Gaza aid airdrops won't solve 'deepening starvation'
"Airdrops will not reverse the deepening starvation. They are expensive, inefficient & can even kill starving civilians," UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini wrote on X, calling the wave of hunger affecting Gaza "man made".
An Israeli official said yesterday that aid drops in Gaza would resume soon, adding they would be conducted by the United Arab Emirates and Jordan.
The humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territory has gravely deteriorated in recent days, with international NGOs warning of soaring malnutrition among children.
"Lift the siege, open the gates & guarantee safe movements + dignified access to people in need," Mr Lazzarini said, referring to the various entry points under Israeli control that regulate access into Gaza.
Israel imposed a total blockade on the entry of aid into Gaza on 2 March after talks to extend a ceasefire broke down. It began to allow a trickle of aid to enter again in late May.
The UN and NGOs on the ground have decried the severe scarcity facing Gaza's 2.4 million people, with shortages of food, clean water, medicine and fuel.
#Gaza: airdrops will not reverse the deepening starvation. They are expensive, inefficient & can even kill starving civilians.
It is a distraction & screensmoke.
A manmade hunger can only be addressed by political will.
Lift the siege, open the gates & guarantee safe movements…
— Philippe Lazzarini (@UNLazzarini) July 26, 2025
Israel's military said that the country did "not limit the number of trucks going into the Gaza Strip", and that humanitarian organisations and the UN were not collecting the aid once it was inside the territory.
Humanitarian organisations accuse the Israeli army of imposing excessive restrictions on the goods allowed into Gaza and on the routes made available to transport the aid to distribution points.
The United Arab Emirates, Jordan, France and other countries carried out airdrops in Gaza in 2024, at a time when the transport of aid on land routes also faced restrictions.
Many in the humanitarian community consider such drops to be ineffective and dangerous due to the relatively small volumes of deliveries and the risk of aid seekers being killed by landing crates, as has previously happened in Gaza.
UK 'taking forward' plan to airdrop food into Gaza
Earlier, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told French and German leaders that the UK will be "taking forward" plans to airdrop aid and evacuate children requiring medical assistance in Gaza with partners like Jordan.
Mr Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz agreed to work "closely together on a plan" to "pave the way to a long-term solution and security in the region", Downing Street said.
In a readout of the Prime Minister's call with the French President and German Chancellor, a Number 10 spokesperson said: "The three leaders talked about the situation in Gaza, which they agreed is appalling, and emphasised the urgent need for an immediate ceasefire, for Israel to lift all restrictions on aid and urgently provide those suffering in Gaza with the food they so desperately need.
The leaders all agreed it would be "vital to ensure robust plans are in place to turn an urgently needed ceasefire into lasting peace".
They discussed their intention to "work closely together on a plan, building on their collaboration to date, which would pave the way to a long-term solution and security in the region."
"They agreed that once this plan was worked up, they would seek to bring in other key partners, including in the region, to advance it.
Mr Starmer also rejected calls from MPs to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, while Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has said that recognising the State of Palestine before it is established could be counterproductive.
Some 221 MPs have signed a letter urging the British Government to recognise the state of Palestine at a meeting of the UN next week.
The UK would follow in the footsteps of France if it did, after Mr Macron announced on Thursday that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September.
Senior Labour MP Sarah Champion, who co-ordinated the cross-party letter, said recognition "would send a powerful symbolic message that we support the rights of the Palestinian people".
While Mr Starmer said he was "unequivocal" about wanting to see a Palestinian state, he insisted this needed to be part of a "wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis".
The UK and its allies must work together to broker a peace, he added, likening the effort to the coalition of the willing to support Ukraine.
US President Donald Trump, who is currently visiting Scotland, has said Mr Macron's announcement was "not going to change anything".
Ms Meloni meanwhile said that while she was very much in favour of a Palestinian state, she was "not in favour of recognising it prior to establishing it".
"If something that doesn't exist is recognised on paper, the problem could appear to be solved when it isn't," Ms Meloni added.
France's decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September drew condemnation from Israel and the United States, amid the war in Gaza between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Yesterday, Italy's foreign minister said recognition of a Palestinian state must occur simultaneously with recognition of Israel by the new Palestinian entity.
