logo
Donald Trump says the US is in danger of ‘messaging and propaganda' from international cinema. Pull the other one

Donald Trump says the US is in danger of ‘messaging and propaganda' from international cinema. Pull the other one

Irish Times11-05-2025
Over the past decade or so, much air has been wasted on debating whether the world should take Donald Trump literally or seriously. Or neither. Or both. The only indisputable conclusion is that no proposed scheme is too deranged for him to give it at least a half-hearted crack.
Who can therefore blame the world's film-makers for wincing at the US president's recent proposal to
slap a 100 per cent tariff
on films 'produced in Foreign Lands'?
'Honestly, we're all scratching our heads,' Ed Guiney, one of the founders of the Irish production company Element Pictures, said this week.
The film community had some difficulty making sense of the scattershot statement. Trump's initial focus on 'Other Countries' (he lives to capitalise all things Abroad) offering incentives to US film-makers suggested his concern was Hollywood productions shooting overseas.
READ MORE
It has long been commonplace for the American industry, profiting from tax incentives and lower labour costs, to film thousands of kilometres from Sunset Boulevard. Ireland has done well from such incoming investment over the past decades. Who would not be concerned?
But the statement, in its most bizarre passage, appeared to be also swiping in a different direction. 'This is a concerted effort by other nations and, therefore, a national security threat,' he said. 'It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda!'
[
Trump film tariffs could hit thousands of jobs in Ireland, industry figures warn
Opens in new window
]
What the hell is he talking about? We must surely read this as concern at films
originating
in foreign parts (or should that be 'Foreign Parts'?) poisoning frail American minds with their decadent social attitudes.
The upcoming Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning was shot largely in the UK, with additional filming in Malta, South Africa and Norway. On the evidence of the last M:I film, we are unlikely to see much anti-American 'propaganda'.
What there is will surely have little to do with the film touching down in Valletta and the English Lake District. The 'messaging' would be the same if Tom Cruise were doing his abseiling in Cleveland.
No, Trump here seems to be railing against actual foreign movies. You know? Films in French, Spanish and Mandarin. Maybe even one or two in Irish. He seems to believe overseas cinema is having an undue influence on the American mind. How to put this delicately? As if!
There are suggestions of the quota China imposed on films not produced by domestically licensed production companies. Whatever the rights and wrongs of this strategy, the authorities can point to American films that have landed enormously in China.
Avengers: Endgame
took about $500 million there. The Fast & Furious films are also hugely popular.
There is no such challenge from abroad at the US box office. Get away from the nut-loaf art houses of the coastal metropolises and there is nothing but the Rock and the Cruise from sea to shining sea.
There were, towards the end of Trump's first term, signs of his uneasiness about pesky foreign titles polluting American souls. In early 2020, after Bong Joon Ho's
Parasite
became the first film not in English to win the best-picture Oscar, Trump pulled on the nativist tabard and ran up the corresponding flag.
'What the hell was that all about? We've got enough problems with South Korea with trade. On top of it they give them the best movie of the year?' he said. 'Let's get Gone with the Wind. Can we get, like, Gone with the Wind back, please?'
It may be only a coincidence that he picked a film romanticising the antebellum south over a ruthless satire on economic inequality. (To be fair, he also mentioned Sunset Boulevard, revealing at least a smidgen of good taste.) But the impression remained of a man keen on shutting out all disruptive foreign influences. You know? Like Enver Hoxha in postwar Albania.
In truth, the US has never had much affection for movies originating outside the 50 states. Even British films can be a hard sell. Just observe how, earlier this year,
Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy
, ultimately a smash in most other anglophone territories, was not even granted a theatrical release in Trumpland.
You will struggle to find a genuinely foreign film among the
100 highest-grossing films
released in the United States in 2024. No,
Bob Marley: One Love
, at number 23, was developed and financed by Paramount. Okay,
Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga
, a box-office disappointment at 33, is an Australian story, but it would never have made it on to the screen without Warner Bros. The closest to a genuine overseas release is the Japanese animation Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba, way down at 76.
So, no, the US is in no danger of 'messaging and propaganda' from international cinema. There is as much possibility of such indoctrination happening via free jazz, imagist poetry or equestrian dressage. Chance would be a fine thing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jerome Powell to deliver Jackson Hole address under fire on multiple fronts
Jerome Powell to deliver Jackson Hole address under fire on multiple fronts

Irish Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Jerome Powell to deliver Jackson Hole address under fire on multiple fronts

