
'Finally, someone's interested in you': When male victims of sexual crimes are mocked or dismissed, the hurt deepens
Yet, a woman in her 30s chose to stand uncomfortably close to 22-year-old Mike (not his real name), who was leaning against a glass panel.
"She had places to stand, places to sit, but she chose to stand next to me," he recalled.
He brushed it off at first, but as the train trudged along, he felt the woman's hand touch his thigh. He turned his head to see that the woman had angled her arm backwards in an unnatural position to do so.
"At that moment, I was just baffled. My mind went blank and I couldn't think. What am I supposed to do in this kind of situation? Who's going to help a guy like me?" he said.
"Because of that, I didn't react in any way. I just cowered in the corner as much as possible and I realised that the more I did that, the bolder she got."
The woman retracted her hand from his thigh only when they reached a station where the train doors opened next to them and other passengers streamed in.
Mike took the opportunity to leave the train then.
When he confided to his friends about what had happened to him, their responses, regardless of gender, were the same – gently mocking or teasing, none taking the incident seriously.
"At least you gained something out of the experience."
"Finally, someone's interested in you."
Because of their reactions, Mike, who turns 30 years old this year, felt that there was no point in reporting the incident because he believed that the authorities would just make light of the situation in the same way.
These comments also frustrated him immensely and contributed towards his "spiral into a dark place", he said.
"It set an expectation in me that this isn't a big deal. And even if I do share it with other people, no one is ever going to think that I was taken advantage of."
For those reasons, till today, he has not sought professional counselling.
Mike's story is indicative of a broader problem in society – male victims of sex crimes tend to go unheard, are made fun of or dismissed.
This was made clear in the social media comments on a news report earlier last month, about a woman who was charged after allegedly committing sexual offences against a boy who was her primary school student and stalking him.
Court documents stated that the 34-year-old Singaporean hugged the boy, kissed him, sat on his lap and ground her body against him in a car at a multi-storey car park between February and October 2019.
On social media, many commenters made light of it, saying, for example, that the incident was a "dream" or "fantasy" for many school boys, or that they were envious of the victim.
Experts told CNA TODAY that such trivialisation or dismissive responses can have an impact on survivors that is as profound as the assault itself.
Ms Anita Krishnan-Shankar, a psychologist and sex therapist at Alliance Counselling, said this is especially significant for male survivors since their experiences are rarely acknowledged.
"When a man finds the courage to speak out – often after years of silence – and is met with disbelief or trivialisation, the effects can be devastating," she said.
"Such reactions reinforce feelings of shame, perpetuate the culture of silence and deeply undermine the survivor's sense of self-worth."
The latest figures from the Singapore Police Force show that the number of men who have had their modesty outraged has increased more than twofold since 2015.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Wake Up Singapore founder can be admitted to the Bar despite KKH defamation case, says chief justice
SINGAPORE: A lawyer linked to the criminal defamation of KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) involving a fake miscarriage story has been given the green light to be admitted to the Bar. Mr Ariffin Iskandar Sha Ali Akbar, a 28-year-old Singaporean, was fined S$8,000 (now US$6,230) by a court in August last year for defaming the hospital by publishing a false account submitted by a woman from Myanmar on the Wake Up Singapore (WUSG) website. Mr Ariffin, who founded WUSG and is better known simply as Ariffin Sha, is a legal executive who has worked with other lawyers such as Mr Gino Hardial Singh and Mr Eugene Thuraisingam. He was also a candidate for the Singapore Democratic Party in this year's General Election. According to a judgment released on Friday (Aug 8), the attorney-general (AG) and the Singapore Institute of Legal Education (SILE) had objected to Mr Ariffin's application to be admitted to the Bar because of the KKH case. The AG and SILE said Mr Ariffin was not "capable of being entrusted to aid in the administration of justice as an advocate and solicitor without the risk of undermining public confidence". Mr Ariffin was WUSG's sole administrator at the time of the offence in March 2022, and he was convicted of criminal defamation and fined, said the AG and SILE. OBJECTIONS BY AG, SILE The AG argued that while the defamation offence did not involve dishonesty, it was "incompatible with the values which the legal profession stood for, namely integrity, probity and trustworthiness". The AG contended that Mr Ariffin was "plainly negligent in failing to verify the allegations as against KKH before publishing them", despite knowing that doing so could harm the hospital's reputation and cause grave public concern over the state of Singapore's hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The AG likened Mr Ariffin's conduct to that of Mr M Ravi, who had acted without due care when he made statements to the court which