logo
Iran-Israel conflict spreads to hacks on banks, crypto

Iran-Israel conflict spreads to hacks on banks, crypto

Straits Times5 hours ago

The attacks tied to Israel herald a new front in the escalating Middle East conflict – but the countries' cyber rivalry spans two decades. PHOTO: ARASH KHAMOOSHI/NYTIMES
The conflict between Israel and Iran is spilling over into the digital world, inflaming a decades-long campaign of hacks and espionage between two nations renowned for their cyber prowess.
On June 17, a pro-Israel hacking group claimed responsibility for a disruptive cyberattack against a major Iranian bank, and Iran's state-run IRIB News reported that Israel had launched a full-scale cyberattack on the country's critical infrastructure.
Then on June 18, the pro-Israel hackers announced a new breach targeting an Iranian crypto exchange.
Iran's Fars News Agency, affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, reported that the country has endured more than 6,700 distributed denial-of-service attacks over the past three days.
It said temporary internet restrictions were implemented as a measure to blunt the impact of large-scale cyberattacks. DDoS attacks overwhelm servers with artificial traffic, disrupting access to websites and online services.
Iranians were reporting widespread issues accessing the internet on the night of June 17, with many virtual private networks, or VPNs, rendered unusable.
Customers also reported problems with banking services, including banking machines and online systems. It is not clear if the problems were the result of cyberattacks or efforts by the government to minimise their impact.
The attacks tied to Israel herald a new front in the escalating Middle East conflict – but the countries' cyber rivalry spans two decades.
Iran and its regional proxies, such as Hamas, have attempted a wide variety of cyberattacks against Israel in recent years – including information operations, data destruction attacks and phishing campaigns – with mixed results, according to data compiled by Google's Threat Analysis Group.
Israel is widely considered one of the world's most advanced and capable countries in launching cyberattacks.
An operation called Stuxnet, uncovered in 2010 and tied to the US and Israel, sabotaged hardware believed to be responsible for Iran's nuclear weapons development.
One of the most advanced and impactful hacking operations in history, Stuxnet demonstrates the longstanding centrality of cyber to the Israel-Iran conflict.
Predatory Sparrow's claims that it hacked Iran's Bank Sepah and Iranian crypto exchange Nobitex are the latest manifestation of that digital tit-for-tat.
The group is known for launching significant cyberattacks against Iran over the last five years, while maintaining the image of a 'hacktivist' organisation.
Many cybersecurity experts within the private industry have suggested Predatory Sparrow is linked to the Israeli government.
Israel's Ministry for Foreign Affairs did not respond to a request for comment. Predatory Sparrow could not be reached for comment.
'Most disruptive and destructive cyberattacks are about influence and psychological impact rather than practical impact,' said Mr John Hultquist, chief analyst at Google's Threat Intelligence Group.
'That's why a lot of them involve an effort to publicize the incidents, which oftentimes includes a fictitious hacktivist front.'
Predatory Sparrow posted on Telegram and X at 4am on June 17 New York time (4pm Singapore time) that it had successfully 'destroyed the data' of Bank Sepah, claiming that the institution was used to circumvent international sanctions.
On June 18, the group said it had also targeted Nobitex in a separate attack. Prominent crypto sleuth ZachXBT noted in a post on Telegram that he had observed 'suspicious outflows' from Nobitex and said that an attacker appeared to have stolen more than US$81 million (S$104 million) in cryptocurrencies from the Tehran-based exchange.
Bank Sepah could not be reached for comment.
Nobitex said in a statement posted on X that it had detected signs of unauthorised access 'specifically affecting internal communication systems and a segment of the hot wallet environment'.
The platform said users' wallet balances would be restored 'with no loss or discrepancy'.
Predatory Sparrow has been active since 2021. The group appeared in public when they took credit for destroying data in Iran's national railway system, resulting in delays around the country.
Iran's Ministry of Roads and Urban Development were hit by hackers around the same time with the same tool designed to destroy computer files.
In other attacks, Predatory Sparrow was blamed for targeting point-of-sale systems at Iranian gas stations, causing a malfunction at Iran's Khouzestan steel mill that caused molten steel to spill onto the steel plant's floor, and publicising the alleged phone number of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
The attackers are unique in that there is relatively little technical information about their hacks compared to similar campaigns, according to security experts.
Predatory Sparrow's efforts tend to destroy the technical forensic evidence that analysts need to understand it.
Often, the group has used social media to promote its activity, a tactic that experts say is proof that Predatory Sparrow aims to have a psychological impact.
The hack against Bank Sepah came with its own publicity push, with Predatory Sparrow warning that 'this is what happens to institutions dedicated to maintaining the dictator's terrorist fantasies'. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Explainer: How close is Iran to having nuclear weapons?
Explainer: How close is Iran to having nuclear weapons?