Jerome Powell's speech at the Federal Reserve's August summit in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, is always a high-stakes moment. This year, the central bank's chair takes the podium under fire – facing fierce attacks from US President Donald Trump and a growing insurgency within his own institution. Trump has engaged in a months-long assault on Powell, calling him a 'stubborn mule' and 'numbskull' for refusing to cut borrowing costs this year over concerns that the president's tariffs will inflame inflation. Now, almost six months in advance of schedule, Trump has been gifted a chance to sow more discord within the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) by picking a loyalist to fill an empty seat on the Fed's board. Stephen Miran, the economist he has chosen to replace Adriana Kugler following her abrupt departure from the central bank's policy-setting board, has endorsed Trump's calls for interest rate cuts. He has also pushed for an overhaul in Fed governance that would hand presidents the power to dismiss the likes of Powell at will. READ MORE Analysts expect something like fireworks inside the ordinarily staid central bank. 'Miran is not somebody who's going to be enveloped in and overwhelmed by the traditions inside the Fed,' said Steven Blitz, chief US economist at TS Lombard. 'He will be the agent provocateur representing Trump at the FOMC. And proudly so. He'll make no bones about it.' It would make Powell's job in Wyoming on Friday, when markets will pore over every word in his speech, more complicated than normal. [ The moment Jerome Powell stood up to Trump a reminder how few dare to contradict him Opens in new window ] 'We are in this uncomfortable equilibrium, where we don't know where things go next,' said Gennadiy Goldberg, chief rates strategist at TD Securities. 'The market wants a bit of confirmation from Powell on Friday as to whether he is open to cutting rates.' Miran is not Powell's only problem. Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, two Fed governors who both made the Treasury's 11-person longlist to succeed Powell in May, dissented and backed cuts at the central bank's July vote. [ Scott Bessent calls for inquiry into 'the entire Federal Reserve institution' Opens in new window ] Assuming Miran is confirmed by the Senate in time for the September 16-17 Fed meeting, that would leave Powell facing three dissenters from within his own seven-strong board. A schism of that magnitude last occurred in 1988 – and would be seized upon by Trump and his supporters as evidence that the chair was losing his grip. Mixed US economic data is adding to Powell's dilemma as he seeks to balance the Fed's dual mandates of maximum employment and stable prices. The Teton Range seen from the Jackson Hole valley in Wyoming. Photograph: Ryan Dorgan/The New York Times Trump's sweeping duties on trading partners have yet to produce the sort of surge in inflation seen during Joe Biden's time in the White House, but they have clouded the outlook enough to leave rate-setters wondering if they have much room to cut. Investors leapt on a relatively benign consumer price index figure last week to fully price in at least a quarter-point cut in mid-September. But insiders view the Fed's vote next month as a far closer call than markets. While a gloomy jobs report for July has raised concerns about the health of the labour market, a hot producer price index figure brought worries that tariffs were about to hit US shoppers. Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, said tariffs had created 'a stagflationary impulse' that had complicated the Fed's job 'dramatically'. [ Will Donald Trump fire Jerome Powell? 'I don't rule out anything. But it's unlikely. Unless …' Opens in new window ] Some Fed-watchers say Powell's view would depend on whether he remains focused on the unemployment rate as the prime indicator of the health of the US labour market. At 4.2 per cent, the rate remains low, suggesting the sharp slowdown in hiring this summer might be down to supply-side factors, such as a fall in immigration, which the central bank can do little to counteract. Marc Giannoni, chief US economist at Barclays, said: 'Powell warned [after the July meeting] that payrolls could be close to zero, he also said the unemployment rate may not move up much because of supply-side factors. If he repeats that, then that puts the expectations for rate cuts back closer to 50 per cent.' Bets of a September cut have edged lower in recent days, to an 85 per cent chance as of Tuesday, on the back of the PPI report and Fed officials' comments that have tempered expectations. But doves argue that, at 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent, the Fed's benchmark range remains in 'restrictive' territory, limiting growth at a time when the US labour market might be on the turn and the economy showing signs of slowing. More bad data on jobs would raise the prospect of the likes of Waller backing a jumbo 0.5 percentage point cut – in line with calls from US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent for more aggressive action. Trump's demands, meanwhile, remain extreme: he wants borrowing costs slashed to just 1 per cent, claiming this would save the government hundreds of billions of dollars on debt repayments. 'I don't think the Department of Finance have any respect for the tourism industry' Listen | 41:44 The big question for Miran is how he would keep pushing for such steep rate cuts while coming across as credible. He struggled in April to reassure investors during a market eruption after Trump launched his trade war, and previously wrote about the merits of devaluing the dollar and a so-called Mar-a-Lago accord to realign the global economy. 'He's there to try to see how far he can shift the Fed's 'Overton window',' said Derek Tang, of LH Meyer, referring to the concept that describes the range of ideas considered acceptable in public discourse. Miran, now chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, will not attend Jackson Hole, though his fellow council members Pierre Yared and Aaron Hedlund will be there. Ed Glaeser, who taught Miran microeconomics in his first semester at Harvard, expected his former pupil to echo the president's calls for rate cuts, but played down the degree to which he would be a disruptive force within the Fed. '​​I suspect he would not be nominated if he did not believe that he should be cutting rates and he will certainly come into it with a pro rate-cutting view,' Glaeser said. 'But he will listen to his colleagues and do his best to be a decent member of this group.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Noel Gallagher left ‘shaky' after Oasis after-party in Dublin
Noel Gallagher left ‘shaky' after Oasis after-party in Dublin