he ought to have known were untrue. Furthermore, Mr Ariffin ought to have known the importance of ascertaining the truth before making public allegations, especially since he had worked in law firms since November 2019, said the AG. SILE similarly submitted that the nature of the offence was relatively serious and that only a short time had passed since his conviction and punishment. In particular, it highlighted that the offence was committed against a public hospital and had a ripple effect of spreading falsehoods about KKH, since the story was picked up by multiple news outlets and served to "erode trust" in the hospital. The Law Society of Singapore (LawSoc) did not object to Mr Ariffin's admission, saying the offence was "not one of serious gravity and did not involve any dishonesty". CHIEF JUSTICE'S DECISION Both the AG and SILE, as well as LawSoc, agreed that the issue in Mr Ariffin's case was not one that affected his character, said Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon. Mr Ariffin had disclosed what happened when applying for admission, and all three stakeholders noted that he was "cooperative and remorseful" throughout the admissions process, noted the chief justice. He said there had been no suggestion by any of the stakeholders that Mr Ariffin presented any character issue that stood in the way of his being admitted to the Bar. "Indeed, he voluntarily disclosed his involvement in publishing the article and demonstrated remorse when the article was later retracted," said Chief Justice Menon. "He also showed his willingness to take responsibility for his actions. He apologised to KKH privately by email, published a retraction of the story and issued an apology to KKH on WUSG's Facebook page. He had also assisted with police investigations and disclosed all the material facts relating to the incident. He had left his sentence in the hands of the court and paid his fine on the same day," he said. The chief justice noted that Mr Ariffin was aware that the story was a fabrication only two days after he published the article. "The complaint that can be laid against Mr Ariffin was not that he had acted dishonestly, but rather, that he had failed to exercise due care to ascertain the veracity of the story before he published it," said Chief Justice Menon. He said that while what Mr Ariffin did was "wholly unsatisfactory", this remained an offence of "a lack of care, rather than knowing falsehood or indifference to the truth". He also noted the positive steps taken by Mr Ariffin to re-establish his suitability for legal practice after being convicted, including supporting lawyers in pro bono and community work. He thus found that Mr Ariffin was a fit and proper person in terms of character and that his application for admission could go ahead. Mr Ariffin was represented by Mr Eugene Thuraisingam and Mr Ng Yuan Siang. According to the public hearing list, he will be called to the Bar on Aug 13. In the same judgment allowing Mr Ariffin to be admitted to the Bar, the chief justice found two others to be not fit and proper for admission due to character issues. They had committed plagiarism. He ordered their applications to be stayed for 18 months and three years, respectively, from July 2025. In response to a request from CNA for a statement, Mr Ariffin said he was "humbled and honoured". "I hope to use this privilege of practice to serve the community and help those in need. I would like to thank the honourable court, the stakeholders, my lawyers from Audent Chambers and Eugene Thuraisingam, and my mentors in law. I will do my best to make them proud," he said.


CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Apex court dismisses appeal by man convicted of sexually assaulting his wife in first such case
SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (Aug 8) dismissed the appeal of a man convicted of sexually assaulting his wife, finding that the trial judge was right to convict him and sentence him to eight years' jail and six strokes of the cane. At the time, it was the first case that considered a spousal relationship and whether it could give rise to the abuse or breach of trust in sexual offences, after marital immunity for rape was fully repealed in Singapore in January 2020. The 39-year-old man had claimed trial to two charges of sexual assault by penetration against his wife on Jul 13, 2020. He also contested one count of obstructing justice in October 2020, by trying to get his wife, now 40, to withdraw the allegation against him. Neither can be named due to a gag order protecting the wife's identity. The man was convicted of all charges. On Friday, his lawyers, Ms N K Anitha and Mr Vinit Chhabra, tried to urge the court to dismiss the conviction and to allow them to present fresh evidence to show that the wife was not a credible witness. DEFENCE CITES "HIGHLY SEXUAL" NATURE OF RELATIONSHIP Ms Anitha's arguments centred on the wife's evidence, highlighting "inconsistencies" that made it "dangerous" for the court to convict the man. The wife has since served divorce papers to him in prison. The lawyer urged the court, comprising Justices Tay Yong Kwang, Belinda Ang and Woo Bih Li, to consider the "highly sexual nature" of the couple's relationship. At the time, they had been married for more than eight years, and to expect sexual intimacy between a married couple to be "predicated by express consent" is "contrived and unrealistic", she said. However, the court pointed out that the context was different this time because the husband had just moved back to stay with