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Explainer: How close is Iran to having nuclear weapons?

Iranian flag, atom symbol and words \"Nuclear program\" are in this illustration taken June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration VIENNA - Israel has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, alleging Tehran was getting close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Below is a summary of what is known on the subject: HOW DID ISRAEL EXPLAIN ITS ATTACK? In a statement on Friday, when the attacks were launched, the Israel Defence Forces said they were revealing for the first time Iran's secret and accelerating plan for the development of a nuclear weapon that could threaten Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been making similar accusations for years, even once presenting a cartoon of a bomb at the U.N. in 2012. Israel has not, however, produced proof that Iran is as close as it now alleges. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said that while it cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear programme is entirely peaceful, it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme either. HOW DID WE GET HERE? As its 2015 nuclear deal with major powers has eroded over the years, Iran expanded and accelerated its nuclear programme, shortening the time it would need to build a nuclear bomb if it chose to - though it denies wanting to. The 2015 deal introduced strict limits on Iran's atomic activities in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. It slashed Iran's stock of enriched uranium, leaving it only with a small amount enriched to up to 3.67% purity, far from the roughly 90% purity that is weapons grade. The United States said at the time that a main aim was to increase the time Iran would need to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb - the biggest single hurdle in a weapons programme - to at least a year. In 2018, during his first term, President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the deal, reimposing sanctions on Tehran that slashed its oil sales and battered its economy. In 2019, Iran started breaching the restrictions on its nuclear activities and then pushed far beyond them. It went on to breach all the deal's key restrictions, including on where, with what machines and to what level it can enrich uranium, and how much material it can amass. Its stock of enriched uranium, which was capped at 202.8 kg under the deal, was estimated at 9.2 tonnes in May, according to the latest quarterly International Atomic Energy Agency report. HOW FAR HAS IRAN GOT? The exact status of various Iranian nuclear facilities and material since Israel's strikes is unclear. At least until Israel's attacks, Iran was enriching uranium to up to 60% purity and had enough material at that level for nine nuclear weapons if enriched further, according to a theoretical IAEA yardstick. That means Iran's so-called "breakout time" - the time it would need to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb - was close to zero, likely a matter of days or little more than a week, analysts say. Iran had three operating enrichment facilities: an above-ground plant and a larger, underground one at its Natanz complex and another buried inside a mountain at Fordow. Only Fordow appears to have been spared damage, the IAEA has said. The above-ground plant has been destroyed and the underground one at Natanz has likely had its uranium-enriching centrifuges badly damaged or destroyed, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said. That will have lengthened its breakout time at least somewhat because far fewer centrifuges if any are operating. The status of its stock of enriched uranium is also unclear. HOW FAST COULD IRAN SPRINT TO A BOMB? Aside from uranium enrichment, there is the question of how long it would take Iran to produce the rest of a nuclear weapon and possibly make it small enough to put in a delivery system like a ballistic missile, should it choose to. This is much harder to estimate as it is less clear how much knowledge Iran has. Estimates of how long Iran would need for weaponisation generally vary between months and about a year. "Certainly it was not for tomorrow... I don't think it was a matter of years," Grossi told CNN on Tuesday when asked how long it would have taken Iran to produce a bomb. AND WOULD IT? U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA believe Iran had a coordinated nuclear weapons programme that it halted in 2003. It worked on aspects of weaponisation and some work continued until as late as 2009, the IAEA found in a 2015 report. Grossi said this month its latest findings still broadly fit with that. Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons programme, though Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said that if it wanted to world leaders "wouldn't be able to stop us". The IAEA has said it has concerns about statements by former senior officials about Iran's ability to make a bomb. Diplomats said those statements included a television interview by Iran's former nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi in which he likened producing a nuclear weapon to building a car, saying Iran knew how to make all the parts needed. As a result of Iran ceasing to implement elements of the 2015 deal, the IAEA can no longer fully monitor Iran's production and inventory of centrifuges and it can no longer conduct snap inspections. That has prompted speculation about whether Iran could have set up a secret enrichment site, but there are no concrete indications of one. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

US military ready to carry out any Trump decisions on Iran, Hegseth says
US military ready to carry out any Trump decisions on Iran, Hegseth says

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US military ready to carry out any Trump decisions on Iran, Hegseth says