Irish Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Noel Gallagher left ‘shaky' after Oasis after-party in Dublin

A hard day's night of heavy drinking in O'Donoghue's pub on Baggot Street following Oasis 's second and final night of triumph in Croke Park left Noel Gallagher 'feeling a bit shaky' as he headed off to Dublin Airport for his flight home early the following morning. Some scant details of the after-party have been shared widely on social media since the weekend. Speaking on TalkSport, the elder Gallagher brother admitted the night out in one of Dublin's most beloved and traditional musical pubs had left him the worse for wear. 'It went on. It went on,' he said. 'It eventually finished, [and] we had to get a flight home, but it went on for a while.' He said there had been' a lot of singing, a lot of drinking and a lot of talking nonsense ... It was quite a night.' READ MORE As the Croke Park curtain came down on the band's comeback, Noel said he was 'feeling on top of the world [and] couldn't be any better'. [ Did you see Oasis at Croke Park? Share your experience Opens in new window ] He told the phone-in football show that he had been 'completely blown away' by the fans' reception to the band getting back together. 'It's difficult to put into words, actually. Every night is the crowd's first night, so every night's got that kind of same energy to it. It's been truly amazing. I'm not usually short for words but I can't really articulate it at the minute to be honest.' He said that before the tour's opening night in Cardiff earlier this summer he had 'grossly underestimated what I was getting into', and five minutes after appearing on stage in front of tens of thousands of adoring fans, he could feel his legs 'turning to jelly'. He soldiered on and fans would have been oblivious to his reaction to the acclaim, but Gallagher half wished he could go back to the dressingroom to get himself together 'and start again'. With the world tour about to start, he said he was most looking forward to playing the River Plate football stadium in Argentina's capital, Buenos Aires, in November, which will be the band's second-last show of the tour. He said it was 'without a doubt in the top five places for us to play in the world' and a 'special, special, special place for us'. He expressed pride and a degree of wonder at how his younger brother Liam – a person he has not always seen eye to eye with – was conducting himself on the tour so far, although he added that expressing emotion in a huggy fashion was not really the Gallagher way. 'I'm the songwriter, you know what I mean? I'm not really a singer but Liam is smashing it. I am proud of him. 'Having been the frontman in a band for 16 years, I know how difficult it is and seeing him I know I couldn't do the stadium thing like he does. It is not in my nature. But I've got to say I kind of look at him and I think, Good for you. He's been amazing.'

Rose of Tralee winner reveals she's actually from a different county
Rose of Tralee winner reveals she's actually from a different county

Extra.ie​

timean hour ago

  • Extra.ie​

Rose of Tralee winner reveals she's actually from a different county

While we're used to hearing how the Sydney or New York Roses are actually from Dublin or Galway, it's rare for one of the Ireland-based Roses to make a similar revelation, let alone the winner! This is the case with this year's Rose of Tralee, Katelyn Cummins, who represented Laois in the 2025 competition. The 20-year-old hails from the village of Ballyouskill, which is situated on the Laois-Kilkenny border, and when chatting on Newstalk Breakfast this morning, she revealed which side of the border she's actually on. 2025 International Rose of Tralee Katelyn Cummins. Pic: Domnick Walsh To Shane Coleman and Ciara Kelly's surprise, Katelyn responded: 'I'm… from Kilkenny.' Her connection to the Marble County wasn't necessarily hidden, as even the Instagram post about her appearance on stage alluded to it, with her link to the North Kilkenny Macra club included in the description. 2025 International Rose of Tralee Katelyn Cummins with Kathryn Thomas and Dáithí Ó Sé. Pic: Domnick Walsh It reads: 'Laois Rose Katelyn Cummins is 20 years old and comes from the village of Ballyouskill on the Laois-Kilkenny border. She grew up on a dairy farm, where her love of the outdoors began. 'Katelyn is currently in the third phase of her electrical apprenticeship with Alpha Drives Ltd and hopes to pursue an engineering degree in the future. Outgoing and adventurous, she thrives on socialising and meeting new people. 'She has a strong love for travelling and enjoys learning about different cultures. Sport and community are also central to her life. Katelyn has won two county finals playing camogie with her local club and enjoys set dancing and jiving with family and friends. Laois Rose Katelyn Cummins is selected as the 2025 International Rose of Tralee. Pic: Domnick Walsh 'She is chairperson of the North Kilkenny Macra club, which has given her the opportunity to meet people and form connections across lreland. She is honoured to represent Laois at the 2025 Rose of Tralee International Festival and looks forward to the journey ahead with her fellow Roses.' Shane joked that Kilkenny can likely claim her as well as Laois in the wake of her win on August 19, and commented on how surprised she looked to hear her name be called out as the new Rose of Tralee. She shared: 'I did not expect my name to be called out even at the Laois show selection. It was such an honour to be representing Laois and now to be representing the Rose of Tralee International Festival is an absolute dream come true. 'I think it's a bit overwhelming at the same time, but I think it'll take me a few days to get used to it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store