A German government spokesperson said that Berlin was not planning to recognise a Palestinian state in the short term and said its priority now is to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
3 hours ago
- Sunday World
Declassified docs reveal UDA leadership pledged to stop paramilitary activity 20 years ago
Details of the broken promise have emerged in declassified British government documents from 2003-4 National Archives records photo dated 06/02/03 of the former Northern Ireland Secretary, Paul Murphy, talking to reporters outside the Old Library at Trinity College, Dublin. Sinn Fein raised security concerns with the Government about housing Northern Ireland's new Assembly at Stormont, according to newly released documents from the National Archives. Issue date: Wednesday December 29, 2021. PA Photo. See PA story RECORDS Ulster Stormont. Photo credit should read: Haydn West/PA Wire ...A The UDA leadership pledged to stop all paramilitary activity in a secret meeting with government officials more than 20 years ago. Details of the broken promise have emerged in declassified British government documents from 2003-4. In a number of meetings with officials and then Secretary of State Paul Murphy, the UDA leadership, in the shape of Brigadiers Jackie McDonald, Billy McFarland, Andre Shoukri and Tommy Kirkham, said in return for certain assurances they were ready to transition away from criminality. They had agreed to make an announcement at Remembrance Sunday services in advance of putting their plan in the place. The proposals were warmly welcomed by British officials. Billed as an Ulster Political Research Group (UPRG) delegation, the four leading loyalists raised concerns about the influence of UFF commander Johnny Adair and they also demanded equal treatment when compared to the 'support'' given to the IRA as they stood down their activities. memo The UDA made the demands during a meeting with the NIO's Nick Perry, a senior government official. His memo, dated November 4, 2004, said: 'They had two main points to make. First, they want specification lifted before they make their statement on 14 November. Second, they are very concerned about the negative impact which Johnny Adair's release in January could have on the UDA. 'They did not expect him to stay in Northern Ireland after his release, but they did expect him to try to 'make his mark' before departing the scene, or attempt to do so by proxy after his departure.' They also raised concerns about the LVF, an even more sectarian terror offshoot set up by former UDA and UVF members opposed to a ceasefire. Kirkham said their followers 'needed to have some early 'wins' if they were to be persuaded to take a course many would find uncomfortable,' the memo states. Perry wrote: 'McDonald stressed that part of the process was about equality of esteem. The awful things the UDA had done were no worse than those perpetrated by, for example, the last Executive's Education Minister [Martin McGuinness], and the loyalists deserved the same chance of rehabilitation that the republican movement had received. 'Shoukri in particular said that he would need time to wean people off their criminality (!); more genuinely, perhaps, McFarland said that leaving too many people behind could be dangerous.' He said McDonald was 'vehement in his condemnation of drugs'', which Perry noted clearly made Shoukri uncomfortable. Under the terms of their intended statement, the UDA would remain intact and continue to be a proscribed organisation but with a commitment to cease criminal activity. Paul Murphy said it would amount to 'return to barracks'. In a memo to Prime Minister Tony Blair, Mr Murphy was positive about the developments. He said he would be 'announcing my intention to despecify the UDA' in light of the Remembrance Day statement. 'This move is largely symbolic. The UDA will remain an illegal organisation, as, for example, the IRA and UVF still are. Specification relates specifically to the early release of prisoners' legislation, and will have little practical effect. Former UDA spokesman Tommy Kirkham 'But politically it is important, as it involves the Government recognising the UDA's ceasefire. I am taking this step partly because the UDA's behaviour has improved somewhat in recent months, but mainly because there are positive signs that some in the UDA leadership, and their political wing the UPRG, now want to pursue a political path.' He said the Remembrance Sunday pledge in 2004 would a 'very forward'' development. Another letter from Nick Perry, dated November 4, described a 'constructive meeting' with Tommy Kirkham and the UPRG's Frankie Gallagher who 'said that their key requirement remained a despecification announcement ahead of their statement on 14 November'. 