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee on June 18, in Washington, DC. PHOTO: AFP US military ready to carry out any Trump decisions on Iran, Hegseth says WASHINGTON - The US military is ready to carry out any decision that President Donald Trump may make on Iran, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on June 18, suggesting that the US direction could become more clear in the coming days. Testifying before a Senate committee, Mr Hegseth was very cautious in his public testimony, declining to say whether the Pentagon had prepared strike options against Iran. But when pressed by lawmakers, he acknowledged being ready to carry out any orders on Iran and cautioned that Tehran should have heeded Mr Trump's calls for it to make a deal on its nuclear programme prior to the start of Israel's strikes on June 13. 'They should have made a deal, President Trump's word means something. The world understands that. And at the Defence Department, our job is to stand ready and prepared with options and that's precisely what we're doing,' Mr Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee. Mr Hegseth was then asked whether the Trump administration was moving to re-establish deterrence, a term used to describe actions meant to constrain an adversary from taking hostile action. He responded: 'I think we already have in many ways in this environment re-established deterrence. The question is, in the coming days, exactly what direction that goes.' Mr Trump on June 18 declined to answer reporters' questions on whether the US was planning to strike Iran or its nuclear facilities, and said the Iranians had reached out but he feels 'it's very late to be talking.' 'There's a big difference between now and a week ago,' Mr Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Mr Trump said that Iran had proposed to come for talks at the White House. He did not provide details. He described Iran as totally defenceless, with no air defence whatsoever, as Israel's strikes entered a sixth day. A source familiar with internal discussions said Mr Trump and his team were considering options that included joining Israel in strikes against Iranian nuclear sites. Still, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has rejected Mr Trump's demand for unconditional surrender. Iranians jammed the highways out of the capital Tehran, fleeing from intensified Israeli airstrikes. In the latest bombing, Israel said its air force destroyed the headquarters of Iran's internal security service. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Ships advised to keep their distance from Iran around Hormuz Strait
Ships advised to keep their distance from Iran around Hormuz Strait

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Ships advised to keep their distance from Iran around Hormuz Strait

FILE PHOTO: A tug boat moves cargo towards the Strait of Hormuz, in Musandam province, Oman, July 20, 2018. Picture taken on July 20, 2018. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed/ File Photo Ships advised to keep their distance from Iran around Hormuz Strait LONDON - Commercial ships are sailing close to Oman and are being advised by maritime agencies to avoid Iran's waters around the Strait of Hormuz, with the risk of the conflict between Israel and Iran escalating, shipping sources said on Wednesday. Iran has in the past threatened to close the critical Strait of Hormuz to traffic in retaliation for Western pressure. Any closure of the strait could restrict trade and affect global oil prices. In the latest measure, ships sailing towards Hormuz are looking to minimise risks and are sailing close to Oman's coast for much of the journey. The Gulf of Oman is 200 miles (320 km) wide - much of it international waters - and is bordered by Oman and Iran, as well as the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan, which have territorial waters of 12 miles. Journeys will still need to be made through Hormuz itself, which is 21 miles (33 km) wide at its narrowest point. The two shipping lanes are just 2 miles (3 km) wide in either direction. A larger cluster of ships was sailing closer to the Omani coast on Wednesday, while mainly Iranian-flagged vessels were sailing within Iranian waters, according to ship-tracking data on the MarineTraffic platform. "Taking into account that during the past, there have been incidents of violations of freedom of navigation and maritime safety for merchant vessels near the shores of Iran, we strongly suggest that Greek-flagged vessels sail, if possible, away from waters of Iranian jurisdiction when in the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman," the Greek Shipping Ministry said in a statement on Tuesday. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement read by a television presenter on Wednesday that his country will not accept U.S. President Donald Trump's call for an unconditional surrender, in his first comments since Israel began bombarding Iran on Friday. Iran has responded with deadly barrages across Israel. Electronic interference with commercial ship navigation systems has surged in recent days around the Strait of Hormuz and the wider Gulf, adding to risks for sailors hauling oil cargoes. Average earnings for the supertankers that carry a maximum of 2 million barrels of oil have surged in recent days to over $50,000 a day from over $20,000 a week ago, according to analysts. "The regional threat level remains significant as strikes continue from both Iran and Israel," the multinational, U.S.-led Combined Maritime Forces JMIC Information Center said in an advisory, adding that the maritime threat level is elevated. QatarEnergy has instructed tankers to remain outside the Strait of Hormuz and to enter the Gulf only the day before loading, amid military strikes between nearby Iran and Israel, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Tuesday. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store