the wife after a period of separation. Ms Anitha responded that her client had access to the house, and had been sneaked in by his wife on at least eight to 10 occasions for them to have sexual intimacy. This was over and above them going on family trips and being sexually active, she said. Justice Tay said there was "obviously some strain" at the time, as the wife had initially refused to let the man return home and agreed only after intervention by other family members. Ms Anitha argued that the wife had "demonstrated a readiness to tailor her evidence to suit her narrative", with a medical report for certain injuries being inconsistent with her claim of being punched many times. Justice Tay said the main issue in the hearing was whether the sex was consensual. While the wife may have been inconsistent on other things, the crux was whether she was consistent in saying the sex was without consent. The defence argued that their client believed his wife had consented based on "good faith", and based on his own interactions with his wife, which was the only context in which he could understand her. The defence also asserted that the wife had a motive as she always intended to have sole custody, care and control of their two children, and to restrict the man's access to them. In response, Deputy Public Prosecutor Jane Lim said none of the alleged inconsistencies by the wife affected her credibility or her account regarding consent. The woman had been consistent in her account of how she did not give consent, from closing her legs to her husband, telling him to stop and saying "stop violating me". UNANIMOUS DECISION After hearing arguments, the court gave a unanimous decision dismissing the defence's appeals against the conviction and sentence, as well as rejecting the application to present fresh evidence. Justice Tay said fresh evidence should not be admitted at this appeal, because it would not have an important influence on the results. This was because the man's contentions are premised largely on the assumption that the "unusually convincing" standard of proof applied to this case. This is in a situation of a sexual offence where it is only the victim's word against the accused, and the victim's evidence must therefore be "unusually convincing" - a legal standard with a high threshold to meet. However, Justice Tay said this standard does not apply here as the wife's evidence was not the sole basis for the conviction. There was corroborating evidence in the communications between the man and his sister, in the first video-recorded interview with the police on Jul 14, 2020, and in the statement he gave to the police on Jul 15, 2020. The apparent inconsistencies raised by the defence pertain to "minute details in relation to the penetration charges" and do not detract "in any way" from the woman's assertion that the penetration had taken place without her consent, said Justice Tay. The court found that the sentence of eight years' jail and six strokes of the cane did not appear to be wrong in principle or manifestly excessive. The man, who sat in the dock in his prison outfit as he had been remanded for a period of time, showed little reaction to the verdict. His loved ones in the public gallery had their hands in prayer poses. They were allowed to speak to him before he was taken away.


AsiaOne
5 hours ago
- AsiaOne
JB to enforce stricter rules on car wash businesses, classifies them as 'high-risk', Singapore News
Car wash centres in Johor Bahru have been reclassified as high-risk businesses following repeated breach of regulations. This decision has prompted tighter licensing conditions and stricter enforcement by the Johor Baru City Council, reported the New Straits Times (NST). Johor Bahru mayor Datuk Mohd Haffiz Ahmad said the decision came during a recent meeting of the council's licensing committee in response to persistent non-compliance among operators. "Applications for new car wash licences have reopened, with immediate implementation of stricter requirements," said Datuk Mohd Haffiz. According to The Star, Mohd Haffiz said new applicants must fulfil operating regulations before applying for a licence. "New applicants must operate from premises with adequate water drainage systems and ensure that their operations do not damage public roads. "More importantly, adequate steps must be taken to prevent chemical discharge into rivers." He further stated that business owners must present full details of their workers, particularly foreigners, during inspections and warned that failure to comply with regulations could lead to licence revocation, reported The Star. This action follows public backlash over a car wash outlet in Taman Abad that allegedly prioritised Singapore-registered vehicles while turning away local customers. No formal complaints lodged Since the incident, Johor housing and local government committee chairman Datuk Mohd Jafni instructed all local councils to take firm action against outlets that exclusively serve foreigners, describing such practices as unacceptable. Regarding the outlet in Taman Abad, Mohd Haffiz said that city council enforcement officers had conducted inspections but found that no formal complaints were lodged. But he said that officials are closely monitoring the situation, reported NST. According to The Star, there are currently 543 licensed car wash outlets operating in Johor Bahru. Last year, 53 unlicensed centres were shut down, and as at June this year, an additional 33 illegal operators have been identified and are currently being dealt with. [[nid:720814]]