'At the end they stressed again the seriousness of their initiative: they wanted 'a dignified end to their war' and some acknowledgement in return. Their statement was not dependent on a breakthrough with the Provisionals, nor on action by the UVF. Billy McFarland 'The proposed statement is very positive (indeed, almost too good, given the UDA's lack of credibility); Kirkham, however, seems confident he can deliver.' One of the conditions was that the UDA would re-engage with the International Commission for Decommissioning. Elsewhere in the newly released files is a report of a meeting between Tony Blair and Bertie Ahern with the UVF-linked PUP where David Ervine told them 'there was only one blockage in the pipe – the IRA's refusal to acknowledge the war was over'. The document said he continued: 'If the IRA ceased to exist there would be no need for loyalist paramilitaries. It had been a long time since the ceasefires but still these hadn't turned into full cessation of activity. Both Governments should hammer home to the IRA the need to declare an end to the war.' The document adds: 'The end of the conflict, Ervine continued, had weakened the loyalist leadership. In particular, many of the 'good guys' [his term] had now walked away, to return to normal life. This meant the proportion of 'bad guys' increased. Previous bad summers had made communities feel insecure, increasing the likelihood of people getting involved with paramilitaries.' More than two decades later the UDA has yet to publicly state their intention to transition away from paramilitary activity and criminality. Jackie McDonald and Andre Shoukri News in 90 Seconds - August 6th
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: 80 years on, remember victims of Hiroshima
This week, we marked the 80th anniversary of the first nuclear bomb being dropped on the city and the people of Hiroshima. We honour and remember the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, drawing focus on the horrific impact of nuclear bombs. Some 214,000 people died… an overwhelming number. Buried in that awful statistic is the child victim figure of 38,000. Survivors envied the dead. Let us awaken to the reality of the true inhumanity of nuclear weapons. There can be no compromise on the issue of nuclear either put an end to nuclear weapons, or they will put an end to us. We make our own pledge to continue to work for peace and disarmament and to do all we can to promote world peace and an end to nuclear armaments. Current tensions around the globe shows us that nuclear escalation is not a relic of the Cold War, but an increasing clear and present danger. Nuclear weapons have a combined destructive capability of 100,000 Hiroshima or Nagasaki sized bombs. Bringing an end to the world as we know it…with the ability to kill millions of people and kill the climate catastrophically. I believe that nuclear weapons cannot, must not, coexist with humanity. We are regressing into a world in which the rule of law is replaced with the rule of power. Let us say loudly on this 80th anniversary: No to War! No to Nuclear Weapons! Yes to Peace! Yes to Disarmament! Adi Roche, Chernobyl Children International Church has power to help Gazans The Catholic Church has an opportunity to make a positive impact on the dire situation in Gaza. Shortly after his election, the late Pope Francis visited the Island of Lampedusa and made a significant impact in highlighting indifference to migrants and asylum seekers. Pope Leo could make an equal impact, by visiting Gaza, on the dire situation of the Palestinian people as they die from bullets and starvation. Even if he got as far as the Raffah crossing, it would send out a powerful message to the people of Gaza that religion has no borders. Brendan Butler, Drumcondra, Dublin Rich and poor gap widens further I found Monday's article by the Irish Examiner's Ann Murphy (Cork Crime: Soaring prices drive a surge in the theft of meat) to be a most compelling read. In her piece, Ms Murphy reports about a rise in shoplifting of expensive cuts of meat where more and more cases are coming before the courts in Cork. She delineates how the theft-to-order of luxury food is just one of the patterns revealed in this paper's two-day series based on data from Garda stations. We learn of situations where certain meats like legs of lamb and steak are being stolen and then sold back on to the black market. One would have to say this that this is really quite indicative of the fact that meat is nearly like a real premium product at this stage. It is also very much a reflection of the way that prices have surged. If you look at meats such as fillet steak, one is talking something to the order of €30, €40 or possibly even €50, depending on the size of the packet and depending on the weight. So it's of significant value in terms of its ability to be sold on, and also the demand that these meats hold. One must remember that there's an inherent appeal for beef, certainly among Irish shoppers. It would be true to say that beef is very much one of those products that's in almost every single shopping basket. I do believe supermarkets are conscious of the impact of meat prices on shoppers. The fact that high beef prices are leading to a spike in shoplifting is an indicator of how great the wealth gap is between the rich and the poor. