Poor conditions, safety concerns among reasons teachers' quarters unoccupied, says Fadhlina
The Education Minister said a study by the ministry had also found that the quarters were sometimes located in unstrategic or unsafe areas, making them targets for theft and vandalism.
'The total number of teachers' quarters under the Education Ministry is 47,855 units.
'As of June 2025, out of this total, 31,004 units are occupied while 17,524 units remain unoccupied.
'From the number of unoccupied units, the Ministry has successfully optimised 673 quarters, which include 125 units with repurposed functions, 40 units for shared use, 58 units transferred in ownership, and 400 units leased to private agencies,' she said in a parliamentary written reply to Kamal Ashaari (PN-Kuala Krau).
Kamal had asked the ministry to state the government's efforts in optimising teacher quarters in the country.
Fadhlina said that for short-term solutions, the ministry is centralising residents living in teacher quarters with high vacancy rates to moderately occupied quarters.
'Vacated teacher quarters will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine their suitability for optimisation through rental, leasing to interested parties, or recommended demolition if there is no demand, to curb social issues at these premises,' she said.
She also said that the ministry is reviewing applications from Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) and Government-Linked Investment Companies (GLICs) to establish strategic collaborations to address issues related to unoccupied teachers' quarters, including refurbishing and optimising their usage.
'Following the Cabinet Memorandum (CM) on Nov 22, 2024, outlining the direction to optimize the use of unoccupied quarters, the ministry has received an application from the Home Ministry to explore the possibility of housing members and staff of agencies and departments in Education Ministry-owned unoccupied quarters.
'It is estimated that around 613 quarters will be jointly occupied by Home Ministry agencies and departments such as the police, National Anti-Drug Agency, and Malaysia Volunteer Department,' she added.
In May, The Star reported that teachers had shared their concerns at having to live in poorly maintained quarters nationwide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
7 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
13MP: Education that upholds human dignity
THE Association for Welfare, Community and Dialogue (ACID) welcomes the assertion by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim that the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) is not a conventional government blueprint but a concerted endeavour to embody the people's aspirations and driven by the priority of upholding human dignity. He added that 'To realise this aspiration, the Government will build a social system that guarantees a decent and dignified life, not merely focused on access and material achievements, but one that reinforces the spiritual foundation, human values, and intellectual excellence of every citizen. The prime minister's desire to uphold human dignity seems to contradict the preoccupation of Malaysian major political parties and politicians on ethno-religious grievances and aspirations. On the other hand while the aspiration to uphold human dignity, reinforcing spiritual, human values and intellectual excellence is noble, the prime minister has not laid out in practical terms how such a vision will materialise in a society that is very much conscious of ethno-religious identity that tends to be sectarian and dominating. The younger generation are currently trapped by politics of ethnicity and religion of the major parties which does not reflect the broader dimension of human dignity. The respect for human dignity in essence has a broad dimension of solidarity and respect for the dignity and rights of those who are poor and marginalised irrespective of race and religion. No communities will feel marginalised in this context. Such an understanding begins when education is not reduced to a utilitarian, sectarian and materialistic concept. One has to progressively interpret the Rukun negara principle in the belief of God from the current static and conservative worldview that focuses on a particular religion to a broader world view of divine inclusivity that embraces all communities. It is a pity that major ethno-religious-centric parties like UMNO and PAS continue to use race religion as a political bait that projects the belief in God in the Rukun Negara among sectarian lines. In this regard it is vital that the Malaysian school and university education be transformed in reference to the belief in God in the Rukun Negara that empowers metaphysical education that embraces universal spiritual values that is embodied by major religions in the world. Philosophy, spiritual contemplation, peacemaking, human solidarity and ecological integration should be core subjects that reflect the belief in God. ACID believes that such an approach is the best way to reinforce the Malaysian spiritual foundation as stated by the prime minister. A right balance between metaphysical and utilitarian education is crucial for a harmonious society built on mercy, justice, peace and solidarity. Therefore it is hoped the current Malaysian government would transform our education in the spirit of Rukun Negara that respects human dignity. The belief in God cannot be separated from the importance of upholding human dignity. Upholding human dignity is about loving our fellow human being irrespective of race and religion. This would nurture the younger generation to be more conscious of others and instead of being trapped or caved in ethno-religious cocoons. Let's build an education system that upholds human dignity that transcends sectarianism. ‒ Aug 6, 2025 Ronald Benjamin is a human resources practitioner based in Ipoh. He is currently secretary of the Association for Community and Dialogue. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main pic credit: Facebook/Anwar Ibrahim
Sinar Daily
11 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Why the Jalur Gemilang deserves more than just apologies
