. The last time any South African legislative body was unanimously in support of anything was when it was declared that smoking was bad for you and should be legislated out of existence. What I find so touching is the faith ActionSA has in the Gauteng legislature of which it is so vibrant a part. Motion your motion, get it unanimously approved and… what? Are all the bodies and persons responsible for traffic lights now going to knuckle down and soon all the traffic lights in Gauteng will be moving serenely through their cycle of green, red and orange without interruption? You will note they didn't put a time frame on it. No, they didn't commit the strategic error of the ANC's Gauteng premier, His Highness Panyaza Lesufi, when he said in his State of the Province Address, I think it was, that all potholes would be fixed within 72 hours. That is, if I understand the premier correctly (yes, I know it's difficult), no more than 72 hours would elapse between the reporting of that pothole that's just opened up in your street and its successful closure – sorry, 'resolution', by pothole officials. A strategic error, I say, because I've been keeping an eye on most of the 47 potholes within a kilometre of my house and they're still there – whereas it's certainly more than 72 hours since the premier made that promise in his speech. Perhaps some time has to elapse before that promise becomes an instruction to the relevant civil servants, and then perhaps a mandatory period has to elapse before any action is taken? Perhaps Lesufi forgot to add 'And this will become law in a year's time,' or something like that? Timelines for instructions from above to be heard and acted upon by those below seem variable, but I'm sure if it doesn't happen, Lesufi can blame his coalition partners, or perhaps just the Democratic Alliance (DA), whose members are well-known subverters of any good idea the ANC comes up with. I mean, the DA has been complaining since the aforementioned State of the Province Address (or Sopa, which means 'candyfloss' in seven of South Africa's 12 official languages) that all the thousands of kitskonstabels (instant constables) hired by Lesufi to help curb crime in the province haven't helped. Not to mention the helicopters. There are helicopters? Lesufi bought helicopters for the kitskonstabels? And we thought it was only BMWs. Let's not go down that road, or at least not today. It is a road with too many potholes. And maybe that R28,000 wasted every 37 minutes pales next to some of the other numbers thrown up by the Auditor-General. Johannesburg, she said, had awarded more than R987-million to contractors 'with close ties to employees or councillors' of the city. That's what a journalist of the yellow press variety would call a pretty 'dodgy tender'. Okay, R987-million is a large amount of money and should probably be looked into – though the relevant officer of the city was already fingered in a dodgy tender case but has been cleared of Special Investigating Unit charges by a mysterious inner ANC process. Still, R987-million is a lot less than R2.8-billion. This is surely an incontrovertible fact, even to those expensive lawyers hired by the ANC to compose internal reports that the mayor can leave in his bottom drawer for a few decades. At least the Honourable Premier of Gauteng, Mr Lesufi, didn't object when the ActionSA motion calling for more oversight by MPLs was passed unanimously – so, by the 28 ANC members too. They obviously endorse the idea that, in Ngobeni's words, the 'motion responds directly to the executive's pattern of disregarding legitimate oversight interventions such as its failure to place the Emfuleni Municipality under mandatory administration despite sustained collapse'. 'Sustained collapse' may be oxymoronic, but never mind. ActionSA goes on, in a distinctly firm tone of voice: 'The unanimous support for these motions sends a clear message: accountability, transparency and basic service delivery are non-negotiable. 'We commend all political parties that voted in support [that's everyone, then], and we call on the Gauteng executive [that's Lesufi] to immediately act on the resolutions of the house.' Did you hear that, Mr Lesufi? You have 72 hours. DM Shaun de Waal is a writer and editor. This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store