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary AI governance framework vital John Whelan's article (Every penny of Apple cash needed to back Irish AI, Irish Examiner August 4) reporting on Chinese and American AI initiatives is further proof that digital innovation is accelerating and that all countries are struggling with the societal challenges of AI-driven digital transformation. Significantly, neither of these initiatives referred explicitly to the existential threats to humanity posed by AI. These threats have been airbrushed out of the US AI action plan which is designed to facilitate US Big Tech companies, in their go-it-alone, headlong rush to an unregulated era of AI-powered super profits. However the Chinese proposal, made by premier Li Qiang, at the Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai on 26 July, emphasises co-operation, underlining the need to 'strengthen co-ordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible' and to help create a 'world AI co-ordination organisation'. Rather than a kneejerk rejection, this proposition should be taken at face value. Thus Naoise Ó Cearúil's proposed national Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026 could include an action to spearhead an initiative by Ireland with the EU, the UK, Ukraine, India, and China to create a Global AI Governance framework, supported by appropriate international institutions, that would resonate with citizens, communities and governments everywhere. Underpinned by a philosophy of digital humanism, it could be the catalyst to garner support worldwide for the global solutions that are necessary for a safer digital future for us all. This global AI governance framework could be launched at the planned AI conference during Ireland's EU presidency next year. Declan Deasy, Castlebellingham, Co Louth Litter plan must not be binned I read with interest in your publication recently that Cork County Council is contemplating the creation of a new litter management plan. As has been the situation so often in the past, when the above subject is discussed, local councillors immediately seek headlines on the issue of illegal dumping. What is overlooked by local authorities throughout the country is the lack of essential infrastructural provision to reduce and eliminate, where possible, the litter and waste that is dropped on our streets. This process should be initiated with the adoption of a proactive concept of having all waste taxed at the point of creation in contrast to the present reactionary method where the taxation of waste is not contemplated until it is about to be disposed. Next the numbers of litter bins and cigarette receptacles should be substantially increased, but unfortunately to date the numbers continue to decline. I live in the Fermoy municipal district where the entire electoral area including the towns of Fermoy, Mitchelstown, and Doneraile and surrounding villages are denied the most basic environmental infrastructure, namely an civic amenity site. In conclusion, any plan that lacks the above supports is not worth the paper it is written on. Tadhg O'Donovan, Fermoy, Co Cork US must find power to end war Israel's recent war waged against Iran was brief, efficient, and effective with outcomes that strengthened its military might and prestige. However, the war in Gaza is becoming endless, indiscriminate and pointless from a military perspective and with Israel portrayed as a pariah state. Following ceasefire talks in Qatar, it is now time for the USA to muster its power to find a negotiated solution to end the war. It is indeed essential to do so in order to avoid mass starvation. Moreover, it is in Israel's national self-interest and would create opportunities to develop a government for Gaza and without whatever is left of Hamas. Given the weakness of Hamas, the proposed 60-day truce period and ceasefire could be used to form a new governing body supported by the Palestinian Authority, which would take control of Gaza in the next phase with Western and Arab backstop. What is clearly manifest is the ineptitude, incompetence, cynicism, and indifference that Hamas has shown to Palestinian lives and Gaza citizens. Without a ceasefire, Gaza will not escape a full-blown famine of apocalyptic dimensions. Patrick L O'Brien, Kerry Pike, Co Cork
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
If states can be shamed into action, Israel will be forced to change
Earlier this week, the renowned Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem released Our Genocide, an analysis of Israeli policy towards Palestinians since October 7, 2023. The report finds that, since October 2023, the Israeli regime has been responsible for carrying out genocide against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. The finding of genocide is based on two prior conclusions, supported by evidence gathered by the organisation: Mass crimes by Israel are being 'perpetrated systematically, as part of a coordinated attack aimed at annihilating all facets of life in the Gaza Strip'; The intent of Israel's political and military leadership is to 'irreversibly destroy Palestinian life'. The international community, B'Tselem argues, has not only failed to halt this genocide, but enabled it 'through statements affirming Israel's right to self-defense" or active support — including the shipment of weapons and ammunition' to Israel. The foundations for the genocide, the report states, have been laid through Israel's settler-colonial project, notably three of its fundamental elements: Apartheid, imposing separation, and ethnic cleansing; systematic and institutionalised