IN 2025, despite our progress and education, we still get the basics wrong, such as flying our national flag, the Jalur Gemilang, upside down. While a school in Port Dickson quickly apologised for the mistake, the incident kindled larger questions: How much empathy is too much? When does accountability kick in? And what does it say about us as a nation when the very symbol of our unity is mishandled, again? SJKC Chung Hua said one of the flags had been accidentally hung upside down by a staff member. Photo source: Social media On Aug 3, SJKC Chung Hua in Port Dickson issued a public apology. The reason? A photo of the Jalur Gemilang, flying upside down on their school compound, had gone viral on social media. The school, along with its board and Parent-Teacher Associations (PTAs), admitted the mistake and claimed it was a staff oversight. According to their statement, the incident occurred on the afternoon of Aug 1, when a school employee reportedly a person with disabilities (PwD) was installing flags before the end of the workday. It was described as a careless error. Once alerted, the school corrected it immediately. Empathy poured in from some quarters. But so did criticism. Even Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek issued a stern statement, stressing the seriousness of the mistake and promising firm action after a full investigation. 'This mistake should not have occurred,' she said. Frankly, she is right. Because at what point do we stop excusing the inexcusable? Yes, the individual responsible is reportedly a PwD. And yes, mistakes happen. Perhaps that person had hung the Jalur Gemilang correctly hundreds of times before and this was just one accidental lapse. But should that soften our response entirely? The answer is not black and white. Of course we must show empathy, especially toward individuals with different abilities. But empathy does not mean erasing the importance of accountability. If the individual in question was visually impaired, then yes, logic tells us that disability directly affects the task. But if the disability is not relevant to the action - for example hanging a flag the right way - then why bring it up unless we are deliberately trying to deflect responsibility? The school's statement did not explain why this person was in charge of the task or what protocols were in place to ensure it was done correctly. That lack of transparency is frustrating, especially because this wasn't the first time Malaysia has dealt with an upside-down flag situation. And every time it happens, the public reaction is the same: a mixture of shame, anger and tired resignation. Over the years, there have been repeated cases of our flag being flown upside down. Some accidental, others alleged to be deliberate. The pattern is disturbing. It has led to dangerous and divisive narratives: race-blaming, sarcastic social media commentary and a general breakdown of trust between people and institutions. Scroll through the comments on social media posts about this incident and you will likely see something like, 'Nanti dia keluar kad OKU, lepas macam itu saja.' (He will show his PwD card, and the case will be settled just like that.) That's where we are now; where disabilities are sometimes seen as 'get-out-of-jail-free cards' even in public discourse. This is toxic. It is unfair to the disabled community and insulting to everyone's intelligence. The real question is, why are we not taking this seriously enough to prevent it from happening in the first place? Malaysia is a complex, beautiful mess of races, languages, beliefs and cultures. Our diversity is marketed globally as our strength and to a large extent, that is true. But scratch the surface and we see the cracks. Online, everything from crime reports to everyday mishaps often turns into racial commentary. A story about theft? People ask if the perpetrator is 'Type M,' 'Type C,' or 'Type K.' Social media racism has become routine. That is why the Jalur Gemilang holds such significance. It stands as one of the few symbols all Malaysians are meant to stand behind. For all the talk of 'unity in diversity,' it is worth asking: what truly brings us together? Take Nasi Lemak, often celebrated as our unofficial national dish. Not everyone eats it and even among those who do, some skip the ' sambal ', ' kacang ', or ' ikan bilis '. So the point is not that every Malaysian enjoys the same food in exactly the same way, 100 per cent similar. It is not a language either. While Malay is the national language, there are Malaysians who struggle to speak or understand it. Even among the Malays themselves, some are not fluent. And it certainly is not politics. If anything, our political journey has often pulled us apart rather than brought us together. What we are left with is the Jalur Gemilang; a powerful symbol that rises above race, religion and class. It does not require translation. It does not rely on personal taste. It simply represents us all. A flag, by definition, is more than just cloth and colour. Ours, designed in 1949 by Mohamed Hamzah, symbolises unity, bravery, Islam, Royalty and equality among our states and federal territories. Every stripe, every star point, every color, means something. People died defending what it represents. Warriors, true heroes of our 'tanah tumpahnya darahku' literally bled for Malaysia. So no, flying it upside down is not 'just a careless mistake.' It is a symptom of something deeper, a carelessness with national identity, a tolerance for repeating the same errors, a nation too afraid to draw the line between empathy and excuses. We need to stop treating flag protocol as an afterthought. Every school, government office and private institution must understand that displaying the Jalur Gemilang is not symbolic fluff, it is a national responsibility. There must be standard operating procedures. There must be checks. And most importantly, there must be consequences when things go wrong; regardless of who is involved, regardless of race, status or ability. Because if we can not even agree on how to hang our flag properly in 2025, what else are we willing to get wrong? We are just weeks away from Merdeka Day. While most Malaysians are gearing up to celebrate, reflect and show pride in our country, this incident served as a wake-up call. Respecting the Jalur Gemilang is not just about hoisting it up. It is about upholding what it stands for. It is about making sure that in everything we do, whether in leadership, education or civil service, we are facing the right way. And not upside down.
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Govt studying proposal to raise mandatory retirement age to 65
PUTRAJAYA: The Public Service Department (PSD) will study the proposal to raise the mandatory retirement age for civil servants from 60 to 65. According to Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar, an in-depth study of the proposal is necessary before any decision can be made. "There has been no study on the proposal so far. So, the PSD will conduct one first," he told reporters after attending a lecture titled 'State Capacity and Directed Growth: A Mission-Oriented Approach' by renowned economist Prof Mariana Francesca Mazzucato, here on Wednesday (Aug 6). On July 31, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, when tabling the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) in Parliament, announced that the retirement age policy would be reviewed in line with Malaysia's demographic shift toward an ageing nation. The initiative is part of the ninth strategic thrust of 13MP, which focuses on advancing social justice and equal opportunities for all citizens. Anwar had stated that various factors, including financial implications and job market dynamics, must be considered before making a final decision on the matter. The current mandatory retirement age for civil servants in Malaysia is 60, which also serves as the minimum retirement age for private sector workers under the Minimum Retirement Age Act 2012. – Bernama