violence against Palestinians, perpetrated with impunity; and the institutionalised dehumanisation of Palestinians, including through the framing of them as an existential threat. B'Tselem points to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023 — which it finds 'included many war crimes and likely also crimes against humanity' — as 'the catalyst for the ruling system to carry out genocide". The B'Tselem report is based on 20 months of research and documentation of human rights violations committed by Israel against Palestinians. It was released on the same day as an equally damning and clear report by a second Israeli organisation, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, which has concluded the following: 'The destruction of life-sustaining systems, the cumulative patterns of destruction, the bodily and mental trauma inflicted, and the direct killing of civilians, when understood in light of the implemented policy and the public rhetoric, make clear that Israel's campaign in Gaza constitutes genocide under international law.' In publishing their reports, the Israeli organisations join a host of other internationally recognised human rights organisations — first and foremost Palestinian — in describing the slaughter being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza as genocide. On October 13, 2023, in light of the Israeli onslaught and statements by high-ranking Israeli politicians that followed the Hamas attacks of October 7 that year, Al-Haq, Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights issued a statement calling on the international community to urgently intervene to protect the Palestinian people from a genocide by Israel. The Palestinian organisations warned that other states not only had an obligation under international law to intervene to prevent the potential genocide, but that they may be held responsible if they failed to take all measures within their power to do so. Since then, all three Palestinian organisations have continued to document the mass crimes being perpetrated by Israel. They have denounced its actions as amounting to genocide, and have called on all states do all within their power to bring it to an end. Their work, and that of other Palestinian human rights defenders, has reverberated around the world It has been reinforced by international human rights organisations and UN mechanisms. However, it has been cruelly, callously ignored and disregarded by many states which continue to defend Israel's actions, provide weapons and other equipment for its army, and allow the crimes to continue. The result: A famine engineered by Israel with international support; more than 60,000 Palestinians killed by Israel with international support, including more than 1,000 Palestinians killed trying to access humanitarian aid; cities completely destroyed, and millions displaced with international support; hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches bombed one by one by Israel with international support; more than 100,000 Palestinians injured by Israel with international support; and companies profiting from these crimes with international support. The atrocities go on. All the while Israeli cabinet ministers proclaim that Gaza will be entirely destroyed and cleared of all Palestinians in what B'Tselem calls 'the exact definition of genocide'. UN special rapporteur Mary Lawlor: 'International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7.' And what is the response by States? Crumbs dropped from the sky by former colonial powers and Middle Eastern states; an internal conclusion by the EU that there are 'indications' Israel is in breach of its human rights obligations, but no concrete measures to pressure it to abide by them; and the British government arguing in court that there is no evidence of genocide in Gaza. Where is the action? It is with the people in the streets, communities, associations, and organisations all around the world who are organising and protesting to demand an end to Israel's crimes, apartheid, and occupation — doing so despite being beaten by police, designated as terrorists, and smeared as antisemites. Action is with the Palestinian people among them and in Gaza and the West Bank, supporting one another despite the bombardments, massacres, displacement, and starvation. It is with Palestinian human rights defenders and their allies in Israel, such as B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, documenting these crimes and demanding justice. Recent days have shown what an increase in international pressure can do as aid trucks were finally permitted into Gaza by Israel, albeit on an extremely limited basis and while the killing continues. This is far too little, far too late for far too many, but it does demonstrate that if states can be shamed into action, Israel's behaviour will be forced to change International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7. In order to rescue the remnants of this system and resuscitate that which remains, the atrocities must stop, Israel must be held accountable, and the Palestinians must be guaranteed their full rights — including their right to self-determination. Mary Lawlor is the UN special rapporteur on human rights defenders
